Insight

One Crucial Clause for Every Agreement

No matter what legal agreement you’re signing, it probably ought to include a critical chunk of exculpatory text to prevent unexpected liability. Many documents lack it.

Two hands point to text on document
JS

Joshua Stein

November 2, 2022 04:00 PM

Participants in commercial real estate transactions do business through corporations, limited liability companies and sometimes other entities. (We’ll henceforth call all of these entities “companies” for convenience.) The principals of the company don’t do business in their own names. Instead, they use companies for many good reasons: to accommodate complex ownership structures, to allocate tax exposures, to define financial rights and obligations and to shield individual principals from liability. That’s just how all modern commercial real estate business—and most other business—is done.

Loan agreements often go a step further and say that the lender’s shareholders, principals, employees, agents and others in the lender’s organization (let’s call them the lender’s “constituents”) will never have any liability to the borrower. That gives the lender’s constituents a second layer of protection, going beyond the fact that the lender itself is a company.

What about the borrower’s constituents? More generally, what about the constituents of any party to any legal document except a lender whose loan documents expressly protect the lender’s constituents? Some contracts specifically state that no constituents of any party will ever have any liability for any claims related to the contract. Many don’t state that, however, even though they seem to cover everything else that might ever become relevant—and much that won’t.

You might think no one needs to bother to explicitly protect constituents from any liability under a contract. That’s because these contracts are invariably signed by companies, not individual people—again, that’s how business is always done—so the fundamental legal structure of each company should insulate the constituents from any claims that creditors might have against the company. You would think each creditor knew from the start that it was doing business with a company whose fundamental structure protected its constituents from liability. The notion of limited liability is baked into the deal structure and known by all, so you shouldn’t need to say it again. Unfortunately, you might be wrong about that.

In a big surprise for constituents of any company—not at all what anyone expected when the company signed a contract—creditors can sometimes try to “pierce the veil” that is supposed to protect the constituents from liability. This means the creditors will try to go after a company’s constituents to make them pay the company’s contractual obligations. Whether a creditor can indeed pierce the veil depends on the facts of each case. It’s difficult, fact-sensitive and thus expensive litigation, but highly tempting to a creditor that believes it was wronged.

A company’s creditors can argue that the constituents exercised so much control over the company that they were inseparable from it. They might also argue that the company and its constituents mixed their bank accounts and paid little or no attention to who paid which bill or who signed which piece of paper. When a constituent did things for the company—placing orders or signing leases, for example—creditors might claim the constituent didn’t adequately announce that the company was doing these things rather than the constituent itself.

Constituents often pay little attention to the line between themselves and their company.”

Creditors can cite facts like these, and others, to argue that a court should strip away constituents’ liability protection and hold them liable for the company’s debts. These arguments often arise long after the underlying dispute with the company began, or the underlying claims arose. That means the constituents are stuck with whatever has already happened. At this point, they have no control over or choice in the matter.

Creditors seeking to pierce the veil and hold constituents liable always face an uphill battle. If the creditor’s claim is substantial, however, and the company turns out to be an assetless waif, this battle may be tempting to fight. Facts like those in the previous paragraph can invite creditors to make creative, aggressive arguments against a company’s constituents.

In the real world, though, small companies often operate informally. That’s just how these things work. Constituents often pay little attention to the line between themselves and their company. It can sometimes be difficult to say whether any particular action was taken by the constituent or by the company, especially if just one constituent owns the whole company. The ordinary operation of a company can entice a creditor to try to pierce the constituents’ veil of liability protection. The argument usually fails. Once in a while, however, it succeeds—even though everyone, including every creditor, went into the legal relationship with the company knowing the company structure existed precisely to protect its constituents from liability.

To prevent any argument that might allow creditors to go after constituents, every legal document a company signs should include language to try to make it impossible to pierce the veil. Each legal document should expressly protect constituents from liability for the company’s obligations under any circumstance. This is exactly the language that loan documents almost always include to protect the lender’s constituents. Loan documents and all sorts of other contracts don’t necessarily give constituents of other contractual parties the same protection. This protection could turn out to be the most important provision in any contract if the company or the transaction ultimately goes sideways—far more important than many other provisions that typically appear in any serious legal document and attract extensive attention and negotiation.

