Insight

Department of Labor Proposes Limits to Tip Credit for Work "Directly Supporting" Tipped Work

Department of Labor Proposes Limits to Tip Credit for Work "Directly Supporting" Tipped Work

Michael C. "Mike" Harrington

Michael C. Harrington

December 15, 2022 08:55 PM

Executive Summary: On Monday, June 21, 2021, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) proposing limits on the tip credit employers can take during workweeks when tipped employees perform work that “directly supports” tipped work (“directly supporting work”) but does not itself produce tips. If adopted, the proposal would cap the use of the tip credit for “directly supporting work” at 20 percent of an employee’s total hours worked during a particular workweek. In addition, if an employee’s “directly supporting work” exceeds 30 minutes for any continuous period of time, the proposed regulation would prohibit employers from applying the tip credit to any portion of the continuous period. This latter prohibition would apply regardless of the total amount of “directly supporting work” during any workweek.

Background: Section 3(m) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) allows employers who meet certain requirements to credit a limited portion of the tips its tipped employees receive towards payment of those employees’ required minimum wage. The FLSA currently allows qualifying employers to claim a $5.12 “tip credit” towards the current $7.25 federal minimum wage of tipped employees. If an employee’s tips are sufficient to cover this tip credit, employers only need to pay tipped employees cash wages of $2.13 per hour to satisfy the minimum wage.

The FLSA defines a “tipped employee” as an employee who customarily and regularly receives more than $30 per month in tips. Often, however, tipped employees perform duties that, while related to their jobs, do not produce tips. For example, in addition to taking customers’ orders and delivering meals to their tables, restaurant servers often clean and set tables for the next customer or prepare items for tables so the servers can access the items more easily when serving customers.

Over the years, DOL had developed a non-regulatory enforcement policy known as the 80/20 rule. This allowed employers to apply the tip credit to time spent performing tasks related to a tipped employee’s non-tip producing duties, but only if that time did not exceed 20 percent of the employee’s total hours worked for the workweek.

During the Trump Administration, DOL discarded the 80/20 rule, first in a 2018 Wage opinion letter, followed by a February 15, 2019 Field Assistance Bulletin. DOL then codified this in a December 30, 2020 final rule (“the 2020 Tip final rule”) that amended several sections of the tip credit regulations. This included adding § 531.56(e)(2) to the regulations to allow employers to take a tip credit for “any hours that [a tipped] employee performs related, non-tipped duties contemporaneous with his or her tipped duties, or for a reasonable time immediately before or after performing the tipped duties.”

Initially, the 2020 Tip final rule was to become effective March 1, 2021. The Biden Administration, however, extended the effective date, first to April 30, 2021 and then to December 31, 2021, to consider whether to withdraw and re-propose revisions to the 2020 Tip final rule’s limits on application of the tip credit to non-tip producing work.

The Proposed New Rule: The NPRM proposes replacing § 531.56(e)(2) of the 2020 Tip final rule with a new § 531.56(f). Section 531.56(f), as proposed, would allow a tip credit only for work performed by a tipped employee that is “part of the tipped occupation.” Proposed § 531.56(f)(1) would define “work that is part of the tipped occupation” to include work that (a) produces tips as part of the tipped occupation, and (b) “directly supports” the tip-producing work, provided the “directly supporting work” is not performed for a “substantial amount of time.”

Proposed § 531.56(f)(1)(iii) states an employee has performed “directly supporting work” for “a substantial amount of time” if that work either (a) exceeds 20 percent of the hours worked during the employee’s work week, or (b) the employee performs directly supporting work for a continuous period exceeding 30 minutes. Section 531.56(f)(1)(iii)(A) states that, if a tipped employee spends more than 20 percent of the employee’s total hours worked for the workweek performing “directly supporting work,” employers cannot take a tip credit for any time that exceeds the 20 percent threshold. As to directly supporting work performed for continuous periods of more than 30 minutes, proposed § 531.56(f)(1)(iii)(B) would prohibit employers from taking a tip credit for any portion of such periods.

Proposed § 531.56(f)(1)(i) says work “directly supports” tip-producing work if it helps an employee perform the work for which the employee receives tips. In addition to the above-discussed example regarding servers, § 531.56(f)(1)(i) includes examples regarding bartenders and nail technicians. The preamble to the NPRM also discusses a few non-exclusive examples of “directly supporting work” involving other tipped occupations.

The NPRM requests comments to the proposed revisions to the tip credit regulations. The NPRM was published in the Federal Register on June 23, 2021, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2021-06-23/html/2021-13262.htm. Interested parties have 60 days from the date of the publication to submit comments, making them due on or before August 23, 2021.

Employers’ Bottom Line: Portions of the NPRM may change after DOL publishes the proposed rule in final form. Most likely, however, a final rule will retain some version of the proposed 80/20 rule and the disallowance of the tip credit for continuous periods of “directly supporting work” exceeding some specified limit. Employers should anticipate increased litigation and DOL enforcement following implementation of a final rule. Accordingly, employers using the tip credit should consider procedures to help monitor, schedule and limit non-tipped work by tipped employees. This could include exploring the feasibility of hiring a few workers to perform some or all of certain non-tipped duties. Employers should also consider administrative controls, such as rotating non-tipped duties among tipped staff to avoid or minimize occurrences of any employees’ non-tipped duties exceeding the limits proposed in the NPRM. These controls could also help employers identify instances when a particular employee has exceeded these limits. This would allow employers to avoid inadvertent minimum wage violations by paying an employee’s full minimum wage instead of taking a tip credit during the particular workweek. Employers should also be prepared to train managers and supervisors on efforts to control non-tipped work and comply with tip credit limits if some version of the DOL’s proposed revisions become part of the tip credit regulations.

