Insight

Internet Speech in the Crosshairs

Charges of anti-right bias notwithstanding, online platforms are on solid ground when they defend their policies and procedures as neutral and protected by the First Amendment.

Is Internet Speech Protected?
AH

Ari Holtzblatt and Jamie Gorelick

January 10, 2019 12:18 PM

Accusations that prominent online platforms are stifling conservative voices have been much in the news lately—accusations that have turned into threats of investigations or enforcement actions. In late August, President Trump tweeted that various platforms are “suppressing voices of Conservatives,” pledging that this “very serious situation will be addressed.” In September, former Attorney General Jeff Sessions convened a meeting of state attorneys general to discuss whether the platforms are “hurting competition” and “intentionally stifling the free exchange of ideas.”

The companies in question have forcefully denied any anti-conservative bias in the operation of their algorithms or application of their community standards. Their algorithms, they say, are neutral tools for sorting and classifying information online, and their standards aim to create a safe environment, not to squelch particular views.

If litigation or enforcement nonetheless materializes, however, among the most significant issues that regulators, litigants, and courts will confront is whether the First Amendment prohibits second-guessing the platforms’ decisions about what content to disseminate. (Disclosure: The authors of this article represent various online providers in matters presenting these and similar issues.)

The First Amendment Argument

The Supreme Court has long recognized that the First Amendment protects not only the right to publish one’s own speech but also the “exercise of editorial control and judgment” that, for example, a newspaper undertakes in deciding whether to publish third-party submissions. Miami Herald Pub. Co. v. Tornillo, 418 U.S. 241, 258 (1974).

Online service providers, the argument goes, exercise the same editorial judgment when adopting and enforcing community standards for speech on their platforms, or when designing and applying algorithms to filter and classify that speech. Such judgments are simply the digital-economy version of a bookstore or newsstand deciding which books or magazines to carry, or a cable operator assessing whether and when to air particular programming—and are just as entitled to First Amendment protection as those decisions.

Accusations that anti-conservative bias motivates these judgments in no way diminish the platforms’ First Amendment rights. “[W]hether fair or unfair,” the Supreme Court held in Miami Herald, the First Amendment protects the right to choose what “material” to present. Indeed, if the accusations were accurate (contrary to what the companies have maintained), that would strengthen the First Amendment argument because such “political expression” triggers the most robust level of First Amendment protection. See McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Comm’n, 514 U.S. 334, 346 (1995).

Against the First Amendment

Critics of this First Amendment argument respond that online platforms are not distributors of other people’s speech (the way newspapers, bookstores, and cable operators are), but rather operators of a public forum for expression. For these critics, the key precedent is not Miami Herald but Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins, in which the Supreme Court held that the First Amendment did not prevent a privately-owned shopping mall from being forced, under state law, to permit members of the public to solicit signatures and distribute political pamphlets in the concourses of the mall. 447 U.S. 74 (1980).

According to this counterargument, the real free-speech right at stake is that of online users who lose access to these public forums. The only free-speech interest that the platforms possess, this viewpoint holds, is that the public might mistakenly attribute a message written by a user to the platform itself. As with the mall in Pruneyard, though, that limited speech interest can be accommodated fully by online providers “publicly dissociat[ing] themselves from the views of the speakers” they host. 447 U.S. at 88.

Generally, courts that have confronted these or similar issues have affirmed that online service providers have a robust First Amendment right to decide how best to arrange and display (or not display) third-party content on their platforms. See, e.g., Zhang v. Baidu.com, Inc., 10 F. Supp. 3d 433 (S.D.N.Y. 2014). Though they now arise in a new, more highly charged context, we expect courts to answer these questions in the same way as the Southern District of New York did in Zhang v. Baidu here: Second-guessing platforms’ algorithms or community standards would “‘violate[] the fundamental rule of protection under the First Amendment, that a speaker has the autonomy to choose the content of his own message.’” Id. (quoting Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian, & Bisexual Group of Boston, 515 U.S. 557 (1995)).

