Insight

Georgia’s Tort Reform Overhaul

A New Front in the National Battle Over Civil Justice

Georgia tort reform hed
BD

Bryan Driscoll

May 19, 2025 06:00 AM

Georgia has just pulled the trigger on its most sweeping tort reform since 2005—an exclamation point on a national trend already underway. Governor Brian Kemp’s signature on Senate Bills 68 and 69 rewires the entire framework of civil litigation in the state, reshaping how injury and liability cases will be fought, settled, and won.

What sets Georgia apart isn’t just the scope of the reforms—it’s the symbolic weight. As a fast-growing business hub with a politically ambitious governor, Georgia is positioning itself as a national test case, a place where conservative legal strategy meets economic muscle. The outcome here could influence legislative playbooks across the country, pushing tort reform even further into the national spotlight.

This is no isolated experiment. Georgia now stands alongside a wave of red and purple states pushing aggressive reforms to limit corporate liability and constrain plaintiff strategies. The stakes are high: insurers, hospitals, trucking companies, and retailers see it as a win for business predictability, while trial lawyers and victim advocates warn the state has narrowed the courthouse doors for everyday Georgians seeking justice.

Inside Georgia’s Tort Reform Law

Georgia’s new tort reform law rewrites core liability rules, reshapes trial strategy, and rewires the numbers behind damages.

Negligent security claims, a staple of premises liability litigation, are now boxed in by strict conditions. Plaintiffs must show the property owner or security contractor had prior knowledge of similar wrongful acts, confined to a 500-yard radius. Even if they clear that hurdle, the law presumes most of the fault belongs to the third-party criminal, not the business. This shifts fault lines sharply, forcing plaintiffs’ lawyers to dig deeper before filing and to attack built-in legal presumptions head-on.

Bodily injury and wrongful death cases now face a split trial structure, with fault and damages decided in separate phases. This cuts off emotional spillover, forcing juries to decide liability first before hearing how much the harm is worth.

It’s a defense lawyer’s dream—no sympathy bleed, no backdoor pressure. Exceptions are narrow: claims under $150,000 and certain sexual offense cases. For most litigants, this rule forces a wholesale shift in how cases are built and tried.

Noneconomic damages now come with stricter courtroom controls. Anchoring tactics, where lawyers float big dollar figures early to set juror expectations, are heavily restricted.

Under the new system, no side can argue or suggest specific amounts for noneconomic damages until after all evidence is presented, and only under defined rules. This isn’t a cosmetic tweak; it’s a direct strike at one of plaintiffs’ strongest trial tools.

Medical expense claims also take a hit. Plaintiffs can no longer seek the full face value of medical bills when large portions were written off or unpaid. Defendants can introduce evidence showing the actual amounts paid to satisfy the bills—often a fraction of the charged amounts. This sharply reduces the potential size of verdicts tied to medical costs and reshapes how damages experts will calculate economic loss.

On attorney fees, the law clamps down hard, cutting off recovery of duplicate fees, court costs, and litigation expenses, and it bars the use of contingent fee agreements as proof of reasonableness. For plaintiff-side firms, this has major implications on case selection and risk analysis, especially in cases where fee recovery helped offset lower damages or thinner margins.

Procedurally, discovery timelines are now a different game. If defendants file a motion to dismiss, discovery halts automatically. They also don’t need to file an answer until 15 days after the court rules on the motion.

Courts are now under the gun to issue rulings within 90 days of the briefing close. This ratchets up the pressure on plaintiffs to plead surgically and cuts off one of their key early-stage leverage points: aggressive discovery.

Discovery stays reshape leverage. Without early document access or depositions, plaintiffs lose crucial tools for uncovering patterns of misconduct or amplifying pressure on defendants. Defense teams, in contrast, gain a powerful cost-control mechanism, forcing the opposition to carry more weight upfront and turning early litigation into a surgical contest over pleadings and motions.

Litigation funding, long operating in the shadows, will soon face daylight. As of January 2026, third-party funders must register with the Georgia Department of Banking and Finance and comply with strict limits—no steering case strategy, no controlling settlement decisions, no false advertising. Funders who pour in $25,000 or more can be hit with joint liability on awards. Defense teams now have the right to request discovery into these funding arrangements, even if the details don’t automatically come into evidence at trial.

