Insight

New and expanded AHPRA Advertising Guidelines: a welcome aid to compliance

New and expanded AHPRA Advertising Guidelines: a welcome aid to compliance

Kellie Dell'Oro

Kellie Dell'Oro

March 30, 2021 12:38 AM

Meridian Lawyers has published several Health Insights in the past about the importance of understanding and adhering to the advertising obligations set out under section 133 of the National Law. However, claims concerning advertising continue to be a recurring theme in our Health Law practice, indicating some persisting confusion about the boundaries of what is permitted.

At the end of last year, AHPRA and the National Boards published a revised set of advertising guidelines titled the ‘Guidelines for Advertising a Regulated Health Service’ (the 2020 Guidelines). The 2020 Guidelines aim to assist health practitioners and other relevant persons to better understand the way in which the National Law advertising provisions operate in practice, by expanding on guidance previously issued and equipping practitioners with concrete examples of real-life advertising scenarios. Changes to the guidelines include:

  • more content about testimonials, protected titles and claims about registration, competence and qualifications
  • new content about the evidence required for claims about the effectiveness of a regulated health service and what is acceptable evidence
  • re-structuring of content so that information is easier to find, and
  • new flowcharts to help assess when advertising needs to be supported by acceptable evidence and whether a review is considered a testimonial [1]

Meridian Lawyers actively encourages all health practitioners to take the time to review the new 2020 Guidelines which can be found here. The injection of depth and breadth into the guidelines, represents the welcome evolution of an area of regulation that has been a notorious source of inadvertent non-compliance to date. Although a number of advertising compliance tools have been published by AHPRA over the past few years, the 2020 Guidelines consolidate the guidance into one resource and elaborate further on some of the more pervasive issues.

Of particular note is the addition of two new sub-headings directed specifically to the manner in which scientific evidence may or may not be used to substantiate claims about the effectiveness of a regulated health service.

It has long been the case that persons who advertise a regulated health service must not advertise in a way that creates an unreasonable expectation of beneficial treatment by making claims which cannot be scientifically substantiated [2]. However, misunderstandings about the type and quality of scientific evidence required to sufficiently substantiate a claim about treatment have generated a string of AHPRA complaints and investigations in the past. The 2020 Guidelines provide much-needed guidance on this issue, including statements such as the following:

  • Acceptable evidence mostly includes empirical data from formal research or systematic studies in the form of peer-reviewed publications [3]
  • Primary sources of evidence should be used wherever possible. Advertisers should consult the AHPRA and National Boards’ framework for assessing acceptable evidence for any claims made in their advertising. The framework is available on the AHPRA website [4]
  • The evidence required to support a therapeutic claim will depend on the specific claim made in the advertisement. A well-conducted systematic review of relevant randomised controlled trials represents the highest level of evidence where it includes and identifies all studies on a given topic and the review is systematic, reproducible and representative of the totality of evidence. Where a systematic review is unavailable, it is important that all relevant sources of evidence are considered (i.e. the research is not ‘cherry-picked’) [5].

The 2020 Guidelines provide examples of evidence that generally will not be considered acceptable evidence for advertising claims, including studies involving no human subjects, before and after studies with few or no controls or anecdotal evidence based on observations in practice [6].

By way of a reminder, a breach of the advertising obligations under section 133 of the National Law is an offence. Anyone advertising a regulated health service in contravention of the section may be prosecuted and ordered to pay fines ranging from $5,000 penalty per offence (for an individual) or $10,000 penalty per offence (for a body corporate). The availability of these severe penalties compounds the need for clear regulatory guidance in this area, to help health practitioners comply with their obligations. Hopefully, the 2020 Guidelines will go some way to achieving this.

This article was written by Principal Kellie Dell’Oro and Associate Anna Martin. Please contact us if you have any questions or would like more information.

Download Health Insight

[1] https://www.ahpra.gov.au/News/2020-11-17-Advertising-guidelines-and-strategy.aspx, 17 November 2020.

