Insight

Understanding the Affirmative Defense of Duress in Arizona

How states determine the use of this specific criminal defense.

Affirmative Defense of Duress in Arizona
CO

Craig Orent

January 7, 2020 03:54 PM

Many defenses can be used if a person is accused of a crime. Some of these include insanity, coercion, duress, withdrawal, self-defense, intoxication, consent, or statute of limitations. They can also be categorized as affirmative defenses or non-affirmative defenses. States determine which defenses can be used, who can use them, and what the circumstances must be to grant the defense.

Affirmative Defense of Duress

An affirmative defense means that the defendant admits that they committed a crime. However, they also offer a reason to justify why they committed the crime. This reason might be enough to lessen the charges against them or even negate their guilt altogether. Types of affirmative defenses that are allowed vary state to state.

Duress means that you’re being forced to do something that you don’t want to do because of the threats, constraints, or violence. It is a defense that claims the individual had no choice to commit the crime because they feared for their life or someone else’s. The threat generally must be immediate and happen at the time of the crime. For example, someone holding a gun to a person’s head and making them commit a crime would be considered duress.

Duress as an Affirmative Defense in Arizona

Several defenses can be used in Arizona. These include self-defense, insanity, and justification. Duress belongs under the affirmative defense justification. This means that a crime has been committed but under mitigating circumstances that should negate the guilt of the defendant.

In Arizona, duress is a justified and affirmative defense to being charged with a criminal act. The courts use the standard that a reasonable person in the same circumstance would believe that they were forced to commit the act because of a threat of an immediate use of force that could lead to a serious injury. The threat can be against the defendant or another individual.

The Arizona statute only allows a duress defense if a reasonable person in the same situation would have not resisted the use of force. This means that if the court finds that other individuals may have said no to the action or were able to resist the threat of force, the defendant will not be able to use this as a defense.

Recent Changes to the Arizona Affirmative Defense of Duress

In 2018, a decision made by the Arizona Supreme Court altered the definition of duress as a defense. The case focused on a woman who was convicted of the abuse of her three children. She was sentenced to 20 years in prison. At trial, the woman claimed that she was forced to lock her daughters up for months in horrendous conditions because she feared that her husband would hurt her or her daughters if she tried to intervene or save them.

The defense wanted to present evidence of abuse towards the woman that included a doctor’s diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder and pictures of abuse she had suffered from her husband. The judge claimed that the woman was using a battered women’s syndrome defense and not duress. This means that the judge believed the woman was claiming to be so abused that she did not have the mental capacity to know that she was committing a crime.

The judge then ruled that the woman was not allowed to use duress as a defense because her claims meant that her defense was that she had a diminished capacity when she committed the crimes. A diminished capacity defense is not allowed in Arizona. The decision was appealed and the case went to the Arizona Supreme Court. They rejected the lower court’s finding and held that the woman should have been allowed to raise the duress defense.

Impacts of the Recent Changes

The Arizona Supreme Court stated that it did not matter if the threat was immediate to the woman in this particular case. A jury should be allowed to determine whether the woman was forced to go along with the crime because she had a reasonable belief that her husband would hurt her or the children at some point. The threat of fear could have been over several days or weeks. Therefore, the court held that the woman should have been able to use duress as a defense at her trial.

The implication of this could be far-reaching in the state. The decision means that the threat of force in an affirmative defense no longer needs to be directly immediate at the time of the crime. This can now be used at trial if the defense can prove that an ongoing threat was “sufficiently immediate.” This means that the crime and threat only need to be closely related. In fact, as in the case here, they can be several days apart. This expands the use of duress and allows it to be used in a broader amount of cases.

----------

About the Author: Craig Orent is a criminal lawyer in Phoenix, AZ, and founder of Orent Law Offices, PLC. He has over 30 years of experience handling all serious state and federal criminal matters.

Related Articles

The Impact of Plea Bargains in Criminal Cases in the U.S.


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers highlights why plea bargains have risen to such prevalence, quickly becoming an essential part of the criminal justice system in the U.S.

