Understanding the Affirmative Defense of Duress in Arizona

How states determine the use of this specific criminal defense.

Affirmative Defense of Duress in Arizona

Craig Orent

January 7, 2020 03:54 PM

Many defenses can be used if a person is accused of a crime. Some of these include insanity, coercion, duress, withdrawal, self-defense, intoxication, consent, or statute of limitations. They can also be categorized as affirmative defenses or non-affirmative defenses. States determine which defenses can be used, who can use them, and what the circumstances must be to grant the defense.

Affirmative Defense of Duress

An affirmative defense means that the defendant admits that they committed a crime. However, they also offer a reason to justify why they committed the crime. This reason might be enough to lessen the charges against them or even negate their guilt altogether. Types of affirmative defenses that are allowed vary state to state.

Duress means that you’re being forced to do something that you don’t want to do because of the threats, constraints, or violence. It is a defense that claims the individual had no choice to commit the crime because they feared for their life or someone else’s. The threat generally must be immediate and happen at the time of the crime. For example, someone holding a gun to a person’s head and making them commit a crime would be considered duress.

Duress as an Affirmative Defense in Arizona

Several defenses can be used in Arizona. These include self-defense, insanity, and justification. Duress belongs under the affirmative defense justification. This means that a crime has been committed but under mitigating circumstances that should negate the guilt of the defendant.

In Arizona, duress is a justified and affirmative defense to being charged with a criminal act. The courts use the standard that a reasonable person in the same circumstance would believe that they were forced to commit the act because of a threat of an immediate use of force that could lead to a serious injury. The threat can be against the defendant or another individual.

The Arizona statute only allows a duress defense if a reasonable person in the same situation would have not resisted the use of force. This means that if the court finds that other individuals may have said no to the action or were able to resist the threat of force, the defendant will not be able to use this as a defense.

Recent Changes to the Arizona Affirmative Defense of Duress

In 2018, a decision made by the Arizona Supreme Court altered the definition of duress as a defense. The case focused on a woman who was convicted of the abuse of her three children. She was sentenced to 20 years in prison. At trial, the woman claimed that she was forced to lock her daughters up for months in horrendous conditions because she feared that her husband would hurt her or her daughters if she tried to intervene or save them.

The defense wanted to present evidence of abuse towards the woman that included a doctor’s diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder and pictures of abuse she had suffered from her husband. The judge claimed that the woman was using a battered women’s syndrome defense and not duress. This means that the judge believed the woman was claiming to be so abused that she did not have the mental capacity to know that she was committing a crime.

The judge then ruled that the woman was not allowed to use duress as a defense because her claims meant that her defense was that she had a diminished capacity when she committed the crimes. A diminished capacity defense is not allowed in Arizona. The decision was appealed and the case went to the Arizona Supreme Court. They rejected the lower court’s finding and held that the woman should have been allowed to raise the duress defense.

Impacts of the Recent Changes

The Arizona Supreme Court stated that it did not matter if the threat was immediate to the woman in this particular case. A jury should be allowed to determine whether the woman was forced to go along with the crime because she had a reasonable belief that her husband would hurt her or the children at some point. The threat of fear could have been over several days or weeks. Therefore, the court held that the woman should have been able to use duress as a defense at her trial.

The implication of this could be far-reaching in the state. The decision means that the threat of force in an affirmative defense no longer needs to be directly immediate at the time of the crime. This can now be used at trial if the defense can prove that an ongoing threat was “sufficiently immediate.” This means that the crime and threat only need to be closely related. In fact, as in the case here, they can be several days apart. This expands the use of duress and allows it to be used in a broader amount of cases.


About the Author: Craig Orent is a criminal lawyer in Phoenix, AZ, and founder of Orent Law Offices, PLC. He has over 30 years of experience handling all serious state and federal criminal matters.

Related Articles

Truck Safety Watchdogs

by Best Lawyers

Unqualified, Poorly Trained Truck Drivers and Unsafe Trucks Heighten Roadway Dangers

Truck Safety and Roadway Dangers

Breaking Down Criminal Conviction in Canada

by Best Lawyers

Statistics Canada’s annual breakdown of adult criminal court data provides an eye-opening review of how the country’s court system resolves its hundreds of thousands of cases annually.

Canada's Criminal Court Patterns Are Changing

Patrick A. Mullin, Esq. - Annual Report

by Patrick A. Mullin, Esq.

Veteran federal criminal defense attorney Patrick A. Mullin, Esq. provides an annual report of his victories in high-stakes criminal and tax matters.

Patrick A. Mullen Annual Report of Defense

Southern California “Lawyer of the Year”

by Best Lawyers

Thomas A. Mesereau, Jr. is honored as 2022 "Lawyer of the Year" in Criminal Defense: General Practice in Los Angeles.

 Southern California “Lawyer of the Year”

A Trial Icon Joins a Legal Powerhouse

by John Fields

Dan Cogdell on moving his renowned criminal defense practice to Jones Walker LLP.

A Trial Icon Joins a Legal Powerhouse

Restore the Vote

by Janice Zhou

Voting rights for felons is shifting. Florida allows ex-felons to register to vote after they have completed their entire sentence, including incarceration, probation, and parole.

Polling station for voting

As Courts Grapple With the COVID-19 Pandemic, Scarlett Law Group Adapts

by Sean Stonefield

Best Lawyers honoree Randall Scarlett on obtaining results despite unprecedented challenges.

