The Next Pandemic

An incipient wave of litigation generated by the coronavirus hasn’t even begun to crest. Here’s a look at current conditions—and what lies ahead.

Rising tide of water
Roberta F. Green

Roberta F. Green

October 12, 2020 08:00 AM

On December 31, 2019, the municipal-health commissioner in Wuhan, China, reported to the World Health Organization 44 cases of unknown etiology. Eleven of those people were severely ill. On January 5, the WHO posted online some of the information it had been able to glean in the preceding days: The outbreak, it reported, was traceable to wholesale live-animal markets, though it advised against travel restrictions to Wuhan—a city of 19 million in a province of 58 million—or to China itself. On January 31, Alex Azar, the U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Resources, declared a public-health emergency. On March 11, the WHO declared the ongoing novel coronavirus outbreak a pandemic.

The virus has since disrupted every conceivable aspect of life worldwide. After a brief lag, civil and criminal litigation—as is their nature—caught up, as prisoners sought compassionate leave to avoid COVID-19 risk and businesses closed by executive fiat clamored for compensation. President Trump signed the CARES Act into law on March 27, and on April 1, the federal Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA) was operational.

As of August 25, a reported 4,564 COVID-related complaints had been filed in more than a dozen jurisdictions, with New York, California, and Texas at the fore. Roughly 15 kinds of claims had been filed, including 881 insurance suits (including business-interruption claims), 622 civil-rights claims, 580 habeas suits, and 380 labor-and-employment claims. Some high-profile suits have already been dismissed; certain class-action claims seem to be gaining momentum.

On March 16, what is widely considered the first COVID-19 civil lawsuit was filed in the Civil District Court for New Orleans: Cajun Conti LLC v. Governor John B. Edwards. In it, the plaintiffs compared the coronavirus to the intrusion into a restaurant of lead or gaseous fumes, constituting a direct physical loss. Citing a civil-authority order the governor had issued on March 13, they alleged that the order’s ban on gatherings of 250 or more people in a single space should not apply to any restaurant whose capacity exceeded 250. They also sought a determination that their insurance policy, issued by Lloyd’s, did not contain an exclusion for a viral pandemic.

Not long after, French Laundry v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company was filed in part by the same attorneys in Napa, California, seeking declaratory judgment regarding coverage the plaintiffs had purchased. The battered hospitality industry has even formed a consortium, the Business Interruption Group (, which seeks business-interruption coverage for the industry, which it says is responsible for 8.3 million jobs, $395 billion in wages, and a $660 billion contribution to American GDP.

More recently, renewed shutdowns are spurring additional claims. In Miller’s Tavern v. State of Nevada, 37 bars filed suit regarding the Silver State’s emergency order, effective July 11, which closed bars but left restaurants, casinos, and other public establishments open. (The complaint cites OSHA pandemic-violation data that sheds favorable light on bars relative to a variety of other businesses.)

Twenty Minor League Baseball teams, meanwhile, filed suit against a number of insurance companies, seeking redress for losses incurred as a result of the virus, governments’ response to it, and the teams’ inability to obtain players. They further allege that the insurers’ negligence placed Minor League teams “in serious risk of economic failure and jeopardized the future of America’s pastime as we know it.”

Some suits have already made their way through the system. Simon Wiesenthal Center and Moriah Films v. Chubb Group of Insurance Companies stemmed from a policy bought on or around August 1, 2019, which promised to “indemnify the plaintiffs for losses, including but not limited to business income losses. It refers to Los Angeles’s Safer at Home Emergency Order of March 19, which it alleges “effectively shuttered all income-producing arms of the Simon Wiesenthal Center in Los Angeles,” including a major fundraising dinner and a film premiere. The plaintiffs allege that the policy does not contain a virus or pandemic exclusion, and sought a finding that L.A. Mayor Eric Garcetti’s declaration constituted a prohibition of access to the insured premises, thereby triggering the policy’s business-loss coverage.

On May 22, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss Moriah Films, arguing that the plaintiffs’ complaint failed to allege that the Emergency Order prohibited access as a result of direct physical loss or damage within a mile of the insured premises. On June 1, the United States District Court dismissed the plaintiffs’ complaint, but without prejudice to refiling.

Cruise ships, too, have sparked both wrongful-death and class-action emotional-distress claims. The plaintiffs in James Heinzer and Barbara Heinzer v. Princess Cruise Lines were among the passengers on the Ruby Princess, which sailed from Sydney, Australia, for 14 days beginning March 8. The couple allege that Princess knew of the virus risks—or should have known—before exposing them to conditions including a failure to sanitize the ship, ongoing group gatherings and open buffets, insufficient medical care, undertrained staff, and more. The cruise line is alleged to have refused to offer refunds to people who would otherwise have elected not to travel, and failed to disclose key information about the virus—which both plaintiffs contracted, with Mr. Heinzer ending up in an intensive-care unit in “a foreign country.”

