Insight

New Limits on Court Ordered Therapy in Arizona

New Limits on Court Ordered Therapy in Arizona

Mitchell Reichman

Mitchell Reichman

November 27, 2018 01:29 AM

The cultural creep towards Arizona family law judges making parenting decisions, has been altered with two recent decisions by the Arizona Court of Appeals – Nicaise v. Sundaram and Paul E. v. Courtney F.

More than 25 years ago it was established that court-appointed psychologists who were performing custody evaluations enjoyed immunity. While extending this immunity, the court articulated that scope was limited, applying to court-appointed - but not private - psychologists and only with regard to the activities allowed under the terms of the appointment order. Immunity was given due to a concern that exposure to liability would deter acceptance of court appointments, color their recommendations and undermine objectivity and independence.

Over the last 20 years, courts in Arizona have extended this immunity to mental health professionals appointed for purposes other than providing custody evaluations, including those who provide therapy for an individual (parent or child), co-parenting therapists, interventionists and parenting coordinators.

The immunity extended to parenting coordinators is found in a family law procedural rule. The language included in the orders is similar or identical to following: “The ‘co-parenting therapist’ has immunity in accordance with Arizona law as to all acts undertaken pursuant to and consistent with the appointment order of the court.” These appointment orders also often empower the mental health professional to self-reappoint, thereby creating the potential for the mental health professional to be involved for longer than the initial term of the appointment.

Decisions made by the trial court in Paul E. v. Courtney F. gave the Court of Appeals the opportunity to address whether a family law judge is empowered to choose a specific therapist for a child and the propriety of granting that therapist immunity. In the appointment order entered by the trial judge in Paul E. the language granting the immunity was identical to what is cited in the above paragraph.

The court has set limits in this new decision. They held that a family law judge has no authority to appoint a treating professional for a child; that choice is for the decision-making parent. Rule 95(A) Arizona Rules of Family Law Procedure which gives the court discretion to consider engaging and ordering a party to engage in private mental health services does not expand the statutory limitations on the court's authority. Additionally, this rule does not enable the court to make legal decisions regarding a child's professional mental health care.

The Court also examined the granting of judicial immunity to mental health professionals appointed to provide therapy. They held that a treating therapist who performs a non-judicial function does not justify immunity. Reliance on Arizona’s statute A.R.S.§25-405(B) which gives the court the opportunity to seek the advice of professional personnel to justify the appointment did not “withstand [the] scrutiny” of the court. They recognized that the order was for therapy and not as a judicial advisor deciding that the trial court had erred by conflating the roles of a therapist and a judicial advisor. The statute did not afford the court the authority to confer immunity to the therapist.

As part of its final decision the trial judge in Paul E. appointed a different mental health professional to provide guidance to the parties regarding certain issues relating to their child. The court again relied on its authority to appoint a professional in an advisory capacity although the rule again appeared to be ambiguous and could be construed as treatment. The Court of Appeals did not reach that issue because it found that with the entry of the final order - and with no pending motion or scheduled review hearing set - the appointment was impermissible because it was not related to any issue pending before the court.

This latest groundbreaking decision from the Court of Appeals leaves many open questions, including:

  • Can a court appointed child’s therapist ever be such an integral part of the judicial process so as to have judicial immunity?
  • Can a therapeutic interventionist be appointed as part of a “final order” if that order provides for subsequent review hearings?
  • Can an interventionist be appointed after a petition to enforce parenting time is filed, so long as the court’s order is not final, meaning the case is left pending on the active calendar and the interventionist is required to send periodic reports to the court?
  • Do treating mental health professionals serving under current appointment orders actually have judicial immunity if the subject order provides for immunity in accordance with Arizona law?
  • If a mental health professional seeks reappointment must the court reject the request?

On June 18, 2018, a Petition for Review of the Court’s decision in Paul E was filed with the Arizona Supreme Court. Additionally, other groups are considering filing amicus briefs, so this issue is far from being completely decided.

Related Articles

What Is an Uncontested Divorce?


by Bryan Driscoll

A clear, cooperative path to divorce if both spouses agree on the terms

Resigned couple going through divorce

Divorce in Ohio: Filing, Process and Legal Rights


by Bryan Driscoll

A comprehensive overview of divorce procedures, rights and timelines in Ohio.

Divorce in Ohio divides home and property

Understanding Divorce Rights in NY


by Bryan Driscoll

A practical guide to divorce rights, procedures and legal protections in New York.

Two parents exchange money for child support

Divorce in California: What You Need to Know


by Bryan Driscoll

Learn the divorce process in California, from legal requirements to property division, custody and more. Get clear answers and find the right lawyer.

Two gold wedding bands cracked from divorce

How to File for Divorce


by Natalie R. Rowland

Divorce can be complex in both process and cost. An experienced family law attorney explains how best to file for divorce and outlines considerations to take.

Woman sitting on couch rests head on fist with man in background

Finding the Right Divorce Attorney


by Best Lawyers

Divorce proceedings are inherently a complex legal undertaking. Hiring the right divorce attorney can make all the difference in the outcome of any case.

Person at a computer holding a phone and pen

Filing for Divorce in North Carolina


by Melody J. King

Family law lawyer Melody King answers some of the most important questions individuals may have about filing for divorce in North Carolina.

Illustration of man and woman on paper that has been torn apart

IN PARTNERSHIP

Cryptocurrency and Divorce


by Crystal Espinosa Buit

One lawyer explains how cryptocurrency, the fastest growing investment form, can impact assets in a divorce and why it should not be ignored in divorce proceedings.

