Insight

The Proverbial Rock and Hard Place

The physician's opioid prescribing dilemma.

Opioid Prescribing Dilemma
Sarah E. Coyne

Sarah E. Coyne

December 19, 2017 12:25 PM

Physicians (and other prescribers) face a dilemma. Physicians are at least encouraged, and at times required, to evaluate pain and take steps to address it. Prescribing opioids has been a necessary part of the standard of care in addressing pain. There are certainly patients who legitimately cannot find relief any other way. However, the obligation to treat patients and address their pain is fundamentally inconsistent with the increasing pressure on physicians not to cause, facilitate, or tolerate patient opioid abuse.

There is no question that opioid addiction and abuse is a serious threat. Physicians take that seriously. For example, it is now typical for prescribing physicians to require and enforce pain contracts with patients, to monitor patients obtaining prescriptions from multiple providers by state-run tracking databases, and to implement policies that no opioids will be prescribed absent extraordinary circumstances.

The competing requirements to treat pain effectively and to manage the risk of opioid abuse put physicians at a crossroads, with regard to liability. On one hand, patients whose pain is not appropriately managed can bring claims, and both payors and regulators can hold physicians accountable and liable in this circumstance. On the other hand, physicians are subject to significant regulatory parameters from federal and state government as well as many other stakeholders in the health care industry for over-prescribing or negligent prescribing.

State licensing boards are one of the most significant sources of enforcement against physicians for opioid prescribing practices. State boards vary widely in their reputation for such enforcement, but there has been an upward trajectory of regulation of opioid prescribing in most states, with clearer guidelines and more significant consequences. Many believe that state boards do not go far enough, and while that may be true, it is vital to recognize the constellation of factors that a physician must balance in making prescribing decisions.

Physicians invite scrutiny from state boards in a myriad of ways, including failure to fully evaluate the need for pain medication, failing to implement or enforce pain contracts, failing to monitor available databases to determine if a patient is obtaining duplicate prescriptions from other providers, believing patient excuses for needing more or early refills, or failing to detect that a patient is likely selling the opioids rather than taking them as prescribed.

Many of these failures come down to a physician’s decision to trust what their patient is telling them.

Physicians are faulted for not detecting that a patient has misrepresented the circumstances, therefore prescribing to a patient who was abusing the medication. Suspecting one’s patient of malingering or outright lying is a skill that physicians develop over time, but it is not a standard part of the traditional physician-patient relationship. While it is difficult to explain this to a licensing board in any given case, determining a patient’s truthfulness is a largely subjective and imprecise process to manage.

Physicians who have been scrutinized or who have observed colleagues be scrutinized by state medical boards may tend to under-prescribe as a protective mechanism, a manifestation of so-called “defensive medicine.” Various physician organizations have warned against the potential consequences of refusal to prescribe opioids to patients who need them based on fear of licensing disciplinary actions.

When a state regulatory investigation is launched against physicians for over-prescribing, there is an increasing trend of simply resigning their DEA registration and their license to prescribe narcotics rather than proceed with the investigation and face reputational and financial damage.

Certainly, controls on prescribing in the interest of patient safety is crucial and a fundamental skill that should be exercised by all prescribers. State licensing boards investigating opioid prescribing issues should also take into account the other pieces of the puzzle, including the physician’s obligation to address pain, the subjective nature of evaluating pain, and patient truthfulness.

What is the solution here? There have been steps in the right direction. Oversight agencies have promulgated guidelines and rules to govern appropriate prescribing and associate patient safety practices. Physicians are obtaining education about identifying patients attempting to manipulate the system and abuse opioids. Awareness has increased exponentially in the medical community. Nevertheless, all of the issues identified here create a dichotomy of pressure that puts physicians (and other prescribers) in a very difficult position. The tug of war between accommodating patient needs and mitigating opioid abuse and over-prescribing is real and should be recognized by state licensing boards in their enforcement activities.

