Insight

Washington, D.C. In the Law

We explore three legal cases in Washington, D.C.

Small clay figures showing a doctor treating a patient in bed
GS

Gregory Sirico

September 20, 2021 07:25 AM

This article was originally published on September 16, 2021 in Washington, D.C.'s Best Lawyers 2022.

As the threat of COVID-19 remains at the forefront and the possibility of widespread variants lurks around the corner, it does not diminish the other hardships people have had to endure this past year. Unemployment, remote education, and nationwide political tension aside, in times like these people look to their local government, authorities, and medical officials to have their well-being in mind. Specifically, in places like Washington D.C., there has been a recent surge in cases of negligence, all on the medical front, which have been overshadowed by the pandemic at large. Below we highlight three different cases recently fought in the Washington D.C. courts which demonstrate that, despite the rights we often assume to be granted, things are always different in the eyes of the law.

Crum v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

As incarcerated individuals, few rights are afforded, but rights to medical and dental services when sick or injured are still inherent to all inmates. David Crum, a federal prisoner at the District of Columbia Court Jail, alleges his medical rights were infringed upon when he was transferred to a different corrections facility in Beaver, West Virginia. Due to his various medical conditions, such as high blood pressure, congestive heart failure, and an ongoing liver infection, Crum should’ve been placed on medical hold. Crum claims his life was put in “direct danger” when prison staff failed to send his medical records pre-transfer. As a result of this mishap, Crum was wrongfully subjected to numerous medical tests and illegally held under falsified prison documents. He sought $50,000 in compensation for negligence, but the claim was eventually denied due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

Young v. United States Department of Labor

Under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act (EEOICPA), families are entitled to compensation after the passing of a relative due to illness contracted on the job. For Shannon and Kevin Young, sons of a former Department of Energy employee, this should have been the case. After being exposed to unsafe amounts of radiation for years, their father developed prostate cancer and passed away. When the family went to file for compensation, they were subsequently denied on the basis that there was a “less-than-even” chance their father passed due to radiation exposure on the job. The DOE claims that the standard “radiation dose reconstruction” test, a test administered to all energy-based workers as an estimated gauge of their radiation exposure levels, was the responsibility of the Department of Health and Human Services under EEOICPA and was never properly conducted in Young’s stint as a DOE contracted employee. The Young family sought $150,000 in compensation for negligence on the DOE and HHS’s behalf. Despite insufficient radiation data attained by the HHS, the claim was eventually denied, and the HHS was never held liable.

Kaul v. Federation of State Medical Boards

Previously licensed to practice medicine in New Jersey, Richard Kaul’s medical license was later revoked in 2014 when he was caught illegally performing spinal surgery, without proper training or experience, on eleven different patients, an act that blatantly constitutes medical negligence, malpractice, and incompetence. Kaul claims these accusations are all a baseless conspiracy and are the amalgamated efforts of his “medical rivals” to “permanently eliminate him from the practice of medicine anywhere in the world.” Additionally, the end goal of this conspiracy, in Kaul’s assessment, was to ensure that insurance companies are unable to pay him for services rendered. After attempting to sue 30 different individual medical boards and companies, Kaul’s efforts turned up unsuccessful. He is currently seeking $28 trillion in damages but faces 15 counts of medical malpractice and misconduct, with each of the eleven cases bearing a $20,000 fine.

Disclaimer: All above cases summarized from full case documentation on Justia.

Related Articles

How a New Maryland Bike Safety Law Honors a Client’s Legacy


by Justin Smulison

Four-time Lawyer Of The Year Patrick Regan discusses how a client’s bicycling tragedy led to a result that improved Maryland traffic law to protect riders.

Group of lawyers posing for a photo

"Lawyer of the Year"


Lawyer wearing glasses and suit smiles in headshot photo

Duane C. Pozza

Advertising Law

Washington, D.C., DC

2025

New SAFE Act Aims to Tackle Rising Crime in DC


by Gregory Sirico

As DC grapples with skyrocketing crime rates, the Secure Apartments for Everyone Regulation Amendment Act seeks to implement actionable change

Security cameras affixed to animated building

"Lawyer of the Year"


Headshot of the D.C. Lawyer of the Year Honoree

Adam J. August

Corporate Law

Washington, D.C., VA

2024

D.C. Circuit Court Questions Constitutionality of FINRA


by Gregory Sirico

Over the summer, a D.C. Circuit Court was quick to stop the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) from expelling a Utah-based brokerage firm.

Bull and lion fighting within a cage

IN PARTNERSHIP

A Better Roadmap for Bicycle Safety in D.C.


by Justin Smulison

Four-time “Lawyer of The Year” recipient Patrick Regan explains how we can protect cyclists from injury and the nation’s capital from more costly litigation.

Group of lawyers pose for a picture

"Lawyer of the Year"


Woman with red shirt and black jacket with brown hair

Wendy N. Reed

Energy Law

Washington, D.C., DC

2023

New Non-Compete Restrictions To Take Effect in D.C.


by Gregory Sirico

Best Lawyers investigates the Non-Compete Clarification Act of 2022 passed in the District of Columbia.

Woman in black dress pushing a glowing puzzle piece

A Roadmap for Safety in D.C.


by Justin Smulison

Three-time “Lawyer of The Year” Patrick Regan explains how we can protect cyclists from injury and the city from more litigation.

