SEC Focus on CCO Outsourcing

A Way Forward

SEC Focus on CCO Outsourcing

Don Andrews & Michael Manley

December 30, 2016 12:00 AM

There has been increasing regulatory scrutiny about the trend of outsourcing the chief compliance officer (CCO) function to third parties. Late last year, the SEC published findings of approximately 20 examinations as part of an Outsourced CCO Initiative that focused on SECregistered investment advisers that outsource their CCOs to unaffiliated third parties.1


The initiative was conducted by the Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations (OCIE) of the SEC.

In the SEC’s Risk Alert, the staff shared certain observations regarding effective outsourced CCOs and restated their first principles and long-standing guidance on the role and importance of a CCO. The staff reiterated that (i) an adviser’s CCO should be “competent and knowledgeable regarding the Advisers Act and…empowered with the full responsibility and authority within the organization to compel others to adhere to the compliance policies and procedures” (citing the Adopting Release for Rule 206(4)-7 of the Advisers Act), and (ii) the CCO “should have a position of sufficient seniority and authority to compel others to adhere to the compliance policies and procedures”2 (Adopting Release, Sections II.C.1).

During the examinations, the staff focused on registrants that had outsourced the CCO function and assessed the effectiveness of outsourced CCOs by evaluating a number of factors, including whether:

• The CCO was administering a compliance environment that addressed and supported the goals of the Advisers Act (compliance risks were appropriately identified, mitigated, and managed);

• The compliance program was reasonably designed to prevent, detect, and address violations of the Advisers Act, Investment Company Act, and other federal securities laws, as applicable;

• The compliance program supported open communication between service providers and those with compliance oversight responsibilities;

• The compliance program appeared to be proactive rather than reactive;

• The CCO appeared to have sufficient authority to influence adherence to the registrant’s compliance policies and procedures, as adopted; and

• Compliance appeared to be an important part of the registrant’s culture.

In reviewing these factors, the staff noticed instances where certain service providers did not have adequate resources to perform compliance duties for their clients, “especially given the disparate and dispersed nature of the registrants that the CCO serviced.” In addition, there were concerns expressed about the nature of the annual reviews performed by outsourced CCOs, especially given that some of the registrants had the ability to “selectively provide records to the outsourced CCO that … may have affected the accuracy of these registrants’ annual reviews.”3


Compliance and risk have been increasingly identified as critical components of an effective enterprise risk management program. In the Adopting Release for 206(4)-7 and 38(a) (1),4 the staff observed that “an effective compliance program generally relies upon, among other things, the 'correct identification of a registrant’s risks in light of its business, operations, conflicts, and other compliance factors.’” Whether because of resource or access constraints, the staff observed that certain CCOs relied upon standardized or generic checklists that did not appear to “fully capture the business models, practices, strategies, and compliance risks that were applicable to the registrant.”5 In certain cases, the risks described by the registrant’s principles were different from the risks described by the outsourced CCO. The result was predictable: such registrants did not have the policies, procedures, and/or disclosures in place to adequately address certain risks.


During the examinations, the staff identified instances of compliance policies and procedures that were not tailored to the registrant’s businesses or practices. In certain instances, outsourced CCO templates resulted in critical risks not being identified, inconsistent policies in relation to the advisers’ businesses and operations, and the failure to perform critical control procedures. Rule 206(4)-7 requires that the CCO certify that an adviser has adopted and implemented policies and procedures that are designed to detect and prevent violations of law. Clearly, using a service provider’s unmodified, “off-the-shelf” templates will rarely result in a system of policies, procedures, controls, and risk assessments tailored to the business practices of a specific adviser.6


The staff’s harshest criticism concerned the annual review of the Compliance Programs, which is a central element of Rule 206(4)-7. The staff observed that “certain outsourced CCOs infrequently visited registrants’ offices and conducted only limited reviews of documents or training on compliance-related matters while on-site.” In addition, the staff noted, “such CCOs had limited visibility and prominence within the registrant’s organization to, among other things, improve adherence to compliance with policies and procedures.” In sum, the staff concluded that “advisers and funds with outsourced CCOs should review their business practices … to determine whether these practices comport with their responsibilities as set forth in the Compliance Rules.”


There are approximately 11,000 investment advisers registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and clearly these advisers differ greatly in terms of their investment strategies, types and number of clients, the amounts of assets under management, and internal resources. Accordingly, the staff continues to acknowledge that a “one-size-fits-all” approach would not be effective.7 Still, the staff’s recent Risk Alert has drawn attention to the fact that there may be qualitative distinctions between internally managed compliance programs utilizing third-party service providers to assist an internal compliance team and outsourcing the compliance function entirely.

