Best Lawyers in District of Columbia, United States for Litigation - Intellectual Property
Cities
Reid M. Whitaker focuses his practice on patent litigation and other complex civil litigation involving technology. Before joining the firm, Mr. Whitaker clerked for the Honorable Leonard P. Stark of the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals and the Honorable Thomas L. Ambro of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals. Prior to his clerkships in the Court of Appeals, he clerked for the Honorable Chief Judge Colm F. Connolly of the US District Court of Delaware.
Ian Brooks is a lawyer recognized by Best Lawyers in the practice areas of Litigation - Intellectual Property and Litigation - Patent. Ian practices law in Washington, District of Columbia Best Lawyers has recognized Ian Brooks since 2024. The Best Lawyers recognition is based on a peer-review survey of lawyers in the same geographic region and legal practice area. The recognition reflects the professional regard in which Ian Brooks is held by other lawyers.
Akkad Moussa is an intellectual property lawyer who represents clients in the life sciences space on matters involving chemical processing, clinical diagnostics, intermediate chemicals, medical devices, metallurgy and pharmaceuticals. He also represents clients in post-grant proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in cases regarding chemical and biologics patents.
Jennifer Graber is a counsel who focuses her practice on intellectual property litigation matters before federal district courts, appellate courts, administrative agencies and the United States International Trade Commission. Ms. Graber has experience working with a broad range of products and technologies, from medical devices to pharmaceuticals and biologics to microprocessor circuits.
Jacqueline Genovese Bova is a lawyer recognized by Best Lawyers in the practice areas of Litigation - Intellectual Property, Litigation - Patent and Patent Law. Jacqueline practices law in Washington, District of Columbia Best Lawyers has recognized Jacqueline Genovese Bova since 2024. The Best Lawyers recognition is based on a peer-review survey of lawyers in the same geographic region and legal practice area. The recognition reflects the professional regard in which Jacqueline Genovese Bova...
Thomas Derbish is a lawyer recognized by Best Lawyers in the practice areas of Litigation - Intellectual Property, Litigation - Patent and Patent Law. Thomas practices law in Washington, District of Columbia Best Lawyers has recognized Thomas Derbish since 2026. The Best Lawyers recognition is based on a peer-review survey of lawyers in the same geographic region and legal practice area. The recognition reflects the professional regard in which Thomas Derbish is held by other lawyers.
As a member of the firm’s Appellate and Supreme Court Litigation group, Gary M. Fox represents clients in complex litigation matters across the country. He has notable experience in patent appeals to the Federal Circuit raising novel procedural issues, particularly those arising in post-grant proceedings before the US Patent and Trademark Office. His cases have spanned various types of technologies, including balloon catheters, content delivery networks, pharmaceutical dosing regimens a...
Nora Xu focuses her practice on intellectual property litigation matters before federal district courts, appellate courts and administrative agencies. She assists clients in all phases of cases from pre-litigation investigation through trial and appeals. Ms. Xu has represented clients in patent cases involving a variety of technologies, such as pharmaceuticals, biologics, medical devices, solar technology, and semiconductors.
Our Methodology
Recognition by Best Lawyers is based entirely on peer review. Our methodology is designed to capture, as accurately as possible, the consensus opinion of leading lawyers about the professional abilities of their colleagues within the same geographical area and legal practice area.
The Process
Best Lawyers employs a sophisticated, conscientious, rational, and transparent survey process designed to elicit meaningful and substantive evaluations of the quality of legal services. Our belief has always been that the quality of a peer review survey is directly related to the quality of the voters.
