Insight

Liability for Hearing Loss Related to 3M Combat Arms™ Earplugs V2

Liability for Hearing Loss Related to 3M Combat Arms™ Earplugs V2

Benjamin T. Cochran

Benjamin T. Cochran

February 6, 2020 02:38 PM

The Combat Arms Earplug Version 2 was a type of hearing protection that was standard issue for members of the United State military deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan starting in 2003.

Properly made safety equipment is essential to members of the armed services who are exposed to intense levels of noise in combat zones and during training. But many veterans who were issued the Combat Arms™ Earplugs Version 2 (CAEV2) have reported experiencing hearing loss. Hundreds of veterans have filed lawsuits against the 3M Company, seeking compensation for their injuries since the U.S. Department of Justice announced a settlement with 3M of a False Claims Act lawsuit involving the earplugs.

The 3M Company agreed in 2018 to pay $9.1 million to the federal government to settle allegations that it had knowingly sold Combat Arms Earplugs to the U.S. military without disclosing design defects that limited the earplugs’ effectiveness. The legal settlement arose from a qui tam whistleblower lawsuit filed on behalf of the U.S. government by Moldex-Metric, Inc., a competitor of 3M, according to the U.S. Department of Justice press release. Under the terms of the settlement, 3M admitted no liability.

The earplug injury lawsuits filed by veterans seek to hold 3M financially liable for the former service members hearing loss.

What Are 3M Combat Arms Earplugs?

The CAEV2 was initially developed and manufactured by Aearo Technologies, Inc. In 2008, the 3M Company acquired Aearo Technologies along with the Combat Arms brand and supplied the earplugs to the Defense Logistics Agency through 2015. Thousands of earplugs were sold to the military for more than decade.

The earplugs, which contained a special acoustic filter, were supposed to offer soldiers in combat zones two levels of hearing protection, depending on how the plugs were worn. If worn in the open position with the yellow end of the earplug inserted in the ear, the earplugs were supposed to block or significantly reduce intense, high level battlefield noise such as explosions while still allowing the user to hear quieter sounds such as conversation.

How Are 3M’s Combat Arms™ Earplugs Linked to Hearing Loss?

The CAEV2 has a dangerous design defect, the lawsuits allege. The stem of the CAEV2 was too short to hold a tight seal when inserted in the ear canal. The earplugs could loosen slightly in the ears of some service personnel, allowing dangerous levels of noise to bypass the earplugs and making them ineffective as hearing protection.

The U.S. government lawsuit alleged that the design defect was known to Aearo when it completed testing of the CAEV2 in 2000, but there was no disclosure of this design defect to the military. Instead, the military contractors allegedly falsely certified that the equipment met military specifications.

Members of the Armed Services who were issued the Combat Arms™ Earplugs Version 2 (CAEV2) and exposed to loud noise have reported the following types of injuries:

  • Permanent hearing loss
  • Tinnitus – a condition involving ringing or buzzing in the ears
  • Hearing damage affecting one or both ears
  • Deafness
  • Balance problems

Veterans’ Testimonials

Hundreds of veterans who served in Iraq and Afghanistan and were issued Combat Arms Version 2 earplugs have already filed individual civil lawsuits seeking compensation from the 3M Company for their hearing loss. Many additional Combat Arms earplugs lawsuits are expected.

The experiences of two veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts interviewed by CBS News are representative of many who have suffered hearing loss.

“Everybody was under the impression that these particular earplugs were doing their job,” Army veteran Joseph Junk told CBS News. “We’d been told this is the equipment you get and it’s the best out there, and it’s going to save your hearing. Later on, we found out it really didn’t protect our hearing that much at all.”

Junk said he hears constant ringing in his ears, a condition related to hearing loss known as tinnitus. He said he did not realize the earplugs he wore while serving overseas were defective until the Department of Justice announced the settlement with 3M.

“The basic expectation is that you can rely on your equipment,” said David Henderson, another veteran who joined the military after the 9/11 attacks and relied on the earplugs to protect his hearing while in combat zones. “You are trusting the contractor assigned to provide that equipment.” Henderson also has experienced hearing loss.

In 2019, the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation established the 3M Combat Arms earplug multidistrict litigation. The panel found that the numerous pending lawsuits involved common factual questions regarding the design, testing, sale and marketing of Combat Arms earplugs. The court decided that the cases should be centralized for more efficient handling and designated the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida to handle the pre-trial matters related to the cases.

