Insight

Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Should No Longer Be Considered as Only a Mental Disorder

Patients suffering from PTSD may have undergone significant neurochemical and neurobiological shifts, leading one lawyer to argue we need to rethink our perception of PTSD.

Reevaluating PTSD
Steven Weston

Steven Weston

July 12, 2019 03:56 PM

The Historical Understanding of PTSD

The symptoms of what is now known as Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, commonly referred to as “PTSD” have been observed in people for over a hundred years. PTSD has historically been considered a mental psychiatric disorder resulting from, and as a reaction to, witnessing or experiencing severe mental trauma and distress. Soldiers returning from World War I and World War II with severe symptoms of emotional trauma were “diagnosed” with shell shock or war neurosis, respectively. The etiology, or source causation, was unclear, but there was a cluster of symptoms that were commonly displayed, including:

  • Recurrent nightmares
  • Cognitive impairments
  • Hypervigilance
  • Irritability and anger outbursts
  • Depression
  • Dissociative reactions (flashbacks), reliving the traumatic event.
  • Physiological reactions to cues that symbolize or resemble an aspect of the traumatic events
  • Feelings of mistrust and detachment from others
  • Substance Abuse
  • Feelings of jumpiness and being easily startled
  • Heightened vigilance
  • Intense prolonged psychological distress

The primary symptoms may vary from one person to another in specific symptom clusters, and some exhibit combinations of these symptoms.

Examples of the traumatic events that, when experienced or witnessed, can give rise to symptoms of PTSD include, but are not limited to:

  • Exposure to war as a combatant or civilian
  • Threatened or actual physical assault
  • Threatened or actual sexual violence
  • Observing threatened or actual serious injury
  • Witnessing unnatural death
  • Serious traumatic accidents
  • Witnessing or experiencing serious injury
  • Natural or man-made disasters

The onset of the expression of the symptoms of PTSD may be immediate or delayed six months or longer after witnessing or experiencing the traumatic event.

PTSD has historically been viewed as a mental disorder, as a psychological and emotional reaction after a patient experiences or witnesses an extreme occurrence. The DSMV still lists PTSD as a mental disorder. However, it has recently been suggested that this approach is incomplete, and that PTSD should be considered a neuropsychological disorder. The historical view of PTSD, as noted by Puente (2016) forced “scholars and practitioners in the field to conceptualize the understanding, diagnosing and treatment of the disorder as either “mental” or “medical.” This was referred to by Puente as an inefficient silo approach to assessing and treating PTSD.

Perhaps one can grant some clemency for the historical approach of scholars and practitioners. Neuroimaging technology has taken great leaps, even in the last twenty years. The limited ability to observe discernable physiology, brain structure and function did not allow researchers of even one or two decades ago an opportunity to evaluate the actual effects of PTSD on brain structure and function as is currently available.

With the emergence of advances in neuroimaging technology (e.g. Diffusion-Weighted Resonance Imaging (DWI), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), functional MRI (fMRI), Diffusion Tensor Imaging [DTI], Position Emission Tomography (PET), Magnetoencephalography and Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS), researchers have been able to objectively observe physical, structural, and chemical changes to and physical damage in the brains of patients who suffer from PTSD as compared to control subjects. Researchers have discovered harmful changes in brain chemistry as a result of PTSD. These advances support the call for a monistic paradigm that merges the “mental” with the “medical” (Puente, 2016). It is becoming more and more clear that PTSD involves much more than a psycho-emotional response to traumatic external stimuli.

Overview of Relevant Brain Anatomy and Functional Changes in PTSD

In order to understand the structural and functional changes caused by PTSD, understanding the relevant structural anatomy of the brain is helpful. The brain is comprised of different sections, or lobes, and layers, each of which has different functions.

Within these layers and lobes, there are identifiable structures that are known to mediate or govern certain brain functions. Some of the brain structures are known to work together with other brain structures to essentially form different “systems” or categories of brain function.

The amygdala, hippocampus, thalamus, and hypothalamus are brain structures that, working together, are called the limbic system. The limbic system is largely responsible for emotion, behavior, motivation, and organizing memory. The limbic system influences the peripheral nervous system as well as the endocrine system. The amygdala, hippocampus, and hypothalamus play important roles in memory. The limbic system, along with the prefrontal cortex, which is located in the frontal lobe of the brain, influence behavior regulation and judgment, as well as emotional control.

Recent research has demonstrated that a number of neurochemicals are significantly altered in people who suffer from PTSD, causing neuro deregulation. Quadrelli, et al (2019) believe that Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) can objectively diagnose PTSD by detecting specific chemical changes in the brain.

Neuroimaging studies have shown neurobiologic changes in PTSD, with three areas of the brain that are different in patients with PTSD as compared to control subjects. Those areas are the amygdala, the hippocampus, and the medial frontal cortex.

Research has shown that fear, in the presence of a traumatic event, causes activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. This, in turn, activates the stress response which causes the release of corticotropin-releasing factor, along with, among others, noradrenaline, dopamine, serotonin, and cortisol. Structural changes also occur in the amygdala, hippocampus, hypothalamus, and frontal cortex which result in a cascade of cortisol and adrenaline release at toxic levels.

