Insight

Punishment and Deterrents

Facing a jury instruction on punitive damages? Here’s a cheat sheet to help you secure the best possible outcome for the defendant you represent.

Seated man wearing glasses and looking down
DY

David A. Yeagley

September 6, 2022 11:31 AM

The court has denied summary judgment, and now the defendant is facing trial and a looming jury instruction on punitive damages. As defense counsel, you recognize that a punitive damages instruction impacts the defense. How so, exactly? Here’s what to keep in mind.

The punitive damages defense begins at the pretrial stage. Aside from motion practice seeking judgment on a punitive damages claim, a related question, depending on the jurisdiction, is whether the defense ought to seek bifurcation of the liability and punitive damages phases of the trial. The key to the answer turns on whether the defendant can elicit new evidence in the punitive damages phase. For example, perhaps remedial measures or policy changes were implemented after the fact that cannot be admitted in the liability phase.

In the absence of different evidence, what’s the underlying message in the punitive damages phase other than “the defendant still doesn’t get it”? With an all-in-one approach to a trial, a jury that might otherwise be inclined to award punitive damages could be satisfied with an award of compensatory damages (and the defendant’s assurance of accountability), thereby avoiding a post-trial award of attorneys’ fees.

Even before that, the defendant should factor in the likelihood of a punitive damages instruction—and its effect on trial strategy—in the settlement calculus. Counsel should likewise be mindful of the punitive damages claim in witness interviews and discovery. A plaintiff may make important concessions in a deposition that can be used in motion practice and at trial, such as acknowledging that the defendant did not intend to cause harm through its actions. Specific evidentiary issues should be raised prior to trial in motions in limine, which can go a long way toward defining the rules of engagement at trial.

Lay the groundwork for trial. Whenever possible, draft jury questionnaires and voir dire questions tailored to the specific case issues. This will help you gauge potential jurors’ impressions about punitive damages. Jury instructions and written juror questions (interrogatories) should advocate within the law and evidence, articulating the heightened standard for awarding punitive damages based on aggravated or egregious misconduct.

The facts matter. Every lawyer (and client) is an advocate, but it’s the unvarnished facts, viewed through the jury’s eyes, that matter at trial. The reality is that by the time of the punitive damages instruction, the court will twice have passed (under Rules 56 and 50) on the defendant’s party line. The evidence and arguments—going to both liability and punitive damages—must be tested in mock presentations, the nature of which can vary depending on the case (the amount of money at stake, for example). Whatever the process, it’s critical to gain an independent perspective of the evidence outside the legal defense bubble.

The defendant must show up. A cardinal rule for defending a punitive damages claim is to be there in person. The jury needs to see that the defendant takes the matter seriously. A meaningful corporate representative must attend and participate in the trial; defendant’s witnesses must testify to the extent possible; and the defense must provide a credible explanation if a particularly important witness does not testify.

Develop a narrative. Defense counsel must build a comprehensive narrative that goes to the foundational concepts of punitive damages—namely punishment for past misconduct and deterrence of future misconduct. It’s one thing to stubbornly argue that the defendant didn’t do anything wrong, but a looming punitive damages instruction requires the defendant to step out from behind the burden of proof and elicit evidence affirmatively demonstrating that he or she does indeed “get it.”

Whatever the process, it’s critical to gain an independent perspective of the evidence outside the legal defense bubble."

The narrative should be supported by objective documentary evidence. This could include evidence of a peculiar misunderstanding or an explanation of why the same scenario is unlikely to arise again. The defense should elicit evidence of the policies and procedures in place to safeguard against the occurrence or prevent a future occurrence. The defense should marshal whatever facts and evidence exist of the defendant’s good faith and fair dealing, or that refute any indication of malicious conduct.

Assess the approach at trial. If the defendant is facing a punitive damages instruction, the defense narrative begins to unfold during voir dire and the opening statement. During the trial, what message will you send the jury, and how will jurors perceive the defendant? Will the defense try to characterize the plaintiff as opportunistic or a liar, and what’s the risk if the jury doesn’t agree? Consider actively challenging defense witnesses to explain and back up their testimony to build credibility by anticipating the jury’s questions. Throughout, make use of technology. Jurors expect it, and it’s necessary to hold their attention.

At closing, you’ll urge the jury to reach a verdict in favor of the defense, but has your client authorized you to give jurors an alternative to anchor the position? The jury will not view a reasonable alternative, properly couched in a closing argument, as a concession of liability or a sign of weakness. An alternative damages amount steals the plaintiff’s thunder in terms of imploring the jury to “send a message.” Assure jurors in concrete terms of the accountability conveyed by a modest or even nominal award.

Do not overreach. Newton’s Third Law of Motion teaches that every action produces an equal and opposite reaction. This also applies when attempting to defend the indefensible. If the defendant’s conduct is indefensible (and the case cannot be settled), counsel and witnesses must adjust their approach to defend where the real exposure lies.

