Insight

Proposed Changes to the MCAD’s Procedural Regulations

The Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination's new regulations offer a substantial overhaul from the past system.

MCAD’s New Procedural Regulations
Brian J. MacDonough

Brian J. MacDonough

March 20, 2019 09:54 AM

The Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (“MCAD”) recently released new draft procedural regulations, which aim to substantially overhaul the existing ones which have been in effect since 1999. Although the draft regulations are still subject to review, commentary, and public hearing, some key changes are highlighted below:

Timeframes for Respondents/Complainants to Appeal a Probable Cause Finding

One of the most significant changes in the proposed regulations involves the significantly expanded time period that respondents, e.g., employers and supervisors, will have to appeal an adverse finding of probable cause. Under the existing regulations, a respondent has 30 days from the date of the probable cause finding to file a motion for reconsideration. Under the proposed regulations, a motion for reconsideration may be filed for good cause at any time up until the certification conference, or within 45 days of the case being certified for public hearing—events that procedurally occur on the relative eve of public hearing, often months, if not years, after the underlying investigation concluded and discovery has been completed. By way of contrast, under both the current and proposed regulations, complainants, e.g., employees, seeking to appeal an adverse disposition (i.e., a “lack of probable cause” or “lack of jurisdiction” determination, or a dismissal) have only 10 days to appeal.

Position Statements and Rebuttals

Despite the current regulations being silent on the practice, for decades, the MCAD has welcomed, and often requested, that a complainant submit a rebuttal to a respondent’s position statement—thereby ensuring, as in many other legal proceedings, that the injured party gets “the last word.” Under the proposed regulations, this practice would be codified. Indeed, the MCAD makes it clear that rebuttals, while not required, are strongly encouraged and may be specifically requested by the MCAD to assist in investigations. The proposed regulations also impose firm deadlines for filing both positions statements and rebuttals; specifically, Investigators, upon written request and for good cause shown, may grant extensions of not more than 21 days absent “exceptional circumstances.”

Equitable Tolling

The legal doctrine of equitable tolling has been expressly incorporated into the proposed regulations. Specifically, the proposed regulations provide that the statute of limitations (a 300 day filing deadline) may be equitably tolled in those cases where the “complainant is excusably ignorant of their rights or of facts giving rise to a claim within the Commission’s jurisdiction, or where complainant has been misled, either by the Commission or the respondent, as determined by the Investigating Commissioner.”

Motion Practice

The MCAD has taken several steps to expand upon and clarify certain motion procedures at various stages of MCAD proceedings. For example, the requirement that represented parties confer prior to any motion being filed has been expanded beyond discovery-related motions and will apply to all motions unless otherwise exempted under the regulations. Under the proposed regulations, exemptions apply to pro se parties (parties who are not represented by lawyers), “emergency motions” (as delineated under the regulations), and certain pre-determination motions, including motions to amend the complaint and motions for extension of time.

Attorney Withdrawal

The proposed regulations limit the ability of attorneys to withdraw from pending MCAD matters where no appearance of successor counsel has been filed. Specifically, the proposed regulations require leave from the MCAD’s general counsel for an attorney to withdraw after a probable cause finding has been issued. Under the existing regulations, an attorney may withdraw, without leave from the MCAD, at any time prior to certification for public hearing.

Given the review, commentary and public hearing process to which the proposed regulations will now be subject, we expect revisions to be made, but at least as to the issues noted above, the MCAD has given a heads up to parties and practitioners as to what to expect in the future. Stay in touch for updates. Visit Sherin and Lodgen's website to read more.

---------------------

Brian J. MacDonough concentrates his practice in employment law and executive advocacy. He handles a wide range of matters, including contract negotiation and enforcement, discrimination, whistleblowing, wage and hour issues, and wrongful termination.

