Insight

Freedom to Compete

Recent movement at the federal level regarding management-labor relations mean changes to enforcement of noncompete agreements and other covenants could be imminent.

Woman in front of open blue door
Ashley C. Pack

Ashley C. Pack

September 6, 2022 11:05 AM

On July 19, 2022, the Federal Trade Commission and National Labor Relations Board entered into a Memorandum of Understanding regarding what they called their shared “interest in protecting American workers and promoting fair competition in labor markets.”

In the memorandum, the FTC and NLRB stated that they “recognize that continued and enhanced coordination and cooperation concerning issues of common regulatory interest will help to protect workers against unfair methods of competition,” including “the imposition of one-sided and restrictive contract provisions, such as noncompete and nondisclosure provisions.” This follows President Biden’s executive order of July 9, 2021, directing the FTC to consider using its “statutory rulemaking authority under the Federal Trade Commission Act to curtail the unfair use of noncompete clauses and other clauses or agreements that may unfairly limit worker mobility.”

Considering this context, federal regulation that affects the use of noncompete agreements and other restrictive covenants, such as non-solicitation and nondisclosure agreements, appears to be in the offing. What can employers expect?

Recent Congressional bills provide clues. The Freedom to Compete Act was introduced into the Senate on July 15, 2021, by Senators Marco Rubio (R-FL) and Margaret Hassan (D-NH). If enacted, it would ban noncompetes nationwide for workers classified as nonexempt pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act. It would also apply to agreements inked before the bill’s passage. It would not ban confidentiality agreements used to protect trade secrets or other proprietary information as defined by law.

Rubio and Hassan’s bill follows a batch of state legislation regulating the use of noncompetes for low-wage workers. As of January 1, 2022, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Nevada, Oregon, Rhode Island, Virginia and Washington all began imposing a wage thresholds on the enforceability of noncompete agreements.

Another piece of potential legislation is the Workforce Mobility Act, introduced by a bipartisan group of four senators on February 2021. A counterpart bill of the same name was introduced concurrently in the House. The act would ban all noncompete agreements except those entered into in connection with the sale of a business or the dissolution of a partnership, or those signed by senior executive officials in conjunction with a severance agreement.

Both the Freedom to Compete Act and the Workforce Mobility Act remain under consideration by the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions; the latter is also under consideration by the House Subcommittee on Consumer Protection and Commerce.

The Current State of Affairs

The passage of either bill or similar legislation would markedly change the use of restrictive covenants. Currently, these are governed by state law, which necessarily results in a legal patchwork across the country. Some states dictate the use and scope of covenants through statutes; others leave it to the courts to develop applicable law over time. Some, such as California and North Dakota, ban noncompetes outright, while most permit them within certain parameters.

To make things still more complicated, most states that permit noncompetes enforce them case by case, causing uncertainty and prompting costly litigation. In Indiana, for example, noncompetes are disfavored and will be enforced only if they’re narrowly tailored to protect the employer’s legitimate business interests in terms of the time, geography and scope of restricted activities. In addition to the employer’s legitimate interests, Indiana courts now require restrictive covenants to be tailored to the services actually performed by the restricted employee on behalf of the employer.

If enacted, it would ban noncompetes nationwide for workers classified as nonexempt pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act."

In Clark’s Sales & Service, Inc. v. John D. Smith & Ferguson Enterprises (2014), the Indiana Court of Appeals refused to enforce a noncompete agreement that restricted an appliance salesman from providing services competitive to those offered by his employer to any client that had been a customer during the employee’s tenure there. The court reasoned that restricting all services offered by the employer to all customers during the entire span of the salesman’s employment—regardless of whether the salesman had contact with those customers or helped offer the services—was overly broad and unreasonable.

The Indiana decision is just one example of how states and state courts have limited the use of noncompetes. Indiana is not alone in demanding particularity from employers seeking to use covenants to limit competition. Employers should engage competent counsel when drafting such agreements. Here’s why.

Considerations for Employers and Counsel

Given the changing and varied legal landscape of restrictive covenants, employers with multistate operations should think critically before using a form agreement across numerous jurisdictions given that what’s enforceable in one state is likely not in another. Instead, employers may opt to draft different agreements for each state or a single agreement that complies with the most restrictive jurisdiction in which they operate.

