Best Lawyers Near You in Washington, District of Columbia for Commercial Litigation
Shirley Diaz is a lawyer recognized by Best Lawyers in the practice areas of Criminal Defense: White-Collar and Commercial Litigation. Shirley practices law in Washington, District of Columbia Best Lawyers has recognized Shirley Diaz since 2026. The Best Lawyers recognition is based on a peer-review survey of lawyers in the same geographic region and legal practice area. The recognition reflects the professional regard in which Shirley Diaz is held by other lawyers.
Hillary Smith focuses her practice on complex litigation matters in both trial and appellate courts. She has experience at all levels of state and federal court, including the US Supreme Court, and in a wide range of substantive areas, including administrative law, constitutional law, ERISA, the False Claims Act, and criminal law and procedure. She has taken multiple depositions and assisted in taking and defending numerous other depositions, and recently argued before the DC Court of Appeals...
Sarah McVay is a litigation partner in the Washington, D.C., office of Kirkland & Ellis LLP. Her practice focuses on complex commercial litigation in federal and state courts, and her case load covers a broad spectrum, including consumer class actions, breach of contract, business torts, product liability, and trade secrets litigation.
Holly Trogdon is a litigation partner in the Washington, D.C., office of Kirkland & Ellis, LLP. Holly’s practice focuses on complex commercial litigation. She has extensive experience representing clients in a variety of industries across a broad array of subject matters, including contract disputes, class actions, restructuring matters, and government-facing litigation and investigations. Holly advises clients on all aspects of litigation, including fact and expert discovery, motio...
Kate Epstein represents companies, institutions, and individuals in high-stakes commercial litigation, on both the plaintiff and defense side. Kate’s commercial practice spans a broad array of subject areas—including contract, intellectual property, consumer fraud, partnership dispute, employment, finance, cryptocurrency, bankruptcy, and insurance. Kate has extensive experience managing large and complex litigation matters, advising executives about potential and ongoing legal dis...
Zachary Enos represents clients in complex litigation, with a particular emphasis on antitrust, commercial, and government-facing litigation matters. Mr. Enos also maintains an active pro bono practice focused on anti-discrimination and First Amendment litigation in a variety of trial and appellate courts.
Stephen Prifti has a diverse practice, representing clients on high-stakes and sensitive matters, including civil litigations, appeals, criminal trials, arbitrations, and government investigations. His clients have ranged across individuals, financial institutions, pension funds, labor organizations, consulting firms, contractors, and government entities. Stephen has represented individuals and corporations in an array of government investigations, including those involving the Department of ...
Jeremy Brinster represents clients in complex civil litigation at both the trial and appellate levels, with a particular emphasis on Administrative Procedure Act, constitutional, and education-related litigation. He has authored briefs and dispositive motions at all levels of state and federal court, including the US Supreme Court. His clients include universities, school boards, technology companies, healthcare providers, and trade associations in a variety of fields. He has successfully arg...
Our Methodology
Recognition by Best Lawyers is based entirely on peer review. Our methodology is designed to capture, as accurately as possible, the consensus opinion of leading lawyers about the professional abilities of their colleagues within the same geographical area and legal practice area.
The Process
Best Lawyers employs a sophisticated, conscientious, rational, and transparent survey process designed to elicit meaningful and substantive evaluations of the quality of legal services. Our belief has always been that the quality of a peer review survey is directly related to the quality of the voters.
