Busting a Trust

The rules governing trusts and asset distribution are often much more flexible than many might assume. Here’s a primer.

Rules Governing Trusts and Asset Distribution
Joseph Marrs

Joseph Marrs

September 29, 2021 07:30 AM

In Texas, a trust can now last up to 300 years, thanks to a new law supplanting the venerable Rule Against Perpetuities. This puts a sharper edge on a common client problem: Can trusts be changed?

Trust rules are not carved in stone. No trust is immutable in a court of competent jurisdiction. Beneficiaries and assets change, outliving the purposes that a settlor may have foreseen. A trustee’s exercise of discretion always involves a gray area. Trusts serve people, not the other way around; they can be changed or terminated if necessary.

A trust, after all, is just a set of rules governing certain assets. Unlike corporations or partnerships, which the law regards as entities in themselves, trusts merely describe a relationship between people and an asset. A trustee (either a person or a bank, the latter known as a “corporate” trustee) applies rules to assets for the benefit of a person or cause. Those rules usually restrict distributions. Beneficiaries of the trust often don’t control how much or when they’ll receive anything; the trustee distributes assets, and the beneficiary receives them.

Many beneficiaries (and some trustees) end up growing dissatisfied with the restrictions. Clients often want more assets sooner, or even to terminate the trust entirely and secure possession of the assets outright. This may be impossible under the trust’s rules, which are often designed—as in the case of a “spendthrift” trust—to prevent exactly that. However, the trust may provide an express or implied authority for the trustee to distribute all assets to the point of termination.

A well-drafted trust anticipates this. Many lifetime trusts are revocable by design, meaning that the settlor (i.e., the person who created the trust and put the assets into it) can revoke the trust at any time and take the assets back. Yet even irrevocable trusts must have an end. For example, the trust may state that it may be terminated if the assets are no longer of sufficient value, rendering employment of a trustee uneconomical. If so, the trustee may terminate by making one final distribution. Or a beneficiary may have “power of appointment,” which can authorize him to direct distributions to himself or others under certain circumstances. Or power of termination might be implied in a distribution standard. For instance, the direction that assets “shall be distributed” may justify the total distribution of all trust assets if conditions warrant (e.g., for a grave health need) or if insufficient assets remain (e.g., if the trust requires that a flat, or “unitrust,” amount be distributed each year).

man sits signing paper

Even if the trust’s rules offer no way to get to the desired result, there is always the possibility of changing the rules altogether. This may be done by agreement or by court order.

As a practical matter, if all interested parties agree, almost anything can be done to a trust. “Interested parties” refers to anyone with a beneficial or legal relationship to the trust, whether present and actual or future and contingent. This includes all beneficiaries and the serving trustee. In theory, if the beneficiaries and trustee agree to change, or even disregard, trust rules, no one else has standing to complain. All sign an agreement to this effect, and the matter is done as agreed regardless of the trust’s rules. Of course, if not all interested parties are included, the agreement is effective only to those who sign, and a trustee would be unwise to rely on it. In charitable trusts—that is, those with some philanthropic purpose or beneficiary—state law can block the beneficiaries’ agreement. In many states, the charitable trust division of the state attorney general’s office protects the public’s interest in preserving charitable trusts and may intervene for that purpose.

Even if the trust’s rules offer no way to get to the desired result, there is always the possibility of changing the rules altogether.”

A court order is the surest way to change a trust’s rules. In addition to modification by agreement, the Uniform Trust Code permits modification or termination of a trust upon proof of unanticipated circumstances, for example, if its purpose becomes impossible to fulfill. This requires an interested party to file a lawsuit and prove to a court the facts supporting the modification. All interested parties must be served with citation (including the attorney general, if a charitable bequest is at stake) and have a right to appear and object. The court may appoint an attorney ad litem to represent minors or unborn beneficiaries in the proceeding. If parents are the present beneficiaries, they may be able to represent their children and other descendants by “virtual representation,” meaning they consent on behalf of younger or future generations. If, after hearing the evidence presented, the court finds the statutory conditions are met, the trust is modified by a judgment of the court—not even the objection of an interested person will prevent the modification. In many cases, attorneys’ fees and costs may be awarded in the court’s discretion to participating parties who prove their advocacy provided a service to the trust.

