Staunch Competition

On the other side of the pandemic, after record numbers of employee resignation, protecting trade secrets is both challenging and being challenged.

Protecting Trade Secrets During Period of Res

Andrea E. Nieto , Catherine H. Molloy and Jennifer W. Corinis

May 31, 2022 08:38 AM

The pandemic wrought previously unimaginable changes to the labor market. “The Great Resignation” that began in 2020 has continued into 2022, as workers resigned in record numbers. In 2021, 47.8 million workers quit their jobs across the country, a record year for resignations. In January of this year, another 4.3 million workers left their jobs. While some workers left to start their own business, to change careers or to retire, others are staying in the same industry and moving for higher pay, greater flexibility and better benefits. When salespeople and high-level employees leave to join a competitor, their former employers rightfully worry that their valuable trade secrets will go with them.

This increased employee mobility adds new challenges to employers who need to protect their confidential information and trade secrets, including both employers who have lost employees subject to non-compete, non-solicitation or non-disclosure agreements, and employers competing for talented employees who are subject to such agreements. The explosion in remote work also affects employers’ ability to protect their valuable information. Compounding these challenges, the current administration has announced efforts to restrict employers’ use of non-compete agreements.

Protecting Trade Secrets and Confidential Information in 2022

Employers have many tools at their disposal to protect trade secrets, including using non-compete, non-solicitation and non-disclosure agreements as well as invention assignments. But the Biden administration has expressed concern that non-compete agreements, in particular, unfairly limit worker mobility, and has recently taken steps to limit their use. Further, many states have limited the use and enforcement of non-competes and may refuse to enforce choice-of-law provisions requiring application of more employer-friendly states’ laws. In the face of this trend, employers should also focus their attention on protecting trade secrets through non-disclosure and non-solicitation agreements.

On July 29, 2021, President Biden signed an Executive Order titled “Promoting Competition in the American Economy.” The Order

  • detailed a whole-of-government approach to address overconcentration, monopolization and unfair competition in the American economy;
  • established a White House Competition Council within the Executive Office of the President to coordinate government efforts to promote competition, coordinate legislation and enforce fair competition, anti-monopolization and antitrust laws; and
  • encouraged agency heads to influence regulations on competition in the industries under their jurisdiction.

Biden also directed the Federal Trade Commission to use its rulemaking authority to “curtail the unfair use of non-compete clauses and other clauses or agreements that may unfairly limit worker mobility.”

Following the Order, the Treasury Department, in consultation with the Departments of Justice and Labor and the FTC, investigated the effects of a lack of competition on the U.S. labor market. The Treasury Department released its report on March 7, 2022, detailing concerns about restrictive employment agreements. The report recognized that:

  • a restrictive term in an employment contract is not automatically enforceable;
  • “the degree to which courts will enforce such contract provisions varies between states;”
  • enforceability may vary by occupation; and
  • “[e]mployers who illegally use restrictive covenants rarely face sanctions[.]”

In line with the Biden Administration’s Whole-of-Government approach, on March 10, 2022, the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division and the Labor Department announced that they had signed a memorandum of understanding to “strengthen the partnership between the two agencies to protect workers from employer collusion…and promote competitive labor markets and worker mobility.” The two agencies intend to “share enforcement information, collaborate on new policies and ensure that workers are protected from collusion and unlawful employer behavior.”

The DOL will, as appropriate, refer potential antitrust violations to its Antitrust Division, when it discovers potential violations while conducting investigations under its jurisdiction. Similarly, the DOJ will refer labor issues to the DOL that it discovers during the course of enforcing its own statutes. The DOJ has also signaled an increased willingness to prosecute perceived wage-fixing and otherwise aggressively enforce antitrust laws to promote and protect competition.

Another area of concern is so-called “no-poach” agreements, where competitors agree not to hire each other’s top-level employees. While such agreements have sometimes been used in agreements to resolve disputes over solicitation of employees, the DOJ can, and will, prosecute companies and individuals who conspire to suppress competition.

