Insight

“Course And Scope”: What The Adjuster Won’t Tell You

“Course And Scope”: What The Adjuster Won’t Tell You

Kevin Crockett

Kevin Crockett

June 6, 2021 01:18 PM

Whether a defendant is in the course and scope of employment at the time of loss can result in an additional source of recovery for plaintiffs, but it’s often overlooked by plaintiffs’ attorneys.

Plaintiffs’ attorneys will commonly ask the defendant’s insurance carrier whether the defendant was within the course and scope of his employment at the time of the accident, and simply take their word for it. The problem with this is the insurance adjuster, who likely doesn’t understand “course and scope,” is asking its insured, who is likely a layperson who also doesn’t understand “course and scope.” It’s the blind leading the blind.

The fact of the matter is, neither the insurance carrier nor the insured defendant likely has any clue whether the defendant was within the “course and scope” of his employment; unless it’s blatantly obvious (hit by a UPS truck), a plaintiff’s attorney will likely never catch it.

That is why it is imperative for plaintiff’s attorneys to make the determination for themselves. A plaintiff’s attorney can do so by requiring as a condition of the demand that the insurance carrier either allow counsel to take the defendant’s recorded statement, or provide counsel with the defendant’s signed declaration that answers very specific questions that will help you make the determination yourself. The questions you ask will require an understanding of the California case law that follows.

Course and scope of employment

Under the theory of respondeat superior, employers are vicariously liable for tortious acts committed by employees during the “course and scope” of their employment. However, there are exceptions, the most notable of which is the “going and coming” rule.

The going and coming rule

Under the “going and coming” rule, an employee is not within the course and scope of employment while commuting to or from work. The employer is generally not liable because the employee is not rendering a service to his employer during his daily commute. However, there are several exceptions to the going and coming rule that will hold an employer vicariously liable for tortious acts committed by an employee while commuting to and from work.

The vehicle-use exception

One exception to the going and coming rule is the “vehicle use” exception. The “vehicle use” exception states that an employee is within the course and scope of his employment while commuting if (1) the employer required the employee to drive his car to and from the workplace at the time of the accident, or (2) the employee’s use of his car provided a benefit to the employer at the time of the accident.

In Lobo v. Tamco (2010) 182 Cal.App.4th 297 (Lobo I), an employee, Luis Del Rosario, killed Deputy Daniel Lobo while negligently driving home from work. The court found that a reasonable trier of fact could find the employer, Tamco, vicariously liable for Del Rosario’s negligence under the “required-vehicle” exception to the going and coming rule. “[A]pplication of the doctrine turns on whether the employer expressly or implicitly required the employee to make the vehicle available or has reasonably come to expect that the vehicle will be available for work purposes and whether the employer derived a benefit from the availability of the vehicle.” Here, the availability of Del Rosario’s car provided Tamco with the benefit of ensuring he could respond promptly to customer complaints, albeit infrequently, and the benefit of not having to provide him with a company car.

However, four years later in Lobo v. Tamco (2014), 230 Cal.App.4th 438 (Lobo II), the Court of Appeal upheld a jury verdict in favor of Tamco, the defendant employer. The court explained that its decision in Lobo I “did not preclude the possibility that a jury might conclude that although the availability of Del Rosario’s car conferred some benefit on Tamco, it did not confer a sufficient benefit that Tamco should be vicariously liable for Del Rosario’s negligence.” In other words, whether the incidental benefit is sufficient to hold the employer liable for its employee’s negligence while commuting is “the exclusive province of the jury.”

The “day of the accident”

Subsequent cases have construed the vehicle-use exception somewhat narrowly.

In Jorge Jr. v. Culinary Institute of America (2017) 3 Cal.App.5th 382, employee Almir Da Fonseca struck pedestrian Jorge on his drive home from work at the Culinary Institute of America. The appellate court found that even if Da Fonseca was impliedly required to drive his car to off-campus events, the employer could not be held vicariously liable for an accident that took place during Da Fonseca’s ordinary commute home from a day of performing regular duties at the Culinary Institute.

