Winding up a company in record time despite claim of a dispute subject to arbitration

Winding up a company in record time despite claim of a dispute subject to arbitration

Philip Jeyaretnam SC

Philip Jeyaretnam SC

September 24, 2019 12:19 AM


In the recent High Court judgment in VTB Bank (Public Joint Stock Company) v Anan Group (Singapore) Pte Ltd [2018] SGHC 250, Dentons Rodyk, acting for the plaintiff, successfully obtained a winding up order on a debtor company just six weeks after the service of a statutory demand for an underlying debt of US$ 250 million.

This case concerns interesting and novel points of law, where there is a confluence of insolvency and arbitration. It is an important decision on what the standard of proof is for a debtor company to show that there is a dispute, and therefore stave off winding up proceedings by a creditor, where the underlying contract is subject to arbitration.


The plaintiff, VTB Bank, is the second largest bank in Russia. The defendant is a Singapore-incorporated holding company which owns a significant number of shares in SGXlisted AnAn International (AAI). In November 2017, VTB Bank entered into a global master repurchase agreement (GMRA) with the defendant, which essentially provided for a loan of US$ 250 million by VTB Bank to the defendant to assist in a purchase of shares in LSElisted, EN plus. Under the GMRA, the defendant had an obligation to maintain sufficient collateral in respect of the transaction. However, in April 2018, the shares of EN plus plummeted starkly as a result of sanctions imposed by the United States against various individuals who had a controlling interest in EN plus. This triggered a default under the GMRA. The GMRA contained an arbitration clause where parties agree to refer any dispute to the Singapore International Arbitration Centre. VTB Bank issued the necessary notices under the GMRA and triggered the termination of the same; however, the defendant did not make any payment nor dispute the liability or quantum of the debt.

On 23 July 2018, the plaintiff served a statutory demand for the sum of US$ 170 million on the defendant. Three weeks lapsed without the defendant paying the sum owed, or securing or compounding the same to the reasonable satisfaction of the plaintiff. VTB Bank then commenced winding proceedings. The proceedings which followed were heavily contested by the defendant at each turn.

In summary the defendant commenced injunction proceedings to restrain VTB Bank from winding up the defendant, contested against the appointment of provisional liquidators and also the subsequent winding up proceedings.

Court’s Decision

The defendant contested the winding-up proceedings on the basis of three grounds, namely that the:

  1. Sanctions in the United States were an event of frustration;
  2. Sanctions were also a force majeure event; and
  3. The existence of the debt and its quantification was disputed and should both be resolved by arbitration pursuant to the GMRA.

The High Court accepted Dentons Rodyk’s arguments that all three grounds of dispute were unsupported by the evidence. Therefore, the main issue was the applicable standard of proof required when there was an arbitration agreement contained in the contract from which the debt arose.

The defendant relied on BDG v BDH [2016] 5 SLR 977 (BDG), a Singapore Court case, and Salford Estates (No 2) Ltd v Altomart Ltd (No 2) [2015] Ch 589 (Salford), an English Court of Appeal case, to argue that a lower standard of proof ought to apply where a dispute between two parties was governed by an arbitration clause.

The plaintiff argued that the High Court was bound by, inter alia, Metalform Asia Pte Ltd v Holland Leedon Pte Ltd [2007] 2 SLR(R) 268 (Metalform), a Court of Appeal case to rule that the test was not any different because the underlying contract was subject to arbitration.

With respect to this, the court observed that there were two distinct line of authorities submitted by the parties before it, noting particularly that the authorities relied upon by Dentons Rodyk all ‘spoke with one voice’ that the applicable standard of proof is consistent across the board, i.e. that of a genuine and substantial dispute, even where there is an arbitration agreement. On the other hand, the court observed that the defendant’s cases were all fairly recent, with the common underlying thread of according greater primacy to arbitration.

The Current Law

In his judgment, Dedar Singh Gill JC agreed with VTB Bank’s position that the High Court was bound by the Court of Appeal decision in Metalform and that even if there is a dispute between the parties which is governed by an arbitration agreement, the standard of proof remains that of a genuine and substantial dispute.

