Learn How to Value Your Company's IP Portfolio as a Source of Income with Patent Scorecarding

It’s imperative that intellectual property counsel, especially those responsible for the protection of innovation in the electrical, chemical, pharmaceutical and life-science arenas, regularly audit their company’s IP portfolio. Here’s the best way to do it.

Intellectual Property Scorecarding Benefits
Troy A. Groetken

Troy A. Groetken

March 9, 2022 01:00 PM

At least once a year—maybe even as often as every quarter—astute inside counsel will want to assess both the value (based against return on investment or the protection of key company product/technology platforms and strategies) and the cost of the company’s intellectual property portfolio or various segments thereof. Depending on the portfolio’s size, complexity and geographic reach, this request can make for a daunting task. The trick to managing it in a timely manner and with one’s sanity mostly intact: patent scorecarding. It offers an effective way to make a review like this manageable while providing crucial insights that can be built upon over time. Further, patent scorecarding enables a company to more efficiently and effectively evaluate and implement its intellectual property strategy in both the short and long term.

McAndrews Best Lawyers Inline

What Is Patent Scorecarding, and How Does It Work?

In essence, patent scorecarding is a system of assigning value, both quantitative and the more subjectively qualitative, to every IP asset in a given portfolio. The system and process help management decide which parts of the portfolio to retain and which, perhaps, to license or sell. But the process does not end there.

Through patent scorecarding, a company uses its own “company-specific variables.” Those might include:

  • currently identifiable revenue tied to the IP asset
  • currently identifiable products, product lines or technology platforms that are supported by or involve the IP asset
  • future short- and long-term business goals or revenue generation that will involve the IP asset
  • overall IP life of the asset
  • competitive concerns/challenges involving the asset

Through such an analysis, companies are able to more effectively prioritize and direct resources toward the IP assets that are most essential (i.e., “core” versus “non-core”) to its business objectives in both the short- and long-terms.

Further, patent scorecarding allows a company to forecast the potential performance of each asset, group of assets or the entire portfolio over time in order to justify related costs, evaluate improvements and sell or abandon underperforming assets. An objective assessment will also help identify the key IP assets that constitute true economic value for the company over time, and the manner in which they do so. Such information is critical for a business at any stage of its evolution, whether it needs to establish support for a funding valuation, redistribute IP asset resources or assess potential options for divestiture or licensing, among others.

How Your Score Card Can Justify IP Asset Return on Investment

Patent scorecarding also allows for “tying”—in essence, the linking of a particular IP asset, or bundle of assets, to a company’s technology platform, product line or licensing program. Doing so is invaluable: Once a given asset is tied to an income-producing platform or product, executives can immediately visualize the return on investment it offers. Think of patent scorecarding, then, as regular financial hygiene, identifying and ranking beneficial assets and gauging their performance as often as needed.

Because scorecarding is metric-based—with the metrics employed naturally varying from industry to industry, even company to company—a performance value can also be tailored with precision to each IP asset, thereby identifying and tracking that performance over time. For example, patent scorecarding can assign metrics (e.g., existence or nonexistence of composition claims; of challenging method or product-by process claims; of challenging or changing case law; or of competitive landscape challenges, among others) to fully assess over time the strength of the claims of a particular patent asset or group of related assets. All of these variables can be tailored and then used quantitatively and qualitatively, which allows the business, legal and research-and-development teams to value each patent asset according to whichever metric it deems most important.

Moreover, if an asset’s performance is inadequate, the company can deploy additional resources or measures (e.g., claim amendments, reissue applications, and the filing of related continuation or divisional applications, among others)—to enhance its value. Alternatively, if the asset’s underperformance is too great, the company can redirect resources to better-performing assets while either selling or abandoning the underperforming one.

Uncovering New Financial Opportunities

Patent scorecarding’s advantages extend further still. A company’s scorecarding program can help uncover other revenue-generating and revenue-saving opportunities. For example, if a particular asset or asset group no longer supports a technology platform or product within the company’s interests, the asset(s) can be divested or licensed.

The benefits of divestiture are twofold: First, selling any IP asset that is no longer needed can generate funds that the company can use to support more critical IP assets, products or projects. Second, any asset identified as worthy of divestiture will by definition no longer need financial or other support from the business.

