Brace for Impact

The 2021 independent contractor rule might have major impacts on employers and upend compliance issues, especially as the DOL’s definition of an independent contractor is about to change.

Silhouetted figure holding the hands of a clock

Ray Young, Jr. and Scott Hetrick

March 23, 2023 11:30 PM

On October 13, 2022, the Department of Labor (DOL) published proposed new rules, changing the 2021 Independent Contractor Rules (the 2021 IC Rules). The proposed changes simply revert classification analysis back to the same rules pre-2021. While the proposed rules are not novel, they may create compliance issues for employers under the FLSA and possibly other laws and may require expenditures of higher wages and additional benefits for workers.

The Fair Labor Standards Act, initially enacted in 1938, imposes certain wage, hour and benefits requirements on covered employers. For starters, employers are required to at least pay their nonexempt employees federal minimum wage for every hour worked and one and one-half times the employee’s regular rate of pay for all hours worked beyond 40 hours in a workweek. Other federal and state laws also require provision of unemployment insurance, employment tax contributions and workers’ compensation benefits in the event an employee is injured in the workplace. Independent contractors are not entitled to these various legal benefits.

The DOL contends that many workers are misclassified as independent contractors, thereby depriving them of certain rights they are entitled to under the FLSA. The DOL seeks to correct these misclassifications in the proposed new rules.

Why does this matter? Who the DOL considers an “independent contractor” is about to change, likely entitling “independent contractors” to more wage and hour rights typically reserved for employees.

The Old Rule

For decades, the DOL and courts employed the economic reality test to determine whether a worker should be classified as an employee or an independent contractor under the FLSA. This test sought to determine if the worker was economically dependent on the employer for work (and thus an employee) or if the worker was in business for themselves (and thus an independent contractor). The classic standard was whether the employer had control over the result but not the means by which the worker achieved the result.

The DOL and courts have historically used a “totality of the circumstances” analysis to make this determination—applying equal weight to the following six factors: (1) the opportunity for profit or loss, (2) investment, (3) permanency, (4) the degree of control by the employer over the worker, (5) whether the work is an integral part of the employer’s business and (6) skill and initiative. The factors were adopted from the Supreme Court’s Silk and Rutherford decisions.

The DOL asserts that workers are being misclassified due to the 2021 rule’s focus on only a few factors, as opposed to taking a totality-of-the-circumstances approach."

Things changed in January 2021. The DOL published proposed changes to the rule, altering a decades-old rule. While the 2021 IC rule kept the “economic reality test” moniker and most of the factors, it substantially altered the analysis of those factors. The 2021 IC rule designated two factors—the nature and degree of control over the work and the worker’s opportunity for profit or loss—as “core factors” that are the most probative and carry greater weight in the analysis. The other three factors—the amount of skill required for the work, the degree of permanence of the working relationship and whether the work is part of an integrated unit of production—are less probative non-core factors. The 2021 IC rule also limited consideration of investment and initiative to the opportunity for profit or loss factor and narrowed the consideration of facts like control and whether the work is integral to the employer’s business. The DOL explained that the purpose of the 2021 Rule was to establish a streamlined economic reality test that improved on prior articulations often described as “unclear and unwieldy."

New Proposed Rule

On October 13, 2022, the DOL published proposed rules on “Employee or Independent Contractor Classification Under the Fair Labor Standards Act.” Though deferring to the courts as the final arbiter on the validity of the 2021 IC rule’s analysis and factors, the Department of Labor opined that certain provisions in the 2021 rule are in tension with court precedent, specifically portions of the rule which designate two factors “core factors,” predetermining their weight as “most probative.” The Department argues that “the 2021 IC rule does not comport with the FLSA’s text and purpose as interpreted by courts and departs from decades of case law applying the economic reality test.”

What Is Different in the Proposed Rule?

The DOL proposes rescinding the 2021 rule and returning to the totality-of-the-circumstances analysis of the economic reality test. The proposed rule does not designate any factor as more or less probative, “core” or “non-core,” and does not predetermine the weight given to each factor. Importantly, the DOL proposes to return the consideration of “investment” to a standalone factor and rebirth of the “integral factor analysis,” which considers whether the work is integral to the employer’s business.

