Insight

CEO Acquitted of Securities Fraud Charge

On April 19, 2017, after a two-week trial, a federal jury unanimously acquitted Revolutions Medical Corporation (RMCP) CEO Rondald Wheet on all three counts of securities fraud and false filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

"Capital Stock" of $10,000 behind a judicial pillar logo
BD

Bart Daniel

June 21, 2017 10:00 AM

On April 19, 2017, after a two-week trial, a federal jury unanimously acquitted Revolutions Medical Corporation (RMCP) CEO Rondald Wheet on all three counts of securities fraud and false filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

On February 9, 2016, the federal grand jury returned an indictment against Wheet, charging him with conspiracy to commit securities fraud and defrauding the SEC.

Bart Daniel, former United States Attorney for South Carolina, and Michael Sullivan of Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP successfully defended Wheet over the course of the trial in Charleston, South Carolina.

RMCP is a small South Carolina-based company that develops and distributes innovative products and tools for the medical industry. The company largely focuses on creating and perfecting an auto-retractable vacuum safety syringe. Their primary product— the FDA-cleared RevVac™ Auto-Retractable Vacuum Safety Syringe—was designed to substantially reduce accidental needle stick injuries, using patented vacuum technology to retract the needle directly into the plunger after use, thus preventing its reuse once its safety feature had been activated. RMCP’s RevVac syringe included five international patents and two U.S. patents in order to protect the product and RMCP.

The government contended that Wheet fraudulently issued more than 1.2 million shares of RMCP’s stock options to 11 unidentified “consultants” through the use of an S-8 form. The S-8 form is a filing with the SEC that is commonly used by startups and publically traded companies to register securities that will be offered to its employees via benefit or incentive plans. Simply put, a publicly traded company may compensate consultants with stock options in lieu of cash compensation, provided they perform legitimate services such as legal, accounting, or marketing assistance. The government alleged that these consultants were retained only to raise capital for the fledgling startup. It further alleged that no services were actually provided or intended to be provided.

Wheet faced a maximum sentence of 80 years imprisonment. The FBI had investigated the case for two years before a U.S. attorney presented it to the grand jury for indictment. The co-defendant, the former head of RMC’s investor relations team, pled guilty and testified against Wheet. Then-attorney Bill Nettles, in reference to the charges against Wheet, labeled the resources set aside for the investigation as “significant.”

Defense attorneys Daniel and Sullivan culled through a decade’s worth of company history, reports, filings, contracts, financial documents, and employee backgrounds to prepare for and combat the issues presented by the government.

Daniel focused on each of the consultants and highlighted their individual strengths, knowledge they could offer to RMCP, and the potential value they were capable and willing to add to the company. These consultants spanned a variety of careers and backgrounds, including professionals in the fields of health care, insurance, investing, and plastics manufacturing.

Sullivan cross-examined the co-defendant and led Wheet through a day of testimony explaining the company and its SEC filings.

Both attorneys carefully cross-examined the government’s witnesses. Among those were FBI investigating agents, forensic accountants, and securities analysts as well as past employees of the medical device company, including the co-defendant.

At the close of the trial, the federal jury returned a unanimous not guilty verdict for all three counts of securities fraud and false filings with the SEC. It was therefore ordered that Wheet be acquitted, discharged, and any bond exonerated.

------------------------

Bart Daniel defends government investigations in the areas of health care, securities, antitrust, and the False Claims Act, among others. Daniel has defended corporate officers and board members as well as fortune 500 companies in a wide range of civil and criminal investigations. While Daniel has extensive experience in trial defending white-collar criminal prosecutions, his greatest wins have come privately convincing prosecutors and investigators to decline criminal prosecution and quietly close their files. Daniel served as U.S. Attorney for the District of South Carolina from 1989–1992, and currently serves as president for the National Association of Former United States Attorneys. More information can be found at www.bartdaniel.com.www.bartdaniel.com.

Related Articles

The Defense (Never) Rests


by Johanna Marmon

Dan Cogdell is a very busy man, but he’s just not the kind of lawyer who doesn’t return phone calls.