Nonetheless, Gill JC accepted that there is force in the policy reasoning in the defendant’s case and that he would have been amenable to applying the BDG approach if His Honor himself were not bound by the Court of Appeal’s decision. That said, His Honor held that the defendant would have failed to establish its case even if the lower standard of proof in BDG was applied as the defendant had not raised a bona fide dispute in relation to the three grounds that were cited (i.e. frustration, force majeure and the dispute on the alleged quantum).


This matter is highly relevant to financial institution and MNC clients in light of the prevalence of arbitration contracts in cross-border contracts.

This case shows that, even where there is an arbitration clause between the parties, if a debtor does not have any defence(s), a creditor should consider all options including proceeding by way of a statutory demand, and winding up the debtor. The present judgment also highlights the pragmatism and efficiency in the robust approach taken by the Singapore courts. It is a timely reminder that the courts, in its exercise of discretion in winding up proceedings, will always consider the entire facts and circumstances of the case. If the defence(s) raised lack merit, the court cannot and will not turn a blind eye, and allow its process to be abused by a recalcitrant debtor, simply because an arbitration clause is present in the underlying contract.

The defendant has appealed against this decision and the Court of Appeal hearing will take place in a few months’ time.

Related Articles

How PLMJ's Unique Structure Shapes Its Insolvency Practice

by Best Lawyers

A leading attorney with the 2019 "Law Firm of the Year" winner for Insolvency and Reorganization Law in Portugal speaks to Best Lawyers CEO Phillip Greer.

PLMJ "Law Firm of the Year" Interview

"Lawyer of the Year"

Lawyer smiles while posing for headshot photo

Robin Meadow

Appellate Practice

Los Angeles, CA


"Lawyer of the Year"

Headshot of Tampa Lawyer of the Year Honoree

Amy L. Drushal

Financial Services Regulation Law

Tampa, FL


A Time for Choosing

by Brandon D. Saxon and Debra Ellwood Meppen

Vast changes in the law, at both the federal and state level, have made it even harder to get through the already dense thickets of employment arbitration. What do businesses need to know going forward?

Suited man holding up falling walls with gray and yellow backdrop

The Great Debate: Do You Arbitrate Commercial Disputes?

by David K. Taylor

In a civil case, is it wiser for a business to try to persuade the counterparty to agree from the outset to arbitration—or potentially to place its very solvency in the unpredictable hands of a judge and jury?

Hand moving multicolor blocks

Measuring Success by Results

by John Fields

Recognized Best Lawyers®* recipient Joseph F. Brophy on how his Firm determines success.

Measuring Firm Success

Destiny Fulfilled

by Sara Collin

Was Angela Reddock-Wright destined to become a lawyer? It sure seems that way. Yet her path was circuitous. This accomplished employment attorney, turned mediator, arbitrator and ADR specialist nonpareil discusses her career, the role of attorneys in society, the new world of post-pandemic work and why new Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson represents the future.

Interview with Lawyer Angela Reddock-Wright

Racial Discrimination Suit Against NFL May End in Arbitration

by John Ettorre

A former Miami Dolphins head coach is up against the NLF in a discrimination case that is on a path to arbitration; the NFL remains focused on equality for their diverse coaching staff.

Arbitrating Discrimination Suit Against NFL

Blurred Lines

by Andrew Kirby

Where does responsible lending end and unconscionability begin? Australian courts have come to vastly different conclusions. An overview of current case law.

Australian Courts Assess Loan Repayment

Without Delay

by Ashish Mahendru and Darren Braun

Remote testimony? Virtual evidence presentation? Been there, done that: Why even international arbitration proceedings have, for the most part, weathered the pandemic just fine.

People talking in a conference room

The Buyout Brigade

by Best Lawyers

Neill May, John Connon, and David Matlow discuss what’s ahead for private equity—and why dealmakers of all stripes have more leverage than ever.

An Interview With Goodmans

Solving Insolvency

by Best Lawyers

Markus Fellner discusses emerging trends in insolvency and reorganization law and the work his firm has done with the visually impaired.