Move for judgment. At the close of the plaintiff’s case, the defendant should move for judgment as a matter of law under Rule 50(a). The argument should be sketched out before trial based on the anticipated evidence. Remember that the court might defer even the most meritorious motion for judgment pending the jury’s verdict and post-trial motions. The motion for judgment may be critical to preserve certain post-trial motions.

Stipulate to facts. Offer to stipulate to facts that are unhelpful to the defense, which the court will read to the jury in lieu of testimony. One area for stipulation is the defendant’s financial metrics. A stipulation not only shortens the proceeding; it may be preferable to live testimony that might well captivate the jury.

Object and preserve. Before the trial begins, prepare to lodge appropriate objections, including to the jury instructions. The balancing act—objecting to evidence versus appearing obstreperous—depends on a case-specific mixture of the judge, the pretrial rulings and the potential harm or prejudice arising from the evidence in question.

Watch and adjust. Although it may be off-putting for trial counsel to stare intently at the jurors, there may be others assisting with the trial (co-counsel, electronic technician, consultant) who can unobtrusively focus on the jury’s reactions. Trial counsel should receive real-time feedback on them and adjust the presentation accordingly.

A looming punitive damages instruction raises the stakes at trial. As such, defense of the punitive damages claim must always be an integral part of the defendant’s case.

David D. Yeagley is a partner at Ulmer & Berne. David is a trial and appellate lawyer whose practice focuses on class action and complex litigation. David’s practice encompasses the defense of consumer protection and deceptive practices litigation, warranty and false advertising litigation, insurance policy litigation, TCPA class actions, real estate and construction litigation, director, officer and shareholder rights litigation including D&O and derivative claims, credit card litigation, food advertising and marketing litigation, automobile franchise litigation, investment fraud and securities litigation, business contracts litigation, defective products and Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act litigation, and environmental and toxic tort litigation. David is skilled in the development of comprehensive class action defense strategies, including jurisdictional issues and the use of early motion practice based on principles under Article III standing, Rule 12(b) and Rule 23. David also has extensive experience regarding arbitration proceedings and the enforcement of arbitration clauses in consumer and business contracts. He has achieved the highest rating, AV Preeminent®, from Martindale-Hubbell®.

Headline Image: ISTOCK/PEOPLEIMAGES, ISTOCK/MESUT UGURLU

Related Articles

The Write Stuff


by Michele M. Jochner

A series of pointers for making your legal writing clear, concise and—crucially—persuasive.

Closed laptop with woman holding pencil

Freedom to Compete


by Alyson M. St. Pierre and Ashley C. Pack

Recent movement at the federal level regarding management-labor relations mean changes to enforcement of noncompete agreements and other covenants could be imminent.

Woman in front of open blue door

Be Careful What You’re Waiving


by Danielle E. Tricolla and Gabriella E. Botticelli

It’s not true that any correspondence between attorney and client is de facto privileged. That protective wall can crumble quite easily, in fact. Here’s a primer.

Multicolor envelopes flying out of laptop screen

Best Law Firms® Research Has Begun


by Best Lawyers

Best Law Firms® rankings are annually produced awards recognizing the top law firms across the United States. We are here to offer insight into the submission process for all eligible firms.

Black background with colorful squares and faces

Best Lawyers Voting Is Now Open


by Best Lawyers

Voting has begun in several countries across the globe, including the United States, the United Kingdom and Europe. Below we offer dates, details and answers to voting-related questions to assist with the voting process.

Hands holding smartphone with five stars above phone

Best Lawyers’ Purely Pure Voting: Authenticity and Trust Through Decades of Tradition


by Best Lawyers

Larry A. Campagna of Chamberlain Hrdlicka met with Best Lawyers CEO Phillip Greer to discuss how trust and peer-review feedback are pivotal to building authentic relationships with colleagues in the legal industry.

Hands shaking with silhouette of professionals

Honoring the Integrity of Best Lawyers’ Purely Peer Review Voting Process


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers CEO Phillip Greer sat down with attorney J. Keith Hyde of Provost Umphrey to discuss how peer review plays a role in building relationships and establishing accountability in the legal industry.

Five gold stars with a magnifying glass hovering over the right star

Clients with Appeal


by Michele M. Jochner

It’s frustrating to lose a case you’ve worked hard on. When considering whether to take an appeal of that ruling, here’s what to keep in mind—and how to enable your client to make that decision.

Client faces stacks of legal papers

The Evolving Reproductive Landscape


by Justin Smulison

The Supreme Court’s thunderclap Dobbs decision sent abortion policy nationwide into utterly unfamiliar terrain. The ruling also has a colossal effect on surrogates, intended parents and anyone involved in family planning given the patchwork of state laws likely to emerge. What’s a family law attorney to do?

Couple attends surrogate ultrasound

Estate Plan Implications in Divorce


by April Will and James Vedder

It’s essential that family law practitioners consult with estate planning attorneys as they guide their clients through a marital breakup. Here’s what to what to consider when there is a trust, but the parties do not trust each other.

Two figures shaking hands

The Quarter-Century Childhood


by Joseph Trotti

In recent years, proposed and enacted laws have significantly expanded parental obligation for child support, receiving little attention. Even if well-meaning, they have their flaws, beginning with reduced parental rights.

Child helping individual plant flowers

Mike Morse Law Firm’s 90-Day Digital Transformation Disrupts Status Quo


by John Georgatos

Mike Morse Law Firm's Chief Information Officer is shedding light on the firm's 90-day digital transformation.

Up close image of a multicolored eye

2023 Best Lawyers Mexican Awards


by Best Lawyers

Announcing Mexico's 2023 recognized lawyers and firms.

Green, white and red stripes with symbol in center

New York City To Clarify Employer Artificial Intelligence Laws


by Gregory Sirico

Best Lawyer weighs in on New York City's current legislative battle to clarify the extent of artificial intelligence laws in an employment setting.

AI worker stands in front of line of people

IN PARTNERSHIP

Embedded Advantage: The Value in Partnering with Appellate Counsel


by Justin Smulison

Most litigants should expect the non-prevailing party in their case to challenge the trial court’s final judgment in post-judgment motions and/or on appeal. Robert A. Mandel discusses how aligning with a seasoned appellate lawyer can make all the difference in securing a favorable resolution.

Headshot of male lawyer with brown hair in dark suit

A New Spin on Continuing Legal Education


by Sara Collin

Attorney Humira Noorestani is launching a program for continuing legal education, one that she’s dubbed the “Netflix of CLE,” allowing lawyers in the U.S. to explore legal knowledge from prominent lawyers around the world.

Hands emerging from computer and cellphone screens

Trending Articles

Announcing the 2023 The Best Lawyers in America Honorees


by Best Lawyers

Only the top 5.3% of all practicing lawyers in the U.S. were selected by their peers for inclusion in the 29th edition of The Best Lawyers in America®.

Gold strings and dots connecting to form US map

Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2023


by Best Lawyers

The third edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America™ highlights the legal talent of lawyers who have been in practice less than 10 years.

Three arrows made of lines and dots on blue background

The Best Lawyers in South Africa™ 2023


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers proudly announces lawyers recognized in South Africa for 2023.

South African flag

Could Reign Supreme End with the Queen?


by Sara Collin

Canada is revisiting the notion of abolishing the monarchy after Queen Elizabeth II’s passing, but many Canadians and lawmakers are questioning if Canada could, should and would follow through.

Teacup on saucer over image of Queen's eye

IN PARTNERSHIP

2022: Another Banner Year


by John Fields

Block O’Toole & Murphy continues to secure some of New York’s highest results for personal injury matters.

Three men in business suits standing in office

Famous Songs Unprotected by Copyright Could Mean Royalties for Some


by Michael B. Fein

A guide to navigating copyright claims on famous songs.

Can I Sing "Happy Birthday" in Public?

Announcing the 2023 The Best Lawyers in Canada Honorees


by Best Lawyers

The Best Lawyers in Canada™ is entering its 17th edition for 2023. We highlight the elite lawyers awarded this year.

Red map of Canada with white lines and dots

Wage and Overtime Laws for Truck Drivers


by Greg Mansell

For truck drivers nationwide, underpayment and overtime violations are just the beginning of a long list of problems. Below we explore the wages you are entitled to but may not be receiving.

Truck Driver Wage and Overtime Laws in the US

What the Courts Say About Recording in the Classroom


by Christina Henagen Peer and Peter Zawadski

Students and parents are increasingly asking to use audio devices to record what's being said in the classroom. But is it legal? A recent ruling offer gives the answer to a question confusing parents and administrators alike.

Is It Legal for Students to Record Teachers?

Thirteen Years of Excellence


by Best Lawyers

For the 13th consecutive year, “Best Law Firms” has awarded the most elite and talented law firms across the country through a thorough and trusted data review process.

Red, white and blue pipes and writing on black background

The Upcycle Conundrum


by Karen Kreider Gaunt

Laudable or litigious? What you need to know about potential copyright and trademark infringement when repurposing products.

Repurposed Products and Copyright Infringemen

Choosing a Title Company: What a Seller Should Expect


by Roy D. Oppenheim

When it comes to choosing a title company, how much power exactly does a seller have?

Choosing the Title Company As Seller

Caffeine Overload and DUI Tests


by Daniel Taylor

While it might come as a surprise, the over-consumption of caffeine could trigger a false positive on a breathalyzer test.

Can Caffeine Cause You to Fail DUI Test?

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers® in the United States


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers listed in the 28th Edition of The Best Lawyers in America® and in the 2nd Edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2022.

2022 Best Lawyers Listings for United States

Announcing The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2023


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms from Australia.

The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2023

Announcing The Best Lawyers in Germany™ 2023


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms from Germany.

Black, red and yellow stripes