How Does This Rule Affect Your Business?

The 2021 rule arguably allowed employers to classify fewer workers as employees. The DOL asserts that workers are being misclassified due to the 2021 rule’s focus on only a few factors, as opposed to taking a totality-of-the-circumstances approach. Considering the proposed rule takes a more inclusive approach, the proposed new rule widens the pool of workers who may be classified as “employees.”

Simply put, workers who were once considered “independent contractors” may now be considered “employees” under the new proposed rules and thus entitled to more benefits.

For FLSA purposes, this change will require that employers provide workers minimum wage and overtime pay. To the extent courts and other agencies follow the DOL approach, employers may be required to provide workers’ compensation, unemployment insurance, family and medical leave and partial contribution to Social Security and Medicare taxes to more workers than in past years.

Employers should consider the following as changes that will result from the new proposed rule:

Business Structure and Finance:

These changes are predicted to have substantial impact on ride-hailing companies, delivery services and other industries that rely heavily on gig workers. Companies like Lyft or Uber have structured their business model to depend heavily on independent contractors’ classification and the business benefits that come with that classification. This new rule may, though not guaranteed, change many of their workers’ classifications from independent contractor to employee, forcing these employers to increase their base pay, pay overtime and offer other benefits discussed above.

FLSA Compliance Issues:

Even if your business is not affected to the extent discussed above, the new proposed rules, once enacted, will almost certainly require an audit of worker classifications. That is, employers will need to consider the classification of independent contractors, conduct an analysis applying the factors under the economic reality test and make adjustments to wages, hours and benefits based on their findings. Depending on the size of your company, this could require significant expense and resources to complete. In addition to potentially paying reclassified “employees” more, your business also will have to follow the FLSA employee recordkeeping requirements with respect to those workers.

Tax Procedure

Worker classification also affects tax procedure, particularly whether the worker completes a 1099 or W-2. The tax designation may require employers to engage in tax withholding procedures (for employees) and other tax implications. Once reclassification occurs, it may be prudent to consult a tax expert for guidance.

Status of the New Rule’s Enactment

After the DOL published the proposed rule, it offered the public an initial 46-day window to offer written comments. The written comment window was extended to December 13, 2022. Once the written comments are submitted, the DOL will review each comment and prepare a finalized rule.

We expect the rule to be finalized in the first quarter of 2023. Whether the rule is enacted then will depend on if it is challenged in the courts.

Adams and Reese LLP is closely monitoring this process and any subsequent litigation.

Scott Hetrick is the Labor and Employment Practice Team Leader at Adams and Reese and a partner in the firm’s Mobile office. Scott is a management rights advocate who represents employers on federal and state labor and employment law compliance and dispute resolution. He also represents insurers with analysis of their defense and coverage obligations under a wide variety of insurance policies, including commercial liability, errors and omissions, property and casualty and liquor liability, in a wide range of third-party claims against their insureds. Scott counsels employers with an eye to preventing claims arising from day-to-day employment decisions, particularly terminations of employees and large-scale layoffs. An important component of his practice involves drafting and revision of employee handbooks, personnel policies and procedures, employment applications, background check disclosure and consent agreements and employment contracts, including non-compete agreements, trade secret agreements and arbitration agreements. Scott speaks frequently on employment law and human resource management issues at seminars for personnel managers and business owners and has published several articles on employment law topics. Scott has been recognized by clients and peers in Best Lawyers® in Employment Law since 2010, including formerly being named “Lawyer of the Year” in Mobile, Alabama in 2019 for Employment Law.

