Insight

[Inspections, investigations, seizures and searches under the Environment Quality Act: how to navigate them ?] TRANSLATED FROM FRENCH

[Inspections, investigations, seizures and searches under the Environment Quality Act: how to navigate them ?] TRANSLATED FROM FRENCH

Christine D. Duchaine

Christine D. Duchaine

September 6, 2019 09:45 AM

Inspections, Investigations, Seizures and Searches under the Environment Quality Act: How to Find Your Way Around?

Christine Duchaine and Nicolas Dubé

Sodavex Law Firm

2016

1. INTRODUCTION

In the fall of 2015, a large and important investigation into corruption and tax evasion by the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA), known as the "Legal Project," was completed under the watchful eye of the media and the public.1 The case is Agence du revenu du Québec v. BT Céramique inc.2 (hereinafter "BT Céramiques").

In this case, the Honourable Justice Dominique Larochelle of the Court of Québec rendered a resounding decision in which she declared inadmissible the evidence gathered by the Agence du revenu du Québec (hereinafter [the]ARQ) that had been used to lay more than 1,000 charges under the Income Tax Act3 against former CRA officials and several construction contractors, including Mr. Tony Accurso.

Surprisingly, it was following a search of the CRA's offices that the ARQ obtained its evidence. However, it is important to note that this same evidence was originally collected by the CRA as part of a tax audit that led to search warrants. According to B.T. Ceramics and four other applicants, this was not a simple tax audit, but rather an investigation. The latter then argued that the ARQ's evidence initially collected by the CRA should be excluded on the basis of sections 8 and 24 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (hereinafter the "Canadian Charter"),4 while the ARQ claimed the right to use it, arguing that it had obtained the CRA's evidence through valid judicial authorizations and compliant searches.

According to Justice Larochelle, the CRA conducted a criminal investigation under the guise of a tax audit, thereby violating the applicants' rights under the Canadian Charter. This decision confirms once again that courts can go so far as to exclude evidence that is "significant, reliable and indispensable to support serious offences" where it has been collected in an unconstitutional manner and that the exclusion of such evidence is the appropriate remedy in light of the infringement.5

This judgment will have major repercussions on the entire investigation conducted by the ARQ since the other co-accused will only have to assert the same points of law and fact to demand the exclusion of the evidence gathered against them.

In her analysis, Larochelle J.A. applied the rule of principle enunciated by the Supreme Court of Canada in R. v. Jarvis6 ('Jarvis'):

When CRA officials no longer verify the tax liability, but attempt to establish the taxpayer's criminal liability under art. 239, there is an adversarial relationship between the state and the individual. As a result, the protections guaranteed by the Charter apply. In this case, the investigators must give an appropriate warning to the taxpayer. The coercive powers referred to in paras. 231.1(1) and 231.2(1) can no longer be used and search warrants must be obtained to continue the investigation.7

Seeking to determine at what point the relationship between the applicants and the state became adversarial, Larochelle J.A. examined the actions of the tax authorities and came to the following conclusion:

In conclusion, the applicants have shown convincingly that the predominant purpose of the audit procedure was to investigate the criminal liability of certain CRA officials as well as that of B.T. Ceramics Inc., Francesco Bruno and, incidentally, Ms. Palmerino and the shareholders. The investigation began as soon as the file was assigned for audit by Mr. St-Amand.8

As for the remedy sought by the applicants, namely the exclusion of evidence, Larochelle J.A. balanced the seriousness of the infringing conduct of the tax authorities, the impact of the violation on the applicants' rights under the Canadian Charter and society's interest in having the case decided on its merits.9 Once the exercise was completed, she concluded that the exclusion of the evidence was the appropriate remedy for the administration of justice.10

This recent decision is a clear example of an investigation that has been torn to pieces because of the confusion that still reigns between the powers of inspection and investigation granted to certain government officials responsible for the application and enforcement of certain laws.

Important lessons must be learned from this decision. First of all, it must be noted that the confusion between the concepts of investigation and inspection is still relevant. Secondly, this decision illustrates once again the fact that serious consequences can arise from this confusion and misuse of the powers vested in public servants.

