Insight

Amendment to the Federal Labor Law in Mexico: What's Next?

Amendment to the Federal Labor Law in Mexico: What's Next?

Héctor González Graf

Héctor González Graf

June 14, 2019 07:24 PM

On May 1st, a symbolic date, an executive decree was published in the “Diario Oficial de la Federación” (Federal Official Gazette), by which various dispositions in connection to labor and employment justice, freedom to organize and to bargain collectively, contained in the “Ley Federal del Trabajo” (Federal Labor Law), the “Ley Orgánica del Poder Judicial de la Federación” (Organic Law of the Federal Judicial Power), the “Ley Federal de la Defensoría Pública” (Federal Law of the Public Defender), the “Ley del Instituto del Fondo Nacional de la Vivienda para los Trabajadores” (Law of the Institute of Funding for Workers Housing) and the “Ley del Seguro Social” (Social Security Law), were amended, modified and revoked.

MGGL is pleased to present an executive summary of the most relevant aspects of this reform in connection to its impact on individual rights, trade union issues and collective brgaining aspects, conciliation as a way to prevent conflicts and as condition for legal actions to proceed, new procedures before Labor Courts and general matters regarding the authorities, and the transition in the administration of labor justice from the executive to the judicial power.

The Labor Law Reform creates expectations and uncertainty as it is tied to the “TMEC” (USMCA) trade agreement, because of its particular legislative process, and the disengagement by the corporate sector. Nevertheless, it does contain aspects that will contribute to a more balanced labor system, stricter management of employment relations, and a more expeditious justice committed to due process.

1. Individual Employment Relationships

Employment stability will be transformed. On one side, the law amendment establishes the possibility for the employer to terminate the employment relationship with (i) trusted employees, (ii) those with a seniority of less than a year, (iii) domestic, (iv) temporary, or (v) those that due to their services are in direct and permanent contact with the employer; by filing a parallel proceeding before the Labor Court where the amount of the corresponding severance will be deposited.

On the other side, the reform establishes that denying the dismissal and offering the reinstatement to the employee will not exempt the employer from proving his defense. This means that the employer will have the burden of proving the inexistence of the dismissal. Therefore, the reinstatement offer will no longer be used as a defense strategy.

Additionally, if the dismissal notice is not delivered to the employee, the discharge will not be deemed as unjustified by legal definition. The omission of delivering or notifying the dismissal notice will only lead to the presumption that the discharge was unjustified, since it may be proved otherwise. This opens the possibility of proving the legal cause of the dismissal in trial, in spite of not delivering or notifying the corresponding notice.

Domestic employees will now be subject to insurance before the “IMSS” (Social Security Institute), under the regime determined by the applicable laws. Thus, this right is not claimable as of this date.

2. Labor unions and collective bargaining

The law amendment regulates thoroughly the creation and organization of labor unions. The new model is based on democracy and representation, aiming for the freedom of collective bargaining and the protection of interests of employees and employers. Labor unions shall comply with formal requisites that evidence their democratic processes and transparency in its management, the administration of resources and the constraint of their inherent activities to the applicable legal purposes.

Union activities and purposes are regulated with further detail. After the law amendment, labor unions will be able to create and manage cooperative associations and savings banks for their members, but will have the express prohibition, among others, of participating in schemes for evading taxes or breaching employer obligations in connection to their employees, as well as participating in simulations as employers. Collective extortion will also be sanctioned, even with the cancellation of the register as union.

Collective bargaining will be conditioned to the issuance of a “constancia de representatividad” (representation record). The application for obtaining this record will be filed before the “Centro Federal de Conciliación y Registro Laboral” (Federal Office of Conciliation and Labor Register); support from 30% of the employees of the corresponding workplace is required, and will be in force for six months. The right to strike to request the execution of a collective bargaining agreement will be conditioned to obtaining the representation record. For registering a collective bargaining agreement or a revision agreement, it will be necessary for the employees to vote the agreement’s content.

3. Conciliation Function

Pre-trial conciliation is a previous requisite for the employee to exercise legal actions before Labor Courts. No lawsuit will be processed without previously concluding the conciliation stage, except for cases of labor discrimination, designation of beneficiaries, claims of social security benefits, claims for holding the collective bargaining agreement or contract-law, as well as matters related to union bylaws and their amendments.

The pre-trial conciliation stage includes: the request of the parties or one of them to initiate the proceeding before the Federal Office of Conciliation, whether Federal or Local (depending on the jurisdiction derived from the activity of the employer), as well as the holding of the hearing of conciliation (obligatory) and the consequent execution of an agreement. The agreement reached will be in full legal force and only those conditions that imply a waiver of rights will be subject to impugnation.