Client and attorney stand before judge in a courtroom

8 Different Types of Criminal Defenses in Law


by Best Lawyers

Learn about the different types of criminal defenses available in law, including innocence, self-defense, insanity and more. Protect your rights today.

Silver handcuffs laying on finger printed papers

What Legalizing Recreational Marijuana Means for Indiana


by Rock Lee

What will marijuana legalization mean for business, past conviction, and beyond?

Legalizing Marijuana in Indiana

IN PARTNERSHIP

What Is a Criminal Defense Attorney and When Do You Need One?


by Cody Cofer

A criminal defense attorney does everything legally necessary to help you get a favorable outcome for your charges, such as a dismissal. Learn more here.

Figure standing behind prison bars

IN PARTNERSHIP

Breaking Down Criminal Conviction in Canada


by Mass Tsang

Statistics Canada’s annual breakdown of adult criminal court data provides an eye-opening review of how the country’s court system resolves its hundreds of thousands of cases annually.

Canada's Criminal Court Patterns Are Changing

IN PARTNERSHIP

Understanding Main Justice and Its Role in Federal Prosecutions


by Morgan Pilate

Here’s how to resolve a case when Main Justice is involved.

Blonde Woman Talking with White-Haired Man

Announcing the 2024 Best Lawyers Criminal Law Legal Guide


by Best Lawyers

The first edition of the 2024 Best Lawyers Criminal Law Legal Guide is now live and includes awards for all recognized criminal law lawyers in Best Lawyers 2024.

Police and emergency vehicles at night in smoke

Violating the Victim


by Megan Bishop and Thomas R. Ward

Two criminal law lawyers from Colorado detail the confounding ways in which prosecutors violate the victim in domestic violence cases.

Cartoon of woman in blue shirt and hair covering her face

IN PARTNERSHIP

Circuit Split: Can Federal Courts Award Lost Profits as Part of a Restitution Order?


by Nicholas Oleski

The Sixth Circuit has ruled against awarding lost profits as restitution to a business forced to close due to a robbery, highlighting a growing circuit split on whether lost profits can be included in restitution orders under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act (MVRA).

Red shop doors with glass broken open

IN PARTNERSHIP

The Law Offices of Joseph A. Simon: A Criminal Defense Law Firm


by Joseph A. Simon

The Law Offices of Joseph A. Simon is an Ann Arbor-based firm that specializes in Criminal Defense. Over his 37-year career, Joseph A. Simon has defended thousands of cases.

A Lady in a Suit Taking Notes Across from a Man in an Orange Jumpsuit at a Table

IN PARTNERSHIP

Get a Lawyer


by Anne M. Collart and Ricardo Solano Jr.

When a subpoena arrives, having counsel can save time and money and also protect your rights.

Woman with glasses reading a document

IN PARTNERSHIP

Where’s My Apology Letter? Client Control and Expectations Regarding Representation


by Joseph S. Passanise and Taylon Sumners

Through every interaction with clients, lawyers can practice effective client management, utilizing clear communication, transparency and diligence.

Professional men and women sitting around a table shaking hands and making business deals

IN PARTNERSHIP

Why Refusing a Blood Alcohol Test Might Be Safest


by Charles E. Tiernan III

A seasoned criminal defense and OUI lawyer explains why refusing to take a blood alcohol test after an OUI arrest may be the safest option for the arrestee.

Gloved hand holding vial of blood for alcohol test

IN PARTNERSHIP

The Current Situation for Asylum Seekers in the U.S.


by Allison Lukanich and Murali Bashyam

The U.S. asylum system has a staggering over 1.3 million cases pending before immigration courts and the government must distribute more resources to aid this watershed and resolve asylum claims faster.

Shadow of person standing by broken chain link fence

IN PARTNERSHIP

A Beacon of Excellence in Criminal Defense


by Nicole Deborde Hochglaube

Nicole Hochglaube has built her firm and practice on fierce advocacy for her clients, and her excellence and work in Texas are highlighted through her awards and success.

