Piliero & Associates PLLC

1 Best Lawyers award

Awarded Practice Areas

Litigation - Mergers and Acquisitions

Biography

Founded by Robert D. Piliero, a seasoned litigator with more than 40 years of front-line experience, Piliero & Associates PLLC helps companies and high net-worth individuals resolve business disputes. The Firm is justly proud of its track record in assisting plaintiffs to vindicate their rights and defendants to overcome spurious claims against them. Bob's long and diverse experience has given him a deep appreciation that the goal shared by all his litigation clients is to achieve a commercially advantageous resolution of the dispute, with aggressive litigation used as a tool, not as an objective in itself. If the dispute cannot be resolved promptly and on reasonable terms, the Firm has the experience and resources to segue seamlessly from negotiator to warrior. If additional bandwidth is needed for complex litigation, the Firm works with other experienced lawyers through its of-Counsel affiliation with Morea Schwartz Bradham Friedman & Brown, LLP, www.msblaw.com,

The Firm is amenable to contingent- or hybrid-fee arrangements in appropriate cases.

Awards & Recognitions

Mr. Piliero has been selected for inclusion in the Best Lawyers in America USA Guide (Litigation-Mergers & Acquisitions since 2012, as well as the listing of New York Super Lawyers each year since 2007, and he has long been recognized by Martindale-Hubbell as an AV (Preeminent) peer-rated attorney, the highest possible Martindale attorney rating for legal ability and professional ethics.

Piliero & Associates PLLC

1 Best Lawyers award

Overview

  • Georgetown University, graduated 1974
  • University of Pennsylvania

  • American Bar Association - Member
  • New York City Bar Association - Member

  • Supreme Court of the United States
  • U.S. Courts of Appeals For the Second, Third and District of Columbia and Federal Circuits
  • U.S. District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, and the District of New Jersey
  • American Bar Association - Member
  • New York City Bar Association - Member
  • Georgetown University, graduated 1974
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Supreme Court of the United States
  • U.S. Courts of Appeals For the Second, Third and District of Columbia and Federal Circuits
  • U.S. District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, and the District of New Jersey

Client Testimonials

Awards & Focus

Lawyer of the Year Badge - 2022 - Litigation - Mergers and Acquisitions
Named "Lawyer of the Year" by Best Lawyers® for:
  • Litigation - Mergers and Acquisitions, New York City (2022)
Recognized in The Best Lawyers in America® 2026 for work in:
  • Litigation - Mergers and Acquisitions
Additional Areas of Practice:
  • Arbitration
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Litigation - Intellectual Property
  • Litigation - Securities
  • Securitization and Structured Finance Law

