Insight

The IRS Releases FAQ Guidance on Premium Assistance for COBRA Coverage

The IRS Releases FAQ Guidance on Premium Assistance for COBRA Coverage

Elverine "Rena" Felton

Elverine "Rena" Felton

December 15, 2022 03:38 PM

The IRS Releases FAQ Guidance on Premium Assistance for COBRA Coverage

On May 18, 2021, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued Notice 2021-31 which contains much anticipated guidance needed to implement the COBRA subsidy provisions included in the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA). The guidance contains 86 questions and answers that address many issues that have arisen with respect to COBRA premium assistance under ARPA. The IRS indicates that the questions and answers apply for purposes of COBRA continuation coverage requirements under ARPA for both federal COBRA and comparable state mini-COBRA requirements. However, any question or answer or particular part of an answer that is applicable only to federal COBRA refers specifically to federal COBRA. The guidance further clarifies that the COBRA premium assistance requirements apply to the employer or plan sponsor, group health plan, or issuer, depending on the facts and circumstances.

The guidance provides questions and answers with respect to following categories: eligibility, reduction in hours, involuntary termination of employment, coverage eligible for COBRA premium assistance, beginning of COBRA premium assistance period, end of COBRA premium assistance period, extended election period, extensions under the emergency relief notices, payments to insurers under federal COBRA, comparable state continuation coverage, calculation of COBRA premium assistance credit, and claiming the COBRA premium assistance credit. The guidance also recognizes that the Treasury Department and the IRS are aware of certain additional issues related to the COBRA premium assistance provisions in the ARPA that are not addressed in this notice. The Treasury Department and the IRS are continuing to consider these issues and the possibility of issuing guidance with respect to them.

Notably, the FAQs provided or confirmed the following:

Eligibility

  • The guidance clarifies that an assistance eligible individual (AEI) also includes qualified beneficiaries who are the spouse or dependent child of the employee who had the reduction in hours or involuntary termination of employment resulting in a loss of coverage, as well as the employee, if that reduction in hours or involuntary termination of employment caused the qualified beneficiary to lose coverage and the other requirements are satisfied.
  • An individual who loses group health coverage in connection with the termination of a covered employee’s employment by reason of the employee’s gross misconduct is not a qualified beneficiary and, thus, cannot be an AEI.
  • An individual can become an AEI more than once during the six-month period in which the subsidy is provided. An example in the FAQs clarifies that an AEI who is eligible on April 1, 2021, then later becomes eligible for coverage under another employer’s group health plan coverage (and no longer eligible for the subsidy) will become subsidy eligible if the employee’s spouse loses group health plan coverage. Both the employee and the spouse become AEIs and would be eligible for the subsidy until September 30, 2021.
  • Employers may require individuals to provide a self-certification or attestation regarding their eligibility status with respect to a reduction in hours or involuntary termination of employment, which may assist the employer in substantiating its entitlement to the credit. Additionally, employers may require individuals to self-certify or attest as to their eligibility status regarding other disqualifying group health plan coverage or Medicare. The self-certification or attestation may be used to assist the employer in substantiating its entitlement to the premium assistance credit. Employers must keep a record of an individual’s attestation and may rely on the attestation regarding reduction of hours, involuntary termination, and eligibility for other disqualifying coverage.
  • The guidance makes clear that no qualifying events other than a reduction in hours or an involuntary termination of employment, such as divorce or a covered dependent child ceasing to be a dependent child, will be considered qualifying events for an individual for COBRA premium assistance.
  • Individuals who lose coverage under a health plan that is not subject to COBRA are not eligible for the COBRA premium assistance.

Involuntary Termination of Employment

  • The Notice clarifies what constitutes an involuntary termination but states that the determination of whether a termination is voluntary is based on facts and circumstances. The Notice otherwise provides that an involuntary termination of employment means:
    • A severance from employment due to the independent exercise of the unilateral authority of the employer to terminate the employment, where the employee was willing and able to continue performing services.
    • An employee-initiated termination for good reason due to employer action that results in a material negative change in the employment relationship for the employee analogous to a constructive discharge.
    • Involuntary termination for cause.
    • Participation by an employee in a window program under which employees with impending terminations of employment are offered a severance arrangement to terminate employment within a specified period of time.

Calculation of COBRA Premium Assistance Credit

  • The amount of the credit is the premium that would have been charged to an AEI in the absence of the premium assistance and does not include any amount of subsidy that the employer would have otherwise provided.

Claiming the COBRA Premium Assistance Credit

  • Governmental entities are eligible to claim the credit.
  • A premium payee claims the credit by reporting the credit and the number of individuals receiving COBRA premium assistance on the designated lines of its federal employment tax return(s), usually Form 941. The Notice clarifies that the premium payee may (1) reduce the deposits of federal employment taxes, including withheld taxes, that it would otherwise be required to deposit, up to the amount of the anticipated credit, and (2) request an advance of the amount of the anticipated credit that exceeds the federal employment tax deposits available for reduction by filing Form 7200.
  • The guidance clarifies that premium payees that do not have any employment tax liability can still claim the credit on the Form 941 for the quarter in which the premium payee becomes entitled to the credit.
  • A third-party payer (such as a PEO, CPEO, or § 3504 agent) can be treated as a premium payee for purposes of claiming the premium assistance credit under certain circumstances.

