Insight

Will all the Stars be aligned?

Will all the Stars be aligned?

Lawrence Teh

Lawrence Teh

September 24, 2019 12:03 AM

Starboard has been alerted to another application of the Vinmar decision by the courts; this time in the area of arbitration agreements and insolvency proceedings.

In BWF v. BWG [2019] SGHC 81, the Singapore High Court dealt with a case where two parties concluded a contract for the sale and purchase of crude oil. The buyer did not pay the seller’s invoice and informed the seller that it was entitled to various defences under the contract, which also provided that disputes between the parties should be referred to arbitration. In response, the seller served a formal demand for payment of the invoices, default of which would lead to commencement of bankruptcy/winding up proceedings against the buyer.

The buyer applied to the Singapore High Court to restrain the seller from commencing bankruptcy proceedings, contending that the contract obliged the parties to proceed to arbitration to resolve their dispute and that the seller was not allowed to resort immediately to bankruptcy proceedings. The question for the Singapore High Court was whether the relevant test to apply in considering whether to restrain bankruptcy proceedings was the existence of a “bona fide prima facie dispute” or the existence of a “triable issue”. If it was the existence of a “bona fide prima facie dispute”, all that the court would consider is whether there appeared at face value a dispute in good faith. The court would not consider the merits of the case. If it was the existence of a “triable issue” the court would consider the merits of the case and decide if there was something worth referring to arbitration.

The Singapore High Court decided that the applicable test was the existence of a “bona fide prima facie dispute”. It reasoned that the test of the existence of a “triable issue” applied to situations generally where a party applied to restrain another party from bringing bankruptcy proceedings on the ground of a disputed debt. This was to ensure that winding up was not staved off on flimsy or tenuous grounds. However, where there exists an arbitration agreement between the parties and the debt is disputed, the objective of ensuring that winding up was not staved off on flimsy grounds was less pressing. In such situations, the countervailing concern is to hold parties to their agreement to arbitrate their disputes. So long as the court saw that a dispute was raised in good faith, and it could not be said that the party applying to restrain the other party had admitted the debt, that would be sufficient ground on which a court would restrained a party from commencing or continuing bankruptcy proceedings. The court would not enquire into or evaluate the merits of the case and whether there was something serious that deserved arbitration.

In reaching its decision, the court pointed specifically to the Vinmar case (see “Exclusive” means exclusive) as the case that re-emphasised the importance that the court places nowadays on party autonomy. It noted that in Vinmar the Singapore Court of Appeal departed from its own previous authorities because the previous authorities were inconsistent with the central principle of party autonomy and failed to give effect to the parties’ agreement. In doing so, the Singapore Court of Appeal achieved coherence in the law by aligning the principles on exclusive jurisdiction clauses, on forum non conveniens and on international arbitration. It should be added that the principles on non-exclusive jurisdiction clauses are now also aligned (see “Strong cause” for non-exclusive jurisdiction clause cases). Across these areas, the merits of the defence would be irrelevant to the issue of whether to stay proceedings in favour of the agreed tribunal.

The BWF v. BWG is currently on appeal to the Singapore Court of Appeal. There is a competing case, VTB Bank (Public Joint Stock Co.) v Anan Group (Singapore) Pte Ltd [2018] SGHC 250, also on appeal, in which Dentons Rodyk is involved, which decides that the applicable test is the existence of a “triable issue”, that is to say, that the court is entitled to evaluate the merits and see if the party applying to restrain bankruptcy proceedings has “a fair case for defence, reasonable grounds for setting up a defence or a fair probability of a bona fide defence”.

Will the Singapore Court of Appeal adopt the “bona fide prima facie dispute” test and align the principles of bankruptcy law with the principles on exclusive jurisdiction clauses, forum non conveniens, international arbitration and non-exclusive jurisdiction clauses? Or will the Singapore Court of Appeal adopt the “triable issue” test? If the Singapore Court of Appeal adopts the “bona fide prima facie dispute” test, it would probably follow that where a party applies to restrain another party from commencing or continuing bankruptcy proceedings on the ground that it disputes the debt and there is an exclusive or non-exclusive jurisdiction agreement (rather than an arbitration agreement), the test will also be the “bona fide prima facie dispute” test.

