Where Does Roe Go From Here?

Georgia, Alabama, Missouri, and Ohio are among the states fighting to overturn legal abortion in America. With a favorable bench, how might Roe v. Wade look in the future?

Roe v. Wade's Legislative Future

Amanda Martinsek

June 12, 2019 02:06 PM

In real estate, it is location, location, location. In appellate practice, it is forum, forum, forum.

The flurry of laws currently being enacted in states including Georgia, Alabama, Missouri, and Ohio are all driven by a seismic change in the ultimate forum—the U.S. Supreme Court. With the confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh to the Court late last year, right to life/anti‑abortion groups scrambled to enact state laws that severely restrict a woman’s right to choose—thus teeing up a complete reconsideration of Roe v. Wade.

For the first time since Roe was decided in 1973, those opposed to its holding feel confident that there are five votes on the Supreme Court willing to overturn its finding that:

“A state criminal abortion statute…that excepts from criminality only a life-saving procedure on behalf of the mother, without regard to pregnancy stage and without recognition of the other interests involved, is violative of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.”

The holding of Roe determined that, in the first trimester, “the abortion decision and effectuation must be left to the medical judgment of the pregnant woman’s attending physician.” In the second trimester, “the State, in promoting its interest in the health of the mother, may, if it chooses, regulate the abortion procedure in ways that are reasonably related to maternal health.” In the third trimester, Roe weighed the state’s “interest in the potentiality of human life” more heavily, thus, permitting the state to “regulate and even proscribe, abortion except where it is necessary…for the preservation of the life or health of the mother.”

New state laws fly in the face of Roe’s trimester by trimester analysis. In Missouri, as of May 17, no woman may have an abortion after the first eight weeks of pregnancy. Nor does Missouri permit exceptions for rape or incest. Similarly, on May 7, Georgia joined three other states that in just the last year banned abortions after six weeks of pregnancy—considered a proxy for the time that a doctor can detect a fetal heartbeat. Alabama now essentially bans all abortions—once again without exception for pregnancy caused by rape or incest.

Even before these new laws, there were a number of cases percolating through the federal courts addressing state laws implicating the issues of:

  1. parental consent;
  2. requirements of hospital privileges for abortion providers;
  3. reporting requirements concerning abortion procedures;
  4. requirements that abortion providers have agreements with ambulance companies and hospitals;
  5. mandatory ultrasounds;
  6. fetal tissue disposal; and
  7. prohibition of dilation and evacuation abortions.

The first of these challenges to reach the newly composed Supreme Court was Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky. In a per curiam decision, the court reversed the Seventh Circuit’s determination that Indiana’s restrictions on the disposition of fetal remains was not rationally related to Indiana’s stated interest in “the ‘humane and dignified disposal of human remains.’” In the same per curiam ruling, the court declined to consider the question of whether “Indiana may prohibit the knowing provision of sex-, race- and disability-selective abortions by abortion providers.” Instead, pointing out that the Seventh Circuit has been the only circuit to address the issues thus far, the court denied certiorari consistent with its “ordinary practice of denying petitions insofar as they raise legal issues that have not been considered by additional Courts of Appeals.”

Court watchers are left reading the Indiana tea leaves. One thing seems fairly clear—there were not five votes on the Supreme Court interested in reviewing and overturning the Seventh Circuit’s rejection of Indiana’s statute prohibiting abortions based on sex-, race-, and/or disability-selectivity. For those behind the new state laws that unambiguously contravene the holding of Roe, the court’s lack of appetite to take up the first challenge before it may be a cause for caution.

It does, however, also seem pretty clear that with all of the challenges to different state laws restricting the rights established by Roe wending their way through multiple circuits, there is likely to be a point where there are conflicting decisions in two or more circuits. As stated in Box, that is a time where, characteristically, under Rule of the Supreme Court 10, certiorari is granted and an issue is joined. At that point, more conservative justices, including Gorsuch and Kavanaugh, will be tested. Overruling established Supreme Court precedent is relatively rare. However, a state law outright outlawing abortions in the first and second trimesters of pregnancy is undeniably in contravention of the protections provided by Roe.

What happens if Roe is overturned? If the Fourteenth Amendment does not protect a woman’s right to decide, it is no longer a federal issue. As before Roe, abortions will be regulated exclusively by state law, on a state-by-state basis.

Related Articles

Destiny Fulfilled

by Sara Collin

Was Angela Reddock-Wright destined to become a lawyer? It sure seems that way. Yet her path was circuitous. This accomplished employment attorney, turned mediator, arbitrator and ADR specialist nonpareil discusses her career, the role of attorneys in society, the new world of post-pandemic work and why new Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson represents the future.

Interview with Lawyer Angela Reddock-Wright

Ketanji Brown Jackson Becomes Joe Biden’s Nominee for Vacant SCOTUS Seat

by Gregory Sirico

President Joe Biden has nominated former lawyer Ketanji Brown Jackson for the Supreme Court of the United States.

Biden Nominates Ketanji Brown Jackson

Biden’s History-Making SCOTUS Nominees

by Gregory Sirico

The promise of the first Black female Supreme Court Justice in history is on the verge of reality as the top three candidates for the most recent vacant seat are announced.

Biden Promises First Black Female SCOTUS Pick

An Interview With Marie Tomassi

by Best Lawyers

St. Petersburg's 2020 "Lawyer of the Year" honoree in Appellate Practice

Marie Tomassi Appellate Practice

Don’t Fall Asleep at the Wheel

by Paul Goatley

Identify Exhaustion or Risk Waiving a Defense.