The structure of the hippocampus is damaged in PTSD patients, resulting in material loss of volume/size and destruction of gray matter, as well as damage to neuron generation. The hippocampus is a part of the brain that connects and organizes memory. The increase in glucocorticoid kills cells in the hippocampus. The hippocampus helps to put memories into proper context, place and time. When it is damaged from PTSD, the brain is unable to put memories into proper context and the patient’s ability to condition their response is impaired.

In patients with PTSD, the amygdala becomes larger and hyperactive, causing anxiety, extreme stress and panic. The amygdala is involved with regulating part of the fear response. The emotional and somatic (bodily) contents of memories are modulated by a healthy amygdala. The dysregulation in the processing of memory input results from a hyperactive amygdala that continues to release too much norepinephrine (or noradrenaline)

The patient with PTSD remains in an extended “fight or flight” reactive state that can last for months and years.

The prefrontal cortex also shrinks in patients with PTSD. In PTSD, the prefrontal cortex fails to extinguish the fear response actions of the amygdala and hippocampus.

Cognitive functional impairment has also been demonstrated in patients with PTSD as compared to control subjects. Specifically, verbal memory, attention, concentration, and executive functioning have been shown to be impaired in PTSD patients.

Conclusion

Advances in the technology of neuroimaging and the understanding of brain function have resulted in objective evidence that PTSD should no longer be considered as only a mental disorder. The evidence is consistently showing that brain anatomy is altered by PTSD. The evidence shows that brain chemistry is also altered, resulting in neuronal death and loss of grey matter. Further, the evidence is strong that neurocognitive impairment and impairment in intellectual functioning are also caused by PTSD. PTSD should be seen as what it is—a physical injury to the brain caused by extreme traumatic events.

Trending Articles

The Real Camille: An Interview with Johnny Depp’s Lawyer Camille Vasquez


by Rebecca Blackwell

Camille Vasquez, a young lawyer at Brown Rudnick, sat down with Best Lawyers CEO Phillip Greer to talk about her distinguished career, recently being named partner and what comes next for her.

Camille Vasquez in office

Announcing The Best Lawyers in The United Kingdom™ 2023


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms from the United Kingdom.

The Best Lawyers in The United Kingdom 2023

Johnny Depp and Amber Heard: The Best Lawyers Honorees Behind the Litigation


by Gregory Sirico

Best Lawyers takes a look at the recognized legal talent representing Johnny Depp and Amber Heard in their ongoing defamation trial.

Lawyers for Johnny Depp and Amber Heard

Announcing The Best Lawyers in France™ 2023


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms from France.

Blue, white and red strips

Announcing The Best Lawyers in Germany™ 2023


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms from Germany.

Black, red and yellow stripes

Education by Trial: Cultivating Legal Expertise in the Courtroom


by Margo Pierce

The intricacies of complex lawsuits require extensive knowledge of the legal precedent. But they also demand a high level of skill in every discipline needed to succeed at trial, such as analyzing technical reports and deposing expert witnesses.

Cultivating Legal Expertise in the Courtroom

Announcing The Best Lawyers in Belgium™ 2023


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms from Belgium.

Black, yellow and red stripes

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers® in the United States


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers listed in the 28th Edition of The Best Lawyers in America® and in the 2nd Edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2022.

2022 Best Lawyers Listings for United States

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers™ in France


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms, including our inaugural Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch recipients.

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers™ in France

We Are Women, We Are Fearless


by Deborah S. Chang and Justin Smulison

Athea Trial Lawyers is a female owned and operated law firm specializing in civil litigation, catastrophic energy, wrongful death and product liability.

Athea Trial Law Female Leadership and Success

Choosing a Title Company: What a Seller Should Expect


by Roy D. Oppenheim

When it comes to choosing a title company, how much power exactly does a seller have?

Choosing the Title Company As Seller

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers™ in Germany


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms, including our inaugural Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch recipients.

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers™ in Germany

U.K. Introduces Revisions to Right-to-Work Scheme and Immigration Rules


by Gregory Sirico

Right-to-Work Scheme and Immigration Rules in

Destiny Fulfilled


by Sara Collin

Was Angela Reddock-Wright destined to become a lawyer? It sure seems that way. Yet her path was circuitous. This accomplished employment attorney, turned mediator, arbitrator and ADR specialist nonpareil discusses her career, the role of attorneys in society, the new world of post-pandemic work and why new Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson represents the future.

Interview with Lawyer Angela Reddock-Wright

Famous Songs Unprotected by Copyright Could Mean Royalties for Some


by Michael B. Fein

A guide to navigating copyright claims on famous songs.

Can I Sing "Happy Birthday" in Public?

What the Courts Say About Recording in the Classroom


by Christina Henagen Peer and Peter Zawadski

Students and parents are increasingly asking to use audio devices to record what's being said in the classroom. But is it legal? A recent ruling offer gives the answer to a question confusing parents and administrators alike.

Is It Legal for Students to Record Teachers?