Best Lawyers in New York, United States for Litigation and Controversy - Tax
Select a city from the list below to find the best legal talent for your needs.
Cities
Arthur R. Rosen focuses his practice on tax planning and litigation relating to state and local tax matters for corporations, partnerships and individuals. Formerly the deputy counsel of the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance, as well as counsel to the governor’s Temporary Sales Tax Commission and tax counsel to the New York State Senate Tax Committee, Arthur has also held executive tax management positions at Xerox Corporation and AT&T. He has worked in accounting an...
Lawrence M. Hill is a top attorney recognized by Best Lawyers in the practice area(s) of Litigation and Controversy - Tax and Tax Law. Lawrence M., who practices law in New York, New York, has been recognized since 2010. This recognition is based on an exhaustive peer-review survey, reflecting the high esteem in which Lawrence M. is held by other top lawyers in the same geographic and legal practice area.
Maxwell Brown is a top attorney recognized by Best Lawyers in the practice area(s) of Litigation and Controversy - Tax. Maxwell, who practices law in New York, New York, has been recognized since 2027. This recognition is based on an exhaustive peer-review survey, reflecting the high esteem in which Maxwell is held by other top lawyers in the same geographic and legal practice area.
Yelena Niazyan is a top attorney recognized by Best Lawyers in the practice area(s) of Criminal Defense: White-Collar and Litigation and Controversy - Tax. Yelena, who practices law in New York, New York, has been recognized since 2025. This recognition is based on an exhaustive peer-review survey, reflecting the high esteem in which Yelena is held by other top lawyers in the same geographic and legal practice area.
Aaron M. Esman, an accomplished tax controversy and litigation attorney based in New York, represents individual and entity taxpayers before the Internal Revenue Service, the Department of Justice, and state & local taxing authorities. He represents taxpayers in all stages of tax controversy, including audits, appeals, and litigation. Esman also advises clients on tax matters related to corporate transactions, mergers & acquisitions, compliance, and corporate governance. When not work...
Navigating complex tax and financial matters can feel overwhelming. My mission is to provide clarity, confidence, and peace of mind to my clients, empowering them to make informed decisions tailored to their unique needs. With a practical, straightforward approach, I make sure my clients fully understand their options, whether they're resolving personal tax controversies, addressing business and financial disputes, or facing related legal challenges. I believe good counsel means translating c...
Michael J. Hilkin is a top attorney recognized by Best Lawyers in the practice area(s) of Litigation and Controversy - Tax and Tax Law. Michael J., who practices law in New York, New York, has been recognized since 2024. This recognition is based on an exhaustive peer-review survey, reflecting the high esteem in which Michael J. is held by other top lawyers in the same geographic and legal practice area.
Joshua M.R. Becker is a top attorney recognized by Best Lawyers in the practice area(s) of Litigation and Controversy - Tax and Tax Law. Joshua M.R., who practices law in New York, New York, has been recognized since 2021. This recognition is based on an exhaustive peer-review survey, reflecting the high esteem in which Joshua M.R. is held by other top lawyers in the same geographic and legal practice area.
Our Methodology
Recognition by Best Lawyers is based entirely on peer review. Our methodology is designed to capture, as accurately as possible, the consensus opinion of leading lawyers about the professional abilities of their colleagues within the same geographical area and legal practice area.
The Process
Best Lawyers employs a sophisticated, conscientious, rational, and transparent survey process designed to elicit meaningful and substantive evaluations of the quality of legal services. Our belief has always been that the quality of a peer review survey is directly related to the quality of the voters.