Finally, employment claims are increasing as well. Ariel Robtoy v. The Kroger Co. concerns an employee of the grocery chain who alleges a violation of her rights under the FFCRA and the Family and Medical Leave Act. With more than 500 employees, Kroger would not fall within the guidelines of FFCRA, but Robtoy alleges that the company agreed to provide its employees with 14 days’ paid leave to anyone diagnosed with COVID-19 or quarantined due to suspected infection. She was later diagnosed with either COVID-19 or an upper respiratory infection; her physician diagnosed her via telemedicine and provided an excuse for work. Her employer told her the excuse was insufficient to qualify for protection and that she must obtain a better one or return to work. Robtoy’s condition purportedly worsened; she stayed home and was fired when her unexcused absences exceeded the acceptable limit. She alleges wrongful termination.

In Stephanie Jones v. Eastern Airlines, the plaintiff alleges wrongful discharge/FFCRA retaliation concerning the fact that she requested accommodation due to the closure of her child’s school and changes regarding her child-care options. The complaint alleges that Jones had discussed accommodations with her supervisors—including working from home plus two hours of “released time” per day for child care—when communication broke down and she was let go.

While the full extent of these claims is as yet unknown, it’s important to note that the claims themselves, and the defenses gaining traction against them, are the usual tools of litigation: declaratory judgment, due process, equal protection, wrongful discharge, breach of contract. The novel coronavirus has made an unprecedented impact on our lives and communities—and our courthouses—but it’s reassuring to those of us who litigate to see that the tools we use to fight it are not so novel after all.

Roberta F. Green is a member of Shuman, McCuskey & Slicer PLLC in Charleston, West Virginia. Ms. Green’s practice has come to focus on employment law, energy law, state and municipal government liability, personal injury defense, civil rights, professional liability, constitutional law, and appellate practice.


Related Articles

Is It Live . . . Or Is It Virtual?

by Adrian L. Bastianelli III, Kevin J. O'Connor, Paulo Flores and Robert S. Peckar

Mediation via Zoom is just one of the legal-industry oddities the pandemic has wrought. Here’s a cheat sheet for how to make it work for you—and some thoughts on whether it’s here to stay.

Virtual Mediation

Newly Launched COVID-19 Litigation Project Offers Open Access To Pandemic-Related Court Judgments From Over 70 Countries

by Sara Collin

A worldwide database of COVID-19 cases is uniting more than 70 countries as judges, lawmakers and lawyers continue to navigate pandemic related litigation and the ways in which it’s evolving amid year three.

COVID-19 Worldwide Litigation Project

Discovery in the Time of COVID-19

by H. Barber Boone

The pandemic has affected the vital process of legal discovery in ways both good and bad. Which changes are likely to become widely accepted in the years ahead?

The Impact of COVID-19 on E-Discovery

The Next Chapter

by Patrick M. Shelby

Among its uncountable other disruptions, the pandemic upended U.S. bankruptcy procedures. Congressional relief, legislative changes, amended legal provisions: What lies ahead for those looking to file?

COVID-19's Impacts on Bankruptcy Procedures

Phoning It In

by Alyson M. St. Pierre, Ashley C. Pack and Crystal S. Wildeman

It’s not easy for employers to weigh requests from employees to work from afar, even in the wake of the pandemic. Considerations include COVID-19, vaccinations, the Americans with Disabilities Act and the nature of the job itself.

Employer Considerations for Teleworking

The Employment Endemic

by Meredith Caiafa and Sarah Greene

The pandemic has had far-reaching effects on employment law since it officially took hold in 2020, but the litigation and lawmaking surrounding it are mutating faster than the variants. Here’s how lawmakers and businesses can keep up.

Employment Law During COVID-19

Measuring Success by Results

by John Fields

Recognized Best Lawyers®* recipient Joseph F. Brophy on how his Firm determines success.

Measuring Firm Success

Texas "Lawyer of the Year" 2022

by Best Lawyers

Charla Truett is honored as 2022 "Lawyer of the Year" in Texas for Immigration Law.

Texas "Lawyer of the Year" 2022

Hybrid Work: Coping with Compliance Consequences

by Gregory Sirico

Communications platforms like Webex by Cisco, Zoom and Microsoft Teams are more popular than ever in the age of hybrid work, but are firms risking compliance for convenience?

Compliances Issues with Hybrid Work

Changes and Challenges

by Megan Norris

As the pandemic ebbs and many people return to the office, midsize law firms in particular must navigate a host of unprecedented questions about costs, culture and client expectations.

Changes, Challenges and Cost of the Pandemic

Forging Bonds, Building Business

by Crystal L. Howard and Lizl Leonardo

As disorienting and occasionally frightening as the pandemic has been, it has also forced lawyers to find innovative new ways to stay connected and do business.