Employers who wish to protect their legitimate business interest should review their current agreements and determine whether they could be tailored more closely to their interests or the services and activities performed by the employees they wish to obligate through noncompetes and similar agreements. For instance, some employers with dated noncompetes may find that their current agreements no longer match their prevailing interests.

One commonly litigated issue is the use of geographic restrictions in noncompetes. As work becomes increasingly virtual, location-based strictures often no longer match the responsibilities or reach of the workforce. In such situations, unless an applicable jurisdiction requires a geographic restriction for the agreement to be enforceable, the employer might want to consider modifying it to restrict competition related to a narrow group of customers—such as those serviced by the employee—or competitors, instead of restricting competition more generally across a given area.

Regardless, until federal regulations or laws are enacted, employers and their counsel have much to juggle, as scattershot policy on restrictive covenants continues to change. Both management and their lawyers must remain up to date on developments that will affect their ability to enforce them—and be ready to update them quickly if necessary.

Ashley is a partner in the Charleston, West Virginia office of Dinsmore & Shohl LLP. She has significant experience representing employers in a variety of labor and employment matters, including employment litigation, sexual harassment investigations, unfair labor practice and union representation cases. She also practices media and First Amendment law, advising newspapers and media outlets on prepublication review, FOIA and open records, advertising and defamation issues.

Aly is an associate in the Indianapolis office of Dinsmore & Shohl LLP. She helps employers of all sizes across numerous industries navigate the nuanced legal and practical issues that arise in the workplace. She has experience litigating in multiple areas of labor and employment law, and also enjoys proactively counseling clients before litigation ensues.

Headline Image: ISTOCK/EONEREN, ISTOCK/TETIANA MYKHAILENKO

Related Articles

The Write Stuff


by Michele M. Jochner

A series of pointers for making your legal writing clear, concise and—crucially—persuasive.

Closed laptop with woman holding pencil

Punishment and Deterrents


Facing a jury instruction on punitive damages? Here’s a cheat sheet to help you secure the best possible outcome for the defendant you represent.

Seated man wearing glasses and looking down

Be Careful What You’re Waiving


by Danielle E. Tricolla and Gabriella E. Botticelli

It’s not true that any correspondence between attorney and client is de facto privileged. That protective wall can crumble quite easily, in fact. Here’s a primer.

Multicolor envelopes flying out of laptop screen

Build Your Legal Practice with Effective Online Networking


by Jamilla Tabbara

How thoughtful online networking supports sustained legal practice growth.

Abstract web of connected figures symbolizing online networking among legal professionals

Blogging for Law Firms: Turning Content into Client Connections


by Jamilla Tabbara

How law firms use blogs to earn trust and win clients.

Lawyer typing blog content on laptop in office

Law Firm Marketing ROI: Strategies for Small and Midsize Firms


by Jamilla Tabbara

Understand how to improve your marketing ROI with methods tailored for law firms.

3D Computer with Icons Representing ROI Tools and Metrics

Law Firm Marketing: 5 Strategic Steps to Attract More Clients


by Jamilla Tabbara

A practical framework for marketing a law firm with purpose.

Light bulb above a chalkboard illustrating strategic ideas

Best Lawyers Introduces Smithy AI


by Jamilla Tabbara

Transforming legal content creation for attorneys and firms.

Start using Smithy AI, a content tool by Best Lawyers

Why Visibility Matters: The Case for Legal Thought Leadership Today


by Jamilla Tabbara

Build trust before the first consultation.

 lawyer standing on a staircase, symbolizing advancement and thought leadership

How Whitepapers Become Legal Content That Builds Trust


by Jamilla Tabbara

Turning expertise into visibility with strategic white papers.

Stack of legal white papers on a desk representing thought leadership

How to Use Content Syndication to Get Your Law Firm Website Content Seen


by Jamilla Tabbara

Syndicate your law firm’s content on trusted legal platforms to reach a wider audience and drive qualified traffic back to your website.

Legal professional drafting syndicated content on a laptop for third-party publication

Changes in Employment Arbitration for 2025


by Debra Ellwood Meppen, Brandon D. Saxon and Laurie Villanueva

What businesses need to know to stay ahead of the curve.

