New Limits on Court Ordered Therapy in Arizona

New Limits on Court Ordered Therapy in Arizona

Mitchell Reichman

Mitchell Reichman

November 27, 2018 01:29 AM

The cultural creep towards Arizona family law judges making parenting decisions, has been altered with two recent decisions by the Arizona Court of Appeals – Nicaise v. Sundaram and Paul E. v. Courtney F.

More than 25 years ago it was established that court-appointed psychologists who were performing custody evaluations enjoyed immunity. While extending this immunity, the court articulated that scope was limited, applying to court-appointed - but not private - psychologists and only with regard to the activities allowed under the terms of the appointment order. Immunity was given due to a concern that exposure to liability would deter acceptance of court appointments, color their recommendations and undermine objectivity and independence.

Over the last 20 years, courts in Arizona have extended this immunity to mental health professionals appointed for purposes other than providing custody evaluations, including those who provide therapy for an individual (parent or child), co-parenting therapists, interventionists and parenting coordinators.

The immunity extended to parenting coordinators is found in a family law procedural rule. The language included in the orders is similar or identical to following: “The ‘co-parenting therapist’ has immunity in accordance with Arizona law as to all acts undertaken pursuant to and consistent with the appointment order of the court.” These appointment orders also often empower the mental health professional to self-reappoint, thereby creating the potential for the mental health professional to be involved for longer than the initial term of the appointment.

Decisions made by the trial court in Paul E. v. Courtney F. gave the Court of Appeals the opportunity to address whether a family law judge is empowered to choose a specific therapist for a child and the propriety of granting that therapist immunity. In the appointment order entered by the trial judge in Paul E. the language granting the immunity was identical to what is cited in the above paragraph.

The court has set limits in this new decision. They held that a family law judge has no authority to appoint a treating professional for a child; that choice is for the decision-making parent. Rule 95(A) Arizona Rules of Family Law Procedure which gives the court discretion to consider engaging and ordering a party to engage in private mental health services does not expand the statutory limitations on the court's authority. Additionally, this rule does not enable the court to make legal decisions regarding a child's professional mental health care.

The Court also examined the granting of judicial immunity to mental health professionals appointed to provide therapy. They held that a treating therapist who performs a non-judicial function does not justify immunity. Reliance on Arizona’s statute A.R.S.§25-405(B) which gives the court the opportunity to seek the advice of professional personnel to justify the appointment did not “withstand [the] scrutiny” of the court. They recognized that the order was for therapy and not as a judicial advisor deciding that the trial court had erred by conflating the roles of a therapist and a judicial advisor. The statute did not afford the court the authority to confer immunity to the therapist.

As part of its final decision the trial judge in Paul E. appointed a different mental health professional to provide guidance to the parties regarding certain issues relating to their child. The court again relied on its authority to appoint a professional in an advisory capacity although the rule again appeared to be ambiguous and could be construed as treatment. The Court of Appeals did not reach that issue because it found that with the entry of the final order - and with no pending motion or scheduled review hearing set - the appointment was impermissible because it was not related to any issue pending before the court.

This latest groundbreaking decision from the Court of Appeals leaves many open questions, including:

  • Can a court appointed child’s therapist ever be such an integral part of the judicial process so as to have judicial immunity?
  • Can a therapeutic interventionist be appointed as part of a “final order” if that order provides for subsequent review hearings?
  • Can an interventionist be appointed after a petition to enforce parenting time is filed, so long as the court’s order is not final, meaning the case is left pending on the active calendar and the interventionist is required to send periodic reports to the court?
  • Do treating mental health professionals serving under current appointment orders actually have judicial immunity if the subject order provides for immunity in accordance with Arizona law?
  • If a mental health professional seeks reappointment must the court reject the request?

On June 18, 2018, a Petition for Review of the Court’s decision in Paul E was filed with the Arizona Supreme Court. Additionally, other groups are considering filing amicus briefs, so this issue is far from being completely decided.

Related Articles

Split Decisions

by Jonathan Merel

Divorce is inevitably fraught with a torrent of emotions on both sides. Don’t let this occlude your ability to plan rationally and dispassionately to ensure as smooth a process as possible. Here are five common pitfalls to avoid.

Two people standing on either side of a heart made out of curving roads

What If Johnny Depp and Amber Heard Had a Premarital Agreement?

by John M. Goralka

Oh, the gritty details we’re learning from the latest court battle between Johnny Depp and Amber Heard. This unfortunate airing of dirty laundry may have been avoided with a prenup. Should you think about getting one yourself?

What If Johnny Depp & Amber Heard Had Prenup?

Pennsylvania’s Best Lawyers 2022

by Best Lawyers

Our Pennsylvania’s Best Lawyers 2022 digital publication features top-ranked legal talent in Pennsylvania.

Pennsylvania’s Best Lawyers 2022

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers: Family Law Publication

by Best Lawyers

Featuring the top legal talent in Family Law and Trusts & Estates.

Announcing Best Lawyers Family Law 2022

Crossing the Line

by Joseph Trotti

Divorce can be difficult, complicated and emotionally exhausting. Divorcing across state lines ups the jurisdictional complexity significantly.

Jurisdiction and Divorce Across State Lines

Trouble at Home

by Brittney M. Miller and James J. Vedder

Decisions about custody and parenting time after a separation or divorce are never simple. Family violence of any kind makes the process all the more complex—and the victim isn’t always the beneficiary.