An Interview With Fellner Wratzfeld & Partner

It’s a Gas, Gas, Gas

by Best Lawyers

Michael Polkinghorne discusses why arbitration or mediation is a better option.

An Interview With White & Case LLP

How to Advise Clients in International Arbitration and Mediation

by Best Lawyers

Karl Pörnbacher discusses how his firm stays at the forefront of advising clients.

An Interview With Hogan Lovells

Options for a Wrongfully Dismissed Employee

by Stacey Reginald Ball

Mediation, Negotiation, Lawsuit

Options for a Wrongfully Dismissed Employee

An Interview With Norton Rose Fulbright

by Best Lawyers

Australia’s 2020 “Law Firm of the Year” in Insolvency and Reorganization Law

An Interview With Norton Rose Fulbright

Trending Articles

The 2024 Best Lawyers in Spain™

by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is honored to announce the 16th edition of The Best Lawyers in Spain™ and the third edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in Spain™ for 2024.

Tall buildings and rushing traffic against clouds and sun in sky

Best Lawyers Expands Chilean 2024 Awards

by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is pleased to announce the 14th edition of The Best Lawyers in Chile™ and the inaugural edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in Chile™, honoring the top lawyers and firms conferred on by their Chilean peers.

Landscape of city in Chile

The Best Lawyers in Spain™ 2023

by Best Lawyers

Announcing Spain's recognized lawyers for 2023.

Flag of Spain

Announcing The Best Lawyers in South Africa™ 2024

by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is excited to announce the landmark 15th edition of The Best Lawyers in South Africa™ for 2024, including the exclusive "Law Firm of the Year" awards.

Sky view of South Africa town and waterways

Announcing the 2023 The Best Lawyers in America Honorees

by Best Lawyers

Only the top 5.3% of all practicing lawyers in the U.S. were selected by their peers for inclusion in the 29th edition of The Best Lawyers in America®.

Gold strings and dots connecting to form US map

The Best Lawyers in Portugal™ 2024

by Best Lawyers

The 2024 awards for Portugal include the 14th edition of The Best Lawyers in Portugal™ and 2nd edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in Portugal™.

City and beach with green water and blue sky

The Best Lawyers in Peru™ 2024

by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is excited to announce the landmark 10th edition of The Best Lawyers in Peru, the prestigious award recognizing the country's lop legal talent.

Landscape of Peru city with cliffside and ocean

The Best Lawyers in South Africa™ 2023

by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers proudly announces lawyers recognized in South Africa for 2023.

South African flag

The Best Lawyers in Chile™ 2023

by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms in Chile.

White star in blue box beside white box with red box on bottom

The Best Lawyers in Colombia™ 2024

by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is honored to announce the 14th edition of The Best Lawyers in Colombia™ for 2024, which honors Colombia's most esteemed lawyers and law firms.

Cityscape of Colombia with blue cloudy sky above

Announcing the 2024 Best Lawyers in Puerto Rico™

by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is proud to announce the 11th edition of The Best Lawyers in Puerto Rico™, honoring the top lawyers and firms across the country for 2024.

View of Puerto Rico city from the ocean

Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2023

by Best Lawyers

The third edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America™ highlights the legal talent of lawyers who have been in practice less than 10 years.

Three arrows made of lines and dots on blue background

The 2023 Best Lawyers in Portugal™

by Best Lawyers

Announcing the elite group of lawyers recognized in Portugal for 2023.

Green and red Portuguese flag

Unwrapping Shrinkflation

by Justin Smulison

Through the lens of the United States, we take a closer look at the global implication of companies downsizing products while maintaining and often raising prices.

Chocolate bar being unwrapped from foil

2021 Best Lawyers: The Global Issue

by Best Lawyers

The 2021 Global Issue features top legal talent from the most recent editions of Best Lawyers and Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch worldwide.

2021 Best Lawyers: The Global Issue

What the Courts Say About Recording in the Classroom

by Christina Henagen Peer and Peter Zawadski

Students and parents are increasingly asking to use audio devices to record what's being said in the classroom. But is it legal? A recent ruling offer gives the answer to a question confusing parents and administrators alike.

Is It Legal for Students to Record Teachers?