Here is the “full” version of sample language that any company should probably try to include in every contract, including every loan document and lease:

No Constituent of any party to this agreement shall ever have any personal liability or be subject to any recourse, directly or indirectly: (i) under this agreement; (ii) arising from its subject matter or the contractual relationship, or any claim or dispute relating to the agreement, between or among the parties; or (iii) as a result of any action taken on behalf of, or within the scope of responsibility for, any party to this agreement. Each party waives all such personal liability and recourse against any Constituent. Each party waives any claim for “piercing the veil,” “alter ego,” or the like, based on any fact or theory whatsoever (whether in contract, in tort or otherwise), including failure to comply with entity formalities; undercapitalization; unity of interest; excessive control or domination; commingling of funds; payment of bills; shared telephone numbers, letterhead or address; acting on behalf of a party to this agreement; or any fact, circumstance or theory that might support consolidation in bankruptcy. That does not limit any person’s liability under and limited only to: (i) the law of fraudulent transfers, fraudulent conveyances, or illegal distributions or (ii) the express terms of a written guaranty, indemnity, or other agreement signed by that person. This paragraph shall survive any termination or assignment of this agreement. Every Constituent is an intended third-party beneficiary of this paragraph. “Constituent” means, for any entity that is or was a party to this Agreement, any affiliate, agent, contractor, director, employee, equity holder, manager, member, officer, owner, or principal of that party or of anyone claiming through that party. A party is not a Constituent of itself.

By including language like this in any contract, constituents give themselves a cheap insurance policy against overzealous creditors and against judges whose background often involves “public interest” law or prosecution of criminals rather than commercial real estate transactional law.

Joshua Stein practices commercial real estate law in New York. He is a member of the American College of Real Estate Lawyers, the American College of Mortgage Attorneys and the Association for Real Property and Infrastructure (formerly AARPI). He has wide experience in commercial real estate transactions, development transactions, new and defaulted loans and other real estate matters and disputes. He has been listed in Best Lawyers® in Real Estate Law since 2006.

Headline Image: istock/scyther5

Related Articles

IN PARTNERSHIP

7 Things to Never Do After a Car Accident


by J.L. King

The actions you take after a car accident could determine the injury compensation you stand to receive. Learn seven things to never do after a car accident.

Cartoon of person with big pencil and check list

IN PARTNERSHIP

Why You Should Hire a Car Accident Lawyer


by Bill Winters

There are many benefits to hiring a car accident lawyer. They’ll handle your claim from start to finish and ensure you recover the best possible outcome. Learn more here.

Red fire truck beside two crashed cars

IN PARTNERSHIP

Nine Factors That Determine How Much to Expect from a Car Accident Settlement


by Aaron Tillman

Learn about the factors that can impact how much to expect for a car accident settlement in Portland, including what you can do to maximize how much you receive for an injury claim.

Yellow background with black and white animation of car crash

IN PARTNERSHIP

What Will a Car Accident Lawyer Actually Do for You?


by Joshua Fogelman

Learn what a car accident lawyer can do for you after a Texas car crash, including protecting your right to receive maximum compensation for your injuries and damages.

Hands pointing to a white car that has been damaged

IN PARTNERSHIP

5 Things To Consider When Choosing a Car Accident Lawyer


by Gregg Hollander

The lawyer you choose could make the difference between a winning and losing outcome. Learn five things to consider when choosing a car accident lawyer.

Two cars crashing into each other beside judge's gavel

IN PARTNERSHIP

Should I Get a Lawyer for a Car Accident That Wasn't My Fault?


by Mark Anderson

Learn about the reasons why you need to get a lawyer for a car accident claim and how a lawyer can help you get the compensation you deserve for injuries and damages.

Girl in orange sweater grasping injured neck

IN PARTNERSHIP

The Wolf Near Wall Street


by Rebecca Blackwell

When tensions among shared real estate owners reached their tipping point, Adam Leitman Bailey P.C. stepped in and solved a modern issue with an ancient remedy.

New York Real Estate with Adam Leitman Bailey

Where There’s No Will . . .


by Anthony J. Enea

. . . there’s no way for you to ensure your assets get distributed the way you would prefer. A guide to the consequences of exiting the stage without a last will and testament in New York.

Money symbol fading to dust

Family Owned and Operated


by David W. Holaday and John M. Goralka

In the era of sweeping tax reform, family businesses, particularly agricultural business, face many environmental and governmental risks. Outlined below are strategies to ensure family business survival in the face of these threats.

Man on tractor in open field

Split Decisions


by Jonathan Merel

Divorce is inevitably fraught with a torrent of emotions on both sides. Don’t let this occlude your ability to plan rationally and dispassionately to ensure as smooth a process as possible. Here are five common pitfalls to avoid.

Two people standing on either side of a heart made out of curving roads

Divorce in a Downturn


by Jennifer Brandt

Couples who choose to end their marriage during a recession must confront a host of difficult economic questions in addition to all the financial and emotional demands inherent in any divorce.

Piggy bank broken into different sections

Ghosts of Christmas Past


by Steven M. Visioli

’Tis the season . . . for a vacation without the kids. A recommendation against sharing co-parenting holidays with your ex.

Family walking on the beach at sunset

Making a List, Checking It Twice


by Lindsay Heller

Being a separated parent with kids can add stress to the holidays. These five tips can help you navigate the season, maintain your sanity—and ensure that the focus remains on the children’s happiness.

Couple drinking glasses of wine

Confronting the Inevitable


by Theresa Jo Gaffney

It’s never easy to contemplate one’s mortality. Yet end-of-life planning is essential at any age, as I learned all too well when my husband contracted COVID-19 several months into the pandemic. The peace of mind such forethought brings is essential should the worst come to pass.

Unseen figures holding hands

"Lawyer of the Year"


Woman standing in front of city backdrop

Jennifer Durham King

Financial Services Regulation Law

Chicago, IL

2023

Understanding Illinois’ Workers’ Rights Amendment


by Gregory Sirico

Best Lawyers weighs in on Illinois' newly enacted Amendment 1, which sets to provide state workers with the right to collectively bargain and organize.

Figures standing on giant hand

Trending Articles

Announcing the 2023 The Best Lawyers in America Honorees


by Best Lawyers

Only the top 5.3% of all practicing lawyers in the U.S. were selected by their peers for inclusion in the 29th edition of The Best Lawyers in America®.

Gold strings and dots connecting to form US map

Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2023


by Best Lawyers

The third edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America™ highlights the legal talent of lawyers who have been in practice less than 10 years.

Three arrows made of lines and dots on blue background

The Best Lawyers in South Africa™ 2023


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers proudly announces lawyers recognized in South Africa for 2023.

South African flag

Could Reign Supreme End with the Queen?


by Sara Collin

Canada is revisiting the notion of abolishing the monarchy after Queen Elizabeth II’s passing, but many Canadians and lawmakers are questioning if Canada could, should and would follow through.

Teacup on saucer over image of Queen's eye

IN PARTNERSHIP

2022: Another Banner Year


by John Fields

Block O’Toole & Murphy continues to secure some of New York’s highest results for personal injury matters.

Three men in business suits standing in office

Famous Songs Unprotected by Copyright Could Mean Royalties for Some


by Michael B. Fein

A guide to navigating copyright claims on famous songs.

Can I Sing "Happy Birthday" in Public?

Announcing the 2023 The Best Lawyers in Canada Honorees


by Best Lawyers

The Best Lawyers in Canada™ is entering its 17th edition for 2023. We highlight the elite lawyers awarded this year.

Red map of Canada with white lines and dots

Wage and Overtime Laws for Truck Drivers


by Greg Mansell

For truck drivers nationwide, underpayment and overtime violations are just the beginning of a long list of problems. Below we explore the wages you are entitled to but may not be receiving.

Truck Driver Wage and Overtime Laws in the US

What the Courts Say About Recording in the Classroom


by Christina Henagen Peer and Peter Zawadski

Students and parents are increasingly asking to use audio devices to record what's being said in the classroom. But is it legal? A recent ruling offer gives the answer to a question confusing parents and administrators alike.

Is It Legal for Students to Record Teachers?

Thirteen Years of Excellence


by Best Lawyers

For the 13th consecutive year, “Best Law Firms” has awarded the most elite and talented law firms across the country through a thorough and trusted data review process.

Red, white and blue pipes and writing on black background

The Upcycle Conundrum


by Karen Kreider Gaunt

Laudable or litigious? What you need to know about potential copyright and trademark infringement when repurposing products.

Repurposed Products and Copyright Infringemen

Choosing a Title Company: What a Seller Should Expect


by Roy D. Oppenheim

When it comes to choosing a title company, how much power exactly does a seller have?

Choosing the Title Company As Seller

Caffeine Overload and DUI Tests


by Daniel Taylor

While it might come as a surprise, the over-consumption of caffeine could trigger a false positive on a breathalyzer test.

Can Caffeine Cause You to Fail DUI Test?

Announcing The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2023


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms from Australia.

The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2023

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers® in the United States


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers listed in the 28th Edition of The Best Lawyers in America® and in the 2nd Edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2022.

2022 Best Lawyers Listings for United States

Announcing The Best Lawyers in Germany™ 2023


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms from Germany.

Black, red and yellow stripes