Ray Young, Jr. is an associate in the Adams and Reese Jackson office. He is a litigator practicing across a wide spectrum of areas, including labor and employment, commercial litigation, immigration, insurance defense and coverage, and transportation and logistics. Ray formerly worked as a federal law clerk for the Hon. Sharion Aycock, U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of Mississippi. During this clerkship, Ray garnered the important skills needed to be a successful litigator, and obtained the institutional knowledge necessary to ease the litigation process for his clients. Ray graduated cum laude from Mississippi College School of Law. During law school, Ray was involved in Moot Court, as the Chair of External Affairs, received multiple advocacy honors, including induction into the National Order of Barristers and awards for academic excellence. As an undergraduate student at the University of Southern Mississippi, he completed his Bachelor of Arts degree in Political Science.

Headline Image: Adobestock/jozefmicic

Related Articles

Employers Are Budding Heads on Marijuana in the Workplace

by M. Tae Phillips and Melanie C. Cormier

As employment lawyers, we receive many questions from employers navigating marijuana legalization. Below, we answer the top three most asked questions.

Statue of Liberty holding a marijuana joint

Noncompete Extinct

by Mark W. Bakker

The Federal Trade Commission has proposed a blanket ban on noncompete agreements that could radicalize post-termination protections afforded to employers.

Dark figure walking up red staircase to open door

Rights and Wrongs

by Shannon Pierce

Antidiscrimination enforcement agencies, both federal and state, are likely going to be highly active in the next five years. Are Nevada businesses ready?

Faces of women overlapping in multi-color

Withstand the Ban

by Jeffrey A. Calabrese and Kirby Black

With the recent Federal Trade Commission’s announcement proposing a complete ban on noncompete agreements, we offer advice to companies moving forward.

Figure out of frame signing a non-descript contract


Resolving the Toughest Cases

by Justin Smulison

Eight-time “Lawyer of the Year” Victor H. Pribanic reflects on a critical birth injury trial in 2022 and how his firm’s advocacy resonated with jurors.

Suited man with glasses poses for professional headshot

"Lawyer of the Year"

Women with blond hair and earrings poses for headshot

Nancy Rubner Frandsen

Trademark Law

Philadelphia, PA


The Impact of Plea Bargains in Criminal Cases in the U.S.

by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers highlights why plea bargains have risen to such prevalence, quickly becoming an essential part of the criminal justice system in the U.S.

Client and attorney stand before a judge in a courtroom

A Balancing Act

by Joseph Milizio

New York State recently passed a landmark law that expands LGBTQ couples’ ability to start a family while protecting surrogates’ rights.

Surrogacy Rights for LGBTQ Couples

Fostering Acceptance

by Cassandra Biron

Those looking to be a foster or adoptive parent for LGBTQ youth must understand which kinds of support are most beneficial to parent and child alike. Happily, resources are now more widely available than ever.  

Resources for Fostering LGBTQ Youth

A Beautiful Mind: Motown Beginnings, Top Dealmaker

by Sara Collin

Motown scion Farah Fakir Cook has achieved her own stardom away from the klieg lights, helping clients navigate ever-changing currents in intellectual property and technology. One crucial topic looms especially large for her in the years ahead: How current law will contend with the rise of artificial intelligence.

Woman wearing pink suit standing against desk

Your Fault or My Fault, It All Goes Through No-Fault

by Michael L. Taub

The No-Fault System, which helps victims receive payment for accident-related medical bills, does not always regard minor accidents on court dockets.

Man at steering wheel leaning forward grasping sore neck


A Street Fight in the Bronx

by Adam Leitman Bailey

Adam Leitman Bailey’s firm helped settle a Bronx brawl over land between two parties and brought victory against a long-standing powerful family in New York.

Warehouse in New York at night

The Day-To-Day of an Immigration Lawyer in the U.S.

by Best Lawyers

In this article, Best Lawyers takes a glimpse into the day-to-day life of an immigration lawyer, what roles they must take on and how their assistance may be critical to the outcome of a case.

Two U.S. flags surround gold text and official seal


Salvi & Maher, LLP: Illinois and Wisconsin's Personal Injury Firm

by Justin Smulison

For more than 35 years, Salvi & Maher LLP has defended their clients throughout Illinois and Wisconsin in various areas of personal injury law, including medical malpractice, motor vehicle accidents, premises liability and trucking litigation.

