Best Lawyers in Massachusetts, United States for Trademark Law
Sarah Murphy is an intellectual property lawyer representing clients across a broad range of industries. Ms. Murphy has worked on patent matters involving a wide range of technologies, including medical devices, software, systems engineering and data storage. She has also provided patent portfolio support to our Mergers and Acquisitions practice and as a CIPP/US, has leveraged her background in US privacy law to aid our clients.
Xirui Zhang is a top attorney recognized by Best Lawyers in the practice area(s) of Intellectual Property Law and Patent Law. Xirui, who practices law in Boston, Massachusetts, has been recognized since 2026. This recognition is based on an exhaustive peer-review survey, reflecting the high esteem in which Xirui is held by other top lawyers in the same geographic and legal practice area.
Zach Nemtzow focuses his practice on intellectual property matters, including patent prosecution, post grant proceedings and patent litigation. Mr. Nemtzow handles matters in a wide range of technology fields including data storage, telecommunications networks, mobile devices, semiconductors and consumer products.
Karl T. Fisher is a top attorney recognized by Best Lawyers in the practice area(s) of Intellectual Property Law and Litigation - Intellectual Property. Karl T., who practices law in Boston, Massachusetts, has been recognized since 2025. This recognition is based on an exhaustive peer-review survey, reflecting the high esteem in which Karl T. is held by other top lawyers in the same geographic and legal practice area.
Joshua I. Rudawitz is a top attorney recognized by Best Lawyers in the practice area(s) of Intellectual Property Law, Patent Law and Technology Law. Joshua I., who practices law in Boston, Massachusetts, has been recognized since 2025. This recognition is based on an exhaustive peer-review survey, reflecting the high esteem in which Joshua I. is held by other top lawyers in the same geographic and legal practice area.
James R. Anderson is a top attorney recognized by Best Lawyers in the practice area(s) of Intellectual Property Law and Patent Law. James R., who practices law in Boston, Massachusetts, has been recognized since 2026. This recognition is based on an exhaustive peer-review survey, reflecting the high esteem in which James R. is held by other top lawyers in the same geographic and legal practice area.
Kristopher Reichlen is a top attorney recognized by Best Lawyers in the practice area(s) of Intellectual Property Law. Kristopher, who practices law in Boston, Massachusetts, has been recognized since 2025. This recognition is based on an exhaustive peer-review survey, reflecting the high esteem in which Kristopher is held by other top lawyers in the same geographic and legal practice area.
Joshua S. Jackson is a top attorney recognized by Best Lawyers in the practice area(s) of Intellectual Property Law, Life Sciences Practice, Mergers and Acquisitions Law and Technology Law. Joshua S., who practices law in Boston, Massachusetts, has been recognized since 2022. This recognition is based on an exhaustive peer-review survey, reflecting the high esteem in which Joshua S. is held by other top lawyers in the same geographic and legal practice area.
Gurunathan Laxmikanthan is a top attorney recognized by Best Lawyers in the practice area(s) of Intellectual Property Law and Patent Law. Gurunathan, who practices law in Boston, Massachusetts, has been recognized since 2025. This recognition is based on an exhaustive peer-review survey, reflecting the high esteem in which Gurunathan is held by other top lawyers in the same geographic and legal practice area.
Our Methodology
Recognition by Best Lawyers is based entirely on peer review. Our methodology is designed to capture, as accurately as possible, the consensus opinion of leading lawyers about the professional abilities of their colleagues within the same geographical area and legal practice area.
The Process
Best Lawyers employs a sophisticated, conscientious, rational, and transparent survey process designed to elicit meaningful and substantive evaluations of the quality of legal services. Our belief has always been that the quality of a peer review survey is directly related to the quality of the voters.