Case History

Cases
  • REPRESENTATIVE MATTERS
Commercial Disputes. Because few people admit that they are breaching a contract, such breaches are often shrouded in deception. Following are a few examples of this type of commercial dispute that the Firm has handled: · A young musician who co-created an off-Broadway production and co-composed its iconic musical score. was assured by his older and more experienced collaborators his share of royalties would be fair if not generous by industry standards. After many years, he learned that they had been paying him only a fraction of the amount he deserved for his creative contributions. His former friends categorically denied liability and for more than 2 years, engaged in “scorched earth” litigation to beat our client into submission. Three days into a jury trial,defendants finally capitulated and paid our client the full amount of royalties they had surreptitiously diverted from him for a quarter of a century. · Acting on behalf of minority shareholders, the Firm wrested control of the famed Chelsea Hotel from majority shareholders and incumbent management. After a 16-day Arbitration Hearing, our clients were awarded substantial monetary damages, control of the Board of Directors, and reimbursement of all their attorneys’ fees. · A middle-market investment bank engaged the Firm after it learned that its intended merger partner was simultaneously pursuing an alternative business combination. By that time, however, our client had already discontinued critical service areas that were to be filled by its merger partner. After litigation began against both the intended merger partner and its new suitor, our client was made whole financially and was able to develop another business plan. Disputes Involving Financial Services These disputes often involve highly complex financial instruments, significant dollar (or other currency) amounts and, in some cases, existential threats. Following are a few examples: · In the latter part of 2007 and throughout 2008, trillions of dollars of wealth evaporated as the value of residential real estate plummeted, the mortgage-backed securities products that were packaged around that real estate became worthless, and the entire global banking system and financial markets crumbled. The Firm’s lawyers became deeply involved in the litigation that exploded in the wake of this economic crisis. In one particularly noteworthy case, we represented a Hedge Fund seeking nearly $200 million in damages from a foreign global bank for reneging on its agreement to sell our client the riskiest, so-called “equity,” tranche of a $1 billion mortgage backed CDO-squared. After signing the contract, the foreign-bank counterparty belatedly realized that the market would soon turn against it and so kept postponing the closing to avoid the consequences of its error. This effectively deprived the Hedge Fund of the enormous financial benefit to which it was entitled under the contract. The Firm was able to develop strong evidence in discovery establishing that if the counterparty had closed on the transaction when it should have done so according to industry standards, the investment would have yielded an enormous profit for our client. As a result, shortly before trial,the foreign bank made our client an “offer it couldn’t refuse.” · We helped a dot-com billionaire avoid massive losses arising out of his investment in a complex equity derivative product, after he discovered that the bespoke investment contained an undisclosed value-adjusting trigger that was enormously disadvantageous to him. · The Firm represented several prominent affiliated hedge funds in 18 related federal and state court class actions and individual litigations, as well as in NASD and AAA arbitrations, arising out of criminal conduct of a rogue portfolio manager that resulted in the liquidation of the funds. Employment Disputes The Firm regularly advises both companies and executive-level employees regarding employment matters and, where appropriate, represents them in arbitrations and litigations. Following are a few examples. · A senior executive of a well-known multinational in the luxury/fashion industry engaged the Firm when the general manager of his division told him that the geographic and functional scope of his responsibility would both soon be reduced significantly, notwithstanding what had until then been stellar reviews and a fast-track career path of rapid advancement. Our client refused to accept the demotion, and was fired. Relying on New York law’s strong presumption of “at will” employment in the absence of a contract specifying a fixed term of employment, the employer claimed that its unfettered right to terminate his employment included the right to demote him. After a vigorously contested arbitration proceeding culminating in three days of Hearings, the three-member Panel of Arbitrators unanimously accepted the Firm’s advocacy of our client’s position, restored all back pay and benefits and awarded him compensatory damages and attorneys’ fees. · A frequent source of controversy between employers and employees involves attempts to enforce post-employment non-competition agreements. Under New York precedents, the question of enforceability is highly nuanced, and the outcome is far from predictable. The Firm has successfully litigated both sides of the issue by presenting the facts and arguments that enabled the court or arbitrator to strike a balance between promoting fair competition and protecting confidential information that was more favorable to our clients' positions Intellectual Property Disputes. Prompt legal action is required in situations where a business faces the potential loss of the exclusive use of its intellectual property or when an individual is unfairly deprived of just compensation for her creations. The Firm has extensive experience on both sides of these disputes. For example: · The Firm has successfully represented numerous luxury goods and fashion apparel manufacturers in trademark infringement, gray market and counterfeiting disputes. · We defeated a claim that a manufacturer was misappropriating trade secrets which, if successful, would have forced the closure of one of its principal lines of business. · We successfully prosecuted and defended claims on behalf of a bus manufacturer relating to one of its novel designs that enabled transportation and tour companies to enjoy enormous cost savings with no loss of revenue. Professional Negligence Claims. When lawyers, accountants, architects, engineers and other service providers make mistakes, the economic consequences can be <
  • Other Court Admissions
  • U.S. Supreme Court
  • U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Second, Third, Ninth, District of Columbia and Federal Circuits
  • U.S. District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, and the Districts of New Jersey and Arizona
  • U.S. Court of International Trade
  • Other Practice Areas Include:
Securities Litigation

Your browser is not fully compatible with our automatic printer friendly formatting.

Please use the print button to print this profile page.

Spinning circle Big letter B