Insight

New Amendment to NJ Law Against Discrimination Renders Common Employment Agreement Provisions Unenforceable

New Amendment to NJ Law Against Discrimination Renders Common Employment Agreement Provisions Unenforceable

James P. Anelli

James P. Anelli

April 2, 2019 10:26 AM

By: James P. Anelli and Tanya A. Salgado

New Jersey employers should take note of a newly enacted amendment to the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (LAD) that directly impacts employment agreements and settlement agreements of discrimination claims. The amendment was signed by Governor Phil Murphy on March 18, 2019 and is effective immediately.

The law is seen as a response to the “Me Too” movement, which brought public scrutiny of certain commonly used employment practices, such as confidentiality clauses in settlement agreements of employment claims. Such clauses are perceived, rightly or wrongly, as enabling repeat sexual harassment offenders. Arbitration agreements which compel the private arbitration of employment discrimination lawsuits have also come under attack in conjunction with the “Me Too” movement. Activists argue that sexual harassment claims should be adjudicated in the court system, not in private arbitration forums.

New Jersey has responded to the criticism of these employment practices by passing an amendment to the New Jersey LAD which is broad in scope and impact. The amendment “forbids” confidentiality clauses in employment agreements pertaining to all claims of “discrimination, retaliation, or harassment” under the LAD, not just sexual harassment claims. The amendment also “prohibits” any provision in an employment contract that “waives any substantive or procedural right or remedy relating to a claim of discrimination, retaliation, or harassment,” and “prohibits” prospective waivers of rights or remedies under the LAD. This language seemingly may curtail use of arbitration agreements of discrimination claims, but it remains to be seen how this amendment will be implemented. In addition, the regulation of arbitration by state law may be questionable in light of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333 (2011) (holding that in an analogous context involving issues of class-wide representation in arbitration involving consumer contracts, the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. §2, displaces state law that prohibits outright the arbitration of a particular type of claim).

The key provisions of the LAD amendment include:

  • Any provision in an employment contract that waives any substantive or procedural right or remedy relating to a claim of discrimination, retaliation or harassment is against public policy and unenforceable.
  • No prospective waiver of rights or remedies under the LAD.
  • No confidentiality provisions in employment contracts or agreements pertaining to discrimination claims. The amendment states that any provision in an employment contract or agreement that has the purpose or effect of “concealing the details relating to a claim of discrimination, retaliation, or harassment” is against public policy and unenforceable.
  • Settlement agreements with a confidentiality clause must include a notice. In the case of a settlement agreement resolving a discrimination, retaliation or harassment claim, the employer must include a “bold, prominently placed notice” stating that “although the parties may have agreed to keep the settlement and underlying facts confidential, such a provision in an agreement is unenforceable against the employer if the employee publicly reveals sufficient details of the claim so that the employer is reasonably identifiable.”

The amendment clarifies that it does not prohibit non-compete agreements, nor does it prohibit non-disclosure agreements of proprietary information such as non-public trade secrets, business plans and customer information. The amendment forbids retaliation against a person who declines to enter into an agreement that contains a provision that is against public policy and unenforceable. The amendment provides for a private right of action and includes common law tort remedies and reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs for the prevailing party.

All employers in New Jersey should be aware of this groundbreaking amendment as it relates to provisions that are commonly used in employment agreements. If you would like additional details about the amendment or assistance with its implications please contact James Anelli (anellij@whiteandwilliams.com; 201.368.7224), Tanya Salgado (salgadot@whiteandwilliams.com; 215.864.6368) or another member of our Labor and Employment Group.

Related Articles

Fasken Attorneys on Their 2019 "Law Firm of the Year" Award Win


by Best Lawyers

Lawyers from the Canadian firm discus their employment law practice and the changes coming to the Canadain legal market.

Fasken Law Firm Q&A, Karen Sargeant, Claire Vachon, and Martin Denyes

Algorithmic Exclusion


by Bryan Driscoll

The Workday lawsuit and the future of AI in hiring.

Workday Lawsuit and the Future of AI in Hiring headline

The End of Background Circumstances


by Bryan Driscoll

This reaches beyond doctrinal cleanup. It signals a profound shift.

End of background circumstances balancing discrimination headline

Changes in California Employment Law for 2025


by Laurie Villanueva

What employers need to know to ensure compliance in the coming year and beyond

A pair of hands holding a checklist featuring a generic profile picture and the state of California

IN PARTNERSHIP

The Long, Short, Thick and Thin of It


by Avrohom Gefen

“Appearance discrimination” based on employees’ height and weight is the latest hot-button issue in employment law. Here’s a guide to avoid discrimination.

Woman stands in front of mirror holding suit jacket

A Double Dose of Power


by Constance Endelicato

Women in the Legal and Medical Professions Can Work Together to Dismantle Gender Inequality

Blue background with red heels, a blue shoe, and circle with a missing triangle in the center

Racial Discrimination Suit Against NFL May End in Arbitration


by John Ettorre

A former Miami Dolphins head coach is up against the NLF in a discrimination case that is on a path to arbitration; the NFL remains focused on equality for their diverse coaching staff.

Miami Dolphins former head coach Brian Flores’ on the field with crowd blurred

WATCH: A Landmark Win for LGBTQ Rights


by Best Lawyers

Two top employment attorneys join the CEO of Best Lawyers to discuss the landmark Supreme Court ruling protecting gay and transgender employees.