If you have any questions regarding this Alert or other wage/hour or employment-related issues, please contact the author, Michael Prendergast, partner in our Jacksonville office and member of FordHarrison’s Wage/Hour practice group at mprendergast@fordharrison.com. Of course, you can also contact the FordHarrison attorney with whom you usually work.

Related Articles

With Reservations: Vaccine Liability and Restaurant Risk in 2021


by Justin Smulison

Navigating vaccine mandates, liability shields and legal risks for eateries in the pandemic recovery era.

Neon lit diner at nighttime called "Ok"

DOL Proposes New Overtime Rule and Salary Threshold for Exemption


by Megan Erickson Moritz

The Department of Labor is proposing a hike to the salary threshold requirement for exempted employees.

Zoomed In image of clock ticking

The Impact of Duran on the Certification Process in Wage and Hour Class Actions


by Tim Freudenberger and Nancy Lubrano

In May 2014, class action defense attorney Tim Freudenberger from Carothers DiSante & Freudenberger LLP, obtained a very favorable decision from the California Supreme Court in Duran v. U.S. Bank Nat. Assn., 59 Cal. 4th 1 (2014).

One brown haired businessman giving time in exchange to a blond-haired businessmen for money

Trending Articles

2026 Best Lawyers Awards: Recognizing Legal Talent Across the United States


by Jamilla Tabbara

The 2026 editions highlight the top 5% of U.S. attorneys, showcase emerging practice areas and reveal trends shaping the nation’s legal profession.

Map of the United States represented in The Best Lawyers in America 2026 awards

Gun Rights for Convicted Felons? The DOJ Says It's Time.


by Bryan Driscoll

It's more than an administrative reopening of a long-dormant issue; it's a test of how the law reconciles the right to bear arms with protecting the public.

Firearms application behind jail bars

2026 Best Lawyers Awards in Canada: Marking 20 Years of Excellence


by Jamilla Tabbara

Honoring Canada’s most respected lawyers and spotlighting the next generation shaping the future of law.

Shining Canadian map marking the 2026 Best Lawyers awards coverage

Revealing the 2026 Best Lawyers Awards in Germany, France, Switzerland and Austria


by Jamilla Tabbara

These honors underscore the reach of the Best Lawyers network and its focus on top legal talent.

map of Germany, France, Switzerland and Austria

Best Lawyers 2026: Discover the Honorees in Brazil, Mexico, Portugal, South Africa and Spain


by Jamilla Tabbara

A growing international network of recognized legal professionals.

Map highlighting the 2026 Best Lawyers honorees across Brazil, Mexico, Portugal, South Africa and Sp

How to Sue for Defamation: Costs, Process and What to Expect


by Bryan Driscoll

Learn the legal standards, costs and steps involved when you sue for defamation, including the difference between libel and slander.

Group of people holding papers with speech bubbles above them

Build Your Legal Practice with Effective Online Networking


by Jamilla Tabbara

How thoughtful online networking supports sustained legal practice growth.

Abstract web of connected figures symbolizing online networking among legal professionals

Algorithmic Exclusion


by Bryan Driscoll

The Workday lawsuit and the future of AI in hiring.

Workday Lawsuit and the Future of AI in Hiring headline

Blogging for Law Firms: Turning Content into Client Connections


by Jamilla Tabbara

How law firms use blogs to earn trust and win clients.

Lawyer typing blog content on laptop in office

Reddit’s Lawsuit Could Change How Much AI Knows About You


by Justin Smulison

Big AI is battling for its future—your data’s at stake.

Reddit Anthropic Lawsuit headline

How to Choose a Good Lawyer: Tips, Traits and Questions to Ask


by Laurie Villanueva

A Practical Guide for Your First-Time Hiring a Lawyer

Three professional lawyers walking together and discussing work

The 2026 Best Lawyers Awards in Chile, Colombia and Puerto Rico


by Jamilla Tabbara

The region’s most highly regarded lawyers.

Map highlighting Chile, Colombia and Puerto Rico for the 2026 Best Lawyers Awards

Common-Law Marriage in Indiana: Are You Legally Protected?


by Laurie Villanueva

Understanding cohabitation rights and common-law marriage recognition in Indiana.

Married Indiana couple in their home

Why Jack Dorsey and Elon Musk Want to 'Delete All IP Law'


by Bryan Driscoll

This Isn’t Just a Debate Over How to Pay Creators. It’s a Direct Challenge to Legal Infrastructure.

Elon Musk and Jack Dorsey standing together Infront of the X logo

AI Tools for Lawyers: How Smithy AI Solves Key Challenges


by Jamilla Tabbara

Understand the features and benefits within the Best Lawyers Digital Marketing Platform.

Legal professional editing profile content with Smithy AI

Alimony Explained: Who Qualifies, How It Works and What to Expect


by Bryan Driscoll

A practical guide to understanding alimony, from eligibility to enforcement, for anyone navigating divorce

two figures standing on stacks of coins