Insight

Hey, Big Lender

A contentious proposed federal rule would establish “true lender” guidelines for banks and third parties. Does Colorado show the way forward?

Financial Institution
Catherine M. Brennan

Catherine M. Brennan and Latif Zaman

January 27, 2021 08:00 AM

On July 20. 2020, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), an independent branch of the U.S. Department of Treasury, issued a proposed rule to address so-called “true lender” issues. The proposed rule provides that in a partnership between a national bank or federal savings association and a nonbank third party, the bank is the “true lender” if, as of the date of origination, the bank is named as the lender in the loan agreement, or alternatively, the bank funds the loan.

In the supplementary information to the proposed rule, the OCC observed that “uncertainty as to the legal framework that applies to the loans made [through a bank partnership] . . . may discourage banks and third parties from entering into relationships, limit competition, and chill the innovation that results from these partnerships—all of which may restrict access to affordable credit.”

This proposed true lender rule, if implemented, will alleviate the uncertainty surrounding the legal framework that applies to bank partnership loans by eliminating fact-intensive inquiries and imposing a largely mechanical test for when a loan will be considered bank-originated.

In its supplementary information, the OCC likewise noted that in the absence of federal guidance, courts have applied “divergent standards” to true lender cases, with some focusing on the form of the transaction while other courts engage in fact-intensive balancing tests that consider a variety of factors, none of which are dispositive. One test, the “predominant economic interest” test, leads courts to look beyond loan documentation and consider the “totality of the circumstances” of the transaction to determine which party has the “predominant economic interest” in the loan. Under this test, that party with the predominant economic interest is the true lender. Courts applying this test, “do not necessarily consider all of the same factors or give each factor the same weight” and that “fact-intensive inquiries, coupled with the lack of a uniform and predictable standard, increase the subjectivity in determining who is the ‘true lender’ and undermine banks’ ability to partner with third parties to lend across jurisdictions on a nationwide basis.”

Accordingly, the OCC proposed a bright-line rule, stating that once a bank is named as the lender in a loan agreement as of the date of origination, the bank has exercised its right to make the loan under authority granted to a national bank and “elected to subject itself to the panoply of applicable federal laws and regulations (including but not limited to consumer-protection laws) governing lending by banks.” It continued: “If a bank funds a loan as of the date of origination . . . it has a predominant economic interest in the loan and, therefore, has made the loan—regardless of whether it is the named lender in the loan agreement...” Finally, the OCC discussed the robust federal regulation and extensive supervision to which banks are subject.

The proposed rule has garnered considerable criticism. In a comment letter to the OCC, the American Bankers Association praised the OCC’s efforts to clarify which party is the true lender in a bank partnership but called the rule overly broad, urging the OCC to consider collaborating with other banking agencies to develop an approach that established minimum expectations for bank and nonbank partnerships.

The New York Department of Financial Services argued in its own comment letter that the OCC lacked the authority to issue the rule because it “failed to comply with the requirements applicable to preemption determinations under federal law and conflicts with Congress’s intent to limit the preemption of states’ consumer protection laws.” It further claimed the “OCC’s rule would, in essence, allow unregulated nonbank lenders to launder loans through banks as an end-run around consumer-protective state usury limits.”

Importantly, the OCC’s proposed rule would not apply directly to state-chartered banks. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, although expected to issue a similar proposed rule, has not yet done so.

Two months after the OCC’s proposed rule was announced, the Attorney General of Colorado, Democrat Philip J. Weiser, entered into an Assurance of Discontinuance (AOD) to resolve longstanding litigation against Avant of Colorado LLC and Marlette Funding LLC, and their partner banks, WebBank and Cross River Bank, both of which are FDIC-insured state-chartered banks. In the underlying enforcement actions against Avant and Marlette, the Colorado Uniform Consumer Credit Code Administrator contended that each entity was the “true lender” of the loans originated by their partner banks because they, not the banks, retained the “predominant economic interest” in the transactions.

