It’s Official: Options for Challenging “Official Marks” in Canada

“Official marks” are a strangely obscure corner of Canadian intellectual-property law. What are they, what explains their strength and what can a business owner in search of a trademark do to challenge them?

Two griffins on royal crest

Jamie-Lynn Kraft and Philip Lapin

September 30, 2022 12:00 AM

“Official marks” are a unique feature of Canadian trademark law. Many trademark owners, even in Canada, are unaware of their existence. Those who know about them are often unclear about the rights provided and the options available for dealing with citations of (or complaints based on) official marks.

These marks can be a source of great frustration for business owners and others when cited by the Canadian Trademarks Office against an application to register a trademark. However, applicants have several options available to overcome the citation of an official mark.

Recent amendments to the Trademarks Act (which are not yet in force but could optimistically come into effect in late 2023) have codified one of the options that is currently only a matter of Trademarks Office practice and introduced a new mechanism to obtain a remedy currently available only through Canada’s Federal Court.


Although official marks bear some resemblance to standard trademarks, they differ in several significant respects. Most notably, an official mark can prevent others from using or registering an identical mark or any other mark that would be “mistaken for” the official one. The parties’ goods, services and overall businesses are irrelevant and ignored in the assessment of the “mistaken for” test. (The “confusion” test relevant for comparing trademarks does not apply in the case of official marks.)

Official marks represent a surprisingly significant form of intellectual-property protection that never expires, is not subject to non-use cancellation and does not undergo substantive examination. Protection for an official mark may be granted even if the mark is, for example, clearly descriptive, deceptive, a surname, a common place name or easily confused with prior registered trademarks.

“Official marks” are described under paragraph 9(1)(n)(iii) of the Trademarks Act, which reads as follows:

9(1) No person shall adopt in connection with a business, as a trademark or otherwise, any mark consisting of, or so nearly resembling as to be likely to be mistaken for, (n) any badge, crest, emblem or mark (iii) adopted and used by any public authority, in Canada as an official mark for goods or services, in respect of which the Registrar has, at the request of . . . [the] public authority . . . given public notice of its adoption and use.

Under this provision, only Canadian “public authorities” (as further described below) can obtain protection for official marks. To be enforceable, the mark must have been “adopted and used” by the public authority. The term “adopted and used” in this context has been held simply to mean that the mark was publicly displayed.

Before granting an official mark, the Trademarks Office requires evidence demonstrating that the mark has been publicly displayed and that it has public authority status. On the latter point, the office will apply a two-part test to determine if an entity (described below as a “body”) qualifies as a public authority:

  1. a significant degree of control must be exercised by the appropriate government over the activities of the body; and
  2. the activities of the body must benefit the public.

The clearest examples of public authorities are Canadian governments themselves: the federal government and those of the provinces and municipalities. However, the Trademarks Office has also determined that many nongovernmental entities are also public authorities, such as provincial lottery corporations, research companies and organizations including (among others) certain sporting organizations, dairy associations and museums.

Current Options to Challenge an Official Mark

When assessing a citation of an official mark raised by the Trademarks Office as it reviews a trademark application, the first consideration is whether the mark at issue would be “mistaken for” the official mark. In most cases, a putative trademark must be nearly identical to an official mark for its registration to be denied. Accordingly, if the marks at issue are not nearly identical, it may be worth attempting to overcome the objection through argument. If arguments fail, other options are available.

In cases in which an official mark is cited by the Trademarks Office, often the most straightforward remedy is to obtain consent of the official mark’s owner. Relatively often, public authorities are prepared to give their consent—sometimes subject to certain conditions—particularly when the official mark is an ordinary word found in the dictionary and the goods and services listed in the application are unrelated to the public authority’s activities.

Where a letter of consent is unavailable, those facing an objection based on an official mark can consider two other options. First, the Trademarks Office will withdraw an objection if an applicant provides evidence sufficient for the Registrar to determine that the public authority no longer exists. Second, a party can challenge the validity of an official mark by bringing a proceeding in the Federal Court of Canada for judicial review of the Registrar’s decision to give public notice of the official mark (or seeking a declaration that the official mark is invalid).

To date, the Federal Court has considered only two grounds of invalidity: that the owner is not a “public authority” in Canada, and that the official mark was not “adopted and used” prior to the Trademarks Office granting official mark status.

Recent Amendments to the Trademarks Act

The act has been amended to add the following subsections (which are not yet in force as of press time, but could optimistically come into effect in late 2023):

9(3) For greater certainty, and despite any public notice of adoption and use given by the Registrar under paragraph (1)(n), subparagraph (1)(n)(iii) does not apply with respect to a badge, crest, emblem or mark if the entity that made the request for the public notice is not a public authority or no longer exists.
(4) In the circumstances set out in subsection 9(3), the Registrar may, on his or her own initiative or at the request of a person who pays a prescribed fee, give public notice that subparagraph (1)(n)(iii) does not apply to the badge, crest, emblem or mark.