For licensing, a company might prefer to own and manage its non-tied IP assets rather than sell them to someone else. Doing so will help the company control quality metrics, prevent competitive use of assets and warehouse one’s IP over time, among other virtues.

Company executives and counsel should implement and regularly tailor their patent scorecarding process and metrics to identify the assets best suited for product and platform support, divestiture or licensing. This will provide a means to numerically assess, value and structure IP assets so they’re income generators, not revenue eliminators. The company can then live another day to ford the turbulent eddies of modern commerce, secure in the knowledge that its intellectual property is doing the most efficient, most valuable and most remunerative work it can.

For more information regarding patent scorecarding and examples thereof, please contact Troy A. Groetken at 312-775-8259 or

Related Articles

What Entrepreneurs Should Know About Intellectual Property

by Todd Fichtenberg

With the growing rates of entrepreneurs and startups during 2020, applications for EINs and intellectual property protections should grow proportionately.

Business Owners And Intellectual Property

The State of Women Inventors

by Amanda Hermans and Kate Rockwood

What’s being done to improve the gender patent gap—and how attorneys can help.

How to Improve the Gender Patent Gap

Property Protectors

by Best Lawyers

Georg Schönherr and Thomas Adocker discuss the theft of trade secrets, patent infringement, and strategies to combat fake goods.

An Interview With Schwarz Schönherr Rechtsanw

Protect Your Intellectual Property From Patent Trolls

by Best Lawyers

Michael Ritscher discusses how he advises clients to better protect their trade secrets.

An Interview With Meyerlustenberger Lachenal

Woman on a Mission

by Rebecca Blackwell

Baker Botts partner and intellectual property chair Christa Brown-Sanford discusses how she juggles work, personal life, being a mentor and leadership duties.

Woman in green dress crossing her arms and posing for headshot

Anna Inventing: The Importance of Diversity in Innovation

by Emily C. Peyser

A patent from 1887 by female inventor Anna Connelly not only revolutionized fire safety, but highlighted the need for diversity in innovation. Our world is facing big problems that need diverse voices at the table to find solutions that work for everyone. Building diverse teams and encouraging diversity in innovation is a beneficial step forward in resolving our collective challenges.

Diversity in Innovation and Technology

Anthony M. Insogna - San Diego 2021 Lawyer of the Year

by Best Lawyers

Litigation - Intellectual Property San Diego, California

Anthony M. Insogna

Technology and the Changing IP Climate in Mexico

by Best Lawyers

Roberto Arochi discusses Arochi & Lindner’s 2019 “Law Firm of the Year” award for Intellectual Property Law in Mexico in an interview with Best Lawyers.

Arochi & Lindner "Law Firm of the Year" Q&A

Alicia Lloreda on the Increasing Complexity of IP Law

by Best Lawyers

The Lloreda Camacho & Co. attorney discusses the firm's 2019 “Law Firm of the Year” award for Intellectual Property Law.

Alicia Lloreda Law Firm of the Year

After 30 Years, Kevin R. Casey Looks Back on IP Law

by Best Lawyers

Kevin R. Casey, the 2019 "Lawyer of the Year" winner for IP Law in Philadelphia talks about his practice and career.

Kevin R. Casey 2019 "Lawyer of the Year"

Understanding the Constitutionality of Patent Law

by John Powers

Ideas can be stolen, just like the machines or products they were used to create.

Why Patents Lead to Innovation

The Argument Against Self-Representation in Patent Cases

by John Powers

A look back at the 1983 Nilssen case, and what it means for patent law today.

Do I Need a Lawyer to File a Patent?

Four Disastrous IP Mistakes Most Companies Make

by Eric Vaughn-Flam

Registering and investigating trademarks are just the beginning when it comes to keeping your intellectual property safe.

Four IP Mistakes and How to Avoid Them

Famous Songs Unprotected by Copyright Could Mean Royalties for Some

by Michael B. Fein

A guide to navigating copyright claims on famous songs.

Can I Sing "Happy Birthday" in Public?

New European Unitary Patent Is Not-So-Wonderful

by Michael B. Fein

If the European Parliament and the 25 participating states were trying to emulate a U.S. patent and replace the present Balkanized system wherein each state has its own patent granting authority and courts handling patent litigation, it has failed miserably.