Suited man holding up falling walls with gray and yellow backdrop

Legal Content Strategy: A Key Driver of Law Firm Growth


by Jamilla Tabbara

Is your law firm’s content missing the mark? Here’s why it’s not delivering results.

Marketer developing a strategic plan for legal business growth.

The Best Lawyers Network: Global Recognition with Long-term Value


by Jamilla Tabbara

Learn how Best Lawyers' peer-review process helps recognized lawyers attract more clients and referral opportunities.

Lawyers networking

Showcasing Legal Knowledge: Leveraging Success Stories


by Jamilla Tabbara

Let your firm's success stories speak for themselves.

Person reading client testimonials on a laptop, highlighting social proof for a law firm

Is Your Law Firm’s Website Driving Clients Away?


by Jamilla Tabbara

Identify key website issues that may be affecting client engagement and retention.

Phone displaying 'This site cannot be reached' message

Trending Articles

Introducing the 2026 Best Lawyers Awards in Australia, Japan, New Zealand and Singapore


by Jennifer Verta

This year’s awards reflect the strength of the Best Lawyers network and its role in elevating legal talent worldwide.

2026 Best Lawyers Awards in Australia, Japan, New Zealand and Singapore

Revealing the 2026 Best Lawyers Awards in Germany, France, Switzerland and Austria


by Jamilla Tabbara

These honors underscore the reach of the Best Lawyers network and its focus on top legal talent.

map of Germany, France, Switzerland and Austria

Effective Communication: A Conversation with Jefferson Fisher


by Jamilla Tabbara

The power of effective communication beyond the law.

 Image of Jefferson Fisher and Phillip Greer engaged in a conversation about effective communication

The 2025 Legal Outlook Survey Results Are In


by Jennifer Verta

Discover what Best Lawyers honorees see ahead for the legal industry.

Person standing at a crossroads with multiple intersecting paths and a signpost.

The Best Lawyers Network: Global Recognition with Long-term Value


by Jamilla Tabbara

Learn how Best Lawyers' peer-review process helps recognized lawyers attract more clients and referral opportunities.

Lawyers networking

Jefferson Fisher: The Secrets to Influential Legal Marketing


by Jennifer Verta

How lawyers can apply Jefferson Fisher’s communication and marketing strategies to build trust, attract clients and grow their practice.

Portrait of Jefferson Fisher a legal marketing expert

Is Your Law Firm’s Website Driving Clients Away?


by Jamilla Tabbara

Identify key website issues that may be affecting client engagement and retention.

Phone displaying 'This site cannot be reached' message

A Guide to Workers' Compensation Law for 2025 and Beyond


by Bryan Driscoll

A woman with a laptop screen reflected in her glasses

Medical Malpractice Reform Trends in Texas, Utah, Georgia and SC


by Bryan Driscoll

A fresh wave of medical malpractice reform is reshaping the law.

Medical Malpractice Reform Trends hed

Why Jack Dorsey and Elon Musk Want to 'Delete All IP Law'


by Bryan Driscoll

This Isn’t Just a Debate Over How to Pay Creators. It’s a Direct Challenge to Legal Infrastructure.

Elon Musk and Jack Dorsey standing together Infront of the X logo

Best Lawyers Launches CMO Advisory Board


by Jamilla Tabbara

Strategic counsel from legal marketing’s most experienced voices.

Group photo of Best Lawyers CMO Advisory Board members

Changes in California Employment Law for 2025


by Laurie Villanueva

What employers need to know to ensure compliance in the coming year and beyond

A pair of hands holding a checklist featuring a generic profile picture and the state of California

Common Law Firm Landing Page Problems to Address


by Jamilla Tabbara

Identify key issues on law firm landing pages to improve client engagement and conversion.

Laptop showing law firm landing page analytics

New Employment Law Recognizes Extraordinary Stress Is Everyday Reality for NY Lawyers


by Bryan Driscoll

A stressed woman has her head resting on her hands above a laptop

Best Lawyers Introduces Smithy AI


by Jamilla Tabbara

Transforming legal content creation for attorneys and firms.

Start using Smithy AI, a content tool by Best Lawyers

How to Create High-Converting Landing Pages for Your Law Firm


by Jamilla Tabbara

Learn how to create high-converting law firm landing pages that drive client engagement and lead generation.

Laptop screen displaying website tools to improve client conversion rates