When in force, these provisions will ideally create a simple, efficient mechanism to allow the Trademarks Office to declare that an official mark is no longer valid or enforceable. However, as noted above, such a declaration will be available only in limited circumstances—namely, in cases in which the owner of the official mark is not a public authority or no longer exists.

There is currently no simple mechanism to have an official mark declared invalid by reason of the owner not qualifying as a public authority. The only method available at the moment is to file an application for a declaration or judicial review with the Federal Court. However, once subsections 9(3) and 9(4) are in force (optimistically in late 2023), it will be possible to invalidate an official mark by filing a request with the Trademarks Office and paying the prescribed fee.

In most cases, a putative trademark must be nearly identical to an official mark for its registration to be denied."

The Trademarks Office has published a draft Practice Notice regarding its proposed implementation of subsection 9(4). According to the draft, the request (which should be accompanied by evidence) will be reviewed and, if the office is satisfied, it will send a notice to the holder of the official mark regarding evidence of the holder’s status as a public authority. If the notice goes unanswered during the prescribed time, or if the evidence is insufficient to meet the relevant test, then the status of the official mark will be amended to read “inactivated.” The ability to challenge an official mark through an administrative mechanism before the Trademarks Office will undoubtedly be welcomed by many brand owners.

Jamie-Lynn Kraft has been recognized in The Best Lawyers in Canada® since 2022 in Intellectual Property Law. She is a principal in Smart & Biggar’s Ottawa office. As a trusted advisor, Jamie-Lynn counsels her clients throughout the trademark lifecycle, including clearance, prosecution, opposition and enforcement. Jamie-Lynn is passionate about helping her clients grow their businesses and harness the full potential of their brands.

Philip Lapin has been recognized in The Best Lawyers in Canada® since 2016 in Intellectual Property Law. He is a principal in Smart & Biggar’s Toronto office. With more than 20 years of experience and a high rate of success, he is recognized as one of Canada's leading trademark lawyers. As chair of the firm’s Trademark Operations Group, Philip provides strategic advice on trademark portfolios for many Canadian and multinational corporations.


Related Articles

Hobbling the War Machine

by Shawn C.D. Neylan

Since late spring, the Canadian government has been actively sanctioning business and political entities, as well as numerous individuals, with alleged ties to Vladimir Putin and the Russian military, including some in Belarus. You can’t tell the players without a scorecard—so here’s an overview.

Military tank with prohibited symbol

Growing Canadian Business Abroad

by Didier Culat

Canadian entrepreneurs looking to expand their businesses beyond the geographic confines of their home dominion must consider a vast range of questions to ensure they’re fit to branch out. Here’s a quick primer.

Green arrows rising with Canada in backdrop

The Antipodean Advantage

by Gordon Grieve and Tony Britten-Jones

As the pandemic recedes, Australia remains one of the best countries in which to invest. The commercial law experts at Piper Alderman review the country’s advantages when it comes to outside money looking for outsized returns.

Man pointing to cave wall


by Alejandra Daroch, Domingo Russi and Jaime Carey Astaburuaga

Long a beacon of economic stability in South America, Chile has been buffeted lately by the global rise in inflation. Can a key element of its monetary policy help it weather the storm?

Waves crashing into lighthouse

Rental House of Cards

by Tyler D’Angelo

The pandemic devastated uncountable businesses worldwide. A recent court case involving some of Canada’s most venerable companies and pension funds sheds light on the stringency of the country’s commercial leases—and the judiciary’s reluctance to meddle in sophisticated commercial contracts amid a “black swan” event.

Toppling house of cards

The Future of Trade is Digital

by Alan de Rochefort-Reynolds, Daniel Allman and Jo Feldman

Digital information increasingly drives bilateral and multilateral trade throughout the Indo-Pacific region. It behooves countries to devise agreements governing the use and exchange of the enormous amounts of vital data generated every day.

Neon colored boxes in circle with black background

The Carbon Conundrum

by Martin Hamer and Natalie Kopplow

Companies that trade internationally might soon face a “carbon tariff” when importing certain goods into the European Union. Why is the EU doing this—and how will it affect world trade?

Power plant billowing smoke

Competitive Balance

by David Feldman and Peter Flynn

Major amendments to Canada’s Competition Act were rushed through Parliament this June with scarcely any debate. They will likely have enormous antitrust ramifications—and businesses had better be ready.

Blaring megaphone sounds the alarm


Should I Hire a Lawyer After a Car Accident in Lawrenceville?

by Yari D. Lawson

If you or a loved one have suffered from a crash, here’s why hiring a car accident lawyer in Lawrenceville, GA, is a good idea to ensure you get compensation.

First responders assessing a car accident scene


Protecting Patients and the Public

by Justin Smulison

Lubin & Meyer completes its most successful year yet, charting new territory with a historic class action suit involving hundreds of patients in New England.