Dan Cogdell's Winning Criminal Defense

SEC Focus on CCO Outsourcing


by Don Andrews & Michael Manley

A Way Forward

Animated people being outsourced

Trending Articles

2026 Best Lawyers Awards: Recognizing Legal Talent Across the United States


by Jamilla Tabbara

The 2026 editions highlight the top 5% of U.S. attorneys, showcase emerging practice areas and reveal trends shaping the nation’s legal profession.

Map of the United States represented in The Best Lawyers in America 2026 awards

Gun Rights for Convicted Felons? The DOJ Says It's Time.


by Bryan Driscoll

It's more than an administrative reopening of a long-dormant issue; it's a test of how the law reconciles the right to bear arms with protecting the public.

Firearms application behind jail bars

2026 Best Lawyers Awards in Canada: Marking 20 Years of Excellence


by Jamilla Tabbara

Honoring Canada’s most respected lawyers and spotlighting the next generation shaping the future of law.

Shining Canadian map marking the 2026 Best Lawyers awards coverage

Revealing the 2026 Best Lawyers Awards in Germany, France, Switzerland and Austria


by Jamilla Tabbara

These honors underscore the reach of the Best Lawyers network and its focus on top legal talent.

map of Germany, France, Switzerland and Austria

Best Lawyers 2026: Discover the Honorees in Brazil, Mexico, Portugal, South Africa and Spain


by Jamilla Tabbara

A growing international network of recognized legal professionals.

Map highlighting the 2026 Best Lawyers honorees across Brazil, Mexico, Portugal, South Africa and Sp

How to Sue for Defamation: Costs, Process and What to Expect


by Bryan Driscoll

Learn the legal standards, costs and steps involved when you sue for defamation, including the difference between libel and slander.

Group of people holding papers with speech bubbles above them

Build Your Legal Practice with Effective Online Networking


by Jamilla Tabbara

How thoughtful online networking supports sustained legal practice growth.

Abstract web of connected figures symbolizing online networking among legal professionals

Algorithmic Exclusion


by Bryan Driscoll

The Workday lawsuit and the future of AI in hiring.

Workday Lawsuit and the Future of AI in Hiring headline

Blogging for Law Firms: Turning Content into Client Connections


by Jamilla Tabbara

How law firms use blogs to earn trust and win clients.

Lawyer typing blog content on laptop in office

Reddit’s Lawsuit Could Change How Much AI Knows About You


by Justin Smulison

Big AI is battling for its future—your data’s at stake.

Reddit Anthropic Lawsuit headline

How to Choose a Good Lawyer: Tips, Traits and Questions to Ask


by Laurie Villanueva

A Practical Guide for Your First-Time Hiring a Lawyer

Three professional lawyers walking together and discussing work

The 2026 Best Lawyers Awards in Chile, Colombia and Puerto Rico


by Jamilla Tabbara

The region’s most highly regarded lawyers.

Map highlighting Chile, Colombia and Puerto Rico for the 2026 Best Lawyers Awards

Common-Law Marriage in Indiana: Are You Legally Protected?


by Laurie Villanueva

Understanding cohabitation rights and common-law marriage recognition in Indiana.

Married Indiana couple in their home

Why Jack Dorsey and Elon Musk Want to 'Delete All IP Law'


by Bryan Driscoll

This Isn’t Just a Debate Over How to Pay Creators. It’s a Direct Challenge to Legal Infrastructure.

Elon Musk and Jack Dorsey standing together Infront of the X logo

AI Tools for Lawyers: How Smithy AI Solves Key Challenges


by Jamilla Tabbara

Understand the features and benefits within the Best Lawyers Digital Marketing Platform.

Legal professional editing profile content with Smithy AI

Alimony Explained: Who Qualifies, How It Works and What to Expect


by Bryan Driscoll

A practical guide to understanding alimony, from eligibility to enforcement, for anyone navigating divorce

two figures standing on stacks of coins