Best Lawyers for Arbitration in Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Search Best Lawyers Now

*This search returned more than the maximum results. Please refine your search using the links above.
Lawyer
  • Recognized Since: 2019
  • Location:
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • Practice Areas:
    International Arbitration - Commercial Appellate Practice Commercial Litigation Business Organizations (including LLCs and Partnerships) Arbitration Product Liability Litigation - Defendants Bet-the-Company Litigation Closely Held Companies and Family Businesses Law Litigation - Intellectual Property
Lawyer
  • Recognized Since: 2010
  • Location:
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • Practice Areas:
    Arbitration Employment Law - Management Appellate Practice Labor Law - Management Litigation - Labor and Employment
Lawyer
  • Recognized Since: 2014
  • Location:
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • Practice Areas:
    Litigation - Land Use and Zoning Product Liability Litigation - Defendants Litigation - Insurance Commercial Litigation Arbitration Personal Injury Litigation Litigation - Real Estate Mass Tort Litigation Bet-the-Company Litigation Product Liability Litigation Litigation - Banking and Finance Litigation - Trusts and Estates Ethics and Professional Responsibility Law Litigation - Mergers and Acquisitions Appellate Practice Litigation - Construction

  • Recognized Since: Ones to Watch Since:
  • Location:
  • Practice Areas:

Recognition by Best Lawyers is based entirely on peer review. Our methodology is designed to capture, as accurately as possible, the consensus opinion of leading lawyers about the professional abilities of their colleagues within the same geographical area and legal practice area.

Best Lawyers employs a sophisticated, conscientious, rational, and transparent survey process designed to elicit meaningful and substantive evaluations of the quality of legal services. Our belief has always been that the quality of a peer review survey is directly related to the quality of the voters.

Practice Area Definition

Arbitration Definition

Arbitration is the cost effective method of resolving/adjudicating disputes (especially commercial disputes) where you choose (with the consent of your adversary): (a) the judge (arbitrator) who will decide the dispute; (b) the procedure (including discovery, if any) to be followed in resolving the dispute; (c) the costs to be incurred (e.g. live or written testimony); (d) the time within which the dispute is to be finally resolved; and (e) the involvement, if any, of the public court system (e.g. appeal or no appeal).

In the face of skyrocketing legal costs and court delays; in the face of "bet the company" and opportunistic lawsuits; and in the face of "made as instructed" "expert" witnesses, trusting neutral experienced (in both the law and the relevant factual/expert/business area in dispute) deciders/ arbitrators (as opposed to lay jurors who too frequently "think" with their emotions) via the arbitration process has become progressively more rational. Hence, experienced, cost conscious litigators and general counsel are turning ever more frequently to the process which they themselves control and create: ARBITRATION.

Following are those individuals deemed by their peers to be best qualified to act as impartial neutral arbitrators (judges) in their respective practice areas and jurisdictions.

ADR Options, Inc.

ADR Options, Inc. logo

Arbitration is the cost effective method of resolving/adjudicating disputes (especially commercial disputes) where you choose (with the consent of your adversary): (a) the judge (arbitrator) who will decide the dispute; (b) the procedure (including discovery, if any) to be followed in resolving the dispute; (c) the costs to be incurred (e.g. live or written testimony); (d) the time within which the dispute is to be finally resolved; and (e) the involvement, if any, of the public court system (e.g. appeal or no appeal).

In the face of skyrocketing legal costs and court delays; in the face of "bet the company" and opportunistic lawsuits; and in the face of "made as instructed" "expert" witnesses, trusting neutral experienced (in both the law and the relevant factual/expert/business area in dispute) deciders/ arbitrators (as opposed to lay jurors who too frequently "think" with their emotions) via the arbitration process has become progressively more rational. Hence, experienced, cost conscious litigators and general counsel are turning ever more frequently to the process which they themselves control and create: ARBITRATION.

Following are those individuals deemed by their peers to be best qualified to act as impartial neutral arbitrators (judges) in their respective practice areas and jurisdictions.