4. New proceedings of justice administration

Labor Courts in the states will be in charge of the conflicts arisen at their jurisdiction that do not correspond by exception to the Federal Labor Courts. Regarding the ordinary process, plaintiff employees shall file their lawsuit along with the proofs to be rendered and the defendant employer must respond within the following 15 days to the date in which he was summoned to trial, offering the corresponding proofs.

In accordance with the principles of the law amendment, regarding the organization freedom and union democracy, it is established within the special trial, a special collective proceeding. This proceeding does not require the representation record for exercising the action and, given its nature, it does not allow neither previous negotiation nor during the proceeding. This proceeding is designed for solving through a referendum among the unionized employees, matters regarding the union that holds the collective bargaining agreement, as well as collective issues such as the suspension and collective termination of employment contracts, among others.

5. Authorities and transition rules

The law amendment provides the creation or modification of the scope of authorities related to the administration of the employment relationships, in the following terms:

  • Register function and administration of collective bargaining agreements

As long as the Federal Office of Labor Conciliation and Register is not fully operational (maximum two years), the STPS (Ministry of Labor) and the Labor Boards will continue bearing the registration responsibilities in connection to labor unions, in terms of the Law in force until May 1st, 2019. The Organic Law of the Office shall be issued within the 180 days that follow the executive decree’s entry in force.

  • Jurisdictional and conciliation function

Labor Boards will continue in charge of the matters in trial as of this date, as well as those that arise after the executive decree is in force, in terms of the legal dispositions before the reform, until the Labor Courts begin operating. Boards will also have to present a plan for concluding the matters in trial within the 120 days that follow the executive decree’s entry in force.

While the Local Courts and Conciliation Offices will have to begin operations in the following three years, the Federal Courts and Federal Office, regarding the conciliation function, will have to do so in the following four years after the decree is in force. The “Procuraduría del Trabajo” (Employment Public Prosecution) will temporarily keep its conciliatory faculties.

Collective Bargaining Agreements shall be revised at least once within the following four years, in accordance with the procedure established in the law amendment. The default in revising or complying with the requisites of communication and approval from the employees will cause the termination of the collective bargaining agreement. For consulting the employees regarding the agreement’s content, the Ministry of Labor shall establish a verification protocol within the three months that follow the decree’s entry in force.

The labor law amendment will take effect gradually. Those matters that have an impact on administrative and/or jurisdictional individual and collective proceeding will be subject to the functioning of the new conciliatory, registration and jurisdictional authorities, so the legal framework before the reform will continue being applicable. Nevertheless, it does incorporate dispositions that reinforce the compliance of the law, as well as the rights and obligations of the employees and employers in their employment relationships that will be claimable as of the entry in force of the executive decree.

# # #

For more information, please contact:

Tel. +52 55 5340 6840 - info@mggl.com.mx - www.mggl.com.mx

Related Articles

Unveiling the 2025 Best Lawyers Editions in Brazil, Mexico, Portugal and South Africa


by Jennifer Verta

Best Lawyers celebrates the finest in law, reaffirming its commitment to the global legal community.

Flags of Brazil, Mexico, Portugal and South Africa, representing Best Lawyers countries

The Best Lawyers in Mexico Celebrates a Milestone Year


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is excited to announce the 15th edition of The Best Lawyers in Mexico™ and the second edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in Mexico™ for 2024.

Sky view of Mexico city scape

2023 Best Lawyers Mexican Awards


by Best Lawyers

Announcing Mexico's 2023 recognized lawyers and firms.

Green, white and red stripes with symbol in center

The Best Lawyers in Mexico™ 2022


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms.

The Best Lawyers in Mexico™ 2022

Summer Voting Season Is Here!


by Best Lawyers

Summer 2021 voting is open to all lawyers listed in Best Lawyers in Chile, Colombia, Peru, Brazil, Mexico, Portugal, South Africa and Spain.

How To Vote On Your Best Lawyers Ballot

Announcing the 2021 Best Lawyers in Mexico


by Best Lawyers

For the twelfth year, honoring the top lawyers and firms in Mexico.

2021 Best Lawyers in Mexico

Moving With the World


by Best Lawyers

Attorney Adrián Vázquez from the Mexican firm Vázquez Tercero & Zepeda discusses the firm's 2019 award, changes coming to the WTO, Mexico's shifting trade strategy, and more.

Vázquez Tercero & Zepeda Law Firm of the Year

Technology and the Changing IP Climate in Mexico


by Best Lawyers

Roberto Arochi discusses Arochi & Lindner’s 2019 “Law Firm of the Year” award for Intellectual Property Law in Mexico in an interview with Best Lawyers.