Skyline of Chicago with green river and blue background


Emroch & Kilduff: Virginia's Personal Injury & Medical Malpractice Attorneys

by Emroch & Kilduff

For over 40 years, the award-winning Virginia-based firm Emroch & Kilduff has worked to represent their personal injury clients in both state and federal courts.

Skyline with water and bridge on blue background


Needle & Ellenberg: Helping Victims of Medical Malpractice Receive Compensation Throughout Florida

by Needle & Ellenberg

Needle & Ellenberg, P.A. discuss five common types of medical malpractice that can help determine if you have a potential claim.

Doctor with hand on face reviewing scan with another doctor in backdrop

Trending Articles

Presenting The Best Lawyers in The United Kingdom 2024

by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is proud to announce the 12th edition of The Best Lawyers in the United Kingdom™ and Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch™ in the United Kingdom for 2024.

Big Ben and bridge over water in London at sunset

Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2023

by Best Lawyers

The third edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America™ highlights the legal talent of lawyers who have been in practice less than 10 years.

Three arrows made of lines and dots on blue background

Announcing the 2023 The Best Lawyers in America Honorees

by Best Lawyers

Only the top 5.3% of all practicing lawyers in the U.S. were selected by their peers for inclusion in the 29th edition of The Best Lawyers in America®.

Gold strings and dots connecting to form US map

The Best Lawyers in New Zealand™ 2024 Awards

by Best Lawyers

The Best Lawyers in New Zealand 2024 awards include an elite field of top lawyers and law firms.

Auckland, New Zealand Skyline at twilight

Presenting The Best Lawyers in Singapore™ 2024

by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers offers the most prestigious awards for lawyers and law firms in Singapore for 2024.

Singapore skyline at night

The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2024 Launch

by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is excited to announce The Best Lawyers in Australia™ for 2023, including the top lawyers and law firms from Australia.

Australian Parliament beside water at sunset

Announcing The Best Lawyers in Japan™ 2024

by Best Lawyers

We are proud to present the 2024 edition of Best Lawyers awards for Japan which include the top lawyers and law firms in the country.

Mt. Fuji in the background with fall leaves and structure in front


Salvi & Maher, LLP: Illinois and Wisconsin's Personal Injury Firm

by Justin Smulison

For more than 35 years, Salvi & Maher LLP has defended their clients throughout Illinois and Wisconsin in various areas of personal injury law, including medical malpractice, motor vehicle accidents, premises liability and trucking litigation.

Skyline of Chicago with green river and blue background


Athea Trial Lawyers

by Justin Smulison

Athea Trial Lawyers is a nationally recognized firm who has received record-breaking victories throughout the country on behalf of personal injury victims.

women with shades of blue in mass arrangement


Mastering the Art of Trial Practice

by John Fields

With its billion-dollar track record, Morelli Law Firm has earned a reputation as one of the country's most successful trial firms.

Morelli and team at table in office with windows


Rash Mueller Knows What it Means to Help

by Jeffrey Beasley

David Rash of Rash Mueller draws from first-hand experience on the affects of tragic personal injury and loss. His Florida law firm has spent years dedicated to helping the injured find justice.

Doctor with scope reviewing brain scan on screen

The Best Lawyers in South Africa™ 2023

by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers proudly announces lawyers recognized in South Africa for 2023.

South African flag

Announcing The Best Lawyers in The United Kingdom™ 2023

by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms from the United Kingdom.

The Best Lawyers in The United Kingdom 2023

The Role of a Lawyer in the Slip-and-Fall Settlement Process

by Best Lawyers

Let’s examine the role of a lawyer in the slip-and-fall settlement process and how they can help you achieve a fair and just outcome for your case.

Unseen man with wrap on wrist sits across from woman in suit

Choosing a Title Company: What a Seller Should Expect

by Roy D. Oppenheim

When it comes to choosing a title company, how much power exactly does a seller have?

Choosing the Title Company As Seller

Famous Songs Unprotected by Copyright Could Mean Royalties for Some

by Michael B. Fein

A guide to navigating copyright claims on famous songs.

Can I Sing "Happy Birthday" in Public?