Insight

Insight into President Trump’s Immigration Policy

The justification is that it was an overreach of executive authority by President Obama and an illegal amnesty.

Trump’s Immigration Policy
Garry L. Davis, Jr.

Garry L. Davis, Jr.

February 13, 2018 04:38 PM

Since being sworn into office, President Trump has made significant changes to immigration law and policy in the U.S. Of particular note are the end of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program and the institution of a travel ban for people from certain countries.

We’ll start with the DACA program. Let’s be honest: President Obama instituted the program for political reasons. After setting records for deportations from his inauguration to June 2012, he needed to do something to recapture the hearts of voters who were most affected by his enforcement-heavy approach. No one expected the tough immigration policy that came from the Obama administration, and he was at risk of losing a huge number of votes, particularly from the Latino community. Enter the DACA program.

In June 2012, he announced the DACA program and built it so that it would benefit a group of people who would be the least objectionable by political opponents. To qualify, a person had to come to the U.S. prior to age 16, had to be under age 31, had to be in the U.S. for five years prior to the institution of the program, must have been serving the U.S. military, enrolled in school, or a high school graduate/GED certificate, and had no significant criminal record. The person would then receive protection from deportation and a work authorization for two years, and it was renewable.

The program benefited about 800,000 people, allowing them to work legally, to further their personal development goals, and to feel like they were part of a country they had grown up in. For many of them, this is the only country they have ever known. It was a brilliant political move and benefited a lot of good people who were paying the price for someone else’s choice to bring them here as children.

President Trump has ended the program.

The justification is that it was an overreach of executive authority by President Obama and an illegal amnesty. The problem with these justifications is that neither is true.

The president has always had—and continues to have—the legal authority from Congress to grant deferred action status to an illegal immigrant in his or her discretion. All President Obama did was formalize what had always been an informal process of requesting deferred action and limiting it to a class of individuals who met certain requirements. We have always been able to—and still can—request deferred action from the Department of Homeland Security authorities.

And it was not an amnesty as we’ve come to use that term in the U.S. “Amnesty” in the U.S. immigration law context implies forgiveness for past immigration violations and permanent legal status. Amnesty is what happened under President Reagan in the 1980s that led to the legalization of hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants with the stroke of a pen.

DACA was never that. It had no pathway to permanent legal status in the U.S.

The president has also stated that doing this will force Congress to take action to address the situation for those who availed themselves of the DACA program and its benefits. Considering the fact that we are still working with a 1952 statute to manage our immigration law and policy, I agree a change is way overdue. Maybe this will be the impetus for that change, whatever that may be.

The president has also instituted a travel ban for people from several countries in the Middle East, notably Syria and Iran, as well as North Korea and Venezuela. Basically, the ban bars many people from those countries from obtaining visas to come to the U.S. The stated justification is that the current system does not have adequate review and vetting procedures to ensure the safety of Americans. This statement is ridiculous. There is already an “extreme vetting” background investigation into each visa application, including a face-to-face interview and extensive security clearances.

Each of these changes indicates a significantly more restrictive approach than what the country became accustomed to under President Obama’s second term. We’ll see how President Trump plans to handle the potential political backlash when it comes time for him to seek reelection.

-----------------------

Garry Davis is the founder of Davis & Associates, an exclusively immigration law practice in Texas. A graduate of the University of Texas School of Law, he is board certified in immigration and nationality law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization.


Related Articles

Chain Migration Solutions Desperately in Search of a Problem


by Aaron C. Hall

The White House insists that any new law giving Dreamers a permanent place in the United States also stop what it refers to as the chain migration problem.

Chain Migration

Smart Policy and Smart Compassion


by David P. Berry

Why it makes sense to protect the Dreamers.

Dreamers

Trump and Immigration: Separating Truth from Fiction


by Harlan G. York

Deportations aren’t up, but the people who are being deported are more “newsworthy.”

Trump and Immigration

In the News: South Florida


by Compiled by Nicole Ortiz

A summary of newsworthy content from South Florida lawyers and law firms.

South Florida In the News 2018

The Price of Admission


by Janice Zhou

States and the federal government are engaged in a pitched battle over immigration and refugee settlement—with the legal profession caught in the middle, taking fire from both sides.

Immigration Reform in Connecticut

WATCH: Supreme Court Rules DACA Stays


by Best Lawyers

Three immigration law attorneys join the CEO of Best Lawyers to discuss the Supreme Court's decision to block the Trump administration's effort to stop the DACA program.