What types of restrictive covenants are enforceable?

Absent any countervailing federal rules, many courts continue to find valid and enforce non-compete provisions, covenants preventing solicitation of customers and employees and nondisclosure of confidential information where a legitimate business interest underlying those covenants is identified. Those legitimate business interests include:

  • Trade secrets;
  • The sale of goodwill associated with an identifiable business practice, geographic or marketing area;
  • Valuable confidential information, such as intellectual property, business processes and strategies, sales plans and marketing material, detailed information about customers and sales and internal financial information;
  • Substantial relationships with specific prospective or existing customers, patients or clients, where proprietary information is at play; and
  • Employees with extraordinary or specialized training.

In addition to non-compete agreements, employers should also consider protecting their trade secrets by using non-disclosure agreements (NDAs). NDAs can put employees on notice that the company considers certain information confidential and require both current and former employees to maintain the secrecy of that information.

Employers should also consider whether their jurisdiction permits non-solicitation clauses in their employment agreements with salespeople and other high-level employees, which prevent those employees from soliciting their former employer’s customers or employees for a specified period of time. In general, those agreements will be enforced to prevent unfair competition if the restriction is reasonable in time, geography and is related to the employer’s type of business.

Finally, in certain industries, employers may require certain employees to sign invention assignments, in which employees are required to assign to the company any improvements they make to the company's intellectual property while in their employ.

What types of restrictive covenants should be avoided?

Employers should avoid no-poach agreements, covenants that are overbroad in time and geographic limitations and unrelated to the employer’s business, and agreements that are in conflict with the public policy of the state where an employee resides.

  • No-poach agreements. DOJ is willing to prosecute competitors who enter into no-poach agreements and has done so. In March 2021, a federal grand jury in Nevada returned two criminal antitrust indictments against a health care staffing company and its former manager, accusing them of conspiring with a competitor “to allocate employee nurses and to fix the wages of those nurses, in violation of the Sherman Act.”
  • Overbroad agreements. Non-compete agreements that impose broad geographical areas outside of employee’s regular scope of work, such as a nationwide restriction when the employee works in a two-mile radius from the employer’s location, unreasonably long restrictions, such as restrictions for more than two years or are unrelated to the employer’s business, such as prohibiting selling widgets when the employer sells gadgets, will likely be unenforceable.
  • Choice-of-law provisions where the employee’s resident’s state public policy conflicts with the law of the employer’s state. Other state courts will refuse to enforce a state’s non-compete law where that law conflicts with that state’s public policy. For example, courts in Georgia, New York and Illinois have found that Florida employer-friendly law on restrictive covenants violates the public policy of those states. In California, there are specific statutory requirements for enforcing choice of forum and choice of law provisions that apply other state’s laws.


While the FTC has engaged in informal fact-finding through virtual workshops regarding competition in labor markets, any rulemaking action is likely to be delayed due to a vacancy on the five-person commission. Absent action by the FTC, Congress may act on the bi-partisan Freedom to Compete Act co-sponsored by Senator Marco Rubio, which would amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to prevent employers from using non-compete agreements in employment contracts for certain non-exempt employees. That bill was referred to committee in July 2021. We can expect some form of federal action in the future. Accordingly, employers should ensure that future restrictive covenants protect an employer’s trade secrets while not overtly prohibiting competition.

Board Certified in Labor and Employment Law, Katie Molloy focuses her practice on trade secret and restrictive covenant litigation, and defending matters involving discrimination, harassment, wrongful discharge and wage and hour claims in state and federal court. She provides advice and counseling on all employment law and human resources matters, and assists employers with administrative investigations before the EEOC, DOL and NLRB.

Jennifer W. Corinis has deep trial and appellate experience, in both federal and state courts, focusing on claims of alleged individual and class discrimination, Title VII, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as well as complex medical malpractice and tort cases. Prior to joining the firm, Jennifer was an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Middle District of Florida where she gained valuable courtroom experience—approximately a dozen trials and more than ten oral arguments before the Eleventh Circuit. Before joining the U.S. Attorney’s Office, Jennifer spent six years in private practice at two large Boston law firms, where she defended auditing firms in securities class actions, and participated in employment and intellectual property matters.