Although they are drawn from a judgment rendered in a tax law context, these conclusions are equally relevant in environmental law since the Environment Quality Act11 (hereinafter the "EQA") grants broad powers to inspectors and investigators of the Ministère du Développement durable, de l'Environnement et de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques (hereinafter the "MDDELCC").

Like tax law, the environment is a highly regulated area. Moreover, it is an ever-evolving field, and the laws and regulations that aim to preserve the quality of the environment are constantly increasing and becoming more complex. In fact, many federal and provincial statutes give inspection and investigative powers to government officials responsible for preserving the quality of our environment. For example, the Canadian Environmental Protection Act,12 the Threatened or Vulnerable Species Act,13 the Pesticides Act,14 the Water Regime Act,15 the Natural Heritage Conservation Act,16 the Wildlife Conservation and Development Act,17 the Fisheries Act,18 the Species at Risk Act19 and the Migratory Birds Convention Act, 1994 all contain provisions for inspections and investigations. While it may be relevant to conduct a detailed analysis of the inspection and investigative powers granted by each of these statutes, the exercise would be lengthy and tedious, especially since the principles used to differentiate between these two concepts are the same, regardless of the statute and the area of law.

This is why in this article our analysis will be limited to the EQA and the demystification of the concepts of inspection and investigation under this Act. However, as mentioned above, the principles discussed in this article apply equally to other laws, such as the other environmental laws mentioned above, the laws on occupational health and safety, food, catering, language, consumer protection, etc.

Our analysis will lead us to define these two concepts, to determine the rights and obligations of inspectors and investigators responsible for the application and enforcement of the EQA, to define the scope of their powers, and to clearly identify the rights and obligations of the citizens inspected and investigated. We will also examine the relevance of distinguishing between these two concepts and identify the criteria for doing so, as well as the consequences that may result, both for the citizen and for the State. In closing, we will share with you our recommendations on how best to manage an inspection or investigation under the EQA.

However, before getting to the heart of the matter, we think it would be useful to clarify the terminology used by the case law, more particularly by the Supreme Court of Canada in certain cases. Indeed, in the course of our analysis, we found that the terms "investigation" and "search" are sometimes used by courts interchangeably and interchangeably. However, as we shall see in more detail below, these words do not have the same meaning. An investigation is not a search; The former being broader than the latter since an investigation can exist without the need for a search. In a nutshell, a search is the act of entering a place to seize something. The search is usually carried out in the course of an investigation, but powers similar to a search are also vested in the investigators, as will be seen below. It is therefore unfortunate that these terms are used interchangeably in some decisions, which has the effect of adding to the confusion. For the purposes of this article, therefore, we shall attempt to avoid this additional confusion and to make the necessary distinctions when dealing with an investigation or search.

That said, the Supreme Court of Canada has emphasized the importance of distinguishing between inspection and investigation,21 with which we are in complete agreement. We hope that this article can equip the reader and, ultimately, avoid confusion and abuse of power.

Related Articles

Tampa 2022 "Lawyer of the Year"


by Best Lawyers

George F. Gramling III is honored as 2022 "Lawyer of the Year" in Environmental Law for Tampa.

Tampa 2022 "Lawyer of the Year"

A Climate Duty


by Lara Douvartzidis and Samantha Daly

Converging trends in Australia and the Netherlands: reasonable foreseeability in climate change law and other novel developments.

Climate Change Law in Australia

The Great Debate Between Agriculture, Mining and Environment


by Rebecca Hoare

Can we really have it all?  The pursuit of the harmonious intersection of Australia’s agricultural and resources industries and the environment.

Australia Agriculture, Mining & Environment

French Court Relies On an Untraditional Colleague


by Rebecca Blackwell

A rural court in France is helping victims face their assailants with a surprising emotional support companion.

French Court's Untraditional Colleague

Government of the People


by Allyn Stern

A baker’s dozen tips for working with the Environmental Protection Agency

Tips for Working With the EPA

2020 Vision


by Sean Devlin

What Does Corporate Environmental Concern Look Like in 2020?

Best Lawyers Ones to Watch Canada Legal Insights

River Deep, Mountain High


by Hayley Carlock

Lessons from the birthplace of modern environmentalism.

How Environmental Nonprofits Got Their Start

Hotter and More Intense


by Lori Tripoli

Multiple Category 5 hurricanes. Drought. Wildfires. Climate change isn’t just damaging the environment and our health. It’s impacting the bottom line.