Panel: DACA SCOTUS Ruling

Loophole or Fatal Flaw?


by Joseph Begonis

Canada's Best Lawyers share their thoughts on the Safe Third Country Agreement

What Is the Safe Third Country Agreement?

Interagency Cooperation: Raising the Bar for Immigration Compliance


by Kathleen Campbell Walker

Stove-piped legal representation is not advisable (e.g., only focusing on one agency segment or one portion of a filing process).

Immigration Compliance

Immigration Worksite Compliance Issues for Employers


by Maria I. Casablanca

Immigration worksite enforcement has become a balancing act between verifying eligibility to work and avoiding discrimination; thus it has merged two fields of law: labor and employment law with immigration and nationality law.

Immigration Worksite Compliance

H-1B Planning for Fiscal Year 2019


by Lisa Koenig

Employers should be prepared to pivot.

H1-B Planning

Dilip Patel, 2018 "Lawyer of the Year" for Immigration Law


by Nicole Ortiz

Dilip Patel of Dilip Patel Law Firm was named 2018 "Lawyer of the Year" in Tampa for Immigration Law.

Dilip Patel LOTY

In the News: Southern California


by Compiled by Nicole Ortiz

A summary of newsworthy content from Southern California lawyers and law firms.

Southern California In the News

Employers Must Soon Use Yet Another New I-9 Form


by Fisher Phillips

New document could be liability trap for unsuspecting employers.

Begin Using the New Form Now

Trending Articles

Announcing the 2023 The Best Lawyers in America Honorees


by Best Lawyers

Only the top 5.3% of all practicing lawyers in the U.S. were selected by their peers for inclusion in the 29th edition of The Best Lawyers in America®.

Gold strings and dots connecting to form US map

Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2023


by Best Lawyers

The third edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America™ highlights the legal talent of lawyers who have been in practice less than 10 years.

Three arrows made of lines and dots on blue background

The Best Lawyers in South Africa™ 2023


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers proudly announces lawyers recognized in South Africa for 2023.

South African flag

Could Reign Supreme End with the Queen?


by Sara Collin

Canada is revisiting the notion of abolishing the monarchy after Queen Elizabeth II’s passing, but many Canadians and lawmakers are questioning if Canada could, should and would follow through.

Teacup on saucer over image of Queen's eye

Famous Songs Unprotected by Copyright Could Mean Royalties for Some


by Michael B. Fein

A guide to navigating copyright claims on famous songs.

Can I Sing "Happy Birthday" in Public?

Announcing the 2023 The Best Lawyers in Canada Honorees


by Best Lawyers

The Best Lawyers in Canada™ is entering its 17th edition for 2023. We highlight the elite lawyers awarded this year.

Red map of Canada with white lines and dots

IN PARTNERSHIP

2022: Another Banner Year


by John Fields

Block O’Toole & Murphy continues to secure some of New York’s highest results for personal injury matters.

Three men in business suits standing in office

Wage and Overtime Laws for Truck Drivers


by Greg Mansell

For truck drivers nationwide, underpayment and overtime violations are just the beginning of a long list of problems. Below we explore the wages you are entitled to but may not be receiving.

Truck Driver Wage and Overtime Laws in the US

What the Courts Say About Recording in the Classroom


by Christina Henagen Peer and Peter Zawadski

Students and parents are increasingly asking to use audio devices to record what's being said in the classroom. But is it legal? A recent ruling offer gives the answer to a question confusing parents and administrators alike.

Is It Legal for Students to Record Teachers?

The Upcycle Conundrum


by Karen Kreider Gaunt

Laudable or litigious? What you need to know about potential copyright and trademark infringement when repurposing products.

Repurposed Products and Copyright Infringemen

Thirteen Years of Excellence


by Best Lawyers

For the 13th consecutive year, “Best Law Firms” has awarded the most elite and talented law firms across the country through a thorough and trusted data review process.

Red, white and blue pipes and writing on black background

Caffeine Overload and DUI Tests


by Daniel Taylor

While it might come as a surprise, the over-consumption of caffeine could trigger a false positive on a breathalyzer test.

Can Caffeine Cause You to Fail DUI Test?

Choosing a Title Company: What a Seller Should Expect


by Roy D. Oppenheim

When it comes to choosing a title company, how much power exactly does a seller have?

Choosing the Title Company As Seller

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers® in the United States


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers listed in the 28th Edition of The Best Lawyers in America® and in the 2nd Edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2022.

2022 Best Lawyers Listings for United States

Announcing The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2023


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms from Australia.

The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2023

Announcing The Best Lawyers in Germany™ 2023


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms from Germany.

Black, red and yellow stripes