Collateral Damage

Can bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies ever be adequate widespread substitutes for fiat money?

Is Cryptocurrency Property?

Samuel G. Kramer

October 1, 2018 04:20 PM

When the initial cryptocurrency white paper—titled “Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System”—was released in 2008, its stated aim for the blockchain system that made bitcoin possible was to create a peer-to-peer system of electronic cash that “would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution.”

Bitcoin’s creators clearly intended it to function as an alternative to fiat currencies—those backed by a government but not tied to a particular commodity. How well bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies substitute for fiat money remains very much an open question—and indeed, looking at this new asset class through the prism of traditional currencies’ legal classifications exposes crypto tokens’ limitations as fiat alternatives. In particular, Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code (U.C.C.) imposes vastly different security requirements on fiat and virtual currencies that might make bitcoin and other lesser-known cryptocurrencies unsuitable for ordinary transactions.

Are Cryptocurrencies Property?

The secured transactions regime of the U.C.C.’s Article 9 applies to personal property. Therefore, for cryptocurrencies to be pledged as collateral for a debt, they must first qualify as property. Think of property in the abstract as the proverbial bundle of sticks whose owner, by dint of its possession, can exclude others from exploiting.

Certain features of cryptocurrencies challenge traditional notions of property—in particular, the fact that they’re essentially a record of transfers on the blockchain - makes it difficult to recognize them as property. Nonetheless, crypto assets have been treated as personal property by the U.S. legal system. In one 2013 case involving online money exchangers who failed to register with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), the Maryland District Court held bitcoins to be subject to civil forfeiture under 18 U.S.C. §1960, a statute that applies to forfeiture of real or personal property. A U.S. bankruptcy court likewise held that bitcoin was property for purposes of the fraudulent-transfer provisions of the bankruptcy code. And the IRS has ruled that, for federal tax purposes, virtual currency must be treated as personal property.

Are Cryptocurrencies Currencies?

Even if we grant that crypto tokens are property under the law, whether they can function as money alongside a fiat currency such as the U.S. dollar has been the subject of considerable debate. Some of the legal recognition of cryptocurrency-as-property cited above, for example, came in the context of distinguishing it from fiat money.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has deemed cryptocurrencies to be commodities, not currencies, a ruling upheld not long ago by a federal court finding that the CFTC had the authority to regulate crypto transactions. However, a federal court finding is not dispositive; the New York Department of Financial Services and FinCEN alike have treated cryptocurrencies as currencies under their licensure and reporting schemes. A federal district court in Texas, meanwhile, also found cryptocurrency to be currency in a 2013 case involving a bitcoin-related Ponzi scheme.

Faced with so many conflicting judgments, how can we learn more about how crypto tokens would function as currency? Let’s look to the U.C.C. and its treatment of property for purposes of establishing a security interest in cryptocurrency pledged as collateral.

The first question to ask: What is money, anyway? Under the U.C.C., “money” is defined as “a medium of exchange currently authorized or adopted by a domestic or foreign government.” Crypto tokens have yet to meet that basic criterion. And even if a cryptocurrency were to be adopted as legal tender by a government, it could not form the basis of original collateral under the U.C.C.’s rules for perfecting security interests in money. To satisfy that requirement, the secured party must take possession of the property. Cryptocurrencies exist and are transacted on a blockchain. They can be controlled via a private key associated with a given “crypto wallet,” but the crypto tokens themselves are not capable of being possessed in the way you can possess the cash in your wallet.

Cryptocurrencies Are General Intangibles

The U.C.C.’s Article 9 identifies other forms of personal property with specific rules for perfection and priority of security interests; personal property not covered by these categories falls under the catchall heading “general intangibles.”

This is the likely landing spot for cryptocurrencies under the U.C.C. In order to perfect a security interest in general intangibles, the secured party must file a U.C.C.-1 financing statement describing the collateral. This puts would-be creditors on notice that the general intangible in question is the subject of a security agreement between the filing creditor and the debtor, under which the general intangible has been pledged as collateral. That security interest also attaches to the proceeds of the general intangible and is perfected when the security interest in the underlying original collateral is itself perfected.