Don’t Fall Asleep at the Wheel

Traversing the Immigration Frontier

by Best Lawyers

Brian Graham Interview LOTY

What New York's Child Victims Act Means for Public Schools

by Anastasia M. McCarthy

The new Child Victims Act is expected to have a profound and long-lasting impact on public school systems.

Understanding New York's Child Victims Act

Michael Baughman, Pennsylvania’s 2018 Lawyer of the Year in Media Law

by Abigail Rowe

An interview with Michael Baughman, who was recognized with the 2018 "Lawyer of the Year" award in media law.

Michael Baughman, Pennsylvania’s 2018 Lawyer

Supreme Court Decision Will Play Important Role in Shaping Defendant Privacy Rights

by Gus Kostopoulos

The primary question will likely come down to whether or not cell phone data and location records are protected interests under the Fourth Amendment.

Defendant Privacy Rights

Send, Serve, or Both

by Holly M. Polglase and Matthew E. Bown

The Supreme Court decides the meaning of Article 10(A) of the Hague Service Convention.

Article 10(A) of the Hague Service Convention

Victory for The Slants and Redskins

by Carol Steinour Young and Emily Hart

On June 19, 2017, the United States Supreme Court settled the issue of whether an offensive name—in this case, an Asian-American rock band called “The Slants”—can properly be registered as a trademark.

The Slants Legal Case Decoded

Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of California, San Francisco

by Clifford J. Zatz and Josh Thomas Foust

The decision “may make it impossible to bring certain mass actions at all.”

Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. Mass Tort

Post-Conviction Relief

by Douglas Trant

In these post-conviction cases, we look for Constitutional violations that deprived the defendant of a fair trial and undermined confidence in the outcome.

Post-Conviction Relief

In the News: Austin/San Antonio

by Compiled by Tess Congo

A summary of newsworthy content from Austin/San Antonio lawyers and law firms.

Austin/San Antonio In the News

Trending Articles

The Real Camille: An Interview with Johnny Depp’s Lawyer Camille Vasquez

by Rebecca Blackwell

Camille Vasquez, a young lawyer at Brown Rudnick, sat down with Best Lawyers CEO Phillip Greer to talk about her distinguished career, recently being named partner and what comes next for her.

Camille Vasquez in office

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers® in the United States

by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers listed in the 28th Edition of The Best Lawyers in America® and in the 2nd Edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2022.

2022 Best Lawyers Listings for United States

Famous Songs Unprotected by Copyright Could Mean Royalties for Some

by Michael B. Fein

A guide to navigating copyright claims on famous songs.

Can I Sing "Happy Birthday" in Public?

Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch – The Future of Legal Talent Looks Bright

by Justin Smulison

Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch is launching its second edition in the United States, and after talking with both a company leader and esteemed lawyers on the list, the importance of this prestigious list is evident.

Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America 2022

Johnny Depp and Amber Heard: The Best Lawyers Honorees Behind the Litigation

by Gregory Sirico

Best Lawyers takes a look at the recognized legal talent representing Johnny Depp and Amber Heard in their ongoing defamation trial.

Lawyers for Johnny Depp and Amber Heard

Why Cariola Díez Pérez-Cotapos Developed Its Own Legal Tech

by Best Lawyers

Juan Pablo Matus of Cariola Díez Pérez-Cotapos, 2019 "Law Firm of the Year" award for Corporate and M&A Law in Chile, discusses his firm's joint venture with Cognitiva in creating Lexnova, a legal AI system.

Cariola Díez Pérez-Cotapos Interview

Choosing a Title Company: What a Seller Should Expect

by Roy D. Oppenheim

When it comes to choosing a title company, how much power exactly does a seller have?

Choosing the Title Company As Seller

Announcing the 2022 "Best Law Firms" Rankings

by Best Lawyers

The 2022 “Best Law Firms” publication includes all “Law Firm of the Year” recipients, national and metro Tier 1 ranked firms and editorial from thought leaders in the legal industry.

The 2022 Best Law Firms Awards

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers in Canada™

by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers listed in the 16th Edition of The Best Lawyers in Canada™ and 1st Edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in Canada.

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers in Canada™

Education by Trial: Cultivating Legal Expertise in the Courtroom

by Margo Pierce

The intricacies of complex lawsuits require extensive knowledge of the legal precedent. But they also demand a high level of skill in every discipline needed to succeed at trial, such as analyzing technical reports and deposing expert witnesses.

Cultivating Legal Expertise in the Courtroom

Announcing The Best Lawyers in France™ 2023

by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms from France.

Blue, white and red strips

Wage and Overtime Laws for Truck Drivers

by Greg Mansell

For truck drivers nationwide, underpayment and overtime violations are just the beginning of a long list of problems. Below we explore the wages you are entitled to but may not be receiving.

Truck Driver Wage and Overtime Laws in the US

Caffeine Overload and DUI Tests

by Daniel Taylor

While it might come as a surprise, the over-consumption of caffeine could trigger a false positive on a breathalyzer test.

Can Caffeine Cause You to Fail DUI Test?

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers™ in Australia

by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms.

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers™ in Australi

Announcing The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2023

by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms from Australia.

The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2023

Announcing The Best Lawyers in The United Kingdom™ 2023

by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms from the United Kingdom.

The Best Lawyers in The United Kingdom 2023