Climate Change

Outcomes Focus: Environmental Impact Bonds are All About Results


by Jeremy King

Environmental Impact Bonds offer governments, investors and non-government participants the opportunity to focus on outcomes rather than activities.

Environmental Impact Bonds

Go Fish


by Bart Freedman and Ben Mayer

The Impact of the Ninth Circuit’s “Culvert Decision” on Salmon Runs in Washington State.

K&L Gates

Trending Articles

Announcing the 2023 The Best Lawyers in America Honorees


by Best Lawyers

Only the top 5.3% of all practicing lawyers in the U.S. were selected by their peers for inclusion in the 29th edition of The Best Lawyers in America®.

Gold strings and dots connecting to form US map

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers® in the United States


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers listed in the 28th Edition of The Best Lawyers in America® and in the 2nd Edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2022.

2022 Best Lawyers Listings for United States

2021 Best Lawyers: The Global Issue


by Best Lawyers

The 2021 Global Issue features top legal talent from the most recent editions of Best Lawyers and Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch worldwide.

2021 Best Lawyers: The Global Issue

The U.S. Best Lawyers Voting Season Is Open


by Best Lawyers

The voting season for the 31st edition of The Best Lawyers in America® and the 5th edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America is officially underway, and we are offering some helpful advice to this year’s voters.

Golden figures of people standing on blue surface connected by white lines

How To Find A Pro Bono Lawyer


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers dives into the vital role pro bono lawyers play in ensuring access to justice for all and the transformative impact they have on communities.

Hands joined around a table with phone, paper, pen and glasses

The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2024 Launch


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is excited to announce The Best Lawyers in Australia™ for 2023, including the top lawyers and law firms from Australia.

Australian Parliament beside water at sunset

How Palworld Is Testing the Limits of Nintendo’s Legal Power


by Gregory Sirico

Many are calling the new game Palworld “Pokémon GO with guns,” noting the games striking similarities. Experts speculate how Nintendo could take legal action.

Animated figures with guns stand on top of creatures

What the Courts Say About Recording in the Classroom


by Christina Henagen Peer and Peter Zawadski

Students and parents are increasingly asking to use audio devices to record what's being said in the classroom. But is it legal? A recent ruling offer gives the answer to a question confusing parents and administrators alike.

Is It Legal for Students to Record Teachers?

Inflation Escalation


by Ashley S. Wagner

Inflation and rising costs are at the forefront of everyone’s mind as we enter 2023. The current volatile market makes it more important than ever to understand the rent escalation clauses in current and future commercial lease agreements.

Suited figure in front of rising market and inflated balloon

The Upcycle Conundrum


by Karen Kreider Gaunt

Laudable or litigious? What you need to know about potential copyright and trademark infringement when repurposing products.

Repurposed Products and Copyright Infringemen

8 Different Types of Criminal Defenses in Law


by Best Lawyers

Learn about the different types of criminal defenses available in law, including innocence, self-defense, insanity and more. Protect your rights today.

Silver handcuffs laying on finger printed papers

A Celebration of Excellence: The Best Lawyers in Canada 2024 Awards


by Best Lawyers

As we embark on the 18th edition of The Best Lawyers in Canada™, we are excited to highlight excellence and top legal talent across the country.

Abstract image of red and white Canada flag in triangles

Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2023


by Best Lawyers

The third edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America™ highlights the legal talent of lawyers who have been in practice less than 10 years.

Three arrows made of lines and dots on blue background

Wage and Overtime Laws for Truck Drivers


by Greg Mansell

For truck drivers nationwide, underpayment and overtime violations are just the beginning of a long list of problems. Below we explore the wages you are entitled to but may not be receiving.

Truck Driver Wage and Overtime Laws in the US

Choosing a Title Company: What a Seller Should Expect


by Roy D. Oppenheim

When it comes to choosing a title company, how much power exactly does a seller have?

Choosing the Title Company As Seller

The 2024 Best Lawyers in Spain™


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is honored to announce the 16th edition of The Best Lawyers in Spain™ and the third edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in Spain™ for 2024.

Tall buildings and rushing traffic against clouds and sun in sky