The Adopting Release containing Rule 206(4)-7 clearly highlights the SEC’s expectation that a CCO (i) interact frequently with the adviser’s personnel, (ii) be intimately involved in or familiar with the operations of the adviser, and (iii) has the authority and expertise to effectively perform his or her compliance responsibilities. This Risk Alert expresses the SEC’s concerns associated with outsourcing the CCO function and the ability of such outsourced resources to meet the requirements of the Advisers Act. The staff’s concerns generally appear to be addressed when outsourced CCOs (i) frequently and personally interacted with fund and advisory employees, (ii) had sufficient resources to perform their duties, and (iii) were empowered to independently obtain records required for a meaningful and accurate annual review.8


In light of the foregoing concerns and observations, one approach would be to couple an internal CCO or compliance team with an expert third-party law firm or consultant that can provide the CCO much-needed support. Internal CCOs with the authority and expertise to perform their responsibilities would typically possess the intimate knowledge of the firm’s business and operations required to effectively identify risks and manage compliance programs. However, without experienced support, CCOs typically find it difficult to effectively and consistently perform all of their compliance responsibilities.

Below is a summary of services that can be provided to support an internal compliance team, including the CCO:

• Providing independent, targeted reviews of critical areas of concern, such as new business initiatives or areas identified as requiring remediation;

• Assisting the CCO/CRO in developing risk assessments in light of regulatory guidance and industry standards;

• Working with operational heads, compliance, and legal in developing policies and supervisory guidelines that are tailored to the actual business practices of the firm;

• Using a provider as an “on-call” team member to provide regulatory guidance on “hot-button” issues, or complex regulatory matters;

• Providing independent training on key regulatory matters for employees, senior management, and board members;

• Providing pre-exam and on-site examination support in connection with regulatory examinations;

• Providing critical legal and compliance advice in connection with the launch of a new mutual or private fund;

• Providing critical interpretative guidance and/or assistance with implementing AML programs; and

• Conducting independent “mock” SEC exams or similar reviews.

These services can be an indispensable part of an effective compliance program. In utilizing the foregoing approach in conjunction with one or more of these services, CCOs can help foster a strong culture of compliance within their firms and avoid the deficiencies identified by the staff in the Risk Alert.


1 National Exam Program Risk Alert, Vol. V, Issue 1, November 9, 2015 (Risk Alert), p. 1.
2 See SEC, Compliance Programs of Investment Companies and Investment Advisers, Release Nos. IA-2204 and IC-26299 (December 17, 2003) ("Adopting Release").
3 Risk Alert, p. 4.
4 See Adopting Release.
5 Risk Alert, p. 4.
6 The staff noted, “Some standardized risk checklists utilized by outsourced CCOs were generic and did not appear to fully capture the business models, practices, strategies, and compliance risks that were applicable to the registrant.” Risk Alert, p. 4
7 The staff, in its concluding remarks, stated that “each registrant is ultimately responsible for adopting and implementing an effective compliance program and is accountable for its own deficiencies.” Accordingly, they should “evaluate whether their business and compliance risks have been appropriately identified, their policies appropriately tailored in light of their business and associated risks.” Risk Alert, p. 7.
8 Risk Alert, p. 3.

Related Articles

CEO Acquitted of Securities Fraud Charge

by Bart Daniel

On April 19, 2017, after a two-week trial, a federal jury unanimously acquitted Revolutions Medical Corporation (RMCP) CEO Rondald Wheet on all three counts of securities fraud and false filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

CEO Acquitted

Best Law Firms Informational Webinar

by Best Lawyers

The Best Law Firms team hosted a webinar this week highlighting the importance of the submission process and answered law firm questions about presenting clients, professional references and law firm surveys.

Person taking notes in journal with open laptop in background

Best Law Firms® Research Has Begun

by Best Lawyers

Best Law Firms® rankings are annually produced awards recognizing the top law firms across the United States. We are here to offer insight into the submission process for all eligible firms.

Black background with colorful squares and faces

Thirteen Years of Excellence

by Best Lawyers

For the 13th consecutive year, “Best Law Firms” has awarded the most elite and talented law firms across the country through a thorough and trusted data review process.

Red, white and blue pipes and writing on black background

SEC Whistleblower Awards Are Spiraling. Could It Be Part of MeToo Movement?

by John Ettorre

The MeToo movement has had an unexpected impact on SEC-related whistleblower cases, and many are receiving substantial payouts for the financial fraud they are reporting.

Rise in Whistleblowing a Result of MeToo

All Together With Pride: The Best Lawyers Team Volunteers During Pride Month

by Megan Edmonds

Offering time, muscle power, donations and more, the Best Lawyers team supports local advocacy groups’ events.

The Best Lawyers Team Volunteers During Pride

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers in Japan

by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms.

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers in Japan

Hey, Big Lender

by Catherine M. Brennan and Latif Zaman

A contentious proposed federal rule would establish “true lender” guidelines for banks and third parties. Does Colorado show the way forward?

Financial Institution

Announcing the 2021 "Best Law Firms" Rankings

by Best Lawyers

Featuring the top-ranked law firms in the nation.

2021 U.S. News - Best Lawyers "Best Law Firms

A Decade of Excellence

by Joseph Begonis

Nine firms weigh in on issues that will shape the legal industry in 2020.