In Newland v. County of Los Angeles (2018) 24 Cal.App.5th 676, employee Prigo struck another car while driving to the post office to mail his rent check on his way home from work at the County as a public defender. The Court of Appeal found that although Prigo was required to drive his car to perform several of his job duties outside the office, he did not need his car for work purposes on the day of the accident. Prigo was driving a normal, routine commute at the time of the accident from a fixed place of business to home. The court also found there was no evidence to support a finding that the County received a benefit from the availability of Prigo’s car on the day of the accident.

The Jorge Jr., and Newland courts essentially narrowed the vehicle use exception to instances where the employer requires, or benefits from, the vehicle being available on the day of the accident, not just in general.

The special-errand exception

Another exception to the going and coming rule is the “special errand” exception. The “special errand” exception states than an employee is within the course and scope of his employment when performing a special errand as part of his regular duties or as a special request.

In Jeewarat v. Warner Bros. Entm’t Inc. (2009) 177 Cal.App.4th 427, an employee got into a car accident while driving home from the airport after having attended an out-of-town business conference. The appeals court found the employer, Warner Brothers, could be held vicariously liable because attending a business conference may be considered a special errand for the employer. The court also concluded that a special errand continues for the entire trip and would not end until the “employee returns home or deviates from the errand for personal reasons.”

In Morales-Simental v. Genentech, Inc. (2017) Cal.App. LEXIS 915, an employee, Ong, got into a car accident while driving to work in the early hours of the morning to review resumes for a hiring project. The court found that the employer, Genentech, could not be held vicariously liable for Ong’s negligence because the employee cannot order himself to perform a special errand, rather the employer must expect or request it. Otherwise, employers would not be able to control their liability for the off-shift activities of their employees.

Putting these two cases together, we know that commuting to and from a business conference qualifies under the special errand exception for the entirety of the trip so long as the employee did not order himself to go.

Work-related telephone calls exception

A third exception to the going and coming rule is for work-related telephone calls. Under this exception, an employee may be within the course and scope of his employment while commuting if the employee is talking on a work-related telephone call at the time of the accident.

In Miller v. American Greeting Corp. (2008) 161 Cal.App.4th 1055, the court found the employer could not be held vicariously liable for its employee’s negligence while commuting because the work-related telephone call took place eight minutes prior to the accident, which was insufficient.

In Ayon v. Esquire Deposition Solutions, LLC (2018) 27 Cal.App.5th 487, the Court of Appeal affirmed a summary judgment in favor of the employer. In the court’s opinion, the employer could not be held vicariously liable for its employee’s negligence while commuting because there was no evidence the employee’s telephone call with another employee involved work-related matters — just personal matters.

Putting these two cases together, we know that a commute can turn into course and scope if an employee is actively on a work-related telephone call at the moment the accident occurs and the employee is discussing matters that are directly related to work.

How to address course and scope of employment in a demand letter

Whether a defendant was driving within the “course and scope” of his employment at the time of the accident is far from clear-cut. That is why it so important for plaintiffs’ attorneys to not rely upon non-attorney insurance adjusters and defendants to answer this very complicated question.

I recommend plaintiffs’ attorneys consider making it a condition of their demand that the insurance carrier either allow you the opportunity to take the defendant’s recorded statement, or provide you with the defendant’s signed declaration answering very specific questions that will help you make your own determination as to “course and scope.”

Here are some questions you might want to ask of the defendant:

Where were you coming from? Where were you going to? Who is your employer? What is the title of your position at work? What are your job duties? Have you ever used your personal vehicle for a work-related purpose other than commuting? (e.g., client meetings, business conferences, transporting goods, work functions, special projects, etc.) If yes, please explain. Did you use your personal vehicle for a work-related purpose other than commuting on the day of the accident? If yes, please explain. Were you on the telephone, even if it was hands-free, at the time of the accident? If yes, who were you on the phone with? What is that person’s relationship to you? Did you discuss work-related matters?

By asking these very specific questions, there is no doubt that countless plaintiffs’ attorneys will uncover additional sources of recovery for their clients that they otherwise would not have.

Related Articles

IN PARTNERSHIP

Should I Hire a Lawyer After a Car Accident in Lawrenceville?


by Yari D. Lawson

If you or a loved one have suffered from a crash, here’s why hiring a car accident lawyer in Lawrenceville, GA, is a good idea to ensure you get compensation.

