Passionate Pursuit of Justice.
Your Loss Becomes Our Cause.
Scroll or Swipe to Continue to Article
Insight

As Fla. Pushes to Repeal Controversial 'Free Kill' Law, DeSantis Signals Veto

The fight to transform state accountability standards may be in trouble

free kill law hed
BD

Bryan Driscoll

May 19, 2025 12:00 AM

Florida stands on the edge of a sharp, decisive break from 35 years of legal precedent. With House Bill 6017 awaiting Gov. Ron DeSantis’s signature, the state is poised to repeal the so-called “free kill” law—a provision that has long barred families of unmarried adults without minor children from recovering non-economic damages in wrongful death lawsuits for medical malpractice.

If signed, the repeal will restore access to lawsuits challenging malpractice and negligence, forcing a statewide reshaping of accountability standards.

Gov. DeSantis announced on Thursday his intention to veto the long-debated bill that has been advocated by victims of medical malpractice seeking to hold health care providers accountable for alleged wrongful deaths of family members, The Orlando Sentinel reported.

Gov. DeSantis expressed concerns that repealing the law could have significant economic repercussions, specifically warning that it could lead to a sharp increase in medical malpractice insurance premiums. This potential rise in costs, he argued, could negatively impact healthcare systems and providers. The debate underscores the delicate balance between ensuring access to justice for victims and maintaining stability within the medical profession.

Unpacking the Repeal—Why Now, and Why It Matters

The “free kill” provision traces back to 1990, when Florida lawmakers amended the state’s Wrongful Death Act to protect health care providers from a feared surge in malpractice lawsuits. The law barred parents of adult children over 25 and adult children of unmarried individuals from recovering non-economic damages like pain and suffering when malpractice led to death. Supporters argued this carveout was necessary to keep malpractice insurance premiums in check and prevent a mass exodus of physicians from the state.

But the savings never came.

Florida’s malpractice insurance rates have remained among the highest in the country, driven not by lawsuits but by the complexity and costs baked into the state’s health care market. Over time, the argument that this legal shield was necessary to stabilize the system began to erode. Families, left without recourse after devastating losses, turned their private grief into public pressure.

Lawmakers across party lines began to take notice. Advocates presented harrowing stories of preventable deaths and the legal dead ends families faced when the victims were unmarried adults without minor children. For many legislators, the issue became less about economics and more about fairness.

The repeal now sitting on Governor DeSantis’s desk marks a quiet but clear recalibration of Florida’s approach. If signed, it will bring the state’s wrongful death framework closer in line with national norms—restoring a right to sue that many other jurisdictions have long recognized.

This is not a dramatic expansion of liability, nor is it a wholesale shift in malpractice law. It is, simply, a correction: removing a narrow barrier that singled out certain families for exclusion.

The Corporate Fallout—What Hospitals, Insurers and Providers Face Next

For Florida’s health care providers, hospitals, and insurers, the possible repeal of the “free kill” carveout demands a thorough reassessment of institutional risk—not a panic, but a deliberate recalibration. Removing the long-standing statutory bar on wrongful death claims by certain family members expands the pool of potential plaintiffs. Even though the change looks narrow on paper, it alters how corporate actors model risk, price insurance, manage reserves, and plan long-term strategies.

At the institutional level, hospitals will need to revisit malpractice coverage limits and reassess how much financial exposure they’re willing—or able—to carry. Self-insured systems must determine whether existing reserve levels are adequate, while providers covered under broader insurance plans will see underwriters reevaluating risk profiles.

Insurers‌ will need to adjust their models, factoring in the expanded scope of viable claims when setting future premiums. Even moderate increases in claim volume or payout size can ripple across actuarial calculations, changing how policies are priced and how risk is spread across the health care sector.

The loudest opposition to the repeal has come from medical associations and hospital executives warning of catastrophic consequences: skyrocketing insurance rates, destabilized provider networks, and the possibility that some specialties or rural hospitals will become uninsurable. But that narrative often exaggerates the immediate danger. Most structural drivers of malpractice costs—complex case mixes, defensive medicine practices, high-cost settlements, reinsurance market volatility—are only tangentially related to whether adult children or parents can bring non-economic damages claims.

A repeal is unlikely to produce the lawsuit flood some fear. Litigation volume may rise moderately, but the most likely effect is a recalibration of financial exposure, not systemic collapse.

Still, corporate risk managers cannot dismiss the shift. For decades, Florida’s providers operated under a liability environment that deliberately limited certain survivor claims.

Health care systems that refine their risk models now—before large verdicts or unexpected claim patterns emerge—will be better positioned to weather the transition. Updating reserve strategies, enhancing internal claims review processes, and working closely with insurers to ensure coverage alignment are all critical steps. For some hospitals, particularly smaller or rural providers, this may also be a moment to explore collaborative risk-pooling or alternative insurance structures to maintain financial stability.

Looking ahead, insurers and provider groups may call for new legislative safeguards to mitigate expanded liability, like lower caps on recovery. While no formal proposals have emerged, common measures in other states have included tighter pre-suit procedures, caps on non-economic damages, or limits on attorney fees.

Beyond the balance sheets, there’s an institutional reputation component at play. The repeal reflects a larger public and political sentiment shift: a demand for accountability and fair access to legal remedies. Hospitals and providers that recognize this shift and lean into transparency, patient safety initiatives, and public trust-building will not only manage their legal risk—they’ll strengthen their standing in the eyes of patients, families, and communities.

How Legal Teams Will Navigate the Shifting Landscape

While institutional actors reassess financial exposure, legal teams on both sides of the courtroom must rethink strategy, case development, and courtroom dynamics. Plaintiff lawyers will face a new task: building persuasive claims for families who were previously excluded. Adult children and parents of unmarried decedents represent a specific survivor class whose damages are inherently non-economic. These cases will turn heavily on relational evidence: the strength, depth, and day-to-day reality of the family bond.

It’s not enough to plead grief or loss in the abstract. To survive early challenges and prevail at trial, plaintiffs’ counsel will need to anchor these claims in concrete, fact-specific narratives that show jurors exactly what was taken and why it matters.

Defense attorneys‌ must prepare for a litigation landscape where standing arguments no longer provide an early escape hatch. For decades, standing defenses helped narrow exposure and weed out claims before reaching discovery. Now, defense counsel will need to engage more deeply on the merits—focusing on causation, standard of care, and the proportionality of claimed damages. Discovery will likely expand as both sides seek detailed evidence of family dynamics, emotional impacts, and the practical consequences of the alleged malpractice.

This expansion has immediate implications for settlement negotiations. Mediations that once involved a single set of survivors and claims will increasingly include multiple claimants with different perspectives, stakes, and settlement goals. Counsel will need to manage these layered negotiations carefully, ensuring clear communication with clients and coordinated strategy across co-counsel and insurers. Ethical obligations around informed consent, client authority, and settlement allocation become even sharper in these multi-party settings.

Beyond individual cases, the repeal is likely to shape broader litigation patterns. We may see an increase in pre-trial motions challenging the sufficiency of non-economic damages evidence or seeking to limit the scope of testimony about family loss.

Courts may begin developing new case law around how to assess, cap, or apportion damages among multiple survivors. For appellate practitioners, this opens a fresh area of argument and legal development—particularly as questions arise over remittitur, excessiveness, and the constitutional limits of pain and suffering awards.

Appellate courts may soon face constitutional challenges tied to the repeal—particularly around due process and proportionality when large non-economic damages awards are contested. This could open a wave of new appellate arguments, reshaping not just how malpractice cases are tried, but how damages frameworks are justified under Florida law. Litigators on both sides will need to prepare for a shifting appellate environment alongside the trial-level changes.

Importantly, malpractice attorneys—plaintiff and defense alike—will need to navigate this new terrain under heightened public scrutiny. These cases do not live solely in courtrooms. Media coverage, patient advocacy, and professional reputation all exert pressure on how claims are handled and resolved. Lawyers must approach these cases with not only technical skill but strategic awareness, recognizing that the optics of fairness, accountability, and respect for survivors will shape outcomes both inside and outside the legal system.