People in business suits standing in a line clapping

IN PARTNERSHIP

Don’t Cross the Line


by John R. Mitchell and Mira Aftim

Settlement negotiations tend to instigate the most zealous advocacy among attorneys. But how far is “too far?”, and when can settlement demands turn into extortion?

Nike check over image of man in suit with court document in background

Trending Articles

Introducing the 2026 Best Lawyers Awards in Australia, Japan, New Zealand and Singapore


by Jennifer Verta

This year’s awards reflect the strength of the Best Lawyers network and its role in elevating legal talent worldwide.

2026 Best Lawyers Awards in Australia, Japan, New Zealand and Singapore

Revealing the 2026 Best Lawyers Awards in Germany, France, Switzerland and Austria


by Jamilla Tabbara

These honors underscore the reach of the Best Lawyers network and its focus on top legal talent.

map of Germany, France, Switzerland and Austria

Effective Communication: A Conversation with Jefferson Fisher


by Jamilla Tabbara

The power of effective communication beyond the law.

 Image of Jefferson Fisher and Phillip Greer engaged in a conversation about effective communication

The 2025 Legal Outlook Survey Results Are In


by Jennifer Verta

Discover what Best Lawyers honorees see ahead for the legal industry.

Person standing at a crossroads with multiple intersecting paths and a signpost.

The Best Lawyers Network: Global Recognition with Long-term Value


by Jamilla Tabbara

Learn how Best Lawyers' peer-review process helps recognized lawyers attract more clients and referral opportunities.

Lawyers networking

Jefferson Fisher: The Secrets to Influential Legal Marketing


by Jennifer Verta

How lawyers can apply Jefferson Fisher’s communication and marketing strategies to build trust, attract clients and grow their practice.

Portrait of Jefferson Fisher a legal marketing expert

Is Your Law Firm’s Website Driving Clients Away?


by Jamilla Tabbara

Identify key website issues that may be affecting client engagement and retention.

Phone displaying 'This site cannot be reached' message

A Guide to Workers' Compensation Law for 2025 and Beyond


by Bryan Driscoll

A woman with a laptop screen reflected in her glasses

Medical Malpractice Reform Trends in Texas, Utah, Georgia and SC


by Bryan Driscoll

A fresh wave of medical malpractice reform is reshaping the law.

Medical Malpractice Reform Trends hed

Why Jack Dorsey and Elon Musk Want to 'Delete All IP Law'


by Bryan Driscoll

This Isn’t Just a Debate Over How to Pay Creators. It’s a Direct Challenge to Legal Infrastructure.

Elon Musk and Jack Dorsey standing together Infront of the X logo

Best Lawyers Launches CMO Advisory Board


by Jamilla Tabbara

Strategic counsel from legal marketing’s most experienced voices.

Group photo of Best Lawyers CMO Advisory Board members

Changes in California Employment Law for 2025


by Laurie Villanueva

What employers need to know to ensure compliance in the coming year and beyond

A pair of hands holding a checklist featuring a generic profile picture and the state of California

Common Law Firm Landing Page Problems to Address


by Jamilla Tabbara

Identify key issues on law firm landing pages to improve client engagement and conversion.

Laptop showing law firm landing page analytics

New Employment Law Recognizes Extraordinary Stress Is Everyday Reality for NY Lawyers


by Bryan Driscoll

A stressed woman has her head resting on her hands above a laptop

Best Lawyers Introduces Smithy AI


by Jamilla Tabbara

Transforming legal content creation for attorneys and firms.

Start using Smithy AI, a content tool by Best Lawyers

How to Create High-Converting Landing Pages for Your Law Firm


by Jamilla Tabbara

Learn how to create high-converting law firm landing pages that drive client engagement and lead generation.

Laptop screen displaying website tools to improve client conversion rates

This article is a part of the Best Lawyers Criminal Law Legal Guide. Read thought leadership from recognized lawyers and navigate a list of all honorees in the associated practice areas.

Explore the Legal Guide