Pandemic Sparks Innovative Ways of Conducting

Staunch Competition

by Andrea E. Nieto, Catherine H. Molloy and Jennifer W. Corinis

On the other side of the pandemic, after record numbers of employee resignation, protecting trade secrets is both challenging and being challenged.

Protecting Trade Secrets During Period of Res

Employment Entanglements

by Justin Smulison

As the United States approaches its third summer against the backdrop of the coronavirus, employers and employees still find themselves in a Gordian Knot of interconnected labor and employment challenges, with no clear way to untangle them all.

Post-Pandemic Employment Challenges Persist

Legal Trends in the Modern Workplace

by Emma R. Schuering and Meghan H. Hanson

Employees are reevaluating their jobs and the workforce, including issues like pay equity, forced arbitration, paid time off, discrimination and other such policies as they continue to navigate a post-pandemic work life.

Legal Trends In the Workplace Post-Pandemic

Will Recent Boeing Settlements Create Tailwinds In Corporate Law?

by Justin Smulison

Prominent litigation against Boeing is setting a precedent of accountability, professionalism and commitment among company boards as well as ushering ESG further into the courtroom to help monitor and prevent safety issues.

Recent Boeing Settlements and Corporate Law

Courtroom Mastery

by Justin Smulison

Victor H. Pribanic recalled the excitement of returning to the courtroom in late 2021 for a medical negligence case that could help set a new course for Pribanic & Pribanic’s trial advocacy.

Victor H. Pribanic Makes Return to Courtroom

Trending Articles

The Real Camille: An Interview with Johnny Depp’s Lawyer Camille Vasquez

by Rebecca Blackwell

Camille Vasquez, a young lawyer at Brown Rudnick, sat down with Best Lawyers CEO Phillip Greer to talk about her distinguished career, recently being named partner and what comes next for her.

Camille Vasquez in office

Announcing The Best Lawyers in The United Kingdom™ 2023

by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms from the United Kingdom.

The Best Lawyers in The United Kingdom 2023

Johnny Depp and Amber Heard: The Best Lawyers Honorees Behind the Litigation

by Gregory Sirico

Best Lawyers takes a look at the recognized legal talent representing Johnny Depp and Amber Heard in their ongoing defamation trial.

Lawyers for Johnny Depp and Amber Heard

Announcing The Best Lawyers in France™ 2023

by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms from France.

Blue, white and red strips

Announcing The Best Lawyers in Germany™ 2023

by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms from Germany.

Black, red and yellow stripes

Education by Trial: Cultivating Legal Expertise in the Courtroom

by Margo Pierce

The intricacies of complex lawsuits require extensive knowledge of the legal precedent. But they also demand a high level of skill in every discipline needed to succeed at trial, such as analyzing technical reports and deposing expert witnesses.

Cultivating Legal Expertise in the Courtroom

Announcing The Best Lawyers in Belgium™ 2023

by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms from Belgium.

Black, yellow and red stripes

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers® in the United States

by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers listed in the 28th Edition of The Best Lawyers in America® and in the 2nd Edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2022.

2022 Best Lawyers Listings for United States

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers™ in France

by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms, including our inaugural Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch recipients.

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers™ in France

Choosing a Title Company: What a Seller Should Expect

by Roy D. Oppenheim

When it comes to choosing a title company, how much power exactly does a seller have?

Choosing the Title Company As Seller

We Are Women, We Are Fearless

by Deborah S. Chang and Justin Smulison

Athea Trial Lawyers is a female owned and operated law firm specializing in civil litigation, catastrophic energy, wrongful death and product liability.

Athea Trial Law Female Leadership and Success

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers™ in Germany

by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms, including our inaugural Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch recipients.

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers™ in Germany

U.K. Introduces Revisions to Right-to-Work Scheme and Immigration Rules

by Gregory Sirico

Right-to-Work Scheme and Immigration Rules in

Destiny Fulfilled

by Sara Collin

Was Angela Reddock-Wright destined to become a lawyer? It sure seems that way. Yet her path was circuitous. This accomplished employment attorney, turned mediator, arbitrator and ADR specialist nonpareil discusses her career, the role of attorneys in society, the new world of post-pandemic work and why new Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson represents the future.

Interview with Lawyer Angela Reddock-Wright

Famous Songs Unprotected by Copyright Could Mean Royalties for Some

by Michael B. Fein

A guide to navigating copyright claims on famous songs.

Can I Sing "Happy Birthday" in Public?

What the Courts Say About Recording in the Classroom

by Christina Henagen Peer and Peter Zawadski

Students and parents are increasingly asking to use audio devices to record what's being said in the classroom. But is it legal? A recent ruling offer gives the answer to a question confusing parents and administrators alike.

Is It Legal for Students to Record Teachers?