Group of lawyers seated and standing around a table

"Lawyer of the Year"

Lawyer with suit posing and smiling for headshot

Laurie R. Bishop

Education Law

Boston, MA


"Lawyer of the Year"

Thomas B. Mooney

Thomas B. Mooney

Education Law

Hartford, CT



Protecting Patients, Families and the Public

by Justin Smulison

Thousands of patients experience unfathomable pain while being treated. Some turn to Koskoff Koskoff & Bieder PC for justice, empathic counsel and results.

Group of lawyers gathering for a firm photo


Ontario Personal Injury Claims: How Long Can Clients Expect to Wait?

by Salvatore Grillo

Personal injury lawyer Salvatore Grillo discusses types of personal injury claims and how long lawyers and clients can anticipate wait times for resolution.

Insurance forms and a pen with doctor in background


What Are the Benefits of Hiring a Lawyer After a Car Accident?

by Jamie S. Cogburn

Want to learn more about the benefits of hiring a car accident lawyer? Contact J. Cogburn Law for a free consultation with a Las Vegas car accident lawyer.

Man at desk writing with two toy cars in front of him


Injured in a Car Accident? 7 Steps You Need To Take Immediately

by Mark H. Perenich

Personal injury lawyer Mark Perenich offers advice on the seven most important steps to take immediately after you have been injured in a car accident.

Man and woman in car with airbags deployed and smoke coming from dash

Trending Articles

Presenting The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2025

by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is proud to present The Best Lawyers in Australia for 2025, marking the 17th consecutive year of Best Lawyers awards in Australia.

Australia flag over outline of country

The 2024 Best Lawyers in Spain™

by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is honored to announce the 16th edition of The Best Lawyers in Spain™ and the third edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in Spain™ for 2024.

Tall buildings and rushing traffic against clouds and sun in sky

Best Lawyers Expands Chilean 2024 Awards

by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is pleased to announce the 14th edition of The Best Lawyers in Chile™ and the inaugural edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in Chile™, honoring the top lawyers and firms conferred on by their Chilean peers.

Landscape of city in Chile

Best Lawyers Expands 2024 Brazilian Awards

by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is honored to announce the 14th edition of The Best Lawyers in Brazil™ and the first edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in Brazil™.

Image of Brazil city and water from sky

Announcing The Best Lawyers in South Africa™ 2024

by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is excited to announce the landmark 15th edition of The Best Lawyers in South Africa™ for 2024, including the exclusive "Law Firm of the Year" awards.

Sky view of South Africa town and waterways

The Best Lawyers in Mexico Celebrates a Milestone Year

by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is excited to announce the 15th edition of The Best Lawyers in Mexico™ and the second edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in Mexico™ for 2024.

Sky view of Mexico city scape

How Palworld Is Testing the Limits of Nintendo’s Legal Power

by Gregory Sirico

Many are calling the new game Palworld “Pokémon GO with guns,” noting the games striking similarities. Experts speculate how Nintendo could take legal action.

Animated figures with guns stand on top of creatures

The Best Lawyers in Portugal™ 2024

by Best Lawyers

The 2024 awards for Portugal include the 14th edition of The Best Lawyers in Portugal™ and 2nd edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in Portugal™.

City and beach with green water and blue sky

The Best Lawyers in Peru™ 2024

by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is excited to announce the landmark 10th edition of The Best Lawyers in Peru, the prestigious award recognizing the country's lop legal talent.

Landscape of Peru city with cliffside and ocean

How To Find A Pro Bono Lawyer

by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers dives into the vital role pro bono lawyers play in ensuring access to justice for all and the transformative impact they have on communities.

Hands joined around a table with phone, paper, pen and glasses

Presenting the 2024 Best Lawyers Family Law Legal Guide

by Best Lawyers

The 2024 Best Lawyers Family Law Legal Guide is now live and includes recognitions for all Best Lawyers family law awards. Read below and explore the legal guide.

Man entering home and hugging two children in doorway

Announcing The Best Lawyers in New Zealand™ 2025 Awards

by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is announcing the 16th edition of The Best Lawyers in New Zealand for 2025, including individual Best Lawyers and "Lawyer of the Year" awards.

New Zealand flag over image of country outline

The Best Lawyers in Colombia™ 2024

by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is honored to announce the 14th edition of The Best Lawyers in Colombia™ for 2024, which honors Colombia's most esteemed lawyers and law firms.

Cityscape of Colombia with blue cloudy sky above

Announcing The Best Lawyers in Japan™ 2025

by Best Lawyers

For a milestone 15th edition, Best Lawyers is proud to announce The Best Lawyers in Japan.

Japan flag over outline of country

Announcing the 2024 Best Lawyers in Puerto Rico™

by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is proud to announce the 11th edition of The Best Lawyers in Puerto Rico™, honoring the top lawyers and firms across the country for 2024.

View of Puerto Rico city from the ocean

The Best Lawyers in Singapore™ 2025 Edition

by Best Lawyers

For 2025, Best Lawyers presents the most esteemed awards for lawyers and law firms in Singapore.

Singapore flag over outline of country