Related Articles

When Medical Malpractice Defendants Are Better Able To Cope, Lawyers Are Better Able To Do Their Jobs


by Gail Fiore

Lawyers face heavy challenges when dealing with difficult medical malpractice defendants. The Winning Focus, LLC, founded by Gail Fiore, offers coaching and support to defendants feeling the burden of difficult courtroom battles.

Guidance for Medical Malpractice Defendants

Trending Articles

The Real Camille: An Interview with Johnny Depp’s Lawyer Camille Vasquez


by Rebecca Blackwell

Camille Vasquez, a young lawyer at Brown Rudnick, sat down with Best Lawyers CEO Phillip Greer to talk about her distinguished career, recently being named partner and what comes next for her.

Camille Vasquez in office

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers® in the United States


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers listed in the 28th Edition of The Best Lawyers in America® and in the 2nd Edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2022.

2022 Best Lawyers Listings for United States

Famous Songs Unprotected by Copyright Could Mean Royalties for Some


by Michael B. Fein

A guide to navigating copyright claims on famous songs.

Can I Sing "Happy Birthday" in Public?

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers in Canada™


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers listed in the 16th Edition of The Best Lawyers in Canada™ and 1st Edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in Canada.

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers in Canada™

Choosing a Title Company: What a Seller Should Expect


by Roy D. Oppenheim

When it comes to choosing a title company, how much power exactly does a seller have?

Choosing the Title Company As Seller

How A Claim Can Create A ‘Class’ of Its Own


by Justin Smulison

One civil claim can help a victim recover, prevent others from the same harm and even save lives. Tom Connick has experienced this directly, having been at the ground floor of injury claims that have led to high-value class action settlements.

Fire Consuming Paper Money

Johnny Depp and Amber Heard: The Best Lawyers Honorees Behind the Litigation


by Gregory Sirico

Best Lawyers takes a look at the recognized legal talent representing Johnny Depp and Amber Heard in their ongoing defamation trial.

Lawyers for Johnny Depp and Amber Heard

Announcing the 2022 "Best Law Firms" Rankings


by Best Lawyers

The 2022 “Best Law Firms” publication includes all “Law Firm of the Year” recipients, national and metro Tier 1 ranked firms and editorial from thought leaders in the legal industry.

The 2022 Best Law Firms Awards

Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch – The Future of Legal Talent Looks Bright


by Justin Smulison

Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch is launching its second edition in the United States, and after talking with both a company leader and esteemed lawyers on the list, the importance of this prestigious list is evident.

Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America 2022

Why Cariola Díez Pérez-Cotapos Developed Its Own Legal Tech


by Best Lawyers

Juan Pablo Matus of Cariola Díez Pérez-Cotapos, 2019 "Law Firm of the Year" award for Corporate and M&A Law in Chile, discusses his firm's joint venture with Cognitiva in creating Lexnova, a legal AI system.

Cariola Díez Pérez-Cotapos Interview

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers™ in Australia


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms.

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers™ in Australi

Caffeine Overload and DUI Tests


by Daniel Taylor

While it might come as a surprise, the over-consumption of caffeine could trigger a false positive on a breathalyzer test.

Can Caffeine Cause You to Fail DUI Test?

Announcing The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2023


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms from Australia.

The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2023

Wage and Overtime Laws for Truck Drivers


by Greg Mansell

For truck drivers nationwide, underpayment and overtime violations are just the beginning of a long list of problems. Below we explore the wages you are entitled to but may not be receiving.

Truck Driver Wage and Overtime Laws in the US

Education by Trial: Cultivating Legal Expertise in the Courtroom


by Margo Pierce

The intricacies of complex lawsuits require extensive knowledge of the legal precedent. But they also demand a high level of skill in every discipline needed to succeed at trial, such as analyzing technical reports and deposing expert witnesses.

Cultivating Legal Expertise in the Courtroom

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers in South Africa™


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms.

Announcing 2022 Best Lawyers in South Africa