Insight

A Line in the Sand

Norway’s women’s-handball team made news at the Tokyo Olympics not so much for its athletic prowess but for what it was wearing. A look at the legal intricacies of an increasingly fraught topic.

Norway's Handball Team Uniform Controversy
Susan H. Abramovitch

Susan H. Abramovitch and Phedely Artiste

February 4, 2022 07:00 AM

This article was originally published on 9/23/21 and was updated on 2/3/22

Of all the pandemic-delayed 2020 Tokyo Olympic and Paralympic Games’ legal and public-relations issues— contract renegotiations with sponsors, networks and Olympic entities; doping bans; fans demanding ticket refunds—one of the biggest headline grabbers was a brouhaha over female athletes’ sporting attire.

The topic arose before the Games had even begun. On July 18, 2021, five days ahead of the opening ceremony, Norway’s beach-handball team was sanctioned for wearing athletic shorts instead of the required bikini bottoms at the bronze-medal match at this year’s European Beach Handball Championship against Spain in Bulgaria the day before. In light of the team’s deliberate stance against the dress code, the Disciplinary Commission of the European Handball Federation (EHF) reacted by issuing fines of €150 to each of the team’s 10 players.

The EHF had justified its disciplinary measure after Bulgaria by citing the athletes’ “improper clothing,” pursuant to the International Handball Federation (IHF) Rules. Under “Athlete Uniform Regulations,” the Federation Rules stipulate that Team members must wear identical shorts/bikini bottoms [. . .]. Female athletes must wear bikini bottoms that are in accordance with the enclosed graph, with a close fit and cut on an upward angle toward the top of the leg. The side width must be of a maximum of 10 centimetres.

The fines triggered an avalanche of controversy among international fans, the public at large, athletes and sporting organizations—including the Norwegian Handball Federation, which openly supported the athletes. Several parties expressed their frustration at the enforcement of outdated rules regarding women’s athletic attire, which deprive women of the right to meaningfully compete in a respectful and fair environment.

The EHF then issued another statement to underline that, although the fines were appropriate given the Federation Rules, it vowed to do “all [it] can to ensure that a change of athlete uniform regulations can be implemented.”

Legal Recourse

The Norwegian women have two potential, non–mutually exclusive options. The first is to appeal the fines. The second involves lobbying the governing body to amend or repeal current Federation Rules on female athletes’ uniforms altogether.

Appealing the fines: EHF regulations grant athletes the right to appeal a Disciplinary Commission decision—but they must do so no later than 8 p.m. local time the same day the decision is issued. This option has long since lapsed. It’s also worth noting that the request to appeal must be accompanied by a €1,000 fee paid by the appellants to the EHF. In light of the Norwegians having already been fined a team total of €1,500, an appeal was perhaps not a viable option, if only from a financial perspective.

In the event the appeal was granted, it would be directed to a Jury, which is charged with reaching a decision by simple majority. That decision would then have to be announced to the parties no later than 9 a.m. local time the day after the appeal was filed. The Jury comprises three members and two substitute members recruited from among the EHF officials at the venue and nominated by the EHF before the tournament began.

Norway’s beach handball team was sanctioned for wearing athletic shorts instead of the required bikini bottoms at the bronze-medal match at this year’s European Beach Handball Championship.”

Amendment or repeal of Federation Rules: Again, the EHF defended itself by noting that it issued its fines in accordance with International Handball Federation Rules. Athletes’ dress code therefore falls under the jurisdiction of the international body of the sport at issue. Advocating for modification of the rules at the level of the IHF would presumably be a more permanent solution, and Norway’s Handball Federation has advocated for substantial change in this aspect of women’s sports for several years.

On April 23 and 24, three months before the Tokyo Games began, the EHF Congress was held in Vienna, Austria, at which the Norwegian Handball Federation tabled a motion addressing women’s uniforms. The discussion was postponed and scheduled to be held in August with the newly elected Beach Handball Commission. The discussion’s purpose was to prepare suggestions to be presented to the IHF, the world body with ultimate jurisdiction and authority to modify the uniform regulations.

To date, no motion has officially been tabled to the IHF. As such, the regulation mandating bikini bottoms for female beach-handball players remains in force.

A Timely Discussion

Regarding regulation of athletes’ uniforms at the Olympic and Paralympic Games, Section 2.3 of the Olympic Charter states that the National Olympic Committee of a given country is vested with the sole authority to prescribe and determine the clothing and uniforms worn by members of its delegation. However, under the Charter, the International Olympic Committee maintains for itself the authority of last resort on any questions or matters related to the Games.

As the Tokyo 2020 Olympic and Paralympic Games dominated sports headlines this summer, the longstanding debate over uniforms and the agency of female athletes proved timely. Following the dust-up over the Norwegian women, several other incidents drew attention to the topic as well. During the Tokyo Games, Germany’s gymnasts competed in red-and-white unitards, which provide more body coverage than the more commonly worn leotard. The German Gymnastics Federation introduced this apparel with the aim of countering the sexualization of the sport and enhancing women’s agency. On July 18, meanwhile, Welsh Paralympic track-and-field world champion Olivia Breen was reprimanded by an English Championship official for wearing sprint briefs deemed “too short and inappropriate.”

All these incidents have brought significant attention to the sometimes-extraordinary scrutiny of female competitors’ attire at national and international events. It’s difficult to predict the ultimate outcome here, but female athletes are unlikely to give up in their desire to have more say over what they’re required to wear. The Olympics themselves are over, but this tussle has only just begun.

Headline Image: Norwegian Handball Federation

Related Articles

Fierce Competition


by Amalia Berg and Jordan Scopa

Is jumping through legal hoops an Olympic event? It might as well be for any company seeking to sponsor an athlete, a team or the quadrennial games themselves.

Legal Sponsorships for the Olympic Games

The Sponsor Games


by Alasdair Muller and Nick Fitzpatrick

Brands looking to capture a little Olympic glory for themselves face a challenging legal course. Here’s an overview.

Legal Recourse for Olympics Branding

The Subsidy Solution


by Anton O. Petrov and Jan D. Bonhage

Major athletic events are great fun, sources of pride . . . and expensive. What are countries’ responsibilities, especially during the pandemic, to help ensure their survival?

Responsibilities of Olympic Host Countries

2021 Best Lawyers: The Global Issue


by Best Lawyers

The 2021 Global Issue features top legal talent from the most recent editions of Best Lawyers and Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch worldwide.

2021 Best Lawyers: The Global Issue

Champions of Change: Record Breaking LGBTQ Olympic Athlete Representation


by Rebecca Blackwell

LGBTQ Olympic Athletes Make History

All Doped Up


by Howard Rapke

Keeping elite international sporting events free of banned substances is an endless game of cat and mouse. Here’s an overview of the legal efforts set up to do, in theory, exactly that.

Legal Efforts Against Drugs at Olympics

Current Status of Image Rights Structures in Spain


by Eduardo Montejo

Image Rights in Spain

Trending Articles

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers® in the United States


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers listed in the 28th Edition of The Best Lawyers in America® and in the 2nd Edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2022.

2022 Best Lawyers Listings for United States

The Real Camille: An Interview with Johnny Depp’s Lawyer Camille Vasquez


by Rebecca Blackwell

Camille Vasquez, a young lawyer at Brown Rudnick, sat down with Best Lawyers CEO Phillip Greer to talk about her distinguished career, recently being named partner and what comes next for her.

Camille Vasquez in office

Famous Songs Unprotected by Copyright Could Mean Royalties for Some


by Michael B. Fein

A guide to navigating copyright claims on famous songs.

Can I Sing "Happy Birthday" in Public?

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers in Canada™


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers listed in the 16th Edition of The Best Lawyers in Canada™ and 1st Edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in Canada.

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers in Canada™

How A Claim Can Create A ‘Class’ of Its Own


by Justin Smulison

One civil claim can help a victim recover, prevent others from the same harm and even save lives. Tom Connick has experienced this directly, having been at the ground floor of injury claims that have led to high-value class action settlements.

Fire Consuming Paper Money

Choosing a Title Company: What a Seller Should Expect


by Roy D. Oppenheim

When it comes to choosing a title company, how much power exactly does a seller have?

Choosing the Title Company As Seller

Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch – The Future of Legal Talent Looks Bright


by Justin Smulison

Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch is launching its second edition in the United States, and after talking with both a company leader and esteemed lawyers on the list, the importance of this prestigious list is evident.

Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America 2022

Announcing the 2022 "Best Law Firms" Rankings


by Best Lawyers

The 2022 “Best Law Firms” publication includes all “Law Firm of the Year” recipients, national and metro Tier 1 ranked firms and editorial from thought leaders in the legal industry.

The 2022 Best Law Firms Awards

Johnny Depp and Amber Heard: The Best Lawyers Honorees Behind the Litigation


by Gregory Sirico

Best Lawyers takes a look at the recognized legal talent representing Johnny Depp and Amber Heard in their ongoing defamation trial.

Lawyers for Johnny Depp and Amber Heard

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers™ in Australia


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms.

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers™ in Australi

Caffeine Overload and DUI Tests


by Daniel Taylor

While it might come as a surprise, the over-consumption of caffeine could trigger a false positive on a breathalyzer test.

Can Caffeine Cause You to Fail DUI Test?

Announcing The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2023


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms from Australia.

The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2023

Wage and Overtime Laws for Truck Drivers


by Greg Mansell

For truck drivers nationwide, underpayment and overtime violations are just the beginning of a long list of problems. Below we explore the wages you are entitled to but may not be receiving.

Truck Driver Wage and Overtime Laws in the US

Why Cariola Díez Pérez-Cotapos Developed Its Own Legal Tech


by Best Lawyers

Juan Pablo Matus of Cariola Díez Pérez-Cotapos, 2019 "Law Firm of the Year" award for Corporate and M&A Law in Chile, discusses his firm's joint venture with Cognitiva in creating Lexnova, a legal AI system.

Cariola Díez Pérez-Cotapos Interview

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers in South Africa™


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms.

Announcing 2022 Best Lawyers in South Africa

What the Courts Say About Recording in the Classroom


by Christina Henagen Peer and Peter Zawadski

Students and parents are increasingly asking to use audio devices to record what's being said in the classroom. But is it legal? A recent ruling offer gives the answer to a question confusing parents and administrators alike.

Is It Legal for Students to Record Teachers?