2020 Best Law Firms "Law Firm of the Year"

A Global Approach to Settlement

by Bradley A. Klein, Gretchen M. Wolf, Mayra C. Suárez and Peter Y. Cheun

The Department of Justice, in pursuit of companies whose transgressions cross borders, increasingly credits other countries’ fines to avoid “piling on.”

A Global Approach to Settlement

Property Rights...and Wrongs

by Chad Cooper and Steven S. Kaufman

Winning a legal battle often boils down to finding and targeting the weakest part of an opponent’s case. Four recent real estate disputes in northeast Ohio are good examples.

Strategies for Real Estate Litigation

Uninsured Flying Objects

by Claire O'Rourke, Laura Beth Cohen and Marialuisa S. Gallozzi

As drones and other “unmanned aerial vehicles” increasingly crowd the skies, the law—and insurance policies—will have to figure out how best to bring them back safely to terra firma.

Insurance Regulations for Drones

A Sea Change on Land

by Linda A. Klein and Suneel Gupta

Autonomous vehicles will revolutionize almost every area of the law. Here’s a look at what’s rapidly approaching.

Legal Considerations for Autonomous Vehicles

Why Stablecoins Will Be Regulated

by Mladen Milovic

In Order To See Adoption, Stablecoins Must Clear These Hurdles

Why Stablecoins Will Be Regulated

Changing for the Better

by Justin Smulison

Joseph Brophy’s Austin-based boutique firm comprises some of the most talented and experienced civil litigators in Texas.

Betting on Finance, Civil Litigation Success

Trending Articles

Whistleblower Legislation Opens the Doors for More International Claims

by Justin Smulison

An Anti-Money Laundering Act, part of a recently passed Omnibus Budget in the U.S. Senate, is expanding protection for whistleblowers both domestically and internationally.

Shadow figure in spotlight against red and blue brick wall

The Best Lawyers in South Africa™ 2023

by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers proudly announces lawyers recognized in South Africa for 2023.

South African flag

Announcing the 2023 The Best Lawyers in America Honorees

by Best Lawyers

Only the top 5.3% of all practicing lawyers in the U.S. were selected by their peers for inclusion in the 29th edition of The Best Lawyers in America®.

Gold strings and dots connecting to form US map

Best Lawyers Voting Is Now Open

by Best Lawyers

Voting has begun in several countries across the globe, including the United States, the United Kingdom and Europe. Below we offer dates, details and answers to voting-related questions to assist with the voting process.

Hands holding smartphone with five stars above phone

Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2023

by Best Lawyers

The third edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America™ highlights the legal talent of lawyers who have been in practice less than 10 years.

Three arrows made of lines and dots on blue background

Rising Transfer Taxes

by Angus C. Beverly

Transfer taxes in California are becoming a statewide trend with potentially national implications. Here is a breakdown of the effects in several cities.

State of California in orange with city in backdrop

Could Reign Supreme End with the Queen?

by Sara Collin

Canada is revisiting the notion of abolishing the monarchy after Queen Elizabeth II’s passing, but many Canadians and lawmakers are questioning if Canada could, should and would follow through.

Teacup on saucer over image of Queen's eye

Famous Songs Unprotected by Copyright Could Mean Royalties for Some

by Michael B. Fein

A guide to navigating copyright claims on famous songs.

Can I Sing "Happy Birthday" in Public?

What the Courts Say About Recording in the Classroom

by Christina Henagen Peer and Peter Zawadski

Students and parents are increasingly asking to use audio devices to record what's being said in the classroom. But is it legal? A recent ruling offer gives the answer to a question confusing parents and administrators alike.

Is It Legal for Students to Record Teachers?

Announcing the 2023 The Best Lawyers in Canada Honorees

by Best Lawyers

The Best Lawyers in Canada™ is entering its 17th edition for 2023. We highlight the elite lawyers awarded this year.

Red map of Canada with white lines and dots

Announcing The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2023

by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms from Australia.

The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2023

The Upcycle Conundrum

by Karen Kreider Gaunt

Laudable or litigious? What you need to know about potential copyright and trademark infringement when repurposing products.

Repurposed Products and Copyright Infringemen

Caffeine Overload and DUI Tests

by Daniel Taylor

While it might come as a surprise, the over-consumption of caffeine could trigger a false positive on a breathalyzer test.

Can Caffeine Cause You to Fail DUI Test?

Wage and Overtime Laws for Truck Drivers

by Greg Mansell

For truck drivers nationwide, underpayment and overtime violations are just the beginning of a long list of problems. Below we explore the wages you are entitled to but may not be receiving.

Truck Driver Wage and Overtime Laws in the US


2022: Another Banner Year

by John Fields

Block O’Toole & Murphy continues to secure some of New York’s highest results for personal injury matters.

Three men in business suits standing in office

Choosing a Title Company: What a Seller Should Expect

by Roy D. Oppenheim

When it comes to choosing a title company, how much power exactly does a seller have?

Choosing the Title Company As Seller