Pixelated image of paper money bill

IN PARTNERSHIP

The Parenting Plan


by Derren Ciaglia

Co-parenting considerations should always be taken into account when negotiating Parenting Plans in divorce or paternity matters.

Woman in car looking through window at man hugging child

Divorce in Florida


by Hugo E. Acebo

A Florida family law lawyer highlights the important steps each party should take when facing the complexities of divorce, particularly when faced with decisions surrounding the children.

Painting of father walking with two children

The Hague Convention and International Custody Battles


by Alexandra Goldstein

One family law lawyer explains how Joe Jonas and Sophie Turner’s celebrity divorce brings The Hague Convention treaty and international child custody battles into the spotlight.

Man and woman celebrities wearing black and standing for photo

Five Tips for Business Owners Facing Divorce


by Brittany A. Brown

When married couples have entered into joint business ventures find themselves facing divorce, it is important that they heed these five steps to ensure amicable resolution.

People standing in opposite circles forming Venn diagram

High-Net-Worth Divorce


by Gretchen S. Knight and Jill Spevack Di Sciullo

Many issues can arise during divorce proceedings, particularly for affluent couples. Outlined below are some of the best practices for the most common concerns.

Spouses standing in doorway of home having argument

IN PARTNERSHIP

How to File for Divorce


by Natalie R. Rowland

Divorce can be complex in both process and cost. An experienced family law attorney explains how best to file for divorce and outlines considerations to take.

Image of bride and groom on beach with a split down the middle

IN PARTNERSHIP

How to Find a Good Divorce Lawyer


by Best Lawyers

To navigate a divorce, which is inherently a complex legal landscape, finding the right divorce lawyer can make all the difference in the outcome of any case.

Bride and groom figurines on top of a wedding cake

The Advantages of Collaborative Divorce for Families


by Best Lawyers

Collaborative divorce is a cooperative alternative to a possibly contentious, court-focused divorce process. Learn more about collaborative divorce here.

Silhouetted figures split down the middle with child in backdrop

Trending Articles

Introducing the 2026 Best Lawyers Awards in Australia, Japan, New Zealand and Singapore


by Jennifer Verta

This year’s awards reflect the strength of the Best Lawyers network and its role in elevating legal talent worldwide.

2026 Best Lawyers Awards in Australia, Japan, New Zealand and Singapore

Revealing the 2026 Best Lawyers Awards in Germany, France, Switzerland and Austria


by Jamilla Tabbara

These honors underscore the reach of the Best Lawyers network and its focus on top legal talent.

map of Germany, France, Switzerland and Austria

Effective Communication: A Conversation with Jefferson Fisher


by Jamilla Tabbara

The power of effective communication beyond the law.

 Image of Jefferson Fisher and Phillip Greer engaged in a conversation about effective communication

The 2025 Legal Outlook Survey Results Are In


by Jennifer Verta

Discover what Best Lawyers honorees see ahead for the legal industry.

Person standing at a crossroads with multiple intersecting paths and a signpost.

The Best Lawyers Network: Global Recognition with Long-term Value


by Jamilla Tabbara

Learn how Best Lawyers' peer-review process helps recognized lawyers attract more clients and referral opportunities.

Lawyers networking

Build Your Legal Practice with Effective Online Networking


by Jamilla Tabbara

How thoughtful online networking supports sustained legal practice growth.

Abstract web of connected figures symbolizing online networking among legal professionals

Blogging for Law Firms: Turning Content into Client Connections


by Jamilla Tabbara

How law firms use blogs to earn trust and win clients.

Lawyer typing blog content on laptop in office

Jefferson Fisher: The Secrets to Influential Legal Marketing


by Jennifer Verta

How lawyers can apply Jefferson Fisher’s communication and marketing strategies to build trust, attract clients and grow their practice.

Portrait of Jefferson Fisher a legal marketing expert

A Guide to Workers' Compensation Law for 2025 and Beyond


by Bryan Driscoll

A woman with a laptop screen reflected in her glasses

Is Your Law Firm’s Website Driving Clients Away?


by Jamilla Tabbara

Identify key website issues that may be affecting client engagement and retention.

Phone displaying 'This site cannot be reached' message

Medical Malpractice Reform Trends in Texas, Utah, Georgia and SC


by Bryan Driscoll

A fresh wave of medical malpractice reform is reshaping the law.

Medical Malpractice Reform Trends hed

Why Jack Dorsey and Elon Musk Want to 'Delete All IP Law'


by Bryan Driscoll

This Isn’t Just a Debate Over How to Pay Creators. It’s a Direct Challenge to Legal Infrastructure.

Elon Musk and Jack Dorsey standing together Infront of the X logo

Best Lawyers Launches CMO Advisory Board


by Jamilla Tabbara

Strategic counsel from legal marketing’s most experienced voices.

Group photo of Best Lawyers CMO Advisory Board members

As Fla. Pushes to Repeal Controversial 'Free Kill' Law, DeSantis Signals Veto


by Bryan Driscoll

The fight to transform state accountability standards may be in trouble

free kill law hed

Changes in California Employment Law for 2025


by Laurie Villanueva

What employers need to know to ensure compliance in the coming year and beyond

A pair of hands holding a checklist featuring a generic profile picture and the state of California

Key Issues to Tackle on Law Firm Landing Pages


by Jamilla Tabbara

Identify key issues on law firm landing pages to improve client engagement and conversion.

Laptop showing law firm landing page analytics