Scarlett Law Group

Achieving Justice For Essential Workers

by Justin Smulison

Patrick Regan of Regan Zambri Long describes how the recent resolution of a corporate negligence case brought closure to survivors of a fatal 2016 apartment building explosion.

Patrick Regan Best Lawyers 2021

Engineered for Success

by Justin Smulison

Koskoff’s product-liability leader, Bill Bloss, explains how his group combines legal knowledge with engineering insight for the benefit of their clients—and future consumers as well

Bill Bloss Best Lawyers 2020

Big Case Warriors

by Best Lawyers

The co-founders of Lyons & Simmons, LLP discuss their relentless dedication to pursuing justice for clients while also invoking change.

Lyons & Simmons Best Lawyers 2020

A Trial Icon

by Sean Stonefield

Dan Cogdell on his almost four decades of courtroom success.

Dan Cogdell Best Lawyers 2020

Brophy & Devaney, PLLC

by Best Lawyers

Joseph F. Brophy embraces his reputations for his zealous representation of his clients and is passionate about learning their businesses and problems and ensuring that their rights are protected and their interests are maximized, whether by way of litigation or transaction.

Joseph Brophy Best Lawyers 2020

Trial Law Leadership

by Justin Smulison

Daniel J.T. Sciano, twice-named Best Lawyers® San Antonio “Lawyer of the Year” for Personal Injury Litigation – Plaintiffs (2010, 2012), discusses how his record of success impacts clients and Texas’ legal community

Daniel Sciano Best Lawyers 2020

What Are the Anti-Protest Laws in the U.S.?

by Jim Owen

The First Amendment includes the right to assemble. But how are the rules surrounding protesting changing?

Anti-Protest Laws in the U.S.

How to Digitally Market Your Law Firm

by dNovo Group

In the digital age, everyone is online. So it's important to make sure your results pop up first. This digital marketing agency gives SEO tips specifically for lawyers.

How SEO is Different for Lawyers in Toronto

Are Teenage Drivers More Likely to be in a Car Accident?

by Jason Stephens

Teenagers are more likely to be in car accidents due to driving inexperience. But what are the other factors, and what can be done to help?

Teenage Drivers and Car Accidents

Trending Articles

Johnny Depp and Amber Heard: The Best Lawyers Honorees Behind the Litigation

by Gregory Sirico

Best Lawyers takes a look at the recognized legal talent representing Johnny Depp and Amber Heard in their ongoing defamation trial.

Lawyers for Johnny Depp and Amber Heard

The Real Camille: An Interview with Johnny Depp’s Lawyer Camille Vasquez

by Rebecca Blackwell

Camille Vasquez, a young lawyer at Brown Rudnick, sat down with Best Lawyers CEO Phillip Greer to talk about her distinguished career, recently being named partner and what comes next for her.

Camille Vasquez in office

Announcing The Best Lawyers in The United Kingdom™ 2023

by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms from the United Kingdom.

The Best Lawyers in The United Kingdom 2023

Announcing The Best Lawyers in France™ 2023

by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms from France.

Blue, white and red strips

Announcing The Best Lawyers in Germany™ 2023

by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms from Germany.

Black, red and yellow stripes

Education by Trial: Cultivating Legal Expertise in the Courtroom

by Margo Pierce

The intricacies of complex lawsuits require extensive knowledge of the legal precedent. But they also demand a high level of skill in every discipline needed to succeed at trial, such as analyzing technical reports and deposing expert witnesses.

Cultivating Legal Expertise in the Courtroom

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers® in the United States

by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers listed in the 28th Edition of The Best Lawyers in America® and in the 2nd Edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2022.

2022 Best Lawyers Listings for United States

Announcing The Best Lawyers in Belgium™ 2023

by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms from Belgium.

Black, yellow and red stripes

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers™ in France

by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms, including our inaugural Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch recipients.

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers™ in France

We Are Women, We Are Fearless

by Deborah S. Chang and Justin Smulison

Athea Trial Lawyers is a female owned and operated law firm specializing in civil litigation, catastrophic energy, wrongful death and product liability.

Athea Trial Law Female Leadership and Success

Choosing a Title Company: What a Seller Should Expect

by Roy D. Oppenheim

When it comes to choosing a title company, how much power exactly does a seller have?

Choosing the Title Company As Seller

What If Johnny Depp and Amber Heard Had a Premarital Agreement?

by John M. Goralka

Oh, the gritty details we’re learning from the latest court battle between Johnny Depp and Amber Heard. This unfortunate airing of dirty laundry may have been avoided with a prenup. Should you think about getting one yourself?

What If Johnny Depp & Amber Heard Had Prenup?

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers™ in Germany

by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms, including our inaugural Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch recipients.

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers™ in Germany

U.K. Introduces Revisions to Right-to-Work Scheme and Immigration Rules

by Gregory Sirico

Right-to-Work Scheme and Immigration Rules in

What the Courts Say About Recording in the Classroom

by Christina Henagen Peer and Peter Zawadski

Students and parents are increasingly asking to use audio devices to record what's being said in the classroom. But is it legal? A recent ruling offer gives the answer to a question confusing parents and administrators alike.

Is It Legal for Students to Record Teachers?

Destiny Fulfilled

by Sara Collin

Was Angela Reddock-Wright destined to become a lawyer? It sure seems that way. Yet her path was circuitous. This accomplished employment attorney, turned mediator, arbitrator and ADR specialist nonpareil discusses her career, the role of attorneys in society, the new world of post-pandemic work and why new Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson represents the future.

Interview with Lawyer Angela Reddock-Wright