The rules concerning the perfection of security interests have a profound impact on cryptocurrencies’ ability to substitute for currency. Money is freely negotiable under the U.C.C.—and absent physical possession of money, no security interest attaches to it. Therefore, a third party need not perform due diligence on the money received in any transaction to be secure (as it were) in the knowledge that it’s not subject to a preexisting security interest. In fact, consumer transactions would be practically impossible if sellers were required to perform such diligence on the money they receive from buyers.

Cryptocurrencies, on the other hand, would be subject to a security interest regime applicable to general intangibles, and therefore possibly encumbered by a prior lien. The buyer in any crypto transaction would thus have to do due diligence on the cryptocurrency received to ensure that no prior claims had been filed over the tokens in question.

Due-diligence requirements of this sort, from which fiat currencies are exempt, clearly burden the transfer of cryptocurrencies. Curiously, though, cryptocurrencies are quite well-suited to support such audits. Because blockchains record the transfer history of every transaction involving every token in an immutable distributed ledger, each token is traceable back to the transaction in which the security interest was recorded. Until the security interest is released, a cryptocurrency pledged as collateral can easily be traced through subsequent transfers and identified at any point.

Although cryptocurrencies are controlled pseudonymously via a digital blockchain address—making identification of the third-party transferee of the collateral potentially quite difficult—a secured party could theoretically foreclose on its security interest in a cryptocurrency through an action in rem against the tokens on the blockchain.

The U.S. legal system appears to have settled on the notion that cryptocurrencies are indeed a form of property. Under the U.C.C., however, they don’t have the same standing as fiat currency. Unlike money, crypto tokens, as explained above, are general intangibles under the U.C.C.—and when pledged as collateral are subject to its attachment and perfection rules.

Where a secured party has filed a U.C.C.-1 financing statement and security agreement concerning specific crypto tokens, those tokens are identifiable on the blockchain through all subsequent transfers. Recipients of crypto tokens cannot rely on the exemption rules that apply to money under the U.C.C. If token buyers haven’t done their due diligence to locate prior recorded security interests, they might find their tokens subject to foreclosure by the secured party. Or, to put it in fiat-currency terms, their cash will disappear.


Sam Kramer is a partner in the Information Technology and Intellectual Property practice in Baker McKenzie’s Chicago office. He serves on the firm’s global FinTech steering committee and is a frequent speaker on blockchain issues.

Related Articles

Russian Rubles are Going Digital

by Rebecca Blackwell

Russia is moving toward the ever-expanding trend of digital currency.

Russian Rubles are Going Digital

Blockchain 101

by Peter Brown

The rapidly developing technology is good for much more than just cryptocurrency exchange. What do lawyers need to know?

What is Blockchain?

Tales From the Crypto

by Gregory Sirico

The economic turmoil of COVID-19 has given cryptocurrency its moment in the spotlight. But are we, and more importantly our banks, ready for it?

Cryptocurrency on the Rise During


Cryptocurrency and Divorce

by Crystal Espinosa Buit

One lawyer explains how cryptocurrency, the fastest growing investment form, can impact assets in a divorce and why it should not be ignored in divorce proceedings.

Pixelated image of paper money bill

An Interview With Latham & Watkins

by Best Lawyers

Germany's 2020 “Law Firm of the Year” honoree in Banking and Finance Law

An Interview With Latham & Watkins

An Interview With Sayenko Kharenko

by Best Lawyers

Ukraine's 2020 “Law Firm of the Year” winner in Capital Markets Law

An Interview With Sayenko Kharenko

Why Stablecoins Will Be Regulated

by Mladen Milovic

In Order To See Adoption, Stablecoins Must Clear These Hurdles

Why Stablecoins Will Be Regulated

An Interview With Egorov Puginsky Afanasiev & Partners

by Best Lawyers

Russia's 2020 "Law Firm of the Year" in Arbitration & Mediation Law

An Interview With Egorov Puginsky Afanasiev

Trending Articles

How Palworld Is Testing the Limits of Nintendo’s Legal Power

by Gregory Sirico

Many are calling the new game Palworld “Pokémon GO with guns,” noting the games striking similarities. Experts speculate how Nintendo could take legal action.