The AOD establishes a “Safe Harbor” to originate consumer loans in Colorado pursuant to a bank partnership program. The Safe Harbor is applicable to Avant, Marlette, and any other entity that partners with Cross River or WebBank. Programs that comply with the Safe Harbor will negate true lender challenges, or claims that the non-bank partner or a subsequent assignee was prohibited from enforcing the loans on their original terms. Although the AOD applies only to programs involving WebBank or Cross-River, it’s reasonable to expect that other programs can prospectively rely on the Safe Harbor to guard against regulatory scrutiny. Although the Safe Harbor imposes a rate cap of 36 percent per year and requires the nonbank partner to obtain a license, it has clear terms for compliance and includes certain conditions that are typical in such partnerships. The Safe Harbor potentially creates a straightforward avenue to regulatory compliance in Colorado, a state that has traditionally been hostile to bank partnership programs.

In addition to the rate cap and licensure requirements, key provisions of the Safe Harbor include:

  • all aspects of the program must be subject to active supervision by the banks, consistent with applicable banking guidelines, and the bank must retain ultimate approval authority;
  • loan agreements, disclosures, and the program website must identify the bank as the lender;
  • the bank must fund all loans at origination; and
  • there are limitations on the platforms’ ability to commit to purchase certain loans originated by the banks in advance.

Catherine M. Brennan is a partner in Hudson Cook’s Maryland office and chair of the Fintech practice.She assists national and state banks, investment banks, consumer and commercial finance companies, mortgage bankers, installment lenders, and other licensed lenders in the development and maintenance of nationwide consumer and commercial lending programs.

Latif Zaman is an associate in Hudson Cook’s Maryland office.He assists consumer financial services clients on federal and state regulatory compliance matters and investor clients with due diligence of credit and alternative finance programs. He advises on regulatory issues related to bank partnerships and litigation funding programs and advises lenders on choice of law issues.

Headline Image: ISTOCK.COM / VECTORIOS2016, COURTNEYK

Related Articles

Blurred Lines


by Andrew Kirby

Where does responsible lending end and unconscionability begin? Australian courts have come to vastly different conclusions. An overview of current case law.

Australian Courts Assess Loan Repayment

All Together With Pride: The Best Lawyers Team Volunteers During Pride Month


by Megan Edmonds

Offering time, muscle power, donations and more, the Best Lawyers team supports local advocacy groups’ events.

The Best Lawyers Team Volunteers During Pride

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers in Japan


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms.

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers in Japan

Now That We Are SECURE: The SECURE Act Brings Important Changes to Retirement Plans


by Jesse St. Cyr

The SECURE Act aims to make retirement plans easier for Americans.

SECURE Act Brings Changes to Retirement Plans

A Decade of Excellence


by Joseph Begonis

Nine firms weigh in on issues that will shape the legal industry in 2020.

2020 Best Law Firms® "Law Firm of the Year"

A Global Approach to Settlement


by Bradley A. Klein, Gretchen M. Wolf, Mayra C. Suárez and Peter Y. Cheun

The Department of Justice, in pursuit of companies whose transgressions cross borders, increasingly credits other countries’ fines to avoid “piling on.”

A Global Approach to Settlement

Property Rights...and Wrongs


by Chad Cooper and Steven S. Kaufman

Winning a legal battle often boils down to finding and targeting the weakest part of an opponent’s case. Four recent real estate disputes in northeast Ohio are good examples.

Strategies for Real Estate Litigation

Uninsured Flying Objects


by Claire O'Rourke, Laura Beth Cohen and Marialuisa S. Gallozzi

As drones and other “unmanned aerial vehicles” increasingly crowd the skies, the law—and insurance policies—will have to figure out how best to bring them back safely to terra firma.

Insurance Regulations for Drones

A Sea Change on Land


by Linda A. Klein and Suneel Gupta

Autonomous vehicles will revolutionize almost every area of the law. Here’s a look at what’s rapidly approaching.

Legal Considerations for Autonomous Vehicles

Q&A with Ricardo Coelho and Júlio César Bueno of 2018 Brazilian “Law Firm of the Year” Pinheiro Neto Advogados’ Project Finance and Development Practice


by Best Lawyers

Can you tell me about the characteristics that make up your law firm and the project finance in development practice that led to being recognized as a “Law Firm of the Year”?