Related Articles

South Florida "Lawyer of the Year"


by Best Lawyers

Jerry Hamilton is honored as 2022 "Lawyer of the Year" in Admiralty and Maritime Law for Miami.

South Florida "Lawyer of the Year"

How Injury Lawyers Can Keep Their Heads Above Water by Referring Maritime Cases


by Justin Smulison

The maritime lawyers at Lipcon, Margulies & Winkleman, P.A. are ready to help injury lawyers fight for their clients in catastrophic cruise ship injuries.

Maritime Lawyers for Personal Injury Cases

Piercing Limitation of Liability in the Admiralty and Maritime Context


by Ethan Price-Livingston & David Y. Loh

One of the hallmarks of American admiralty and maritime law is the Limitation of Liability Act, which has been in existence since 1851 and permits a shipowner to limit its liability to the value of the vessel after the casualty.

Admiralty Limitation of Liability

Trending Articles

The Best Lawyers in New Zealand™ 2024 Awards


by Best Lawyers

The Best Lawyers in New Zealand 2024 awards include an elite field of top lawyers and law firms.

Auckland, New Zealand Skyline at twilight

Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2023


by Best Lawyers

The third edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America™ highlights the legal talent of lawyers who have been in practice less than 10 years.

Three arrows made of lines and dots on blue background

Announcing the 2023 The Best Lawyers in America Honorees


by Best Lawyers

Only the top 5.3% of all practicing lawyers in the U.S. were selected by their peers for inclusion in the 29th edition of The Best Lawyers in America®.

Gold strings and dots connecting to form US map

Presenting The Best Lawyers in Singapore™ 2024


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers offers the most prestigious awards for lawyers and law firms in Singapore for 2024.

Singapore skyline at night

The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2024 Launch


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is excited to announce The Best Lawyers in Australia™ for 2023, including the top lawyers and law firms from Australia.

Australian Parliament beside water at sunset

Announcing The Best Lawyers in Japan™ 2024


by Best Lawyers

We are proud to present the 2024 edition of Best Lawyers awards for Japan which include the top lawyers and law firms in the country.

Mt. Fuji in the background with fall leaves and structure in front

IN PARTNERSHIP

Paulson & Nace, PLLC: A Pioneer in Personal Injury Law


by Best Lawyers

Since its inception more than 40 years ago, Paulson & Nace, PLLC, a Washington D.C., Maryland and West Virginia-based personal injury firm, has always led with compassion first. Here are some key insights from the firm on how to go about filing a personal injury claim.

Group of lawyers meet around a conference table

Could Reign Supreme End with the Queen?


by Sara Collin

Canada is revisiting the notion of abolishing the monarchy after Queen Elizabeth II’s passing, but many Canadians and lawmakers are questioning if Canada could, should and would follow through.

Teacup on saucer over image of Queen's eye

Announcing The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2023


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms from Australia.

The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2023

What the Courts Say About Recording in the Classroom


by Christina Henagen Peer and Peter Zawadski

Students and parents are increasingly asking to use audio devices to record what's being said in the classroom. But is it legal? A recent ruling offer gives the answer to a question confusing parents and administrators alike.

Is It Legal for Students to Record Teachers?

The Best Lawyers in South Africa™ 2023


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers proudly announces lawyers recognized in South Africa for 2023.

South African flag

Announcing The Best Lawyers in Germany™ 2023


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms from Germany.

Black, red and yellow stripes

Choosing a Title Company: What a Seller Should Expect


by Roy D. Oppenheim

When it comes to choosing a title company, how much power exactly does a seller have?

Choosing the Title Company As Seller

Famous Songs Unprotected by Copyright Could Mean Royalties for Some


by Michael B. Fein

A guide to navigating copyright claims on famous songs.

Can I Sing "Happy Birthday" in Public?

Wage and Overtime Laws for Truck Drivers


by Greg Mansell

For truck drivers nationwide, underpayment and overtime violations are just the beginning of a long list of problems. Below we explore the wages you are entitled to but may not be receiving.

Truck Driver Wage and Overtime Laws in the US

The Upcycle Conundrum


by Karen Kreider Gaunt

Laudable or litigious? What you need to know about potential copyright and trademark infringement when repurposing products.

Repurposed Products and Copyright Infringemen