Insight

Pilot Project Aims to Expedite Discovery in Federal Court

Discovery has become more expansive in litigation, despite the fact that the vast majority of civil cases settle before trial.

Improving Discovery in Federal Court
Robert A. Clifford

Robert A. Clifford

July 13, 2017 01:16 PM

Discovery has become more expansive in litigation, despite the fact that the vast majority of civil cases settle before trial. Two federal district courts are participating in a Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project designed to expedite the way standard discovery is exchanged between litigants.

Effective May 1 and June 1, 2017, respectively, the U.S. District Court of Arizona and the U.S. District Court for the Northern District Court of Illinois are participating in the three-year project, the first of its kind. The two participating district courts are studying whether parties involved in civil cases should be required to undertake a series of standard discovery procedures before other traditional discovery gets underway and if that reduces the cost, burden, and delay of civil litigation.

Recently, I had the opportunity to participate in an American Bar Association panel to discuss how to promote more efficient discovery. This pilot project was the focal point of the afternoon discussion, with panelists that included Judge Ruben Castillo, Chief Judge of the Northern District of Illinois. It was moderated by the Hon. John D. Bates of the District Court of Washington, D.C, and Chair of the Advisory Committee on Federal Rules from which this pilot program emanated. The ABA Section of Litigation presentation “Roadshow 2.0: Precision Advocacy” was repeated with other panels in 13 cities, including Chicago and Phoenix, to further explain the need for this pilot project.

According to the Federal Judicial Center (FJC), the pilot project requires that when mandatory initial discovery responses are made, “parties are required to disclose both favorable and unfavorable information that is relevant to their claims or defenses regardless of whether they intend to use the information in their cases.” The objective is a fair trial based on the facts, not clever lawyering and maneuvering. That means no more Perry Mason “ah-ha” moments in the courtroom.

This new rule vastly alters practice under the existing federal rules requiring parties to produce only information that “the disclosing party may use to support its claims or defenses.”

The reason for the pilot rule change is to eliminate parties’ worry about getting their hands on every single document or fear that relevant documents and materials have not been produced. This goes beyond the current disclosures required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedures 26(a)(1)[1].

The Standing Order also provides that “parties must file answers, counterclaims, cross-claims, and replies within the time set forth in Rule 12(a)(1)-(3), even if they have already filed a preliminary motion pursuant to Rule 12(b).” Furthermore, a party seeking affirmative relief must file its response to the mandatory discovery within 30 days of the first pleading filed in response to the complaint, counterclaim, cross claim, or third-party complaint, and in turn, the responsive pleading also must be filed within 30 days. The goal of this project also is to test efficiency.

The pilot project also requires the parties to give the court a Rule 26(f) report that includes a description of their discussions, including resolved and unresolved disagreements and the effort made to resolve those disagreements.

The Standing Order affects all cases filed on or after June 1, 2017, except those categories of cases that have been exempted by the Standing Order, such as MDL and patent cases and/or those cases assigned to judges who have opted out of the program. In Illinois, 17 judges and all magistrates in the Northern District have signed on.

Explanatory materials on the pilot program are available from the Federal Judicial Center as well as the two participating jurisdictions. That includes the Standing Order, checklists, users’ manuals, and two video presentations that provide additional information[2].

The pilot project seems very well conceived and will be very useful in straightforward cases. In cases that are more complex, the meet and confer requirement will be a particularly useful tool for increasing compliance with the rules.

Those behind this program are anxious to see what parts of the program produce the results that will help move cases more efficiently through the discovery process in federal court. In three years, we may be looking at a very different way discovery is conducted in all federal courts.

------------------------

[1] https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_26

[2]www.fjc.gov:https://www.fjc.gov/content/321837/mandatory-initial-discovery-pilot-project-overview

------------------------

Robert A. Clifford is a nationally recognized personal injury attorney and a leader of the bar. Named in The Best Lawyers in America© since its inception, Clifford has obtained record verdicts and settlements in the area of wrongful death and personal injury, with an emphasis on aviation crashes. He has represented victims and their families involved in commercial airline crashes for 40 years, having even been the catalyst for change of some of the rules and regulations governing aviation safety as a result of his investigations regarding complex cases. Mr. Clifford is the founder and senior partner of Clifford Law Offices, a nationally recognized personal injury and wrongful death law firm in Chicago, concentrating in aviation, transportation, personal injury, medical negligence, premises liability, product liability law, consumer, and class action law.

