Insight

Department of Labor Proposes Limits to Tip Credit for Work "Directly Supporting" Tipped Work

Department of Labor Proposes Limits to Tip Credit for Work "Directly Supporting" Tipped Work

Michael C. "Mike" Harrington

Michael C. "Mike" Harrington

December 15, 2022 08:55 PM

Executive Summary: On Monday, June 21, 2021, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) proposing limits on the tip credit employers can take during workweeks when tipped employees perform work that “directly supports” tipped work (“directly supporting work”) but does not itself produce tips. If adopted, the proposal would cap the use of the tip credit for “directly supporting work” at 20 percent of an employee’s total hours worked during a particular workweek. In addition, if an employee’s “directly supporting work” exceeds 30 minutes for any continuous period of time, the proposed regulation would prohibit employers from applying the tip credit to any portion of the continuous period. This latter prohibition would apply regardless of the total amount of “directly supporting work” during any workweek.

Background: Section 3(m) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) allows employers who meet certain requirements to credit a limited portion of the tips its tipped employees receive towards payment of those employees’ required minimum wage. The FLSA currently allows qualifying employers to claim a $5.12 “tip credit” towards the current $7.25 federal minimum wage of tipped employees. If an employee’s tips are sufficient to cover this tip credit, employers only need to pay tipped employees cash wages of $2.13 per hour to satisfy the minimum wage.

The FLSA defines a “tipped employee” as an employee who customarily and regularly receives more than $30 per month in tips. Often, however, tipped employees perform duties that, while related to their jobs, do not produce tips. For example, in addition to taking customers’ orders and delivering meals to their tables, restaurant servers often clean and set tables for the next customer or prepare items for tables so the servers can access the items more easily when serving customers.

Over the years, DOL had developed a non-regulatory enforcement policy known as the 80/20 rule. This allowed employers to apply the tip credit to time spent performing tasks related to a tipped employee’s non-tip producing duties, but only if that time did not exceed 20 percent of the employee’s total hours worked for the workweek.

During the Trump Administration, DOL discarded the 80/20 rule, first in a 2018 Wage opinion letter, followed by a February 15, 2019 Field Assistance Bulletin. DOL then codified this in a December 30, 2020 final rule (“the 2020 Tip final rule”) that amended several sections of the tip credit regulations. This included adding § 531.56(e)(2) to the regulations to allow employers to take a tip credit for “any hours that [a tipped] employee performs related, non-tipped duties contemporaneous with his or her tipped duties, or for a reasonable time immediately before or after performing the tipped duties.”

Initially, the 2020 Tip final rule was to become effective March 1, 2021. The Biden Administration, however, extended the effective date, first to April 30, 2021 and then to December 31, 2021, to consider whether to withdraw and re-propose revisions to the 2020 Tip final rule’s limits on application of the tip credit to non-tip producing work.

The Proposed New Rule: The NPRM proposes replacing § 531.56(e)(2) of the 2020 Tip final rule with a new § 531.56(f). Section 531.56(f), as proposed, would allow a tip credit only for work performed by a tipped employee that is “part of the tipped occupation.” Proposed § 531.56(f)(1) would define “work that is part of the tipped occupation” to include work that (a) produces tips as part of the tipped occupation, and (b) “directly supports” the tip-producing work, provided the “directly supporting work” is not performed for a “substantial amount of time.”

Proposed § 531.56(f)(1)(iii) states an employee has performed “directly supporting work” for “a substantial amount of time” if that work either (a) exceeds 20 percent of the hours worked during the employee’s work week, or (b) the employee performs directly supporting work for a continuous period exceeding 30 minutes. Section 531.56(f)(1)(iii)(A) states that, if a tipped employee spends more than 20 percent of the employee’s total hours worked for the workweek performing “directly supporting work,” employers cannot take a tip credit for any time that exceeds the 20 percent threshold. As to directly supporting work performed for continuous periods of more than 30 minutes, proposed § 531.56(f)(1)(iii)(B) would prohibit employers from taking a tip credit for any portion of such periods.

Proposed § 531.56(f)(1)(i) says work “directly supports” tip-producing work if it helps an employee perform the work for which the employee receives tips. In addition to the above-discussed example regarding servers, § 531.56(f)(1)(i) includes examples regarding bartenders and nail technicians. The preamble to the NPRM also discusses a few non-exclusive examples of “directly supporting work” involving other tipped occupations.

The NPRM requests comments to the proposed revisions to the tip credit regulations. The NPRM was published in the Federal Register on June 23, 2021, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2021-06-23/html/2021-13262.htm. Interested parties have 60 days from the date of the publication to submit comments, making them due on or before August 23, 2021.

Employers’ Bottom Line: Portions of the NPRM may change after DOL publishes the proposed rule in final form. Most likely, however, a final rule will retain some version of the proposed 80/20 rule and the disallowance of the tip credit for continuous periods of “directly supporting work” exceeding some specified limit. Employers should anticipate increased litigation and DOL enforcement following implementation of a final rule. Accordingly, employers using the tip credit should consider procedures to help monitor, schedule and limit non-tipped work by tipped employees. This could include exploring the feasibility of hiring a few workers to perform some or all of certain non-tipped duties. Employers should also consider administrative controls, such as rotating non-tipped duties among tipped staff to avoid or minimize occurrences of any employees’ non-tipped duties exceeding the limits proposed in the NPRM. These controls could also help employers identify instances when a particular employee has exceeded these limits. This would allow employers to avoid inadvertent minimum wage violations by paying an employee’s full minimum wage instead of taking a tip credit during the particular workweek. Employers should also be prepared to train managers and supervisors on efforts to control non-tipped work and comply with tip credit limits if some version of the DOL’s proposed revisions become part of the tip credit regulations.