The Political and Power Dynamics Behind the Reform

Georgia’s tort reform overhaul didn’t appear out of thin air—it was driven hard by some of the most powerful players in the state. At the front of the push were business groups, insurers, and the Georgia Chamber of Commerce, all eager to rein in what they describe as runaway jury awards, unpredictable court rulings, and a legal climate too friendly to plaintiffs.

For years, they’ve argued that Georgia’s liability system had become a magnet for outsized payouts, driving up insurance premiums and leaving businesses—especially small businesses—vulnerable to legal shocks they can’t control. The Chamber’s messaging was sharp: civil justice reform wasn’t just good for the business climate, it was essential to keep Georgia competitive.

On the other side, plaintiff lawyers, abuse survivors, and civil justice advocates mounted fierce resistance. Their argument was simple and visceral: these reforms don’t target frivolous claims—they gut protections for real people.

For survivors of assault or abuse, narrowing negligent security liability could mean shutting the courthouse doors entirely. For victims of catastrophic injury, new limits on damages and courtroom strategy could turn an already uphill legal fight into a legal dead end.

Plaintiff lawyers warned that this was corporate self-protection dressed up as reform—stacking the deck for businesses, insurers, and defense firms while leaving ordinary Georgians with fewer ways to hold wrongdoers accountable. Civil rights groups joined the fight, framing the bill as part of a national rollback on access to justice, especially for marginalized communities.

Driving all of this was the political muscle of Governor Brian Kemp. Kemp didn’t just sign the legislation—he went all in, making tort reform a signature priority and using sharp-elbowed tactics to force it through. Kemp aligned himself with a broader conservative push to reshape civil justice nationally, turning Georgia into a showcase for delivering wins against what business leaders call a “litigation tax” on growth.

Business interests wanted a more predictable, defendant-friendly system. Plaintiff-side forces wanted to preserve, even expand, access to justice. And the political machine, led by Kemp, was more than willing to take sides—driving the legislation through not just as policy, but as a statement of priorities and political identity.

What Lawyers and Law Firms Need to Do Now

Georgia firms must rethink their internal systems, training trial teams on two-phase strategies and witness prep to avoid crossover pitfalls.

Intake screening has to get sharper. Marginal cases that once justified contingency investment may no longer survive under reduced damage models or tighter liability rules. Litigation budgeting must adjust, accounting for longer timelines on fault-only phases before any damages are in play.

Defense firms can treat Georgia as a live test lab. The new tools create opportunities to cut costs and control litigation exposure in ways that could reshape national practice.

Forward-thinking firms should document how these strategies play out, tracking savings, outcomes, and settlement patterns. That data becomes powerful ammunition when advising national clients or preparing for similar reforms in other states.

National firms need to move now, not later. Georgia’s law is a blueprint for where tort reform is heading, especially in states where business groups and conservative lawmakers hold sway. Litigation leaders should pull teams together to pressure-test current strategies, refresh risk models, and prepare client briefings. Firms representing insurers, national retailers, transportation companies, or healthcare networks need to explain how a Georgia-style shift would change exposure—not after the law lands, but before.

For plaintiff-side firms, the challenge cuts deeper. This isn’t just tactical adjustment—it’s business model recalibration. With anchoring limited, medical damages trimmed, and bifurcation fracturing trial narratives, contingency firms must rethink portfolio balance.

How much capital can be committed to long-shot or thin-margin cases? How should funding partnerships be structured to avoid new discovery and compliance risks? Should small firms form alliances to pool resources, share expert networks, or coordinate case strategies across state lines?

Adaptation isn’t the only play—advocacy matters too. Beyond recalibrating trial tactics, firms can push back by shaping appellate arguments, filing amicus briefs in test cases, or joining coalitions that challenge reforms in the courts or legislatures.

Some firms may even take on public education roles, spotlighting how these changes affect access to justice for ordinary people. Staying ahead doesn’t just mean surviving the new system; it can also mean helping shape what comes next.

Georgia’s Signal to the Nation

Georgia has fired a warning shot across the national litigation landscape—this is more than a local rewrite, it’s a signal. Business-backed tort reform isn’t confined to one state, and the political momentum behind it isn’t slowing.