Q&A with Pinheiro Neto Advogados Project Fina

SEC Focus on CCO Outsourcing


by Don Andrews & Michael Manley

A Way Forward

SEC Focus on CCO Outsourcing

Sounding Out the Supreme Court of Canada on Utility


by Daphne Lainson

Supreme Court of Canada

Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation Advisory


by John Hickman & Ashley Gillihan

Navigating the Winding Highway of Wellness Program Compliance: A GPS for the EEOC’s Wellness Program Rules

Employee Benefits

Spoliation Allegations Spread into Arbitration


by Elizabeth Del Cid and Katherine McGrail

Spoliation into Arbitration

Current Status of Image Rights Structures in Spain


by Eduardo Montejo

Image Rights in Spain

Special Aspects for Attracting Investments into Ukrainian Agribusiness


by Dmytro Alexandrov

Attracting Investors Ukraine

Trending Articles

Presenting The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2025


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is proud to present The Best Lawyers in Australia for 2025, marking the 17th consecutive year of Best Lawyers awards in Australia.

Australia flag over outline of country

How To Find A Pro Bono Lawyer


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers dives into the vital role pro bono lawyers play in ensuring access to justice for all and the transformative impact they have on communities.

Hands joined around a table with phone, paper, pen and glasses

How Palworld Is Testing the Limits of Nintendo’s Legal Power


by Gregory Sirico

Many are calling the new game Palworld “Pokémon GO with guns,” noting the games striking similarities. Experts speculate how Nintendo could take legal action.

Animated figures with guns stand on top of creatures

Announcing The Best Lawyers in New Zealand™ 2025 Awards


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is announcing the 16th edition of The Best Lawyers in New Zealand for 2025, including individual Best Lawyers and "Lawyer of the Year" awards.

New Zealand flag over image of country outline

Legal Distinction on Display: 15th Edition of The Best Lawyers in France™


by Best Lawyers

The industry’s best lawyers and firms working in France are revealed in the newly released, comprehensive the 15th Edition of The Best Lawyers in France™.

French flag in front of country's outline

Announcing The Best Lawyers in Japan™ 2025


by Best Lawyers

For a milestone 15th edition, Best Lawyers is proud to announce The Best Lawyers in Japan.

Japan flag over outline of country

The Best Lawyers in Singapore™ 2025 Edition


by Best Lawyers

For 2025, Best Lawyers presents the most esteemed awards for lawyers and law firms in Singapore.

Singapore flag over outline of country

Announcing the 13th Edition of Best Lawyers Rankings in the United Kingdom


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is proud to announce the newest edition of legal rankings in the United Kingdom, marking the 13th consecutive edition of awards in the country.

British flag in front of country's outline

Announcing the 16th Edition of the Best Lawyers in Germany Rankings


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers announces the 16th edition of The Best Lawyers in Germany™, featuring a unique set of rankings that highlights Germany's top legal talent.

German flag in front of country's outline

How Much Is a Lawyer Consultation Fee?


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers breaks down the key differences between consultation and retainer fees when hiring an attorney, a crucial first step in the legal process.

Client consulting with lawyer wearing a suit

Presenting the 2024 Best Lawyers Employment and Workers’ Compensation Legal Guide


by Best Lawyers

The 2024 Best Lawyers Employment and Workers' Compensation Legal Guide provides exclusive access to all Best Lawyers awards in related practice areas. Read below and explore the legal guide.

Illustration of several men and women in shades of orange and teal

Things to Do Before a Car Accident Happens to You


by Ellie Shaffer

In a car accident, certain things are beyond the point of no return, while some are well within an individual's control. Here's how to stay legally prepared.

Car dashcam recording street ahead

Celebrating Excellence in Law: 11th Edition of Best Lawyers in Italy™


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers announces the 11th edition of The Best Lawyers in Italy™, which features an elite list of awards showcasing Italy's current legal talent.

Italian flag in front of country's outline

Combating Nuclear Verdicts: Empirically Supported Strategies to Deflate the Effects of Anchoring Bias


by Sloan L. Abernathy

Sometimes a verdict can be the difference between amicability and nuclear level developments. But what is anchoring bias and how can strategy combat this?

Lawyer speaking in courtroom with crowd and judge in the foreground

The Push and Pitfalls of New York’s Attempt to Expand Wrongful Death Recovery


by Elizabeth M. Midgley and V. Christopher Potenza

The New York State Legislature recently went about updating certain wrongful death provisions and how they can be carried out in the future. Here's the latest.

Red tape blocking off a section of street

6 Ways a Lawyer Can Help You With Your Medical Malpractice Claim


by Adam Malone

If you believe you have a medical malpractice claim, contact an experienced medical malpractice lawyer. Read on to learn how they can help with your claim.

Doctor in white lab coat showing x-ray to patient in blue scrubs