First responders assessing a car accident scene

IN PARTNERSHIP

What Are the Benefits of Hiring a Lawyer After a Car Accident?


by Jamie S. Cogburn

Want to learn more about the benefits of hiring a car accident lawyer? Contact J. Cogburn Law for a free consultation with a Las Vegas car accident lawyer.

Man at desk writing with two toy cars in front of him

Car Accident Compensation in Florida


by Peter Catania

Are you curious about how to maximize your compensation after a car accident? These steps can help. Learn more here.

Car Accident Compensation in Florida

What Will a Car Accident Lawyer Actually Do for You?


by David Muñoz

Find out what you can expect after hiring a personal injury attorney. Learn about your legal rights to help you decide if you should hire an attorney after suffering injuries in a car accident.

What to Expect from A Personal Injury Lawyer

When Do You Need To Hire a Car Accident Attorney


by Jay S. Knispel

Injured in a car accident? Here are seven major signs you need to hire a car accident lawyer for your case.

Seven Signs To Hire a Car Accident Attorney

Things to Do Before a Car Accident Happens to You


by Ellie Shaffer

In a car accident, certain things are beyond the point of no return, while some are well within an individual's control. Here's how to stay legally prepared.

Car dashcam recording street ahead

The Role of Medical Experts in Catastrophic Injury Cases


by Timothy A. Loranger

When catastrophic injury is the result of an accident, medical experts can play a crucial role in the legal process, providing transparency for all involved.

Doctor and nurse discussing an X-ray scan

IN PARTNERSHIP

Common Personal Injury Claims and the Importance of Hiring a Lawyer


by Joshua Michael Palmintier

The Palmintier Law Group sheds light on why it's crucial for individuals to hire legal representation when facing one of many different personal injury claims.

Hard hat on the floor with person in the background

Steps To Take After a Columbus Car Accident


by Mark Casto

Learn some steps to take after a car accident in Columbus, GA. Contact Mark Casto Personal Injury Law Firm for legal assistance if you were injured in a crash.

Two front ends of cars shattering in pieces after collision

IN PARTNERSHIP

Should I Hire A Lawyer After A Houston Car Accident?


by Ryan Zehl

You should hire a lawyer after a Houston car accident for help proving liability, gathering evidence and pursuing insurance claims or lawsuits for compensation.

Yellow background with white car being viewed through magnifying glass

IN PARTNERSHIP

Five Tips To Avoid a Car Accident in Nashville


by Harlene Labrum

Learn five tips to avoid a crash in Nashville, TN. Call Labrum Law Firm Personal Injury Lawyers for a consultation with a skilled Nashville car accident attorney.

Car driving on snowy road

IN PARTNERSHIP

The Benefits of Hiring an Attorney After a Car Accident


by James D. Payer

Hiring a car accident attorney is about maximizing the compensation you recover from the at-fault party. Learn more about the benefits of hiring a lawyer here.

Nighttime image of two crashed cars in street covered in broken glass

IN PARTNERSHIP

Should I Hire a Lawyer After a Car Accident in Galveston, TX?


by Alton Todd

Learn whether you should hire a lawyer after a car accident in Galveston, TX. Contact The Law Firm of Alton C. Todd Personal Injury Lawyers for a free consultation.

Yellow car crashing into the side of blue car

IN PARTNERSHIP

Should I Hire a Lawyer After a Car Accident in Brentwood, TN?


by Harlene Labrum

Learn whether you should hire a lawyer after a car accident lawyer in Brentwood, TN. Contact Labrum Law Firm Personal Injury Lawyers for a free consultation.

Road caution sign in front of two wrecked cars

IN PARTNERSHIP

What Will a Chicago Car Accident Lawyer Actually Do for You?


by Adam Zayed

Personal injury lawyer Adam Zayed explains the important steps a Chicago car accident lawyer will take to ensure you receive the best legal representation.