Arochi & Lindner "Law Firm of the Year" Q&A

The Economic Landscape Changing Capital Markets Law in Mexico


by Best Lawyers

Michell Nader discusses his firm's 2019 "Law Firm of the Year" award for Capital Markets Law in Mexico.

Nader, Hayaux & Goebel Interview

Q&A with Pablo Perezalonso Eguía of Ritch Mueller


by Best Lawyers

An interview with Pablo Perezalonso Eguía of 2018 Mexican "Law Firm of the Year" Ritch Mueller.

Pablo Perezalonso Eguía – Ritch Mueller

Q&A with Eduardo Kleinberg of Basham Ringe y Correa


by Best Lawyers

"Law Firm of the Year" interview with Eduardo Kleinberg of Basham Ringe y Correa.

Eduardo Kleinberg of Basham Ringe y Correa

Centro Mexicano Pro Bono, A.C.


by Ivette Montero and Paulina Bojalil

Among other important features, ProBono.MX encourages pro bono work by defining a policy for each law firm, according to its areas of expertise, preferred social causes, and by filtrating cases through a scrupulous study in which they verify the vulnerability of the beneficiary and if pro bono work is needed.

Centro Mexicano Pro Bono

Trending Articles

Introducing the 2026 Best Lawyers Awards in Australia, Japan, New Zealand and Singapore


by Jennifer Verta

This year’s awards reflect the strength of the Best Lawyers network and its role in elevating legal talent worldwide.

2026 Best Lawyers Awards in Australia, Japan, New Zealand and Singapore

Revealing the 2026 Best Lawyers Awards in Germany, France, Switzerland and Austria


by Jamilla Tabbara

These honors underscore the reach of the Best Lawyers network and its focus on top legal talent.

map of Germany, France, Switzerland and Austria

Effective Communication: A Conversation with Jefferson Fisher


by Jamilla Tabbara

The power of effective communication beyond the law.

 Image of Jefferson Fisher and Phillip Greer engaged in a conversation about effective communication

The 2025 Legal Outlook Survey Results Are In


by Jennifer Verta

Discover what Best Lawyers honorees see ahead for the legal industry.

Person standing at a crossroads with multiple intersecting paths and a signpost.

The Best Lawyers Network: Global Recognition with Long-term Value


by Jamilla Tabbara

Learn how Best Lawyers' peer-review process helps recognized lawyers attract more clients and referral opportunities.

Lawyers networking

Jefferson Fisher: The Secrets to Influential Legal Marketing


by Jennifer Verta

How lawyers can apply Jefferson Fisher’s communication and marketing strategies to build trust, attract clients and grow their practice.

Portrait of Jefferson Fisher a legal marketing expert

Is Your Law Firm’s Website Driving Clients Away?


by Jamilla Tabbara

Identify key website issues that may be affecting client engagement and retention.

Phone displaying 'This site cannot be reached' message

A Guide to Workers' Compensation Law for 2025 and Beyond


by Bryan Driscoll

A woman with a laptop screen reflected in her glasses

Medical Malpractice Reform Trends in Texas, Utah, Georgia and SC


by Bryan Driscoll

A fresh wave of medical malpractice reform is reshaping the law.

Medical Malpractice Reform Trends hed

Why Jack Dorsey and Elon Musk Want to 'Delete All IP Law'


by Bryan Driscoll

This Isn’t Just a Debate Over How to Pay Creators. It’s a Direct Challenge to Legal Infrastructure.

Elon Musk and Jack Dorsey standing together Infront of the X logo

Best Lawyers Launches CMO Advisory Board


by Jamilla Tabbara

Strategic counsel from legal marketing’s most experienced voices.

Group photo of Best Lawyers CMO Advisory Board members

Common Law Firm Landing Page Problems to Address


by Jamilla Tabbara

Identify key issues on law firm landing pages to improve client engagement and conversion.

Laptop showing law firm landing page analytics

Changes in California Employment Law for 2025


by Laurie Villanueva

What employers need to know to ensure compliance in the coming year and beyond

A pair of hands holding a checklist featuring a generic profile picture and the state of California

New Employment Law Recognizes Extraordinary Stress Is Everyday Reality for NY Lawyers


by Bryan Driscoll

A stressed woman has her head resting on her hands above a laptop

Best Lawyers Introduces Smithy AI


by Jamilla Tabbara

Transforming legal content creation for attorneys and firms.

Start using Smithy AI, a content tool by Best Lawyers

How to Create High-Converting Landing Pages for Your Law Firm


by Jamilla Tabbara

Learn how to create high-converting law firm landing pages that drive client engagement and lead generation.

Laptop screen displaying website tools to improve client conversion rates