Insight

Why Eating Disorder Patients in Illinois Are Losing Insurance Coverage

Patients and families say insurers are cutting off vital treatment for eating disorders, despite laws requiring equal coverage for mental health care.

Lisa S. Kantor

Written by Lisa S. Kantor

Published: November 3, 2022

CHICAGO (CBS 2) - Eating disorders are an epidemic, with about 11 million people in this country suffering from one. So why are insurance companies increasingly delaying, denying or minimizing coverage for this potentially fatal disease?

CBS 2 Investigator Dave Savini takes a look at how Illinois cases are frequently handled.

Melanie Korer suffers from an eating disorder so severe, at times she would eat only 200 calories a day.

"I got to 85 pounds," said Korer who restricted her dietary fats and began having organ damage. "So my liver got a little messed up."

Korer also battles an addiction to excessive exercising and has even taken laxatives as part of her illness.

She admits outpatient treatment did not provide enough care, so she went to a residential program. However, after four days into treatment at the facility Korer said her insurance company, Blue Cross Blue Shield cut off her in-patient coverage. That, according to Korer, happened even though she had a pre-approval.

"What happened is they authorized me, and a few days later, they denied that they authorized me," said Korer.

Her mother, Julie Korer, worries about what could happen if this residential treatment program is not covered.

"She's going to die," said Julie Korer, who says her daughter's appeal denial letter had wrong information about her condition and who ever wrote it even spelled "anorexia" wrong.

Attorney Lisa Kantor, who primarily handles eating disorder cases, said the problem with insurance companies denying eating disorder claims is a big issue.

"Insurance companies do not understand eating disorders," said Kantor. "It's virtually every insurance company that offers mental health insurance."

Kantor said Blue Cross Blue Shield in Illinois, has been especially troubling since the company changed its claims process last month. An outside vendor used to handle claims but they are now being handled by Blue Cross Blue Shield employees.

"There's an incredible backlog," Kantor reveals. "There's a lot of confusion. Providers aren't getting paid and patients aren't going to get treatment."

At Insight, a Chicago treatment center, co-founder Susan McClanahan said more than 100 patients could soon face treatment denials or higher out-of-pocket expenses related to Blue Cross Blue Shield coverage.

"As of January 1st, they [Blue Cross Blue Shield] just refused to authorize our visits," said McClanahan. She said they were blindsided last month when after seven years of billing Blue Cross Blue Shield for treatment, the company suddenly threatened to cut them off.

McClanahan, and other experts, admit insurance companies are increasingly issuing denials or reducing coverage because of concerns about increasing mental health costs linked to health care reform.

"I have never seen it this bad," said McClanahan.

"All I want to do is be able to do is live a normal happy healthy life," said Melanie Korer. "And the insurance company is taking that away from me."

In Minnesota, the death of a young woman led the state attorney general to file a lawsuit against the local Blue Cross Blue Shield for delaying, denying and withholding access to care. Now every denial goes before an independent three-judge panel for review. That does not happen in Illinois. In complex disputes like these, families often hire a lawyer to navigate appeals and protect access to treatment.

Blue Cross Blue Shield declined an interview. A spokesman stated they could not comment because of privacy reasons.

Statement from Michael T. McRaith, Director of the Illinois Dept of Insurance:

In Illinois, health insurers often treat patients with eating disorders unfairly or in a way that does not promote the health or well being of the patient.

For this reason and others, the Department of Insurance has initiated legislation that, if passed, will require fairer and better treatment for the patient and families who struggle with eating disorders or other mental health challenges.

The Department's proposed legislation is premised upon the federal mental health parity law passed in September 2008, which requires equal treatment by insurers of mental and physical health issues.

Learn More About:

Bad Faith Insurance Attorney

Bad Faith Insurance Claim

Eating Disorders

Trending Articles

The Family Law Loophole That Lets Sex Offenders Parent Kids


by Bryan Driscoll

Is the state's surrogacy framework putting children at risk?

family law surrogacy adoption headline

Recognizing Legal Leaders: The 2027 Best Lawyers Awards in Australia, Japan and Singapore


by Jamilla Tabbara

Market drivers, diversity trends and the elite practitioners shaping the legal landscape.

Illustrated maps of Australia, Japan and Singapore displayed with their national flags, representing

Holiday Pay Explained: Federal Rules and Employer Policies


by Bryan Driscoll

Understand how paid holidays work, when employers must follow their policies and when legal guidance may be necessary.

Stack of money wrapped in a festive bow, symbolizing holiday pay

Can a Green Card Be Revoked?


by Bryan Driscoll

Revocation requires a legal basis, notice and the chance to respond before status can be taken away.

Close-up of a U.S. Permanent Resident Card showing the text 'PERMANENT RESIDENT'

New Texas Family Laws Transform Navigating Divorce, Custody


by Bryan Driscoll

Reforms are sweeping, philosophically distinct and designed to change the way families operate.

definition of family headline

How Far Back Can the IRS Audit You?


by Bryan Driscoll

Clear answers on IRS statutes of limitations, recordkeeping and what to do if you are under review.

Gloved hand holding a spread of one-hundred-dollar bills near an IRS tax document

US Tariff Uncertainty Throws Canada Into Legal Purgatory


by Bryan Driscoll

The message is clear: There is no returning to pre-2025 normalcy.

US Tariff Uncertainty Throws Canada Into Legal Purgatory headline

Can You File Bankruptcy on Credit Cards


by Bryan Driscoll

Understanding your options for relief from overwhelming debt.

Red credit card on point-of-sale terminal representing credit card debt

Musk v. Altman: The Lawyers Behind the Case


by Jamilla Tabbara

Meet the Trial Lawyers Shaping One of AI's Biggest Legal Disputes.

Portrait photos of Elon Musk and Sam Altman positioned in front of the OpenAI logo.

How AI Is Changing the Way Clients Find Lawyers


by Jamilla Tabbara

Best Lawyers CEO Phil Greer explains how AI-driven search tools are reshaping legal marketing and why credibility markers matter.

AI chat bubble icon with stars representing artificial intelligence transforming client-lawyer conne

Colorado’s 2026 Water Rights Battles


by Bryan Driscoll

A new era of conflict begins.

Colorado Water Rights 2026: A New Era of Conflict headline

When Is It Too Late to Stop Foreclosure?


by Bryan Driscoll

Understanding the foreclosure timeline, critical deadlines and the legal options that may still protect your home.

Miniature house model on orange background surrounded by thumbtacks representing foreclosure

Can You Go to Jail at an Arraignment?


by Bryan Driscoll

Understanding What Happens at Your First Court Appearance.

A heavy chain lying on the ground in the foreground with a blurred figure standing in the background

What’s the Difference Between DUI and DWI?


by Bryan Driscoll

Understanding the terminology and consequences of impaired driving charges.

Driver during nighttime police traffic stop with officer's flashlight shining through car window

Canadian Firms Explore AI, But Few Fully Embrace the Shift


by David L. Brown

BLF survey reveals caution despite momentum.

Canadian Firms Explore AI, But Few Fully Embrace the Shift headline

The Legal Teams Behind the Blake Lively–Justin Baldoni Settlement


by Grace Greer

A closer look at the legal teams and attorneys involved in the Blake Lively–Justin Baldoni litigation and its resolution.

Split-screen image of Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni