Insight

3 Recent Just Cause Termination Cases in Alberta Important for Employers

3 Recent Just Cause Termination Cases in Alberta Important for Employers

Charles Osuji

Charles Osuji

October 7, 2021 05:43 PM

TERMINATION FOR CAUSE: What the Employer Must Prove

Alberta employers are learning the seriousness of proving just cause for termination after three important Court decisions last year. In all three cases, the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench determined that the employers did not have just cause to terminate their employees.

“Just cause” is not easy to prove, and the onus is on employers to prove it. While each situation is unique, recent history indicates that Alberta courts seem to favour the employee in this type of case.

What is Just Cause Termination?

Termination for Cause: What the Employer Must Prove – 3 Recent Just Cause Termination Cases in Alberta Important for Employers

Just cause termination is when an employer can prove that there is a legal cause for termination and follows the appropriate legal procedure for termination.

Legal cause for termination may be established when the employee has engaged in severe misconduct, gross negligence, or an ongoing pattern of incompetence serious enough to warrant termination. Common behaviour resulting in a just cause termination include:

  • Theft or fraud in the workplace;
  • Persistent incompetence or negligence in completing assigned duties;
  • Harassment or abuse toward other coworkers, clients, or customers;
  • A clear pattern of insubordination or intentional non-compliance;
  • Off-duty misconduct causing substantial harm to the employer; and
  • Engagement in competing business activities causing established economic harm to the employer.

Occasional lateness, unsatisfactory work performance, age, race, gender, or other personal factors are not just cause for termination.

Just Cause Termination in Alberta Courts

In Underhill v Shell Canada Limited, Shell terminated Underhill’s employment for just cause, alleging various instances of serious misconduct. The Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta concluded that, while Underhill had made some mistakes, there was no evidence of disloyalty or acting in bad faith. Her 17-year history as a dedicated employee and the fact that Shell didn’t suffer significantly because of Underhill’s actions led to the Court’s decision in Underhill’s favour.

In Mack v Universal Dental Laboratories Ltd., Universal satisfied the Court in proving misconduct. However, the Court also determined that Universal had allowed the misconduct by failing to issue any written warnings and failing to follow its performance management process according to its employee policy manual. The Court also concluded that Mack’s misconduct did not warrant termination.

In Baker v Weyerhaeuser Company Limited, Weyerhaeuser alleged that Baker engaged in misconduct and safety violations, including a fire and failure to report the fire. The Court acknowledged that the fire was grounds for discipline, and Weyerhaeuser had properly issued written warning to Baker. Yet the Court concluded that the primary reason for terminating Baker was the supervisor’s personal feelings.

A Caution for Employers About Just Cause Termination

These three cases present an important caution for employers about just cause termination. The context of the termination matters greatly, the issue is complex, and it is remarkably difficult to establish just cause for termination.

The consequences for an employee of a just cause termination are serious. In a just cause termination, the employer is not required to provide termination notice or severance pay, and the employee may be unable to collect Employment Benefits (EI).

Because of the gravity of this, the onus rests on the employer to establish that cause was warranted, and the bar for proving cause is extremely high. If the employer fails to provide sufficient evidence of cause, the termination may be considered wrongful dismissal, and the employer may be liable for damages.

How Employers Must Prove Just Cause Termination

Clearly, Alberta Courts consider termination of employment an extremely serious matter, and employers have a huge responsibility even before a termination happens because history, employment policies, and other factors all impact a decision about just cause for termination.

Employers should have clear, up-to-date policies in place and ensure all employees have a firm understanding of those policies. These policies should include performance expectations and unacceptable behaviour, including how the employer will handle poor behaviour or performance.

Documentation is a crucial component of proving just cause for termination. Employers should keep thorough records of misconduct and other potential grounds for termination, along with written warnings, performance records, and disciplinary history.

Before terminating an employee for just cause, employers must consider context factors, including:

  • the workplace culture,
  • the nature of the business and the employee’s actions,
  • the timing of the employee’s actions, and
  • the employee’s length of service, position, and duties.

If the employer can prove that the employee’s conduct or actions are severe enough to undermine the employment relationship, consult with a lawyer. Providing evidence for just cause termination is not easy, and the Court will look beyond the cause by considering the nature of the termination process as well. So proceed with caution.

The recent Alberta cases regarding just cause termination show that, even when employers can prove just cause, the employer must meet further requirements to prevent a case of wrongful dismissal. Employers must exercise extreme caution and consider the risks. Sometimes it may be better to terminate the employee without cause.

CALGARY LAWYERS FOR JUST CAUSE TERMINATION CASES

An employment lawyer can review an employer’s argument and help to determine if a just cause termination is warranted. Consulting with an experienced employment lawyer can limit employer liability and lay the groundwork for a successful termination.

The award-winning employment lawyers at Osuji & Smith in Calgary can provide expert legal advice to employers before proceeding with a just cause termination. Protect your business and get a clear understanding of the legal and financial implications of a just cause termination for your specific situation. We can also help you argue your case for just cause termination in court.

Trending Articles

Introducing the 2026 Best Lawyers Awards in Australia, Japan, New Zealand and Singapore


by Jennifer Verta

This year’s awards reflect the strength of the Best Lawyers network and its role in elevating legal talent worldwide.

2026 Best Lawyers Awards in Australia, Japan, New Zealand and Singapore

Revealing the 2026 Best Lawyers Awards in Germany, France, Switzerland and Austria


by Jamilla Tabbara

These honors underscore the reach of the Best Lawyers network and its focus on top legal talent.

map of Germany, France, Switzerland and Austria

Effective Communication: A Conversation with Jefferson Fisher


by Jamilla Tabbara

The power of effective communication beyond the law.

 Image of Jefferson Fisher and Phillip Greer engaged in a conversation about effective communication

The 2025 Legal Outlook Survey Results Are In


by Jennifer Verta

Discover what Best Lawyers honorees see ahead for the legal industry.

Person standing at a crossroads with multiple intersecting paths and a signpost.

The Best Lawyers Network: Global Recognition with Long-term Value


by Jamilla Tabbara

Learn how Best Lawyers' peer-review process helps recognized lawyers attract more clients and referral opportunities.

Lawyers networking

Jefferson Fisher: The Secrets to Influential Legal Marketing


by Jennifer Verta

How lawyers can apply Jefferson Fisher’s communication and marketing strategies to build trust, attract clients and grow their practice.

Portrait of Jefferson Fisher a legal marketing expert

Is Your Law Firm’s Website Driving Clients Away?


by Jamilla Tabbara

Identify key website issues that may be affecting client engagement and retention.

Phone displaying 'This site cannot be reached' message

A Guide to Workers' Compensation Law for 2025 and Beyond


by Bryan Driscoll

A woman with a laptop screen reflected in her glasses

Best Lawyers Launches CMO Advisory Board


by Jamilla Tabbara

Strategic counsel from legal marketing’s most experienced voices.

Group photo of Best Lawyers CMO Advisory Board members

Common Law Firm Landing Page Problems to Address


by Jamilla Tabbara

Identify key issues on law firm landing pages to improve client engagement and conversion.

Laptop showing law firm landing page analytics

Changes in California Employment Law for 2025


by Laurie Villanueva

What employers need to know to ensure compliance in the coming year and beyond

A pair of hands holding a checklist featuring a generic profile picture and the state of California

New Employment Law Recognizes Extraordinary Stress Is Everyday Reality for NY Lawyers


by Bryan Driscoll

A stressed woman has her head resting on her hands above a laptop

Turn Visitors into Clients with Law Firm Website SEO That Converts


by Jamilla Tabbara

Learn how to create high-converting law firm landing pages that drive client engagement and lead generation.

Laptop screen displaying website tools to improve client conversion rates

Best Lawyers Introduces Smithy AI


by Jamilla Tabbara

Transforming legal content creation for attorneys and firms.

Start using Smithy AI, a content tool by Best Lawyers

SEO for Law Firms: Overcoming Common Challenges


by Jamilla Tabbara

Tackle common SEO challenges and take the next step with our guide, How to Make Your Law Firm Easier to Find Online.

Graphic image of a phone displaying SEO rankings, with positions 1, 2 and 3 on the screen

Medical Malpractice Reform Trends in Texas, Utah, Georgia and SC


by Bryan Driscoll

A fresh wave of medical malpractice reform is reshaping the law.

Medical Malpractice Reform Trends hed