Insight

Strategies for Deposing Lay Expert Witnesses When Defending Railroad Companies

Taking a measured approach during expert witness depositions is sometimes the most challenging aspect.

Railroad Companies
Benjamin Slater III

Benjamin Slater III

November 20, 2017 10:22 AM

Oftentimes in transportation-related casualty litigation, plaintiff will offer as expert witnesses one or more former industry employees who rely on experience rather than education as the basis for their expertise.

For instance, in a railroad grade crossing accident involving injury to employees operating the train or those struck by it, plaintiff’s counsel may often use former industry engineers or conductors as experts on proper train handling, operating rules, and industry practices. The plaintiff also may retain former Federal Railroad Administration inspectors, many of whom had previously worked in the industry as transportation department employees, to offer expert testimony.

Assuming such a matter is pending in federal court or in a state court system that tracks Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26, the expert(s) in question would provide a report, together with additional supporting materials. In this hypothetical case, lawyers representing the railroad company would first analyze the report’s findings. Further, they would perform a search for published cases in which the plaintiff-provided witness had been proffered as expert, and only then would they make a threshold judgment whether a Daubert motion might be successful (See Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals [92–102], 509 U.S. 579 [1993]).

Should it turn out that such strategy could succeed, counsel for the railroad company should consider scheduling the proposed expert’s deposition to tie down his opinions, establish his lack of expertise, and obtain concessions from the witness that other courts have found his opinions insufficient to meet reliability requirements. Often in the course of probing the background of such witnesses—for example, a former railroad engineer—counsel would be able to find a history of rules’ violations, reprimands, or dismissals from service, as well as prior accidents involving the witness that counsel can use as leverage to impeach the expert’s credibility.

If the forum state court in this putative case is among those that take a restrictive view of Daubert or the lines of attack appear likely insufficient to succeed with such approach, counsel for the railroad will likely have to weigh a number of critical options to prevail under such circumstances. Those include, among others, initiating a full-blown attack on the witness in deposition, hoping to undermine his confidence or that of the plaintiff’s counsel in the witness, and, by so doing, lay out in advance the direction of cross-examination at trial. As an alternative, counsel for the defendant could take a measured and limited deposition seeking only to nail down the opinions the witness may offer at trial.

For the litigator, taking a measured approach during expert witness depositions is sometimes the most challenging aspect—however difficult, this route can pay off when confronting the expert with someone’s most probing and winning arguments in front of a jury.

No matter how respectable the credentials of a plaintiff-side expert witness may appear, a diligent defense counsel will explore all options to uncover issues that may disprove otherwise seemingly undebatable expert testimonies. Often, that may require counsel to become acquainted with a client’s industry sector and the case law behind it beyond what many would consider necessary, for that is what may make them successful when deposing expert witnesses.

--------------------------

Benjamin “Ben” Slater III serves as the New Orleans Office’s managing partner at national law firm Akerman LLP, where he also is a member of the firm’s litigation practice group. His practice focuses on complex commercial and mass tort litigation.


Related Articles

Resilience and Success


by Justin Smulison

Burg Simpson secured favorable results in 2021 and also strategically expanded to ensure its future and provide more personalized service to its clients nationwide.

Burg Simpson on Resilience and Success in Law

Strategy and Resilience


by Justin Smulison

Easton & Easton partners discuss how innovating during 2020’s uncertainty led to stronger injury cases, new practice areas, and greater success.

Easton & Easton

Big Wins From Coast to Coast


by Justin Smulison

Founder Michael S. Burg discusses how Burg Simpson’s lawyers secured major verdicts in some of the nation’s most unique cases in 2019.

Michael S. Burg Best Lawyers 2020

Track Check


by Anthony J. LaRocca, Linda S. Stein, Peter W. Denton and Sarah Nural

A broad-gauge look at the latest trends in U.S. railroad law.

Infrastructure Under Trump 2019

From One Man to a Nationally Recognized Force


by Justin Smulison

As Frantz Law Group nears 38 years of advocacy for the injured, founder James P. Frantz reflects on his firm’s achievements and discusses its involvement with history-making cases.

Frantz Law Group

Supreme Court further Restricts Where Plaintiffs Can Sue in Mass Torts


by Gregory Bubalo and Katherine A. Dunnington

Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of California will significantly impact the plaintiffs’ choices of forums for the filing of mass torts actions.

Plaintiffs No Longer Sue in Mass Torts

Trending Articles

The Real Camille: An Interview with Johnny Depp’s Lawyer Camille Vasquez


by Rebecca Blackwell

Camille Vasquez, a young lawyer at Brown Rudnick, sat down with Best Lawyers CEO Phillip Greer to talk about her distinguished career, recently being named partner and what comes next for her.

Camille Vasquez in office

Announcing The Best Lawyers in The United Kingdom™ 2023


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms from the United Kingdom.

The Best Lawyers in The United Kingdom 2023

Johnny Depp and Amber Heard: The Best Lawyers Honorees Behind the Litigation


by Gregory Sirico

Best Lawyers takes a look at the recognized legal talent representing Johnny Depp and Amber Heard in their ongoing defamation trial.

Lawyers for Johnny Depp and Amber Heard

Announcing The Best Lawyers in France™ 2023


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms from France.

Blue, white and red strips

Announcing The Best Lawyers in Germany™ 2023


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms from Germany.

Black, red and yellow stripes

Education by Trial: Cultivating Legal Expertise in the Courtroom


by Margo Pierce

The intricacies of complex lawsuits require extensive knowledge of the legal precedent. But they also demand a high level of skill in every discipline needed to succeed at trial, such as analyzing technical reports and deposing expert witnesses.

Cultivating Legal Expertise in the Courtroom

Announcing The Best Lawyers in Belgium™ 2023


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms from Belgium.

Black, yellow and red stripes

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers® in the United States


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers listed in the 28th Edition of The Best Lawyers in America® and in the 2nd Edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2022.

2022 Best Lawyers Listings for United States

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers™ in France


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms, including our inaugural Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch recipients.

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers™ in France

Choosing a Title Company: What a Seller Should Expect


by Roy D. Oppenheim

When it comes to choosing a title company, how much power exactly does a seller have?

Choosing the Title Company As Seller

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers™ in Germany


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms, including our inaugural Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch recipients.

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers™ in Germany

We Are Women, We Are Fearless


by Deborah S. Chang and Justin Smulison

Athea Trial Lawyers is a female owned and operated law firm specializing in civil litigation, catastrophic energy, wrongful death and product liability.

Athea Trial Law Female Leadership and Success

U.K. Introduces Revisions to Right-to-Work Scheme and Immigration Rules


by Gregory Sirico

Right-to-Work Scheme and Immigration Rules in

Famous Songs Unprotected by Copyright Could Mean Royalties for Some


by Michael B. Fein

A guide to navigating copyright claims on famous songs.

Can I Sing "Happy Birthday" in Public?

Destiny Fulfilled


by Sara Collin

Was Angela Reddock-Wright destined to become a lawyer? It sure seems that way. Yet her path was circuitous. This accomplished employment attorney, turned mediator, arbitrator and ADR specialist nonpareil discusses her career, the role of attorneys in society, the new world of post-pandemic work and why new Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson represents the future.

Interview with Lawyer Angela Reddock-Wright

What the Courts Say About Recording in the Classroom


by Christina Henagen Peer and Peter Zawadski

Students and parents are increasingly asking to use audio devices to record what's being said in the classroom. But is it legal? A recent ruling offer gives the answer to a question confusing parents and administrators alike.

Is It Legal for Students to Record Teachers?