-----------

Named the 2019 Best Lawyers “Lawyer of the Year” for Government Relations Practice in Washington, D.C., Jamie Gorelick is the chair of the Regulatory and Government Affairs Practice at WilmerHale, where she represents organizations and individuals on a wide array of high-stakes regulatory and enforcement matters, involving issues as diverse as antitrust, cybersecurity, and the First Amendment. She was one of the longest-serving deputy attorneys general of the United States, general counsel of the Defense Department, and a member of the bi-partisan “9/11 Commission.”

Ari Holtzblatt is a counsel in the Appellate and Government Regulatory Litigation practices at WilmerHale in Washington, D.C., where he represents organizations and individuals in high-profile litigation at every level of the federal system, from the trial court to the U.S. Supreme Court. He has litigated cutting-edge issues for leading technology companies, including under the First Amendment, the Communications Decency Act, the Copyright Act, and the Stored Communications Act.

Related Articles

In the News Weekly Roundup: Facebook's Free Speech Controversy


by Best Lawyers

Recent news from Best Lawyers listed lawyers and firms. New hires at Akerman and King & Spalding, and a win for Greenberg Traurig.

Will Facebook Err on the Side of Free Speech?

Social Media and Other Innovations Are Jarring the Judiciary


by Michelle V. Rafter

Judge Shira A. Scheindlin means it when she says social media is “totally disrupting the court system.”

Law: Predictive analytics & social media

My Data My Rules: An Overview of Data Protection in Brazil


by Fábio Pereira

My Data My Rules

Facebook Whistleblower Testimony Shines A Light On Credibility Factor


by Justin Smulison

Landmark whistleblower testimony was provided on Capitol Hill which may have a national—and even worldwide—effect on how governments regulate Big Tech companies.

Capitol Hill Facebook Whistleblower Testimony

Best Lawyers: A Technology Powerhouse in the Legal Industry


by John Ettorre

Best Lawyers, a legal publishing company, is paving the way in the industry as a tech-first giant.

Best Lawyers is a Tech-First Titan

What Are the Anti-Protest Laws in the U.S.?


by Jim Owen

The First Amendment includes the right to assemble. But how are the rules surrounding protesting changing?

Anti-Protest Laws in the U.S.

Insuring the Future


by Best Lawyers

Thomas Heitzer discusses how new technology advancements are impacting the insurance realm.

An Interview With Noerr

Baraona Fischer & Cia on the Changes Coming to Tax Law in Chile


by Best Lawyers

Juan Manuel Baraona of the 2019 "Law Firm of the Year" award-winner for Tax Law in Chile discusses forthcoming regulations, career highlights, and his secrets to success in an interview with Best Lawyers CEO Phillip Greer.

Baraona Fischer & Cia LFOTY

In the News: New York


by Best Lawyers

A roundup of relevant news from listed lawyers in the New York area.

New York Legal News Roundup

An Interview With Jean-Paul Jassy of Jassy Vick Carolan


by Best Lawyers

The 2019 "Lawyer of the Year" winner for First Amendment Law in Los Angeles speaks about his career highlights.

Meet the Attorney Who Represented Mark Boal

ACLU Says Facebook's Targeted Advertising Is Discriminatory


by Donald L. Sapir

By letting advertisers target men in job postings, Facebook may be contributing to gendered discrimination.

Facebook Job Ad Discrimination

In the News Weekly Roundup: Los Angeles Times Wins First Amendment Fight


by Best Lawyers

A roundup of recent news of listed lawyers across the country.

Los Angeles Times Wins First Amendment Fight

Six Steps to Social Media Success for Law Firms


by Bria Burk

Firms can use social media to promote awards, establish their positions, and bring attention to a practice area.

How Should Law Firms Use Social Media?

Michael Baughman, Pennsylvania’s 2018 Lawyer of the Year in Media Law


by Abigail Rowe

An interview with Michael Baughman, who was recognized with the 2018 "Lawyer of the Year" award in media law.

Michael Baughman, Pennsylvania’s 2018 Lawyer

In the News: Georgia


by Nicole Ortiz

A summary of newsworthy content from Colorado lawyers and law firms.