A Measured Shift and a Lasting Impact

The possible repeal of Florida’s “free kill” law marks neither a revolution nor a collapse. It is a measured, deliberate correction—a realignment of the state’s medical malpractice system with broader principles of fairness and accountability.

For decades, the exclusion of certain survivors stood as a quiet but significant outlier in the legal landscape. Now, that carveout is poised to fall, and with it, long-standing assumptions about who gets to bring a claim and why.

The impacts will unfold over years, shaped by case law and courtroom battles. But make no mistake: Florida’s malpractice landscape is shifting, and the attorneys, judges, and institutions that move forward with clarity, preparation, and measured attention will be the ones best positioned to navigate what comes next.

Headline Image: Adobe Stock/motortion

Related Articles

Medical Malpractice Reform Trends in Texas, Utah, Georgia and SC


by Bryan Driscoll

A fresh wave of medical malpractice reform is reshaping the law.

Medical Malpractice Reform Trends hed

Preventing Malpractice Issues in Pediatric Practice. A Lawyer's Perspective.


by Sean M. Cleary

Despite medical breakthroughs and patient care, hospitals often act as a source of medical malpractice claims, leaving patients in dire need of legal counsel.

Sketch of doctor providing medical care to child

Georgia’s Tort Reform Overhaul


by Bryan Driscoll

A New Front in the National Battle Over Civil Justice

Georgia tort reform hed

IN PARTNERSHIP

Elevating Our Cases Into Causes


by Justin Smulison

Two female attorneys

IN PARTNERSHIP

Fighting for Justice. Championing Prevention.


by John Fields

At DeMayo Law Offices, legal advocacy and community outreach reinforce one another

Man Giving Car Presentation

IN PARTNERSHIP

What to do as an Accident Passenger


by Cooper Hurley Injury Lawyers

Cooper Hurley Injury Lawyers is here to help Virginia residents after a car accident.

Woman Getting Out of the Passenger Side of a Damaged Car

IN PARTNERSHIP

Strong Attorneys for Serious Injuries


by Strong Law Trial Attorneys

Why Injured Victims Choose Strong Law P.C.

Two Two People Standing Near a Toy Car Accident

IN PARTNERSHIP

Trial Tested: Building a Successful Medical Malpractice Case


by Robert A. Clifford and Sarah F. King

Blue Body X-Ray with Red Brain Injury

IN PARTNERSHIP

SUGARMAN’s Lasting Legacy: 65 Years of Impact


by Sugarman and Sugarman

Four Sugarman Attorneys in Conference Room

IN PARTNERSHIP

We Are a Law Firm That Gets Results


by Robb & Robb

A law firm known for it's trial victories in aviation and personal injury cases.

Plane flying between two triangular buildings

One of the Greatest Ever...


by Justin Smulison

Steve Yerrid, a top catastrophic injury lawyer, has secured over 300 verdicts of $1M+ and has been recognized as "Lawyer of the Year" multiple times in Tampa.

Lawyer in blue suit poses in office for headshot

IN PARTNERSHIP

Proving Negligence in a South Carolina Personal Injury Case


by Wyche

In South Carolina, as in other states, there are specific elements of negligence that must be established for a successful personal injury claim.

Person Receiving Form at Sight of Car Accident

IN PARTNERSHIP

What Will a Car Accident Lawyer Actually Do for You?


by Nick Norden

Getting into a car accident is stressful. Keep reading for insight into how a car accident attorney can help you recover the compensation you need and deserve.

Steering wheel with deployed airbag

Pribanic Secures Milestone Verdict in Rural PA County


by Justin Smulison

Ten-time honoree Victor H. Pribanic secured one of 2023’s most notable verdicts in a Pennsylvania county that historically has not been empathic to plaintiffs.

