Insight

NLRB Provides Guidance on Non-Disparagement and Confidentiality Provisions in Severance Agreements in Light of McLaren Macomb Decision

On March 22, 2023, the NLRB’s General Counsel, Jennifer A. Abruzzo, issued guidance (the “Memo”) regarding the McLaren Macomb decision, which expounds upon the Board’s decision

Andrew Wolf

Andrew Wolf

July 18, 2023 02:21 PM

The legal world has been reeling since the February 21, 2023 McLaren Macomb decision, in which the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or the “Board”) determined that standard non-disparagement and confidentiality provisions in severance agreements violate employees’ rights under the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA” or the “Act”). On March 8, 2023, attorneys Andrew J. Wolf and Brittany A. Mallow discussed the McLaren Macomb decision.

On March 22, 2023, the NLRB’s General Counsel, Jennifer A. Abruzzo, issued guidance (the “Memo”) regarding the McLaren Macomb decision, which expounds upon the Board’s decision.

The Memo provides the following points to assist employers in recrafting their severance agreements:

• Releases should only waive the employee’s rights to pursue employment claims and only as to claims arising as of the date of the agreement.

• Retaliating against supervisors, who generally are not protected by the NLRA, for refusing to proffer an overly broad severance agreement would violate the NLRA. Additionally, severance agreements with supervisors could also be unlawful if they prevent the supervisor from participating in Board proceedings.

• Maintaining and/or enforcing a previously-entered severance agreement with unlawful provisions that restrict an employee’s Section 7 rights constitutes a violation of the NLRA. A charge alleging such would not be time-bared by the Section 10(b) six-month statute of limitations. To guard against a potential charge, the Memo suggests that employers should contact former employees subject to overly broad non-disparagement and confidentiality provisions in previously entered severance agreements and advise them that the provisions are null and void and the employer will not seek to enforce these provisions.

• The origin of the request to include broad confidentiality and/or non-disparagement provisions in a severance agreement is irrelevant—an employee (or a union on behalf of an employee) cannot waive an employee’s rights under the Act.

• Non-disparagement clauses may be lawful where they are limited to employee statements about the employer that meet the definition of defamation as being maliciously untrue, such that they are made with knowledge of their falsity or with reckless disregard for their truth or falsity.

• Carefully crafted confidentiality clauses that only restrict the dissemination of proprietary or trade secret information for a period of time based on legitimate business justifications may be considered lawful.

• Confidentiality clauses regarding the non-disclosure of financial terms is lawful under the McLaren Macomb decision.

• A disclaimer may not cure overly broad provisions. However, disclaimers which describe the activities that are of primary importance to fulfillment of the NLRA’s purpose and are commonly engaged in by employees may mitigate the potential coercive impact of a severance agreement’s overbroad provisions.

These activities include the employee’s right to engage in the following:

(1) Organizing a union to negotiate with their employer concerning their wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment;

(2) Forming, joining, or assisting a union, such as by sharing employee contact information;

(3) Talking about or soliciting for a union during non-work time, such as before or after work or during break times, or distributing union literature during non-work time, in non-work areas, such as parking lots or break rooms;

(4) Discussing wages and other working conditions with co-workers or a union representative;

(5) Taking action with one or more co-workers to improve working conditions by, among other means, raising work-related complaints directly with the employer or with a government agency, or seeking help from a union;

(6) Striking and picketing, depending on its purpose and means;

(7) Taking photographs or other recordings in the workplace, together with co-workers, to document or improve working conditions, except where an overriding employer interest is present;

(8) Wearing union hats, buttons, t-shirts, and pins in the workplace, except under special circumstances; and

(9) Choosing not to engage in any of these activities.

• Other provisions commonly found in severance agreements may also interfere with the exercise of employee rights, including non-compete clauses, no solicitation clauses, no poaching clauses, broad liability releases and covenants not to sue, and cooperation requirements involving investigations or proceedings.

The McLaren Macomb decision, and subsequent guidance from the NLRB’s General Counsel, clearly indicate that it is time for employers to revisit their standard severance agreements. Employers may wish to consult legal counsel to fully assess the best approach to tackle their severance agreements as it applies to their business.

Hahn Loeser & Parks LLP’s Labor and Employment Group routinely advises employers on the preparation of severance agreements to ensure compliance with the NLRA, as well as other applicable state and federal laws.

Trending Articles

The 2024 Best Lawyers in Spain™


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is honored to announce the 16th edition of The Best Lawyers in Spain™ and the third edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in Spain™ for 2024.

Tall buildings and rushing traffic against clouds and sun in sky

Best Lawyers Expands Chilean 2024 Awards


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is pleased to announce the 14th edition of The Best Lawyers in Chile™ and the inaugural edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in Chile™, honoring the top lawyers and firms conferred on by their Chilean peers.

Landscape of city in Chile

The Best Lawyers in Spain™ 2023


by Best Lawyers

Announcing Spain's recognized lawyers for 2023.

Flag of Spain

Announcing The Best Lawyers in South Africa™ 2024


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is excited to announce the landmark 15th edition of The Best Lawyers in South Africa™ for 2024, including the exclusive "Law Firm of the Year" awards.

Sky view of South Africa town and waterways

Announcing the 2023 The Best Lawyers in America Honorees


by Best Lawyers

Only the top 5.3% of all practicing lawyers in the U.S. were selected by their peers for inclusion in the 29th edition of The Best Lawyers in America®.

Gold strings and dots connecting to form US map

The Best Lawyers in Portugal™ 2024


by Best Lawyers

The 2024 awards for Portugal include the 14th edition of The Best Lawyers in Portugal™ and 2nd edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in Portugal™.

City and beach with green water and blue sky

The Best Lawyers in Peru™ 2024


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is excited to announce the landmark 10th edition of The Best Lawyers in Peru, the prestigious award recognizing the country's lop legal talent.

Landscape of Peru city with cliffside and ocean

The Best Lawyers in South Africa™ 2023


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers proudly announces lawyers recognized in South Africa for 2023.

South African flag

The Best Lawyers in Chile™ 2023


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms in Chile.

White star in blue box beside white box with red box on bottom

The Best Lawyers in Colombia™ 2024


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is honored to announce the 14th edition of The Best Lawyers in Colombia™ for 2024, which honors Colombia's most esteemed lawyers and law firms.

Cityscape of Colombia with blue cloudy sky above

Announcing the 2024 Best Lawyers in Puerto Rico™


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is proud to announce the 11th edition of The Best Lawyers in Puerto Rico™, honoring the top lawyers and firms across the country for 2024.

View of Puerto Rico city from the ocean

Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2023


by Best Lawyers

The third edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America™ highlights the legal talent of lawyers who have been in practice less than 10 years.

Three arrows made of lines and dots on blue background

The 2023 Best Lawyers in Portugal™


by Best Lawyers

Announcing the elite group of lawyers recognized in Portugal for 2023.

Green and red Portuguese flag

Unwrapping Shrinkflation


by Justin Smulison

Through the lens of the United States, we take a closer look at the global implication of companies downsizing products while maintaining and often raising prices.

Chocolate bar being unwrapped from foil

2021 Best Lawyers: The Global Issue


by Best Lawyers

The 2021 Global Issue features top legal talent from the most recent editions of Best Lawyers and Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch worldwide.

2021 Best Lawyers: The Global Issue

What the Courts Say About Recording in the Classroom


by Christina Henagen Peer and Peter Zawadski

Students and parents are increasingly asking to use audio devices to record what's being said in the classroom. But is it legal? A recent ruling offer gives the answer to a question confusing parents and administrators alike.

Is It Legal for Students to Record Teachers?