Insight

Steve R Wagner, A Partner at the Firm, Successfully Helping Buyers Navigate Purchasing Property on a 1840’s Slave Burial Ground

Steve R Wagner, A Partner at the Firm, Successfully Helping Buyers Navigate Purchasing Property on a 1840’s Slave Burial Ground

Adam Leitman Bailey

Adam Leitman Bailey

January 17, 2023 02:50 PM

Bowery Residents Committee (BRC) (2021)

BRC, a highly respected not-for-profit whose mission is to provide shelter and social services to New York’s homeless, entered into a purchase and sale agreement for a property in northern Manhattan. The contract deposit was in excess of $1 million. As is typical on these matters, BRC arranged with City agencies to finance, build, and operate a homeless shelter and social services center on the site. As the final touches were put on the documents with the City, it was discovered that the site was, in fact, an enslaved person burial ground for three farms in the 1840s. In 1903, newspaper articles in the New York Times confirmed use of the property as an enslaved persons burial ground when human remains were discovered during excavation to build foundations for an overhead rail line which is still in use today as part of Amtrack. The site was dreadfully desecrated at the time with human bones and skulls left in boxes for local residents to take.

The City slammed the breaks on signing the contracts with BRC until the site had been thoroughly investigated in accordance with protocols established by the Landmarks Preservation Commission and arrangements to relocate any remains discovered at the site and to honor the enslaved people. This put BRC in a terrible bind. They could not close on the purchase and sale agreement with the property owner, who had previously adjourned the closing and declared it to be time of the essence. Thus, BRC could not close because the City wanted the enslaved burial grounds issues resolve and would not fund the purchase of the property or the project until it was. If BRC was not able to close because the City pulled its support of the project, even temporarily as had happened, BRC was going to lose its $1 million plus contract deposit. Losing more than $1 million is not something a not-for-profit company can afford – ever.

With only three weeks remaining before the time of the essence closing date, the attorneys representing BRC had exhausted any possibility of negotiating further extensions of the closing date or saving the $1 million contract deposit. The closing was scheduled for to take place at the end of January, 2021. The seller’s attorneys told BRC that they were going to declare BRC in default and keep the deposit.

One of the board members, the former president of Battery Park City Authority, knew me and previously hired me to litigate issues for Battery Park City. I was successful in defending Battery Park City against constitutional challenges to its enabling legislation. He suggested that BRC contact me to see if anything could be done.

I researched the issues and found a case from 1893 in which New York’s Court of Appeals declared the rights of descendants to visit burial sites of their ancestors even where they burial sites were located on private property. Later cases built off this Court of Appeals precedent to establish that the right of descendants to visit the burial site of their ancestors was not only the rights of descendants, it was an issue that affected title to the property. The Purchase and Sale Agreement BRC signed required the seller to clear title, subject to a list of very specific exception. This right of descendants to visit their ancestors’ graves was not one of the exceptions listed in the contract. In other words, the seller had to address these rights before the transfer of the property or BRC could get its contract deposit back.

I prepared a full set of papers for a declaratory judgment in which I asked the court to recognize the rights of the descendants and to declare that the location of an enslaved person burial ground on the property was a title issue that the seller was required to clear in order to transfer the property. I also sought a temporary restraining order and an injunction prohibiting the seller from terminating the contract and preventing the seller’s law firm – who was holding the $1+ million escrow deposit – from releasing it to the seller.

After the papers were finished, with less than 10 days left before the ‘time of the essence’ closing, I called up the attorneys for the seller and told them about the seller’s title issue. I explained that I was ready to go to court and I pointed out that once I filed the court papers, there would be a permanent court record of the title defect which would stay on the property until the title issue was resolved. I explained the process to clear the title defect and that the matter was under the jurisdiction of the Landmarks Preservation Commission, who would carefully oversee everything done. I also mentioned to the attorneys that BRC estimated the cost to resolve the defect would be several hundred thousand dollars. This conversation was on a Friday. I told the attorneys that I intended to file the court papers the following Tuesday and that my call was the 24-hour notification required by court rules.

When the attorneys calmed down and stopped yelling at me, I offered to send them the memorandum of law I had prepared along with all the other court papers that were ready to be filed. The attorneys said they would get back to me after they analyzed the court papers I forwarded to them. I gave them my phone number in case they wanted to speak to me over the weekend. Two days later, on the following Sunday, attorneys for the seller called me and asked very nicely for a short adjournment of the ‘time of the essence’ closing so that they could try to work something out between the seller and BRC. They also asked me not to file any papers with the court. I agreed. A stipulation was prepared and signed by the attorneys.