How Domestic Violence Complicates Custody

Washington, D.C. In the Law

by Gregory Sirico

We explore three legal cases in Washington, D.C.

Washington, D.C. In the Law

Prenuptial Peril

by Laura Wheatman Hill

Prenups aren’t always bulletproof, but there’s hope if you end up exposed in a divorce.

Why Your Prenup Might Not Save You

My Husband Didn’t Want to Stay Married…But He Didn’t Want a Divorce

by Jennifer Billock

Patience—and the law—prevails when an uncooperative partner avoids divorce proceedings.

Divorcing an Uncooperative Partner

My Lawyer Failed Me as an Advocate in My Parents’ Divorce

by Rebecca Rush

Here’s how to ensure your children are respected during a custody battle.

Representing Children in a Divorce

What Happens to Credit Card Debt When I Get a Divorce?

by Hossein Berenji

In a community property state like California, credit card debt may be shared between partners.

Credit Card Debt After Divorce

New Year Ushers in New Formulas for Calculating Maintenance Payments in Divorce Proceedings

by Timothy E. Weiler

The anticipated outcome of the adoption of the increased income threshold is to reduce litigation about the amount of maintenance to be paid by simply applying the statutorily mandated calculation to more individuals with a much higher annual income.

Maintenance Payments

Important Considerations in Determining What Is in the Best Interest of a Child

by Hossein Berenji

When courts make determinations about child custody they will make the decision based on what they believe is in the best interest of the child.

Best Interest of a Child

Clients Should Understand Basic Financial Consequences of a Divorce

by Steven Fernandez

Spouses who get divorced will have to adjust how they file their taxes, what income and liabilities they must report for tax purposes, and even how they approach discussions about alimony and spousal support.

Divorce Finances

The Evolving Landscape of Family Law

by Sean Stonefield

​A roundtable discussion with the founders of one of California’s preeminent divorce firms, Meyer, Olson, Lowy & Meyers, LLP.

Meyer, Olson, Lowy & Meyers

Trending Articles

Announcing the 2023 The Best Lawyers in America Honorees

by Best Lawyers

Only the top 5.3% of all practicing lawyers in the U.S. were selected by their peers for inclusion in the 29th edition of The Best Lawyers in America®.

Gold strings and dots connecting to form US map

Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2023

by Best Lawyers

The third edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America™ highlights the legal talent of lawyers who have been in practice less than 10 years.

Three arrows made of lines and dots on blue background

The Best Lawyers in South Africa™ 2023

by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers proudly announces lawyers recognized in South Africa for 2023.

South African flag

Could Reign Supreme End with the Queen?

by Sara Collin

Canada is revisiting the notion of abolishing the monarchy after Queen Elizabeth II’s passing, but many Canadians and lawmakers are questioning if Canada could, should and would follow through.

Teacup on saucer over image of Queen's eye

Famous Songs Unprotected by Copyright Could Mean Royalties for Some

by Michael B. Fein

A guide to navigating copyright claims on famous songs.

Can I Sing "Happy Birthday" in Public?


2022: Another Banner Year

by John Fields

Block O’Toole & Murphy continues to secure some of New York’s highest results for personal injury matters.

Three men in business suits standing in office

Announcing the 2023 The Best Lawyers in Canada Honorees

by Best Lawyers

The Best Lawyers in Canada™ is entering its 17th edition for 2023. We highlight the elite lawyers awarded this year.

Red map of Canada with white lines and dots

Wage and Overtime Laws for Truck Drivers

by Greg Mansell

For truck drivers nationwide, underpayment and overtime violations are just the beginning of a long list of problems. Below we explore the wages you are entitled to but may not be receiving.

Truck Driver Wage and Overtime Laws in the US

What the Courts Say About Recording in the Classroom

by Christina Henagen Peer and Peter Zawadski

Students and parents are increasingly asking to use audio devices to record what's being said in the classroom. But is it legal? A recent ruling offer gives the answer to a question confusing parents and administrators alike.

Is It Legal for Students to Record Teachers?

The Upcycle Conundrum

by Karen Kreider Gaunt

Laudable or litigious? What you need to know about potential copyright and trademark infringement when repurposing products.

Repurposed Products and Copyright Infringemen

Thirteen Years of Excellence

by Best Lawyers

For the 13th consecutive year, “Best Law Firms” has awarded the most elite and talented law firms across the country through a thorough and trusted data review process.

Red, white and blue pipes and writing on black background

Caffeine Overload and DUI Tests

by Daniel Taylor

While it might come as a surprise, the over-consumption of caffeine could trigger a false positive on a breathalyzer test.

Can Caffeine Cause You to Fail DUI Test?

Choosing a Title Company: What a Seller Should Expect

by Roy D. Oppenheim

When it comes to choosing a title company, how much power exactly does a seller have?

Choosing the Title Company As Seller

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers® in the United States

by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers listed in the 28th Edition of The Best Lawyers in America® and in the 2nd Edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2022.

2022 Best Lawyers Listings for United States

Announcing The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2023

by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms from Australia.

The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2023

Announcing The Best Lawyers in Germany™ 2023

by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms from Germany.

Black, red and yellow stripes