Insight

Steve R Wagner, A Partner at the Firm, Successfully Helping Buyers Navigate Purchasing Property on a 1840’s Slave Burial Ground

Steve R Wagner, A Partner at the Firm, Successfully Helping Buyers Navigate Purchasing Property on a 1840’s Slave Burial Ground

Adam Leitman Bailey

Written by Adam Leitman Bailey

Published: January 17, 2023

Bowery Residents Committee (BRC) (2021)

BRC, a highly respected not-for-profit whose mission is to provide shelter and social services to New York’s homeless, entered into a purchase and sale agreement for a property in northern Manhattan. The contract deposit was in excess of $1 million. As is typical on these matters, BRC arranged with City agencies to finance, build, and operate a homeless shelter and social services center on the site. As the final touches were put on the documents with the City, it was discovered that the site was, in fact, an enslaved person burial ground for three farms in the 1840s. In 1903, newspaper articles in the New York Times confirmed use of the property as an enslaved persons burial ground when human remains were discovered during excavation to build foundations for an overhead rail line which is still in use today as part of Amtrack. The site was dreadfully desecrated at the time with human bones and skulls left in boxes for local residents to take.

The City slammed the breaks on signing the contracts with BRC until the site had been thoroughly investigated in accordance with protocols established by the Landmarks Preservation Commission and arrangements to relocate any remains discovered at the site and to honor the enslaved people. This put BRC in a terrible bind. They could not close on the purchase and sale agreement with the property owner, who had previously adjourned the closing and declared it to be time of the essence. Thus, BRC could not close because the City wanted the enslaved burial grounds issues resolve and would not fund the purchase of the property or the project until it was. If BRC was not able to close because the City pulled its support of the project, even temporarily as had happened, BRC was going to lose its $1 million plus contract deposit. Losing more than $1 million is not something a not-for-profit company can afford – ever.

With only three weeks remaining before the time of the essence closing date, the attorneys representing BRC had exhausted any possibility of negotiating further extensions of the closing date or saving the $1 million contract deposit. The closing was scheduled for to take place at the end of January, 2021. The seller’s attorneys told BRC that they were going to declare BRC in default and keep the deposit.

One of the board members, the former president of Battery Park City Authority, knew me and previously hired me to litigate issues for Battery Park City. I was successful in defending Battery Park City against constitutional challenges to its enabling legislation. He suggested that BRC contact me to see if anything could be done.

I researched the issues and found a case from 1893 in which New York’s Court of Appeals declared the rights of descendants to visit burial sites of their ancestors even where they burial sites were located on private property. Later cases built off this Court of Appeals precedent to establish that the right of descendants to visit the burial site of their ancestors was not only the rights of descendants, it was an issue that affected title to the property. The Purchase and Sale Agreement BRC signed required the seller to clear title, subject to a list of very specific exception. This right of descendants to visit their ancestors’ graves was not one of the exceptions listed in the contract. In other words, the seller had to address these rights before the transfer of the property or BRC could get its contract deposit back.

I prepared a full set of papers for a declaratory judgment in which I asked the court to recognize the rights of the descendants and to declare that the location of an enslaved person burial ground on the property was a title issue that the seller was required to clear in order to transfer the property. I also sought a temporary restraining order and an injunction prohibiting the seller from terminating the contract and preventing the seller’s law firm – who was holding the $1+ million escrow deposit – from releasing it to the seller.

After the papers were finished, with less than 10 days left before the ‘time of the essence’ closing, I called up the attorneys for the seller and told them about the seller’s title issue. I explained that I was ready to go to court and I pointed out that once I filed the court papers, there would be a permanent court record of the title defect which would stay on the property until the title issue was resolved. I explained the process to clear the title defect and that the matter was under the jurisdiction of the Landmarks Preservation Commission, who would carefully oversee everything done. I also mentioned to the attorneys that BRC estimated the cost to resolve the defect would be several hundred thousand dollars. This conversation was on a Friday. I told the attorneys that I intended to file the court papers the following Tuesday and that my call was the 24-hour notification required by court rules.

When the attorneys calmed down and stopped yelling at me, I offered to send them the memorandum of law I had prepared along with all the other court papers that were ready to be filed. The attorneys said they would get back to me after they analyzed the court papers I forwarded to them. I gave them my phone number in case they wanted to speak to me over the weekend. Two days later, on the following Sunday, attorneys for the seller called me and asked very nicely for a short adjournment of the ‘time of the essence’ closing so that they could try to work something out between the seller and BRC. They also asked me not to file any papers with the court. I agreed. A stipulation was prepared and signed by the attorneys.