Andrea E. Nieto is member of the Labor & Employment Practice in Greenberg Traurig's Tampa office. In addition to assisting employers with investigations before the EEOC, OSHA and FCHR, she represents employers in disputes regarding restrictive covenants and alleged discriminatory practices in both state and federal court. Prior to joining GT, she served as a federal clerk in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida and litigated ERISA life insurance, and disability insurance disputes.

Related Articles

Employment Entanglements

by Justin Smulison

As the United States approaches its third summer against the backdrop of the coronavirus, employers and employees still find themselves in a Gordian Knot of interconnected labor and employment challenges, with no clear way to untangle them all.

Post-Pandemic Employment Challenges Persist

Trending Top Five: Critical Corporate Components for 2022

by Justin Smulison

It’s no longer “business as usual” for most of Corporate America. With a growing list of challenges facing the legal and financial health of many companies, we talked to several major General Counsel about the biggest areas in which businesses should remain vigilant.

Corporate Advice From General Counsel

The Employment Endemic

by Meredith Caiafa and Sarah Greene

The pandemic has had far-reaching effects on employment law since it officially took hold in 2020, but the litigation and lawmaking surrounding it are mutating faster than the variants. Here’s how lawmakers and businesses can keep up.

Employment Law During COVID-19

Measuring Success by Results

by John Fields

Recognized Best Lawyers®* recipient Joseph F. Brophy on how his Firm determines success.

Measuring Firm Success

Texas "Lawyer of the Year" 2022

by Best Lawyers

Charla Truett is honored as 2022 "Lawyer of the Year" in Texas for Immigration Law.

Texas "Lawyer of the Year" 2022

Hybrid Work: Coping with Compliance Consequences

by Gregory Sirico

Communications platforms like Webex by Cisco, Zoom and Microsoft Teams are more popular than ever in the age of hybrid work, but are firms risking compliance for convenience?

Compliances Issues with Hybrid Work

Changes and Challenges

by Megan Norris

As the pandemic ebbs and many people return to the office, midsize law firms in particular must navigate a host of unprecedented questions about costs, culture and client expectations.

Changes, Challenges and Cost of the Pandemic

Forging Bonds, Building Business

by Crystal L. Howard and Lizl Leonardo

As disorienting and occasionally frightening as the pandemic has been, it has also forced lawyers to find innovative new ways to stay connected and do business.

Pandemic Sparks Innovative Ways of Conducting

Clear and Unmistakable Uncertainty

by Joseph J. Brennan and William D. Edwards

MV Transportation and the battle over the contract coverage test.

Uncertainty for Unionized Workers

Major Change to FLSA Procedure

by Greg Mansell

The Sixth Circuit will determine if a major procedural change is warranted for employees seeking unpaid wages.

Procedural Changes for Unpaid Employees

Blessed Are the Caregivers

by Anne Yuengert and Stephanie Gaston

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission guidance on disparate treatment of employees caring for family members.

EEOC Address Family Caregiving

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers: The Employment Law Issue

by Best Lawyers

Featuring the top legal talent from The Best Lawyers in America, Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America and “Lawyer of the Year” recipients for Labor and Employment Law, Workers’ Compensation Law, ERISA Law and Ethics and Professional Responsibility Law.

Best Lawyers Employment Law Publication

Legal Trends in the Modern Workplace

by Emma R. Schuering and Meghan H. Hanson

Employees are reevaluating their jobs and the workforce, including issues like pay equity, forced arbitration, paid time off, discrimination and other such policies as they continue to navigate a post-pandemic work life.