Lawyer sitting at desk with notepad and laptop

The Push and Pitfalls of New York’s Attempt to Expand Wrongful Death Recovery


by Elizabeth M. Midgley and V. Christopher Potenza

The New York State Legislature recently went about updating certain wrongful death provisions and how they can be carried out in the future. Here's the latest.

Red tape blocking off a section of street

Combating Nuclear Verdicts: Empirically Supported Strategies to Deflate the Effects of Anchoring Bias


by Sloan L. Abernathy

Sometimes a verdict can be the difference between amicability and nuclear level developments. But what is anchoring bias and how can strategy combat this?

Lawyer speaking in courtroom with crowd and judge in the foreground

Trending Articles

Introducing the 2026 Best Lawyers Awards in Australia, Japan, New Zealand and Singapore


by Jennifer Verta

This year’s awards reflect the strength of the Best Lawyers network and its role in elevating legal talent worldwide.

2026 Best Lawyers Awards in Australia, Japan, New Zealand and Singapore

Revealing the 2026 Best Lawyers Awards in Germany, France, Switzerland and Austria


by Jamilla Tabbara

These honors underscore the reach of the Best Lawyers network and its focus on top legal talent.

map of Germany, France, Switzerland and Austria

Effective Communication: A Conversation with Jefferson Fisher


by Jamilla Tabbara

The power of effective communication beyond the law.

 Image of Jefferson Fisher and Phillip Greer engaged in a conversation about effective communication

The 2025 Legal Outlook Survey Results Are In


by Jennifer Verta

Discover what Best Lawyers honorees see ahead for the legal industry.

Person standing at a crossroads with multiple intersecting paths and a signpost.

The Best Lawyers Network: Global Recognition with Long-term Value


by Jamilla Tabbara

Learn how Best Lawyers' peer-review process helps recognized lawyers attract more clients and referral opportunities.

Lawyers networking

Jefferson Fisher: The Secrets to Influential Legal Marketing


by Jennifer Verta

How lawyers can apply Jefferson Fisher’s communication and marketing strategies to build trust, attract clients and grow their practice.

Portrait of Jefferson Fisher a legal marketing expert

Is Your Law Firm’s Website Driving Clients Away?


by Jamilla Tabbara

Identify key website issues that may be affecting client engagement and retention.

Phone displaying 'This site cannot be reached' message

A Guide to Workers' Compensation Law for 2025 and Beyond


by Bryan Driscoll

A woman with a laptop screen reflected in her glasses

Best Lawyers Launches CMO Advisory Board


by Jamilla Tabbara

Strategic counsel from legal marketing’s most experienced voices.

Group photo of Best Lawyers CMO Advisory Board members

Common Law Firm Landing Page Problems to Address


by Jamilla Tabbara

Identify key issues on law firm landing pages to improve client engagement and conversion.

Laptop showing law firm landing page analytics

Changes in California Employment Law for 2025


by Laurie Villanueva

What employers need to know to ensure compliance in the coming year and beyond

A pair of hands holding a checklist featuring a generic profile picture and the state of California

New Employment Law Recognizes Extraordinary Stress Is Everyday Reality for NY Lawyers


by Bryan Driscoll

A stressed woman has her head resting on her hands above a laptop

Turn Visitors into Clients with Law Firm Website SEO That Converts


by Jamilla Tabbara

Learn how to create high-converting law firm landing pages that drive client engagement and lead generation.

Laptop screen displaying website tools to improve client conversion rates

SEO for Law Firms: Overcoming Common Challenges


by Jamilla Tabbara

Tackle common SEO challenges and take the next step with our guide, How to Make Your Law Firm Easier to Find Online.

Graphic image of a phone displaying SEO rankings, with positions 1, 2 and 3 on the screen

Best Lawyers Introduces Smithy AI


by Jamilla Tabbara

Transforming legal content creation for attorneys and firms.

Start using Smithy AI, a content tool by Best Lawyers

6 Steps to Finding the Right Keywords for Your Legal Content


by Jamilla Tabbara

Follow a practical guide to keyword research and boost your law firm’s SEO to reach more potential clients.

 letters symbolizing keywords for legal content