BRC understood part of its mission was to honor the enslaved people who had been buried on the site. During negotiations it offered to purchase the property from the seller with the title defect if additional time was given to BRC to sort out everything that needed to be done with the City agencies. The Seller agreed. The City was extremely happy to work with BRC to create a memorial for the enslaved people in upper Manhattan similar to the African Burial Ground National Monument created in lower Manhattan. Funds were released from the contract deposit escrow to the seller to assist in payment of taxes and upkeep on the property during the adjournment of the closing date. The closing on the property occurred on November 1, 2021, ahead of schedule. The seller sold the property and got his money, BRC did not lose a $1+ million deposit and purchased the site for the new facility it wanted to build, and the remains enslaved persons who were buried on the site will be honored appropriately with a memorial created with the assistance of the City for the benefit of the descendants and the community at large.

Learn More About:

Purchase And Sale Of Homes

Real Estate Litigation

Trending Articles

What AI Visibility Means for Lawyers


by Josh Rupall and Bryan Driscoll

AI tools increasingly interpret lawyers public information. Clear, consistent and credible sources help ensure they describe legal expertise accurately.

AI dashboard visualizing a lawyer's online profile, reputation, and practice information across mult

The Best Lawyers in Canada 2027: Recognizing the Nation's Top Legal Talent


by Jamilla Tabbara

Honoring established leaders and rising practitioners across Canada's legal profession.

3D model of Canada textured with the Canadian flag.

Recognizing Legal Leaders: The 2027 Best Lawyers Awards in Australia, Japan and Singapore


by Jamilla Tabbara

Market drivers, diversity trends and the elite practitioners shaping the legal landscape.

Illustrated maps of Australia, Japan and Singapore displayed with their national flags, representing

2027 Best Lawyers Awards: Honoring Excellence in the Legal Profession


by Jamilla Tabbara

Recognizing the outstanding attorneys leading top practice areas nationwide.

United States with American flag representing The Best Lawyers in America 2027 awards

Musk v. Altman: The Lawyers Behind the Case


by Jamilla Tabbara

Meet the Trial Lawyers Shaping One of AI's Biggest Legal Disputes.

Portrait photos of Elon Musk and Sam Altman positioned in front of the OpenAI logo.

Announcing the 2027 Best Lawyers Awards: Austria, Germany and Switzerland


by Jamilla Tabbara

Celebrating the legal professionals throughout Central Europe.

Graphic displaying three-dimensional map cutouts of Austria, Germany and Switzerland.

The Legal Teams Behind the Blake Lively–Justin Baldoni Settlement


by Grace Greer

A closer look at the legal teams and attorneys involved in the Blake Lively–Justin Baldoni litigation and its resolution.

Split-screen image of Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni

The Best Lawyers in France 2027: Peer-Reviewed Excellence


by Jamilla Tabbara

Seventeen editions of peer trust, a growing profession and a dynamic legal market.

3D Map of France with National Flag Graphic

Rules on Gifting Money to Family: What to Know


by Bryan Driscoll

Generosity often runs ahead of paperwork. Here's how to give to loved ones without surprising the IRS, your estate plan or your relationships.

An open gift box filled with US $100 bills next to a lid tied with a red bow.

New England's Climate Litigation Surge


by Bryan Driscoll

What law firms need to know

New England's Climate Litigation Surge: What Firms Must Know headline

Who Can Override a Power of Attorney?


by Bryan Driscoll

A power of attorney carries real legal authority, but it isn't absolute. Here's who can step in to revoke, restrict or set it aside.

Close-up of a power of attorney document, symbolizing legal authority, revocation rights, guardiansh

How to Optimize Your Best Lawyers Profile for AI Search


by Everett Sizemore

Learn how a complete, well-structured Best Lawyers profile can strengthen your visibility and accuracy across AI search platforms.

A laptop screen displaying the Best Lawyers profile dashboard showing customizable sections.

Best Lawyers Launches ChatGPT App


by Jennifer Verta

Expanding Trusted Legal Guidance Into AI-Driven Search

A glowing digital network overlay on a person typing on a laptop, representing AI in legal search.

Turn Client Questions Into Content That AI Search Can Find


by Bryan Driscoll and Manny Candal

Client questions are becoming search inputs. Your firm’s content should answer them clearly.

Pile of question marks with a single bright yellow question mark in the center, representing search.

How Peer Review Works: Best Lawyers Methodology Explained


by Jamilla Tabbara

Understanding the independent, data-driven framework that defines professional legal standing.

A glowing professional icon surrounded by incoming arrows, symbolizing data collection and feedback.

How to Get an Eviction Off Your Record


by Bryan Driscoll

Whether an eviction can be removed, sealed or corrected depends on your state, your case and where the record appears.

A printed eviction notice attached to a decorative metal security gate, representing housing instabi
Smithy AI Tap to expand

Welcome to Smithy AI the Best Lawyers Assistant

I can help you find attorneys, compare firms, explore practice areas, and surface rankings curated from the Best Lawyers methodology.

Not legal advice This assistant provides general information only. For guidance on your specific situation, please consult a licensed attorney.
Learn about Best Lawyers Research Process
Suggested prompts
Chat limit reached
You've reached the message limit for this chat. To keep exploring, browse Best Lawyers directly or come back later to start a fresh conversation.
Browse Best Lawyers