Group of diverse individuals gathered around a colorful rainbow

Leading the Evolution in Workplace Law


by Best Lawyers

Colin G.M. Gibson discusses workplace safety, issues such as raising the minimum wage, and job-protected leaves. 

Colin G.M. Gibson discusses workplace safety

Unwanted Advances


by Natalie Weatherford

The #MeToo movement has brought unprecedented attention to the problem of sexual assault and abuse. Litigating civil cases along these lines can be tricky, though. Here’s an overview.

Attorneys walking around a building in a rush

New York Legal News: Key Cases and Firm Updates


by Best Lawyers

From courtroom wins to landmark investigations, New York lawyers continue to shape the legal landscape.

New York Lawyer in a suit with a black and white filter

In the News: Southern California


by Best Lawyers

A roundup of notable news of listed lawyers in Southern California.

An outdoor location in Southern California

Washington, D.C. Legal Community Highlights and Recognitions


by Best Lawyers

A roundup of news from listed lawyers in the Washington, D.C., area

Close up of two hands opening a curtain looking at entertainment

The Fighter From New York


by Justin Smulison

Benedict Morelli discusses recent successes and high-profile casework.

The Fighter of New York, Benedict Morelli

Proceed with Caution!


by Bernard J. Bobber

When Section 7 protections clash with employers’ duty to prevent workplace bigotry

Megaphone icon announcing something with masses of people in four corners

Jamie Gorelick Gets It Right


by Meredith Hinshaw-Chaney

Jamie Gorelick on politics, justice, and the rule of law.

Best Lawyers advisory board member Jamie Gorelick of Wilmer Hale in grey suit smiles

Trending Articles

2026 Best Lawyers Awards: Recognizing Legal Talent Across the United States


by Jamilla Tabbara

The 2026 editions highlight the top 5% of U.S. attorneys, showcase emerging practice areas and reveal trends shaping the nation’s legal profession.

Map of the United States represented in The Best Lawyers in America 2026 awards

Gun Rights for Convicted Felons? The DOJ Says It's Time.


by Bryan Driscoll

It's more than an administrative reopening of a long-dormant issue; it's a test of how the law reconciles the right to bear arms with protecting the public.

Firearms application behind jail bars

2026 Best Lawyers Awards in Canada: Marking 20 Years of Excellence


by Jamilla Tabbara

Honoring Canada’s most respected lawyers and spotlighting the next generation shaping the future of law.

Shining Canadian map marking the 2026 Best Lawyers awards coverage

Revealing the 2026 Best Lawyers Awards in Germany, France, Switzerland and Austria


by Jamilla Tabbara

These honors underscore the reach of the Best Lawyers network and its focus on top legal talent.

map of Germany, France, Switzerland and Austria

Best Lawyers 2026: Discover the Honorees in Brazil, Mexico, Portugal, South Africa and Spain


by Jamilla Tabbara

A growing international network of recognized legal professionals.

Map highlighting the 2026 Best Lawyers honorees across Brazil, Mexico, Portugal, South Africa and Sp

How to Sue for Defamation: Costs, Process and What to Expect


by Bryan Driscoll

Learn the legal standards, costs and steps involved when you sue for defamation, including the difference between libel and slander.

Group of people holding papers with speech bubbles above them

Build Your Legal Practice with Effective Online Networking


by Jamilla Tabbara

How thoughtful online networking supports sustained legal practice growth.

Abstract web of connected figures symbolizing online networking among legal professionals

Algorithmic Exclusion


by Bryan Driscoll

The Workday lawsuit and the future of AI in hiring.

Workday Lawsuit and the Future of AI in Hiring headline

Blogging for Law Firms: Turning Content into Client Connections


by Jamilla Tabbara

How law firms use blogs to earn trust and win clients.

Lawyer typing blog content on laptop in office

Reddit’s Lawsuit Could Change How Much AI Knows About You


by Justin Smulison

Big AI is battling for its future—your data’s at stake.

Reddit Anthropic Lawsuit headline

How to Choose a Good Lawyer: Tips, Traits and Questions to Ask


by Laurie Villanueva

A Practical Guide for Your First-Time Hiring a Lawyer

Three professional lawyers walking together and discussing work

The 2026 Best Lawyers Awards in Chile, Colombia and Puerto Rico


by Jamilla Tabbara

The region’s most highly regarded lawyers.

Map highlighting Chile, Colombia and Puerto Rico for the 2026 Best Lawyers Awards

Common-Law Marriage in Indiana: Are You Legally Protected?


by Laurie Villanueva

Understanding cohabitation rights and common-law marriage recognition in Indiana.

Married Indiana couple in their home

Why Jack Dorsey and Elon Musk Want to 'Delete All IP Law'


by Bryan Driscoll

This Isn’t Just a Debate Over How to Pay Creators. It’s a Direct Challenge to Legal Infrastructure.

Elon Musk and Jack Dorsey standing together Infront of the X logo

AI Tools for Lawyers: How Smithy AI Solves Key Challenges


by Jamilla Tabbara

Understand the features and benefits within the Best Lawyers Digital Marketing Platform.

Legal professional editing profile content with Smithy AI

Alimony Explained: Who Qualifies, How It Works and What to Expect


by Bryan Driscoll

A practical guide to understanding alimony, from eligibility to enforcement, for anyone navigating divorce

two figures standing on stacks of coins