In the News Georgia 2018

FinTech at the Crossroads


by Rob Scavone, Pat Forgione, Tayleigh Armstrong, and Kelly Kan

Regulating the Revolution

Fintech at the Crossroads

Trending Articles

Presenting The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2025


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is proud to present The Best Lawyers in Australia for 2025, marking the 17th consecutive year of Best Lawyers awards in Australia.

Australia flag over outline of country

How To Find A Pro Bono Lawyer


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers dives into the vital role pro bono lawyers play in ensuring access to justice for all and the transformative impact they have on communities.

Hands joined around a table with phone, paper, pen and glasses

How Palworld Is Testing the Limits of Nintendo’s Legal Power


by Gregory Sirico

Many are calling the new game Palworld “Pokémon GO with guns,” noting the games striking similarities. Experts speculate how Nintendo could take legal action.

Animated figures with guns stand on top of creatures

Announcing The Best Lawyers in New Zealand™ 2025 Awards


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is announcing the 16th edition of The Best Lawyers in New Zealand for 2025, including individual Best Lawyers and "Lawyer of the Year" awards.

New Zealand flag over image of country outline

Announcing The Best Lawyers in Japan™ 2025


by Best Lawyers

For a milestone 15th edition, Best Lawyers is proud to announce The Best Lawyers in Japan.

Japan flag over outline of country

The Best Lawyers in Singapore™ 2025 Edition


by Best Lawyers

For 2025, Best Lawyers presents the most esteemed awards for lawyers and law firms in Singapore.

Singapore flag over outline of country

Announcing the 16th Edition of the Best Lawyers in Germany Rankings


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers announces the 16th edition of The Best Lawyers in Germany™, featuring a unique set of rankings that highlights Germany's top legal talent.

German flag in front of country's outline

How Much Is a Lawyer Consultation Fee?


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers breaks down the key differences between consultation and retainer fees when hiring an attorney, a crucial first step in the legal process.

Client consulting with lawyer wearing a suit

Presenting the 2024 Best Lawyers Employment and Workers’ Compensation Legal Guide


by Best Lawyers

The 2024 Best Lawyers Employment and Workers' Compensation Legal Guide provides exclusive access to all Best Lawyers awards in related practice areas. Read below and explore the legal guide.

Illustration of several men and women in shades of orange and teal

Things to Do Before a Car Accident Happens to You


by Ellie Shaffer

In a car accident, certain things are beyond the point of no return, while some are well within an individual's control. Here's how to stay legally prepared.

Car dashcam recording street ahead

Combating Nuclear Verdicts: Empirically Supported Strategies to Deflate the Effects of Anchoring Bias


by Sloan L. Abernathy

Sometimes a verdict can be the difference between amicability and nuclear level developments. But what is anchoring bias and how can strategy combat this?

Lawyer speaking in courtroom with crowd and judge in the foreground

Attacked From All Sides: What Is Happening in the World of Restrictive Covenants?


by Christine Bestor Townsend

One employment lawyer explains how companies can navigate challenges of federal and state governmental scrutiny on restrictive covenant agreements.

Illustration of two men pulling on string with blue door between them

The Push and Pitfalls of New York’s Attempt to Expand Wrongful Death Recovery


by Elizabeth M. Midgley and V. Christopher Potenza

The New York State Legislature recently went about updating certain wrongful death provisions and how they can be carried out in the future. Here's the latest.

Red tape blocking off a section of street

6 Ways a Lawyer Can Help You With Your Medical Malpractice Claim


by Adam Malone

If you believe you have a medical malpractice claim, contact an experienced medical malpractice lawyer. Read on to learn how they can help with your claim.

Doctor in white lab coat showing x-ray to patient in blue scrubs

Georgia Proposes Law Requiring Parental Consent for Minors on Social Media


by Gregory Sirico

With data collection on the rise, Georgia lawmakers are currently petitioning for Senate Bill 351, which would require a user's age before social media use.

Teenager with hood on using phone as notifications pop up

Colorado Attorney General Calls For Cannabis Reclassification


by Gregory Sirico

In this article, Best Lawyers highlights a recent call to action by the Colorado state attorney general, requesting a full drug reclassification of cannabis.

Cannabis buds sitting on a checkerboard tabletop