Trending Articles

How Palworld Is Testing the Limits of Nintendo’s Legal Power


by Gregory Sirico

Many are calling the new game Palworld “Pokémon GO with guns,” noting the games striking similarities. Experts speculate how Nintendo could take legal action.

Animated figures with guns stand on top of creatures

Announcing the 2023 The Best Lawyers in America Honorees


by Best Lawyers

Only the top 5.3% of all practicing lawyers in the U.S. were selected by their peers for inclusion in the 29th edition of The Best Lawyers in America®.

Gold strings and dots connecting to form US map

The U.S. Best Lawyers Voting Season Is Open


by Best Lawyers

The voting season for the 31st edition of The Best Lawyers in America® and the 5th edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America is officially underway, and we are offering some helpful advice to this year’s voters.

Golden figures of people standing on blue surface connected by white lines

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers® in the United States


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers listed in the 28th Edition of The Best Lawyers in America® and in the 2nd Edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2022.

2022 Best Lawyers Listings for United States

2021 Best Lawyers: The Global Issue


by Best Lawyers

The 2021 Global Issue features top legal talent from the most recent editions of Best Lawyers and Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch worldwide.

2021 Best Lawyers: The Global Issue

How To Find A Pro Bono Lawyer


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers dives into the vital role pro bono lawyers play in ensuring access to justice for all and the transformative impact they have on communities.

Hands joined around a table with phone, paper, pen and glasses

What the Courts Say About Recording in the Classroom


by Christina Henagen Peer and Peter Zawadski

Students and parents are increasingly asking to use audio devices to record what's being said in the classroom. But is it legal? A recent ruling offer gives the answer to a question confusing parents and administrators alike.

Is It Legal for Students to Record Teachers?

Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2023


by Best Lawyers

The third edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America™ highlights the legal talent of lawyers who have been in practice less than 10 years.

Three arrows made of lines and dots on blue background

The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2024 Launch


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is excited to announce The Best Lawyers in Australia™ for 2023, including the top lawyers and law firms from Australia.

Australian Parliament beside water at sunset

The Upcycle Conundrum


by Karen Kreider Gaunt

Laudable or litigious? What you need to know about potential copyright and trademark infringement when repurposing products.

Repurposed Products and Copyright Infringemen

Inflation Escalation


by Ashley S. Wagner

Inflation and rising costs are at the forefront of everyone’s mind as we enter 2023. The current volatile market makes it more important than ever to understand the rent escalation clauses in current and future commercial lease agreements.

Suited figure in front of rising market and inflated balloon

Wage and Overtime Laws for Truck Drivers


by Greg Mansell

For truck drivers nationwide, underpayment and overtime violations are just the beginning of a long list of problems. Below we explore the wages you are entitled to but may not be receiving.

Truck Driver Wage and Overtime Laws in the US

A Celebration of Excellence: The Best Lawyers in Canada 2024 Awards


by Best Lawyers

As we embark on the 18th edition of The Best Lawyers in Canada™, we are excited to highlight excellence and top legal talent across the country.

Abstract image of red and white Canada flag in triangles

Announcing The Best Lawyers in South Africa™ 2024


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is excited to announce the landmark 15th edition of The Best Lawyers in South Africa™ for 2024, including the exclusive "Law Firm of the Year" awards.

Sky view of South Africa town and waterways

Best Lawyers Voting Is Now Open


by Best Lawyers

Voting has begun in several countries across the globe, including the United States, the United Kingdom and Europe. Below we offer dates, details and answers to voting-related questions to assist with the voting process.

Hands holding smartphone with five stars above phone

Unwrapping Shrinkflation


by Justin Smulison

Through the lens of the United States, we take a closer look at the global implication of companies downsizing products while maintaining and often raising prices.

Chocolate bar being unwrapped from foil