[2] Section 133 (1)(d) of the National Law specifies that “a person must not advertise a regulated health service, or a business that provides a regulated health service, in a way that creates an unreasonable expectation of beneficial treatment.”

[3] Guidelines for advertising a regulated health service dated December 2020, paragraph 4.1.1.

[4] Ibid, paragraph 4.1.2.

[5] Ibid.

[6] Ibid.

Trending Articles

The Real Camille: An Interview with Johnny Depp’s Lawyer Camille Vasquez


by Rebecca Blackwell

Camille Vasquez, a young lawyer at Brown Rudnick, sat down with Best Lawyers CEO Phillip Greer to talk about her distinguished career, recently being named partner and what comes next for her.

Camille Vasquez in office

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers® in the United States


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers listed in the 28th Edition of The Best Lawyers in America® and in the 2nd Edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2022.

2022 Best Lawyers Listings for United States

Famous Songs Unprotected by Copyright Could Mean Royalties for Some


by Michael B. Fein

A guide to navigating copyright claims on famous songs.

Can I Sing "Happy Birthday" in Public?

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers in Canada™


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers listed in the 16th Edition of The Best Lawyers in Canada™ and 1st Edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in Canada.

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers in Canada™

Choosing a Title Company: What a Seller Should Expect


by Roy D. Oppenheim

When it comes to choosing a title company, how much power exactly does a seller have?

Choosing the Title Company As Seller

How A Claim Can Create A ‘Class’ of Its Own


by Justin Smulison

One civil claim can help a victim recover, prevent others from the same harm and even save lives. Tom Connick has experienced this directly, having been at the ground floor of injury claims that have led to high-value class action settlements.

Fire Consuming Paper Money

Johnny Depp and Amber Heard: The Best Lawyers Honorees Behind the Litigation


by Gregory Sirico

Best Lawyers takes a look at the recognized legal talent representing Johnny Depp and Amber Heard in their ongoing defamation trial.

Lawyers for Johnny Depp and Amber Heard

Announcing the 2022 "Best Law Firms" Rankings


by Best Lawyers

The 2022 “Best Law Firms” publication includes all “Law Firm of the Year” recipients, national and metro Tier 1 ranked firms and editorial from thought leaders in the legal industry.

The 2022 Best Law Firms Awards

Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch – The Future of Legal Talent Looks Bright


by Justin Smulison

Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch is launching its second edition in the United States, and after talking with both a company leader and esteemed lawyers on the list, the importance of this prestigious list is evident.

Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America 2022

Why Cariola Díez Pérez-Cotapos Developed Its Own Legal Tech


by Best Lawyers

Juan Pablo Matus of Cariola Díez Pérez-Cotapos, 2019 "Law Firm of the Year" award for Corporate and M&A Law in Chile, discusses his firm's joint venture with Cognitiva in creating Lexnova, a legal AI system.

Cariola Díez Pérez-Cotapos Interview

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers™ in Australia


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms.

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers™ in Australi

Caffeine Overload and DUI Tests


by Daniel Taylor

While it might come as a surprise, the over-consumption of caffeine could trigger a false positive on a breathalyzer test.

Can Caffeine Cause You to Fail DUI Test?

Announcing The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2023


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms from Australia.

The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2023

Wage and Overtime Laws for Truck Drivers


by Greg Mansell

For truck drivers nationwide, underpayment and overtime violations are just the beginning of a long list of problems. Below we explore the wages you are entitled to but may not be receiving.

Truck Driver Wage and Overtime Laws in the US

Education by Trial: Cultivating Legal Expertise in the Courtroom


by Margo Pierce

The intricacies of complex lawsuits require extensive knowledge of the legal precedent. But they also demand a high level of skill in every discipline needed to succeed at trial, such as analyzing technical reports and deposing expert witnesses.

Cultivating Legal Expertise in the Courtroom

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers in South Africa™


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms.

Announcing 2022 Best Lawyers in South Africa