Finally, the application of a trust’s rules can be subject to dispute. To acquire more assets, a beneficiary may pressure a trustee—with or without court intervention—to act differently. For example, trusts often give a trustee discretion to decide how much to distribute for a beneficiary’s support. Technically, the trustee may have the right to withhold distributions even if the beneficiary thinks the trustee is too stingy. However, if the beneficiary can prove that the trustee is limiting distributions in bad faith or for an improper purpose, the trustee has breached his fiduciary duty.

Put another way, even a trustee who has discretion can still abuse that discretion. If the beneficiary can document his claim and present it convincingly through counsel in a demand, he may not even need to file suit to get the result he wants. Trustees, particularly corporate trustees, are by nature risk averse and eager to avoid litigation and public discord. In this way, even if a trust’s rules cannot be changed, their interpretation can be influenced to solve the client’s problem.

Joe Marrs of Marrs Ellis & Hodge LLP represents clients at trial and arbitration, trust, and will contests, as well as other complex disputes in the courts. Mr. Marrs is admitted to practice in the United States District Courts for the Northern, Southern, Eastern, and Western Districts of Texas. He is a member of the Probate Section of the Houston Bar Association and is a Fellow of the Texas Bar Foundation.

Related Articles

Look for the Zoom Label

by Anne R. Yuengert and Matthew C. Lonergan

Will the virtual platforms that got such a boost during the pandemic replace how you interact with your employees, unions, and lawyers?

Virtual Platforms Replacing Work Interactions

Discovery in the Time of COVID-19

by H. Barber Boone

The pandemic has affected the vital process of legal discovery in ways both good and bad. Which changes are likely to become widely accepted in the years ahead?

The Impact of COVID-19 on E-Discovery

The Next Chapter

by Patrick M. Shelby

Among its uncountable other disruptions, the pandemic upended U.S. bankruptcy procedures. Congressional relief, legislative changes, amended legal provisions: What lies ahead for those looking to file?

COVID-19's Impacts on Bankruptcy Procedures

Phoning It In

by Alyson M. St. Pierre, Ashley C. Pack and Crystal S. Wildeman

It’s not easy for employers to weigh requests from employees to work from afar, even in the wake of the pandemic. Considerations include COVID-19, vaccinations, the Americans with Disabilities Act and the nature of the job itself.

Employer Considerations for Teleworking

Compelled to Compete

by Ashish Mahendru

Courts and legislatures—and now the White House—are taking an increasingly dim view of noncompete employment agreements, a development the pandemic has quickened. What can employers do to protect their confidential information?

Protection for Employers Beyond Noncompetes

Meeting Halfway

by Julia B. Meister

To resolve family and business disputes including wills, trusts, estates and more, mediation is often a more effective, gentler and cheaper option than litigation.

Mediation to Resolve Wills, Trusts, Estates

Look Out Below

by Mary Jo Larson

Employee 401(k) and other pension plans that include company stock can be a financial minefield. What’s a responsible fiduciary to do to lessen the risk of a plummeting share price—and the risk of a subsequent “stock-drop” lawsuit from aggrieved workers?

Navigating Employee 401(k) and Pension Plans

Will Recent Boeing Settlements Create Tailwinds In Corporate Law?

by Justin Smulison

Prominent litigation against Boeing is setting a precedent of accountability, professionalism and commitment among company boards as well as ushering ESG further into the courtroom to help monitor and prevent safety issues.

Recent Boeing Settlements and Corporate Law

Colorado's Best Lawyers 2022

by Best Lawyers

Our 2022 Colorado's Best Lawyers publication features top-ranked legal talent in Boulder, Denver and Western Colorado.

Colorado's Best Lawyers 2022

Newly Launched COVID-19 Litigation Project Offers Open Access To Pandemic-Related Court Judgments From Over 70 Countries

by Sara Collin

A worldwide database of COVID-19 cases is uniting more than 70 countries as judges, lawmakers and lawyers continue to navigate pandemic related litigation and the ways in which it’s evolving amid year three.

COVID-19 Worldwide Litigation Project

Road to Somewhere

by Mark LeHocky

How can attorneys take steps to improve settlement efforts and avoid unpleasant surprises as they map out a dispute resolution? One litigator-turned-general counsel-turned mediator (with some help from a distinguished rock star) points the way forward.

Improved Dispute Resolution Settlement

Family Law – Sometimes All in the Family

by Justin Smulison

Led by a father-and-son team of Family Law lawyers and trial advocates, with the support and assistance of family members, Blevans & Blevans, LLP continues its tradition of excellence serving the Northern California Bay Area in 2020 and beyond.