For lawyers everywhere, the message is blunt: adapt your strategies to new procedural and political realities or risk being left behind. Legal strategies now operate in a system increasingly shaped by political winds, legislative muscle, and ideological alliances.

This isn’t just about Georgia—it’s about the direction of civil justice in America. Firms that recognize the shift, sharpen their approaches, and position themselves ahead of the next wave will survive and lead. Those that don’t will find themselves sidelined, watching as the ground under their practice erodes. The next phase of the tort wars has arrived—and Georgia is just the opening move.

Headline Image: Adobe Stock/musfikur

Related Articles

Georgia's Best Lawyers 2022


by Best Lawyers

Our 2022 Georgia's Best Lawyers publication features top-ranked legal talent in Atlanta, Augusta, Columbus, Greater Atlanta, Macon and Savannah.

Georgia's Best Lawyers 2022

The Malone Legacy


by Alicia Lu

Adam Malone continues the legacy of improving lives he and his late father, Tommy Malone, achieved together.

Adam Malone Best Lawyers 2020

Medical Malpractice Reform Trends in Texas, Utah, Georgia and SC


by Bryan Driscoll

A fresh wave of medical malpractice reform is reshaping the law.

Medical Malpractice Reform Trends hed

One of the Greatest Ever...


by Justin Smulison

Steve Yerrid, a top catastrophic injury lawyer, has secured over 300 verdicts of $1M+ and has been recognized as "Lawyer of the Year" multiple times in Tampa.

Lawyer in blue suit poses in office for headshot

IN PARTNERSHIP

Salvi & Maher, LLP: Illinois and Wisconsin's Personal Injury Firm


by Justin Smulison

For more than 35 years, Salvi & Maher LLP has defended their clients throughout Illinois and Wisconsin in various areas of personal injury law, including medical malpractice, motor vehicle accidents, premises liability and trucking litigation.

Skyline of Chicago with green river and blue background

IN PARTNERSHIP

Emroch & Kilduff: Virginia's Personal Injury & Medical Malpractice Attorneys


by Emroch & Kilduff

For over 40 years, the award-winning Virginia-based firm Emroch & Kilduff has worked to represent their personal injury clients in both state and federal courts.

Skyline with blur background and wide view of park

Aim High and Fly


by Khalil Abdullah

From a silent victim of hometown segregation to Air Force captain and lawyer of consummate skill, Karen Evans exemplifies leadership—and vows always to help those who seek to follow her path.

Karen Evans' Leadership in the Airforce

New England's Best Lawyers 2022


by Best Lawyers

Our New England's Best Lawyers 2022 publication features top-ranked legal talent in New England.

New England's Best Lawyers 2022

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers: The Injury & Malpractice Issue


by Best Lawyers

Featuring the top legal talent from The Best Lawyers in America, Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America and “Lawyer of the Year” recipients for personal injury and medical malpractice as well as thought leadership from some of the nation’s top lawyers.

Best Lawyers Injury & Malpractice Publication

Georgia's Injury and Malpractice Leaders


by Justin Smulison

In 2021, Adam Malone recovered more than $38 million in settlements for catastrophically injured clients, while continuing his leadership roles outside the courtroom to enhance the profession for injury lawyers.

Malone Law Remain Leaders in Personal Injury

Catastrophic Personal Injury


by Best Lawyers

Trial legend Frank Branson finds success mixing technology and new skills with vast courtroom experience.

Catastrophic Personal Injury

Billy N. Jones - Georgia 2020 Lawyer of the Year


by Best Lawyers

Personal Injury Litigation - Plaintiffs Savannah, GA

Billy N. Jones

Big Wins From Coast to Coast


by Justin Smulison

Founder Michael S. Burg discusses how Burg Simpson’s lawyers secured major verdicts in some of the nation’s most unique cases in 2019.

Michael S. Burg Best Lawyers 2020

No Challenge Too Big


by Justin Smulison

Following its most successful year to date, Easton & Easton continues its streak of notable victories for California’s injured.

No Challenge Too Big

Oklahoma Finds Tort-Reform Statute Unconstitutional


by T. Luke Abel

The Beason family had a strong case, and the jury responded by awarding them a sizable payout. But, the court invoked a tort-reform statute that capped the family's winnings, much to the surprise of the jury.