Jaclyn McNeely is an associate in the firm’s employment law department. She represents clients in a wide range of matters, including wage and hour issues, wrongful termination, discrimination, retaliation, and contract negotiation and enforcement. Her experience includes advising clients on FMLA, FLSA, Massachusetts Wage Act, and parental leave.

Trending Articles

Announcing the 2023 The Best Lawyers in America Honorees


by Best Lawyers

Only the top 5.3% of all practicing lawyers in the U.S. were selected by their peers for inclusion in the 29th edition of The Best Lawyers in America®.

Gold strings and dots connecting to form US map

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers® in the United States


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers listed in the 28th Edition of The Best Lawyers in America® and in the 2nd Edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2022.

2022 Best Lawyers Listings for United States

2021 Best Lawyers: The Global Issue


by Best Lawyers

The 2021 Global Issue features top legal talent from the most recent editions of Best Lawyers and Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch worldwide.

2021 Best Lawyers: The Global Issue

The U.S. Best Lawyers Voting Season Is Open


by Best Lawyers

The voting season for the 31st edition of The Best Lawyers in America® and the 5th edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America is officially underway, and we are offering some helpful advice to this year’s voters.

Golden figures of people standing on blue surface connected by white lines

How To Find A Pro Bono Lawyer


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers dives into the vital role pro bono lawyers play in ensuring access to justice for all and the transformative impact they have on communities.

Hands joined around a table with phone, paper, pen and glasses

What the Courts Say About Recording in the Classroom


by Christina Henagen Peer and Peter Zawadski

Students and parents are increasingly asking to use audio devices to record what's being said in the classroom. But is it legal? A recent ruling offer gives the answer to a question confusing parents and administrators alike.

Is It Legal for Students to Record Teachers?

How Palworld Is Testing the Limits of Nintendo’s Legal Power


by Gregory Sirico

Many are calling the new game Palworld “Pokémon GO with guns,” noting the games striking similarities. Experts speculate how Nintendo could take legal action.

Animated figures with guns stand on top of creatures

The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2024 Launch


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is excited to announce The Best Lawyers in Australia™ for 2023, including the top lawyers and law firms from Australia.

Australian Parliament beside water at sunset

Inflation Escalation


by Ashley S. Wagner

Inflation and rising costs are at the forefront of everyone’s mind as we enter 2023. The current volatile market makes it more important than ever to understand the rent escalation clauses in current and future commercial lease agreements.

Suited figure in front of rising market and inflated balloon

Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2023


by Best Lawyers

The third edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America™ highlights the legal talent of lawyers who have been in practice less than 10 years.

Three arrows made of lines and dots on blue background

A Celebration of Excellence: The Best Lawyers in Canada 2024 Awards


by Best Lawyers

As we embark on the 18th edition of The Best Lawyers in Canada™, we are excited to highlight excellence and top legal talent across the country.

Abstract image of red and white Canada flag in triangles

8 Different Types of Criminal Defenses in Law


by Best Lawyers

Learn about the different types of criminal defenses available in law, including innocence, self-defense, insanity and more. Protect your rights today.

Silver handcuffs laying on finger printed papers

Wage and Overtime Laws for Truck Drivers


by Greg Mansell

For truck drivers nationwide, underpayment and overtime violations are just the beginning of a long list of problems. Below we explore the wages you are entitled to but may not be receiving.

Truck Driver Wage and Overtime Laws in the US

The Upcycle Conundrum


by Karen Kreider Gaunt

Laudable or litigious? What you need to know about potential copyright and trademark infringement when repurposing products.

Repurposed Products and Copyright Infringemen

Choosing a Title Company: What a Seller Should Expect


by Roy D. Oppenheim

When it comes to choosing a title company, how much power exactly does a seller have?

Choosing the Title Company As Seller

The 2024 Best Lawyers in Spain™


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is honored to announce the 16th edition of The Best Lawyers in Spain™ and the third edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in Spain™ for 2024.

Tall buildings and rushing traffic against clouds and sun in sky