Blevans & Blevans

Achieving Justice For Essential Workers

by Justin Smulison

Patrick Regan of Regan Zambri Long describes how the recent resolution of a corporate negligence case brought closure to survivors of a fatal 2016 apartment building explosion.

Patrick Regan Best Lawyers 2021

Is It Live . . . Or Is It Virtual?

by Adrian L. Bastianelli III, Kevin J. O'Connor, Paulo Flores and Robert S. Peckar

Mediation via Zoom is just one of the legal-industry oddities the pandemic has wrought. Here’s a cheat sheet for how to make it work for you—and some thoughts on whether it’s here to stay.

Virtual Mediation

Great Rebuild

by Best Lawyers

Néstor Méndez discusses labor peace, junk-bond repercussions, and the laudable resilience of those who call this storm-battered island home.

An Interview With Pietrantoni Méndez & Alvare

Insuring Success

by Janice Zhou

Atlanta’s 2020 Litigation/Insurance “Lawyer of the Year,” Lisa Bondurant, on leadership, learning, and how to forge a true understanding of your clients.

Lisa Bondurant

Trending Articles

What the Courts Say About Recording in the Classroom

by Christina Henagen Peer and Peter Zawadski

Students and parents are increasingly asking to use audio devices to record what's being said in the classroom. But is it legal? A recent ruling offer gives the answer to a question confusing parents and administrators alike.

Is It Legal for Students to Record Teachers?

Choosing a Title Company: What a Seller Should Expect

by Roy D. Oppenheim

When it comes to choosing a title company, how much power exactly does a seller have?

Choosing the Title Company As Seller

Caffeine Overload and DUI Tests

by Daniel Taylor

While it might come as a surprise, the over-consumption of caffeine could trigger a false positive on a breathalyzer test.

Can Caffeine Cause You to Fail DUI Test?

Johnny Depp and Amber Heard: The Best Lawyers Honorees Behind the Litigation

by Gregory Sirico

Best Lawyers takes a look at the recognized legal talent representing Johnny Depp and Amber Heard in their ongoing defamation trial.

Lawyers for Johnny Depp and Amber Heard

Announcing The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2023

by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms from Australia.

The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2023

Wage and Overtime Laws for Truck Drivers

by Greg Mansell

For truck drivers nationwide, underpayment and overtime violations are just the beginning of a long list of problems. Below we explore the wages you are entitled to but may not be receiving.

Truck Driver Wage and Overtime Laws in the US

The Real Camille: An Interview with Johnny Depp’s Lawyer Camille Vasquez

by Rebecca Blackwell

Camille Vasquez, a young lawyer at Brown Rudnick, sat down with Best Lawyers CEO Phillip Greer to talk about her distinguished career, recently being named partner and what comes next for her.

Camille Vasquez in office

How to Navigate False Abuse Claims in a Child Custody Case

by Ashley Jones

There’s hope for families to recover—a good lawyer is key.

False Abuse Claims in Child Custody

An Army of Nancy

by Rachel Shrewsbury

The horrific stories out of Guantánamo Bay nearly caused me to lose faith in the American principles of liberty and justice. Nancy Hollander turned out to be the ray of hope I was looking for.

Q&A with Nancy Hollander

Announcing The Best Lawyers in The United Kingdom™ 2023

by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms from the United Kingdom.

The Best Lawyers in The United Kingdom 2023

Announcing The Best Lawyers in Japan™ 2023

by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms from Japan.

The Best Lawyers in Japan™ 2023

“Best Law Firms” Submissions: What They Are and Why They Matter

by Best Lawyers

"Best Law Firms" rankings are produced yearly by U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers. The submissions process is an important component for all eligible firms.

Best Law Firms Submissions

How Peer Review Powers Industry Referrals

by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers combines the trust of industry referrals with state-of-the-art technology to help clients find the right lawyer.

Four people searching in their smartphone with the Best Lawyers methodology wheel over top

Announcing The Best Lawyers in France™ 2023

by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms from France.

Blue, white and red strips

When DNA Isn’t the Tie That Binds

by Brittney M. Miller and James J. Vedder

Determining biological parenthood is as easy as getting a DNA test. Determining legal parenthood is more complicated altogether—especially as the composition of the American family continues to evolve.

When DNA isn't the tie that binds

Aim High and Fly

by Khalil Abdullah

From a silent victim of hometown segregation to Air Force captain and lawyer of consummate skill, Karen Evans exemplifies leadership—and vows always to help those who seek to follow her path.

Karen Evans' Leadership in the Airforce