Several lawyers sitting and standing in a group in office

Aim High and Fly


by Khalil Abdullah

From a silent victim of hometown segregation to Air Force captain and lawyer of consummate skill, Karen Evans exemplifies leadership—and vows always to help those who seek to follow her path.

Attorney Karen Evans smiles with a airplane flying the background

Facebook Whistleblower Testimony Shines A Light On Credibility Factor


by Justin Smulison

Landmark whistleblower testimony was provided on Capitol Hill which may have a national—and even worldwide—effect on how governments regulate Big Tech companies.

Facebook logo Infront of a black silhouette of a woman

A Quarter-century of Leading Client Service


by Justin Smulison

As Regan Zambri Long celebrates its 25th anniversary, co-founder and two-time Medical Malpractice “Lawyer of the Year”, Patrick Regan reflects on some of the firm’s most notable resolutions.

Regan Zambri Long Medical Malpractice “Lawyer of the Year”, Patrick Regan with his firm

Washington D.C. 2022 "Lawyer of the Year"


by Best Lawyers

Subhashini Bollini is honored as 2022 "Lawyer of the Year" in Civil Rights Law for Washington, D.C.

Washington D.C. 2022 "Lawyer of the Year" Subhashini Bollini

John P. Relman - Washington, D.C. 2021 Lawyer of the Year


by Best Lawyers

Civil Rights Law Washington, D.C.

Headshot of John Relman

Time to Vote?


by Janice Zhou

With the presidential election right around the corner, the right to vote is more important than ever. For some, there are obstacles to exercising their constitutional right.

Woman holding up an I Voted sticker

Achieving Justice For Essential Workers


by Justin Smulison

Patrick Regan of Regan Zambri Long describes how the recent resolution of a corporate negligence case brought closure to survivors of a fatal 2016 apartment building explosion.

Regan Zambri Long Law Group smiles for a firm photo

Trending Articles

The Family Law Loophole That Lets Sex Offenders Parent Kids


by Bryan Driscoll

Is the state's surrogacy framework putting children at risk?

family law surrogacy adoption headline

Algorithmic Exclusion


by Bryan Driscoll

The Workday lawsuit and the future of AI in hiring.

Workday Lawsuit and the Future of AI in Hiring headline

Best Lawyers 2026: Discover the Honorees in Brazil, Mexico, Portugal, South Africa and Spain


by Jamilla Tabbara

A growing international network of recognized legal professionals.

Map highlighting the 2026 Best Lawyers honorees across Brazil, Mexico, Portugal, South Africa and Sp

Unenforceable HOA Rules: What Homeowners Can Do About Illegal HOA Actions


by Bryan Driscoll

Not every HOA rule is legal. Learn how to recognize and fight unenforceable HOA rules that overstep the law.

Wooden model houses connected together representing homeowners associations

Holiday Pay Explained: Federal Rules and Employer Policies


by Bryan Driscoll

Understand how paid holidays work, when employers must follow their policies and when legal guidance may be necessary.

Stack of money wrapped in a festive bow, symbolizing holiday pay

Reddit’s Lawsuit Could Change How Much AI Knows About You


by Justin Smulison

Big AI is battling for its future—your data’s at stake.

Reddit Anthropic Lawsuit headline

Florida Rewrites the Rules on Housing


by Laurie Villanueva

Whether locals like it or not.

Florida Rewrites the Rules on Housing headline

US Tariff Uncertainty Throws Canada Into Legal Purgatory


by Bryan Driscoll

The message is clear: There is no returning to pre-2025 normalcy.

US Tariff Uncertainty Throws Canada Into Legal Purgatory headline

Alimony Explained: Who Qualifies, How It Works and What to Expect


by Bryan Driscoll

A practical guide to understanding alimony, from eligibility to enforcement, for anyone navigating divorce

two figures standing on stacks of coins

UnitedHealth's Twin Legal Storms


by Bryan Driscoll

ERISA failures and shareholder fallout in the wake of a CEO’s death.

United healthcare legal storm ceo murder headline

Can a Green Card Be Revoked?


by Bryan Driscoll

Revocation requires a legal basis, notice and the chance to respond before status can be taken away.

Close-up of a U.S. Permanent Resident Card showing the text 'PERMANENT RESIDENT'

The 2026 Best Lawyers Awards in Chile, Colombia and Puerto Rico


by Jamilla Tabbara

The region’s most highly regarded lawyers.

Map highlighting Chile, Colombia and Puerto Rico for the 2026 Best Lawyers Awards

New Texas Family Laws Transform Navigating Divorce, Custody


by Bryan Driscoll

Reforms are sweeping, philosophically distinct and designed to change the way families operate.

definition of family headline

Why Skechers' $9.4B Private Equity Buyout Sparked Investor Revolt


by Laurie Villanueva

Shareholder anger, a lack of transparency and a 'surprising' valuation.

Skechers shareholder lawsuit headline

What Is the Difference Between a Will and a Living Trust?


by Bryan Driscoll

A practical guide to wills, living trusts and how to choose the right plan for your estate.

Organized folders labeled “Wills” and “Trusts” representing estate planning documents

How Far Back Can the IRS Audit You?


by Bryan Driscoll

Clear answers on IRS statutes of limitations, recordkeeping and what to do if you are under review.

Gloved hand holding a spread of one-hundred-dollar bills near an IRS tax document