Legal Trends In the Workplace Post-Pandemic

Courtroom Mastery

by Justin Smulison

Victor H. Pribanic recalled the excitement of returning to the courtroom in late 2021 for a medical negligence case that could help set a new course for Pribanic & Pribanic’s trial advocacy.

Victor H. Pribanic Makes Return to Courtroom

Think Globally, Act Safely

by Michael Winkleman

As the pandemic (fitfully) recedes at last, is it once again safe to travel internationally? It is—if you take a few common-sense steps ahead of time.

International & Cruise Travel After COVID-19

There’s Hope for the Canadian Real Estate Market Post COVID-19

by Steven Tulman

Clover Mortgage offers advice and predictions on the Toronto real estate market as we move on post-pandemic.

Canadian Real Estate Market Post COVID-19

Trending Articles

The Real Camille: An Interview with Johnny Depp’s Lawyer Camille Vasquez

by Rebecca Blackwell

Camille Vasquez, a young lawyer at Brown Rudnick, sat down with Best Lawyers CEO Phillip Greer to talk about her distinguished career, recently being named partner and what comes next for her.

Camille Vasquez in office

Announcing The Best Lawyers in The United Kingdom™ 2023

by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms from the United Kingdom.

The Best Lawyers in The United Kingdom 2023

Johnny Depp and Amber Heard: The Best Lawyers Honorees Behind the Litigation

by Gregory Sirico

Best Lawyers takes a look at the recognized legal talent representing Johnny Depp and Amber Heard in their ongoing defamation trial.

Lawyers for Johnny Depp and Amber Heard

Announcing The Best Lawyers in France™ 2023

by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms from France.

Blue, white and red strips

Announcing The Best Lawyers in Germany™ 2023

by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms from Germany.

Black, red and yellow stripes

Education by Trial: Cultivating Legal Expertise in the Courtroom

by Margo Pierce

The intricacies of complex lawsuits require extensive knowledge of the legal precedent. But they also demand a high level of skill in every discipline needed to succeed at trial, such as analyzing technical reports and deposing expert witnesses.

Cultivating Legal Expertise in the Courtroom

Announcing The Best Lawyers in Belgium™ 2023

by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms from Belgium.

Black, yellow and red stripes

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers® in the United States

by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers listed in the 28th Edition of The Best Lawyers in America® and in the 2nd Edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2022.

2022 Best Lawyers Listings for United States

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers™ in France

by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms, including our inaugural Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch recipients.

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers™ in France

Choosing a Title Company: What a Seller Should Expect

by Roy D. Oppenheim

When it comes to choosing a title company, how much power exactly does a seller have?

Choosing the Title Company As Seller

We Are Women, We Are Fearless

by Deborah S. Chang and Justin Smulison

Athea Trial Lawyers is a female owned and operated law firm specializing in civil litigation, catastrophic energy, wrongful death and product liability.

Athea Trial Law Female Leadership and Success

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers™ in Germany

by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms, including our inaugural Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch recipients.

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers™ in Germany

U.K. Introduces Revisions to Right-to-Work Scheme and Immigration Rules

by Gregory Sirico

Right-to-Work Scheme and Immigration Rules in

Famous Songs Unprotected by Copyright Could Mean Royalties for Some

by Michael B. Fein

A guide to navigating copyright claims on famous songs.

Can I Sing "Happy Birthday" in Public?

Destiny Fulfilled

by Sara Collin

Was Angela Reddock-Wright destined to become a lawyer? It sure seems that way. Yet her path was circuitous. This accomplished employment attorney, turned mediator, arbitrator and ADR specialist nonpareil discusses her career, the role of attorneys in society, the new world of post-pandemic work and why new Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson represents the future.

Interview with Lawyer Angela Reddock-Wright

What the Courts Say About Recording in the Classroom

by Christina Henagen Peer and Peter Zawadski

Students and parents are increasingly asking to use audio devices to record what's being said in the classroom. But is it legal? A recent ruling offer gives the answer to a question confusing parents and administrators alike.

Is It Legal for Students to Record Teachers?