European Unitary Patent

Supreme Court Rejects the 'Promise of the Patent,' Redefines Canada’s Patent Utility Requirement

by Julie Desrosiers and Michael Shortt

The nine judges of the Supreme Court ruled on Friday that the so-called “promise doctrine” was not part of Canadian patent law, and laid out a new approach to the utility requirement which substantially lowers the bar to proving usefulness of patented inventions.

'Promise of the Patent'

Trending Articles

Presenting The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2025

by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is proud to present The Best Lawyers in Australia for 2025, marking the 17th consecutive year of Best Lawyers awards in Australia.

Australia flag over outline of country

Legal Distinction on Display: 15th Edition of The Best Lawyers in France™

by Best Lawyers

The industry’s best lawyers and firms working in France are revealed in the newly released, comprehensive the 15th Edition of The Best Lawyers in France™.

French flag in front of country's outline

How To Find A Pro Bono Lawyer

by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers dives into the vital role pro bono lawyers play in ensuring access to justice for all and the transformative impact they have on communities.

Hands joined around a table with phone, paper, pen and glasses

How Palworld Is Testing the Limits of Nintendo’s Legal Power

by Gregory Sirico

Many are calling the new game Palworld “Pokémon GO with guns,” noting the games striking similarities. Experts speculate how Nintendo could take legal action.

Animated figures with guns stand on top of creatures

Announcing The Best Lawyers in New Zealand™ 2025 Awards

by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is announcing the 16th edition of The Best Lawyers in New Zealand for 2025, including individual Best Lawyers and "Lawyer of the Year" awards.

New Zealand flag over image of country outline

Announcing the 13th Edition of Best Lawyers Rankings in the United Kingdom

by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is proud to announce the newest edition of legal rankings in the United Kingdom, marking the 13th consecutive edition of awards in the country.

British flag in front of country's outline

Announcing The Best Lawyers in Japan™ 2025

by Best Lawyers

For a milestone 15th edition, Best Lawyers is proud to announce The Best Lawyers in Japan.

Japan flag over outline of country

The Best Lawyers in Singapore™ 2025 Edition

by Best Lawyers

For 2025, Best Lawyers presents the most esteemed awards for lawyers and law firms in Singapore.

Singapore flag over outline of country

Announcing the 16th Edition of the Best Lawyers in Germany Rankings

by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers announces the 16th edition of The Best Lawyers in Germany™, featuring a unique set of rankings that highlights Germany's top legal talent.

German flag in front of country's outline

How Much Is a Lawyer Consultation Fee?

by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers breaks down the key differences between consultation and retainer fees when hiring an attorney, a crucial first step in the legal process.

Client consulting with lawyer wearing a suit

Celebrating Excellence in Law: 11th Edition of Best Lawyers in Italy™

by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers announces the 11th edition of The Best Lawyers in Italy™, which features an elite list of awards showcasing Italy's current legal talent.

Italian flag in front of country's outline

Presenting the 2024 Best Lawyers Employment and Workers’ Compensation Legal Guide

by Best Lawyers

The 2024 Best Lawyers Employment and Workers' Compensation Legal Guide provides exclusive access to all Best Lawyers awards in related practice areas. Read below and explore the legal guide.

Illustration of several men and women in shades of orange and teal

Things to Do Before a Car Accident Happens to You

by Ellie Shaffer

In a car accident, certain things are beyond the point of no return, while some are well within an individual's control. Here's how to stay legally prepared.

Car dashcam recording street ahead

Combating Nuclear Verdicts: Empirically Supported Strategies to Deflate the Effects of Anchoring Bias

by Sloan L. Abernathy

Sometimes a verdict can be the difference between amicability and nuclear level developments. But what is anchoring bias and how can strategy combat this?

Lawyer speaking in courtroom with crowd and judge in the foreground

The Push and Pitfalls of New York’s Attempt to Expand Wrongful Death Recovery

by Elizabeth M. Midgley and V. Christopher Potenza

The New York State Legislature recently went about updating certain wrongful death provisions and how they can be carried out in the future. Here's the latest.

Red tape blocking off a section of street

Attacked From All Sides: What Is Happening in the World of Restrictive Covenants?

by Christine Bestor Townsend

One employment lawyer explains how companies can navigate challenges of federal and state governmental scrutiny on restrictive covenant agreements.

Illustration of two men pulling on string with blue door between them