Animated figures with guns stand on top of creatures

Announcing the 2023 The Best Lawyers in America Honorees

by Best Lawyers

Only the top 5.3% of all practicing lawyers in the U.S. were selected by their peers for inclusion in the 29th edition of The Best Lawyers in America®.

Gold strings and dots connecting to form US map

The U.S. Best Lawyers Voting Season Is Open

by Best Lawyers

The voting season for the 31st edition of The Best Lawyers in America® and the 5th edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America is officially underway, and we are offering some helpful advice to this year’s voters.

Golden figures of people standing on blue surface connected by white lines

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers® in the United States

by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers listed in the 28th Edition of The Best Lawyers in America® and in the 2nd Edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2022.

2022 Best Lawyers Listings for United States

2021 Best Lawyers: The Global Issue

by Best Lawyers

The 2021 Global Issue features top legal talent from the most recent editions of Best Lawyers and Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch worldwide.

2021 Best Lawyers: The Global Issue

How To Find A Pro Bono Lawyer

by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers dives into the vital role pro bono lawyers play in ensuring access to justice for all and the transformative impact they have on communities.

Hands joined around a table with phone, paper, pen and glasses

What the Courts Say About Recording in the Classroom

by Christina Henagen Peer and Peter Zawadski

Students and parents are increasingly asking to use audio devices to record what's being said in the classroom. But is it legal? A recent ruling offer gives the answer to a question confusing parents and administrators alike.

Is It Legal for Students to Record Teachers?

Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2023

by Best Lawyers

The third edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America™ highlights the legal talent of lawyers who have been in practice less than 10 years.

Three arrows made of lines and dots on blue background

The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2024 Launch

by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is excited to announce The Best Lawyers in Australia™ for 2023, including the top lawyers and law firms from Australia.

Australian Parliament beside water at sunset

The Upcycle Conundrum

by Karen Kreider Gaunt

Laudable or litigious? What you need to know about potential copyright and trademark infringement when repurposing products.

Repurposed Products and Copyright Infringemen

Inflation Escalation

by Ashley S. Wagner

Inflation and rising costs are at the forefront of everyone’s mind as we enter 2023. The current volatile market makes it more important than ever to understand the rent escalation clauses in current and future commercial lease agreements.

Suited figure in front of rising market and inflated balloon

Wage and Overtime Laws for Truck Drivers

by Greg Mansell

For truck drivers nationwide, underpayment and overtime violations are just the beginning of a long list of problems. Below we explore the wages you are entitled to but may not be receiving.

Truck Driver Wage and Overtime Laws in the US

A Celebration of Excellence: The Best Lawyers in Canada 2024 Awards

by Best Lawyers

As we embark on the 18th edition of The Best Lawyers in Canada™, we are excited to highlight excellence and top legal talent across the country.

Abstract image of red and white Canada flag in triangles

Announcing The Best Lawyers in South Africa™ 2024

by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is excited to announce the landmark 15th edition of The Best Lawyers in South Africa™ for 2024, including the exclusive "Law Firm of the Year" awards.

Sky view of South Africa town and waterways

Best Lawyers Voting Is Now Open

by Best Lawyers

Voting has begun in several countries across the globe, including the United States, the United Kingdom and Europe. Below we offer dates, details and answers to voting-related questions to assist with the voting process.

Hands holding smartphone with five stars above phone

Unwrapping Shrinkflation

by Justin Smulison

Through the lens of the United States, we take a closer look at the global implication of companies downsizing products while maintaining and often raising prices.

Chocolate bar being unwrapped from foil