If you have any questions regarding this Alert or other wage/hour or employment-related issues, please contact the author, Michael Prendergast, partner in our Jacksonville office and member of FordHarrison’s Wage/Hour practice group at mprendergast@fordharrison.com. Of course, you can also contact the FordHarrison attorney with whom you usually work.

Related Articles

With Reservations


by Justin Smulison

Is vaccine liability on the menu for restaurant owners in 2021?

Vaccine Liability for Restaurant Owners

DOL Proposes New Overtime Rule and Salary Threshold for Exemption


by Megan Erickson Moritz

The Department of Labor is proposing a hike to the salary threshold requirement for exempted employees.

DOL Salary Exemption New Rule

The Impact of Duran on the Certification Process in Wage and Hour Class Actions


by Tim Freudenberger and Nancy Lubrano

In May 2014, class action defense attorney Tim Freudenberger from Carothers DiSante & Freudenberger LLP, obtained a very favorable decision from the California Supreme Court in Duran v. U.S. Bank Nat. Assn., 59 Cal. 4th 1 (2014).

Wage and Hour Class Actions

Trending Articles

Presenting The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2025


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is proud to present The Best Lawyers in Australia for 2025, marking the 17th consecutive year of Best Lawyers awards in Australia.

Australia flag over outline of country

The 2024 Best Lawyers in Spain™


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is honored to announce the 16th edition of The Best Lawyers in Spain™ and the third edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in Spain™ for 2024.

Tall buildings and rushing traffic against clouds and sun in sky

Best Lawyers Expands 2024 Brazilian Awards


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is honored to announce the 14th edition of The Best Lawyers in Brazil™ and the first edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in Brazil™.

Image of Brazil city and water from sky

Announcing The Best Lawyers in South Africa™ 2024


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is excited to announce the landmark 15th edition of The Best Lawyers in South Africa™ for 2024, including the exclusive "Law Firm of the Year" awards.

Sky view of South Africa town and waterways

The Best Lawyers in Mexico Celebrates a Milestone Year


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is excited to announce the 15th edition of The Best Lawyers in Mexico™ and the second edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in Mexico™ for 2024.

Sky view of Mexico city scape

How Palworld Is Testing the Limits of Nintendo’s Legal Power


by Gregory Sirico

Many are calling the new game Palworld “Pokémon GO with guns,” noting the games striking similarities. Experts speculate how Nintendo could take legal action.

Animated figures with guns stand on top of creatures

How To Find A Pro Bono Lawyer


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers dives into the vital role pro bono lawyers play in ensuring access to justice for all and the transformative impact they have on communities.

Hands joined around a table with phone, paper, pen and glasses

The Best Lawyers in Portugal™ 2024


by Best Lawyers

The 2024 awards for Portugal include the 14th edition of The Best Lawyers in Portugal™ and 2nd edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in Portugal™.

City and beach with green water and blue sky

Presenting the 2024 Best Lawyers Family Law Legal Guide


by Best Lawyers

The 2024 Best Lawyers Family Law Legal Guide is now live and includes recognitions for all Best Lawyers family law awards. Read below and explore the legal guide.

Man entering home and hugging two children in doorway

Announcing The Best Lawyers in New Zealand™ 2025 Awards


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is announcing the 16th edition of The Best Lawyers in New Zealand for 2025, including individual Best Lawyers and "Lawyer of the Year" awards.

New Zealand flag over image of country outline

Announcing The Best Lawyers in Japan™ 2025


by Best Lawyers

For a milestone 15th edition, Best Lawyers is proud to announce The Best Lawyers in Japan.

Japan flag over outline of country

The Best Lawyers in Singapore™ 2025 Edition


by Best Lawyers

For 2025, Best Lawyers presents the most esteemed awards for lawyers and law firms in Singapore.

Singapore flag over outline of country

Canada Makes First Foray Into AI Regulation


by Sara Collin

As Artificial Intelligence continues to rise in use and popularity, many countries are working to ensure proper regulation. Canada has just made its first foray into AI regulation.

People standing in front of large, green pixelated image of buildings

Commingling Assets


by Tamires M. Oliveira

Commingling alone does not automatically turn an otherwise immune asset into an asset subject to marital distribution as explained by one family law lawyer.

Toy house and figure of married couple standing on stacks of coins

How Much Is a Lawyer Consultation Fee?


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers breaks down the key differences between consultation and retainer fees when hiring an attorney, a crucial first step in the legal process.

Client consulting with lawyer wearing a suit

The Hague Convention and International Custody Battles


by Alexandra Goldstein

One family law lawyer explains how Joe Jonas and Sophie Turner’s celebrity divorce brings The Hague Convention treaty and international child custody battles into the spotlight.

Man and woman celebrities wearing black and standing for photo