We will continue to monitor this and other guidance regarding the COBRA subsidy under ARPA. For further questions regarding this guidance, please feel free to contact the authors of this alert, Tiffany Downs, partner in our Atlanta office and head of FordHarrison’s Employee Benefits practice group at tdowns@fordharrison.com, and Rena Felton, counsel in our Atlanta office and member of the Employee Benefits practice group at efelton@fordharrison.com. Of course, you may also contact the FordHarrison attorney with whom you usually work.

Related Articles

Major Change to FLSA Procedure


by Greg Mansell

The Sixth Circuit will determine if a major procedural change is warranted for employees seeking unpaid wages.

Procedural Changes for Unpaid Employees

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers: The Employment Law Issue


by Best Lawyers

Featuring the top legal talent from The Best Lawyers in America, Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America and “Lawyer of the Year” recipients for Labor and Employment Law, Workers’ Compensation Law, ERISA Law and Ethics and Professional Responsibility Law.

Best Lawyers Employment Law Publication

One Reason Why Uber Is Fighting to Classify Drivers as Contractors


by Stephen Hasner

How Workers' Compensation Is Setting Up a Legal Battle

 Why Uber Wants Drivers as Contractors

Trending Articles

Presenting The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2025


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is proud to present The Best Lawyers in Australia for 2025, marking the 17th consecutive year of Best Lawyers awards in Australia.

Australia flag over outline of country

The 2024 Best Lawyers in Spain™


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is honored to announce the 16th edition of The Best Lawyers in Spain™ and the third edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in Spain™ for 2024.

Tall buildings and rushing traffic against clouds and sun in sky

Best Lawyers Expands 2024 Brazilian Awards


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is honored to announce the 14th edition of The Best Lawyers in Brazil™ and the first edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in Brazil™.

Image of Brazil city and water from sky

Announcing The Best Lawyers in South Africa™ 2024


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is excited to announce the landmark 15th edition of The Best Lawyers in South Africa™ for 2024, including the exclusive "Law Firm of the Year" awards.

Sky view of South Africa town and waterways

The Best Lawyers in Mexico Celebrates a Milestone Year


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is excited to announce the 15th edition of The Best Lawyers in Mexico™ and the second edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in Mexico™ for 2024.

Sky view of Mexico city scape

How Palworld Is Testing the Limits of Nintendo’s Legal Power


by Gregory Sirico

Many are calling the new game Palworld “Pokémon GO with guns,” noting the games striking similarities. Experts speculate how Nintendo could take legal action.

Animated figures with guns stand on top of creatures

How To Find A Pro Bono Lawyer


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers dives into the vital role pro bono lawyers play in ensuring access to justice for all and the transformative impact they have on communities.

Hands joined around a table with phone, paper, pen and glasses

The Best Lawyers in Portugal™ 2024


by Best Lawyers

The 2024 awards for Portugal include the 14th edition of The Best Lawyers in Portugal™ and 2nd edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in Portugal™.

City and beach with green water and blue sky

Presenting the 2024 Best Lawyers Family Law Legal Guide


by Best Lawyers

The 2024 Best Lawyers Family Law Legal Guide is now live and includes recognitions for all Best Lawyers family law awards. Read below and explore the legal guide.

Man entering home and hugging two children in doorway

Announcing The Best Lawyers in New Zealand™ 2025 Awards


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is announcing the 16th edition of The Best Lawyers in New Zealand for 2025, including individual Best Lawyers and "Lawyer of the Year" awards.

New Zealand flag over image of country outline

Announcing The Best Lawyers in Japan™ 2025


by Best Lawyers

For a milestone 15th edition, Best Lawyers is proud to announce The Best Lawyers in Japan.

Japan flag over outline of country

The Best Lawyers in Singapore™ 2025 Edition


by Best Lawyers

For 2025, Best Lawyers presents the most esteemed awards for lawyers and law firms in Singapore.

Singapore flag over outline of country

Canada Makes First Foray Into AI Regulation


by Sara Collin

As Artificial Intelligence continues to rise in use and popularity, many countries are working to ensure proper regulation. Canada has just made its first foray into AI regulation.

People standing in front of large, green pixelated image of buildings

Commingling Assets


by Tamires M. Oliveira

Commingling alone does not automatically turn an otherwise immune asset into an asset subject to marital distribution as explained by one family law lawyer.

Toy house and figure of married couple standing on stacks of coins

How Much Is a Lawyer Consultation Fee?


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers breaks down the key differences between consultation and retainer fees when hiring an attorney, a crucial first step in the legal process.

Client consulting with lawyer wearing a suit

The Hague Convention and International Custody Battles


by Alexandra Goldstein

One family law lawyer explains how Joe Jonas and Sophie Turner’s celebrity divorce brings The Hague Convention treaty and international child custody battles into the spotlight.

Man and woman celebrities wearing black and standing for photo