BRC understood part of its mission was to honor the enslaved people who had been buried on the site. During negotiations it offered to purchase the property from the seller with the title defect if additional time was given to BRC to sort out everything that needed to be done with the City agencies. The Seller agreed. The City was extremely happy to work with BRC to create a memorial for the enslaved people in upper Manhattan similar to the African Burial Ground National Monument created in lower Manhattan. Funds were released from the contract deposit escrow to the seller to assist in payment of taxes and upkeep on the property during the adjournment of the closing date. The closing on the property occurred on November 1, 2021, ahead of schedule. The seller sold the property and got his money, BRC did not lose a $1+ million deposit and purchased the site for the new facility it wanted to build, and the remains enslaved persons who were buried on the site will be honored appropriately with a memorial created with the assistance of the City for the benefit of the descendants and the community at large.

Trending Articles

Whistleblower Legislation Opens the Doors for More International Claims


by Justin Smulison

An Anti-Money Laundering Act, part of a recently passed Omnibus Budget in the U.S. Senate, is expanding protection for whistleblowers both domestically and internationally.

Shadow figure in spotlight against red and blue brick wall

The Best Lawyers in South Africa™ 2023


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers proudly announces lawyers recognized in South Africa for 2023.

South African flag

Announcing the 2023 The Best Lawyers in America Honorees


by Best Lawyers

Only the top 5.3% of all practicing lawyers in the U.S. were selected by their peers for inclusion in the 29th edition of The Best Lawyers in America®.

Gold strings and dots connecting to form US map

Best Lawyers Voting Is Now Open


by Best Lawyers

Voting has begun in several countries across the globe, including the United States, the United Kingdom and Europe. Below we offer dates, details and answers to voting-related questions to assist with the voting process.

Hands holding smartphone with five stars above phone

Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2023


by Best Lawyers

The third edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America™ highlights the legal talent of lawyers who have been in practice less than 10 years.

Three arrows made of lines and dots on blue background

Rising Transfer Taxes


by Angus C. Beverly

Transfer taxes in California are becoming a statewide trend with potentially national implications. Here is a breakdown of the effects in several cities.

State of California in orange with city in backdrop

Could Reign Supreme End with the Queen?


by Sara Collin

Canada is revisiting the notion of abolishing the monarchy after Queen Elizabeth II’s passing, but many Canadians and lawmakers are questioning if Canada could, should and would follow through.

Teacup on saucer over image of Queen's eye

Announcing The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2023


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms from Australia.

The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2023

Famous Songs Unprotected by Copyright Could Mean Royalties for Some


by Michael B. Fein

A guide to navigating copyright claims on famous songs.

Can I Sing "Happy Birthday" in Public?

Announcing the 2023 The Best Lawyers in Canada Honorees


by Best Lawyers

The Best Lawyers in Canada™ is entering its 17th edition for 2023. We highlight the elite lawyers awarded this year.

Red map of Canada with white lines and dots

What the Courts Say About Recording in the Classroom


by Christina Henagen Peer and Peter Zawadski

Students and parents are increasingly asking to use audio devices to record what's being said in the classroom. But is it legal? A recent ruling offer gives the answer to a question confusing parents and administrators alike.

Is It Legal for Students to Record Teachers?

The Upcycle Conundrum


by Karen Kreider Gaunt

Laudable or litigious? What you need to know about potential copyright and trademark infringement when repurposing products.

Repurposed Products and Copyright Infringemen

Caffeine Overload and DUI Tests


by Daniel Taylor

While it might come as a surprise, the over-consumption of caffeine could trigger a false positive on a breathalyzer test.

Can Caffeine Cause You to Fail DUI Test?

Wage and Overtime Laws for Truck Drivers


by Greg Mansell

For truck drivers nationwide, underpayment and overtime violations are just the beginning of a long list of problems. Below we explore the wages you are entitled to but may not be receiving.

Truck Driver Wage and Overtime Laws in the US

Choosing a Title Company: What a Seller Should Expect


by Roy D. Oppenheim

When it comes to choosing a title company, how much power exactly does a seller have?

Choosing the Title Company As Seller

IN PARTNERSHIP

2022: Another Banner Year


by John Fields

Block O’Toole & Murphy continues to secure some of New York’s highest results for personal injury matters.

Three men in business suits standing in office