How Hardison & Cochran Handles 3M Earplug Lawsuits

Manufacturers including those that do business with the government have a legal responsibility to make products that are safe and effective when used as intended and to warn adequately of any known defects. Military contractors that seek to profit at the expense of men and women in uniform should be held accountable when their defective products cause harm.

Veterans who have suffered hearing loss as a result of defective military-issued earplugs may pursue full compensation for their injuries by filing a personal injury lawsuit.

Our attorneys review the dates that a prospective client served in the Army, Navy, Air Force or Marines. We help gather military records to show the theater where the member served and whether his or her hearing loss is likely service-related. There is no charge for investigating a veteran’s case or filing an earplug injury lawsuit. We only receive a legal fee if we are successful in obtaining a settlement or jury award for our client.

---

Attorney Benjamin T. Cochran, managing partner of Hardison & Cochran, has 18 years of experience representing people who have suffered serious personal injuries as a result of others’ negligence and disregard for safety. He has experience handling cases involving defective products that cause injuries, car and truck accidents and workplace accidents.

Trending Articles

Introducing the 2026 Best Lawyers Awards in Australia, Japan, New Zealand and Singapore


by Jennifer Verta

This year’s awards reflect the strength of the Best Lawyers network and its role in elevating legal talent worldwide.

2026 Best Lawyers Awards in Australia, Japan, New Zealand and Singapore

Revealing the 2026 Best Lawyers Awards in Germany, France, Switzerland and Austria


by Jamilla Tabbara

These honors underscore the reach of the Best Lawyers network and its focus on top legal talent.

map of Germany, France, Switzerland and Austria

Effective Communication: A Conversation with Jefferson Fisher


by Jamilla Tabbara

The power of effective communication beyond the law.

 Image of Jefferson Fisher and Phillip Greer engaged in a conversation about effective communication

The 2025 Legal Outlook Survey Results Are In


by Jennifer Verta

Discover what Best Lawyers honorees see ahead for the legal industry.

Person standing at a crossroads with multiple intersecting paths and a signpost.

The Best Lawyers Network: Global Recognition with Long-term Value


by Jamilla Tabbara

Learn how Best Lawyers' peer-review process helps recognized lawyers attract more clients and referral opportunities.

Lawyers networking

Jefferson Fisher: The Secrets to Influential Legal Marketing


by Jennifer Verta

How lawyers can apply Jefferson Fisher’s communication and marketing strategies to build trust, attract clients and grow their practice.

Portrait of Jefferson Fisher a legal marketing expert

Is Your Law Firm’s Website Driving Clients Away?


by Jamilla Tabbara

Identify key website issues that may be affecting client engagement and retention.

Phone displaying 'This site cannot be reached' message

A Guide to Workers' Compensation Law for 2025 and Beyond


by Bryan Driscoll

A woman with a laptop screen reflected in her glasses

Medical Malpractice Reform Trends in Texas, Utah, Georgia and SC


by Bryan Driscoll

A fresh wave of medical malpractice reform is reshaping the law.

Medical Malpractice Reform Trends hed

Why Jack Dorsey and Elon Musk Want to 'Delete All IP Law'


by Bryan Driscoll

This Isn’t Just a Debate Over How to Pay Creators. It’s a Direct Challenge to Legal Infrastructure.

Elon Musk and Jack Dorsey standing together Infront of the X logo

Best Lawyers Launches CMO Advisory Board


by Jamilla Tabbara

Strategic counsel from legal marketing’s most experienced voices.

Group photo of Best Lawyers CMO Advisory Board members

Changes in California Employment Law for 2025


by Laurie Villanueva

What employers need to know to ensure compliance in the coming year and beyond

A pair of hands holding a checklist featuring a generic profile picture and the state of California

Common Law Firm Landing Page Problems to Address


by Jamilla Tabbara

Identify key issues on law firm landing pages to improve client engagement and conversion.

Laptop showing law firm landing page analytics

New Employment Law Recognizes Extraordinary Stress Is Everyday Reality for NY Lawyers


by Bryan Driscoll

A stressed woman has her head resting on her hands above a laptop

Best Lawyers Introduces Smithy AI


by Jamilla Tabbara

Transforming legal content creation for attorneys and firms.

Start using Smithy AI, a content tool by Best Lawyers

How to Create High-Converting Landing Pages for Your Law Firm


by Jamilla Tabbara

Learn how to create high-converting law firm landing pages that drive client engagement and lead generation.

Laptop screen displaying website tools to improve client conversion rates