Blurry image of fast moving traffic in big city

IN PARTNERSHIP

Knowing When to Hire a Car Accident Lawyer


by Muhammad Ramadan

Chicago personal injury lawyer Muhammad Ramadan offers advice on how to know when to hire a lawyer after you have been involved in a car accident.

White and grey cars crashed together with man standing between them

Trending Articles

Presenting The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2025


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is proud to present The Best Lawyers in Australia for 2025, marking the 17th consecutive year of Best Lawyers awards in Australia.

Australia flag over outline of country

How To Find A Pro Bono Lawyer


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers dives into the vital role pro bono lawyers play in ensuring access to justice for all and the transformative impact they have on communities.

Hands joined around a table with phone, paper, pen and glasses

How Palworld Is Testing the Limits of Nintendo’s Legal Power


by Gregory Sirico

Many are calling the new game Palworld “Pokémon GO with guns,” noting the games striking similarities. Experts speculate how Nintendo could take legal action.

Animated figures with guns stand on top of creatures

Announcing The Best Lawyers in New Zealand™ 2025 Awards


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is announcing the 16th edition of The Best Lawyers in New Zealand for 2025, including individual Best Lawyers and "Lawyer of the Year" awards.

New Zealand flag over image of country outline

Legal Distinction on Display: 15th Edition of The Best Lawyers in France™


by Best Lawyers

The industry’s best lawyers and firms working in France are revealed in the newly released, comprehensive the 15th Edition of The Best Lawyers in France™.

French flag in front of country's outline

Announcing The Best Lawyers in Japan™ 2025


by Best Lawyers

For a milestone 15th edition, Best Lawyers is proud to announce The Best Lawyers in Japan.

Japan flag over outline of country

The Best Lawyers in Singapore™ 2025 Edition


by Best Lawyers

For 2025, Best Lawyers presents the most esteemed awards for lawyers and law firms in Singapore.

Singapore flag over outline of country

Announcing the 13th Edition of Best Lawyers Rankings in the United Kingdom


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is proud to announce the newest edition of legal rankings in the United Kingdom, marking the 13th consecutive edition of awards in the country.

British flag in front of country's outline

Announcing the 16th Edition of the Best Lawyers in Germany Rankings


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers announces the 16th edition of The Best Lawyers in Germany™, featuring a unique set of rankings that highlights Germany's top legal talent.

German flag in front of country's outline

How Much Is a Lawyer Consultation Fee?


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers breaks down the key differences between consultation and retainer fees when hiring an attorney, a crucial first step in the legal process.

Client consulting with lawyer wearing a suit

Presenting the 2024 Best Lawyers Employment and Workers’ Compensation Legal Guide


by Best Lawyers

The 2024 Best Lawyers Employment and Workers' Compensation Legal Guide provides exclusive access to all Best Lawyers awards in related practice areas. Read below and explore the legal guide.

Illustration of several men and women in shades of orange and teal

Things to Do Before a Car Accident Happens to You


by Ellie Shaffer

In a car accident, certain things are beyond the point of no return, while some are well within an individual's control. Here's how to stay legally prepared.

Car dashcam recording street ahead

Celebrating Excellence in Law: 11th Edition of Best Lawyers in Italy™


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers announces the 11th edition of The Best Lawyers in Italy™, which features an elite list of awards showcasing Italy's current legal talent.

Italian flag in front of country's outline

Combating Nuclear Verdicts: Empirically Supported Strategies to Deflate the Effects of Anchoring Bias


by Sloan L. Abernathy

Sometimes a verdict can be the difference between amicability and nuclear level developments. But what is anchoring bias and how can strategy combat this?

Lawyer speaking in courtroom with crowd and judge in the foreground

The Push and Pitfalls of New York’s Attempt to Expand Wrongful Death Recovery


by Elizabeth M. Midgley and V. Christopher Potenza

The New York State Legislature recently went about updating certain wrongful death provisions and how they can be carried out in the future. Here's the latest.

Red tape blocking off a section of street

6 Ways a Lawyer Can Help You With Your Medical Malpractice Claim


by Adam Malone

If you believe you have a medical malpractice claim, contact an experienced medical malpractice lawyer. Read on to learn how they can help with your claim.

Doctor in white lab coat showing x-ray to patient in blue scrubs