Oklahoma Tort-Reform Unconstitutional Damages

Jones Kelleher: 90 Years of Expertise and Dedication in Personal Injury Law


by Sean Stonefield

At Boston plaintiffs’ firm Jones Kelleher, attorneys Pat Jones, Tim Kelleher, and Rob DeLello have worked together for almost 25 years and now bring 90 years of cumulative experience to their practice.

Jones Kelleher: A Tradition of Excellence

Trending Articles

Introducing the 2026 Best Lawyers Awards in Australia, Japan, New Zealand and Singapore


by Jennifer Verta

This year’s awards reflect the strength of the Best Lawyers network and its role in elevating legal talent worldwide.

2026 Best Lawyers Awards in Australia, Japan, New Zealand and Singapore

Revealing the 2026 Best Lawyers Awards in Germany, France, Switzerland and Austria


by Jamilla Tabbara

These honors underscore the reach of the Best Lawyers network and its focus on top legal talent.

map of Germany, France, Switzerland and Austria

Effective Communication: A Conversation with Jefferson Fisher


by Jamilla Tabbara

The power of effective communication beyond the law.

 Image of Jefferson Fisher and Phillip Greer engaged in a conversation about effective communication

The 2025 Legal Outlook Survey Results Are In


by Jennifer Verta

Discover what Best Lawyers honorees see ahead for the legal industry.

Person standing at a crossroads with multiple intersecting paths and a signpost.

The Best Lawyers Network: Global Recognition with Long-term Value


by Jamilla Tabbara

Learn how Best Lawyers' peer-review process helps recognized lawyers attract more clients and referral opportunities.

Lawyers networking

Jefferson Fisher: The Secrets to Influential Legal Marketing


by Jennifer Verta

How lawyers can apply Jefferson Fisher’s communication and marketing strategies to build trust, attract clients and grow their practice.

Portrait of Jefferson Fisher a legal marketing expert

Is Your Law Firm’s Website Driving Clients Away?


by Jamilla Tabbara

Identify key website issues that may be affecting client engagement and retention.

Phone displaying 'This site cannot be reached' message

A Guide to Workers' Compensation Law for 2025 and Beyond


by Bryan Driscoll

A woman with a laptop screen reflected in her glasses

Best Lawyers Launches CMO Advisory Board


by Jamilla Tabbara

Strategic counsel from legal marketing’s most experienced voices.

Group photo of Best Lawyers CMO Advisory Board members

Common Law Firm Landing Page Problems to Address


by Jamilla Tabbara

Identify key issues on law firm landing pages to improve client engagement and conversion.

Laptop showing law firm landing page analytics

Changes in California Employment Law for 2025


by Laurie Villanueva

What employers need to know to ensure compliance in the coming year and beyond

A pair of hands holding a checklist featuring a generic profile picture and the state of California

New Employment Law Recognizes Extraordinary Stress Is Everyday Reality for NY Lawyers


by Bryan Driscoll

A stressed woman has her head resting on her hands above a laptop

Turn Visitors into Clients with Law Firm Website SEO That Converts


by Jamilla Tabbara

Learn how to create high-converting law firm landing pages that drive client engagement and lead generation.

Laptop screen displaying website tools to improve client conversion rates

Best Lawyers Introduces Smithy AI


by Jamilla Tabbara

Transforming legal content creation for attorneys and firms.

Start using Smithy AI, a content tool by Best Lawyers

SEO for Law Firms: Overcoming Common Challenges


by Jamilla Tabbara

Tackle common SEO challenges and take the next step with our guide, How to Make Your Law Firm Easier to Find Online.

Graphic image of a phone displaying SEO rankings, with positions 1, 2 and 3 on the screen

Medical Malpractice Reform Trends in Texas, Utah, Georgia and SC


by Bryan Driscoll

A fresh wave of medical malpractice reform is reshaping the law.

Medical Malpractice Reform Trends hed

This article is a part of the Best Lawyers Southern California Legal Guide. Read thought leadership from recognized lawyers and navigate a list of all honorees in the associated practice areas.

Explore the Legal Guide