Best Lawyers for Bet-the-Company Litigation in Arkansas, United States

Search Best Lawyers Now

*This search returned more than the maximum results. Please refine your search using the links above.
Lawyer
  • Location:
    Little Rock, Arkansas
  • Practice Areas:
    Litigation - First Amendment Litigation - Antitrust First Amendment Law Bet-the-Company Litigation Commercial Litigation Antitrust Law Appellate Practice Corporate Law Litigation - Banking and Finance
Lawyer
  • Location:
    Batesville, Arkansas
  • Practice Areas:
    Litigation - Construction Professional Malpractice Law - Plaintiffs Product Liability Litigation - Plaintiffs Professional Malpractice Law - Defendants Bet-the-Company Litigation Personal Injury Litigation - Plaintiffs Commercial Litigation Medical Malpractice Law - Plaintiffs
Lawyer
  • Location:
    Little Rock, Arkansas
  • Practice Areas:
    Product Liability Litigation - Defendants Commercial Litigation Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants Litigation - ERISA Litigation - Labor and Employment Employee Benefits (ERISA) Law Appellate Practice Bet-the-Company Litigation
Lawyer
  • Location:
    Little Rock, Arkansas
  • Practice Areas:
    Litigation - Bankruptcy Bankruptcy and Creditor Debtor Rights / Insolvency and Reorganization Law Bet-the-Company Litigation
Lawyer
  • Location:
    Little Rock, Arkansas
  • Practice Areas:
    Bet-the-Company Litigation Commercial Litigation Litigation - Securities Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants
Lawyer
  • Location:
    Little Rock, Arkansas
  • Practice Areas:
    Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants Commercial Litigation Litigation - Insurance Bet-the-Company Litigation
Lawyer
  • Location:
    Little Rock, Arkansas
  • Practice Areas:
    Commercial Litigation Litigation - Labor and Employment Education Law Employment Law - Management Appellate Practice Bet-the-Company Litigation
Lawyer
  • Location:
    Little Rock, Arkansas
  • Practice Areas:
    Litigation - Securities Litigation - Real Estate Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants Commercial Litigation Bet-the-Company Litigation
Lawyer
  • Location:
    Little Rock, Arkansas
  • Practice Areas:
    Litigation - Banking and Finance Litigation - Labor and Employment Commercial Litigation Civil Rights Law Appellate Practice Bet-the-Company Litigation Employment Law - Management Litigation - First Amendment
Lawyer
  • Location:
    Little Rock, Arkansas
  • Practice Areas:
    Antitrust Law Bet-the-Company Litigation Commercial Litigation
Lawyer
  • Location:
    Little Rock, Arkansas
  • Practice Areas:
    Litigation - Real Estate Litigation - Construction Litigation - Trusts and Estates Bet-the-Company Litigation Commercial Litigation
Lawyer
  • Location:
    Little Rock, Arkansas
  • Practice Areas:
    Litigation - Bankruptcy Bankruptcy and Creditor Debtor Rights / Insolvency and Reorganization Law Bet-the-Company Litigation
Lawyer
  • Location:
    Little Rock, Arkansas
  • Practice Areas:
    Litigation - Labor and Employment Employment Law - Management Employment Law - Individuals Commercial Litigation Bet-the-Company Litigation Trade Secrets Law
Lawyer
  • Location:
    Fayetteville, Arkansas
  • Practice Areas:
    Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Bet-the-Company Litigation Commercial Litigation
Lawyer
  • Location:
    Little Rock, Arkansas
  • Practice Areas:
    Franchise Law Commercial Litigation Construction Law Bet-the-Company Litigation Professional Malpractice Law - Defendants
Lawyer
  • Location:
    Little Rock, Arkansas
  • Practice Areas:
    Appellate Practice Bet-the-Company Litigation Litigation - First Amendment
Lawyer
  • Location:
    Little Rock, Arkansas
  • Practice Areas:
    Bet-the-Company Litigation Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Insurance Law Commercial Litigation Product Liability Litigation - Defendants
Lawyer
  • Location:
    Little Rock, Arkansas
  • Practice Areas:
    Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Bet-the-Company Litigation Product Liability Litigation - Defendants Commercial Litigation Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants
Lawyer
  • Location:
    Little Rock, Arkansas
  • Practice Areas:
    Appellate Practice Bet-the-Company Litigation Franchise Law Commercial Litigation
Lawyer
  • Location:
    Little Rock, Arkansas
  • Practice Areas:
    Commercial Litigation Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Insurance Law Appellate Practice Bet-the-Company Litigation
Lawyer
  • Location:
    Little Rock, Arkansas
  • Practice Areas:
    Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Bet-the-Company Litigation Product Liability Litigation - Plaintiffs Commercial Litigation Personal Injury Litigation - Plaintiffs Product Liability Litigation - Defendants
Lawyer
  • Location:
    Little Rock, Arkansas
  • Practice Areas:
    Commercial Litigation Litigation - Antitrust Bet-the-Company Litigation Media Law Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants First Amendment Law
Lawyer
  • Location:
    Little Rock, Arkansas
  • Practice Areas:
    First Amendment Law Bet-the-Company Litigation Product Liability Litigation - Plaintiffs Product Liability Litigation - Defendants Commercial Litigation Media Law Litigation - Banking and Finance Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants Litigation - First Amendment
Lawyer
  • Location:
    Little Rock, Arkansas
  • Practice Areas:
    Franchise Law Commercial Litigation Litigation - Banking and Finance Bet-the-Company Litigation

  • Location:
  • Practice Areas:

Practice Area Definition

Bet-the-Company Litigation Definition

Bet-the-company litigation threatens to overwhelm and swallow your company, whether a start-up or a long established member of the Fortune 100. Life-threatening stakes can arise from government investigations (Arthur Andersen), large scale industrial disasters (the Gulf Oil Spill, Fukushima), and potential products liability (tobacco, pharmaceuticals). The threat may not be financial. Litigation also can threaten the company’s continued existence through attacks on the company’s core products, core business, or reputation. 

Bet-the-company cases create unique challenges. Counsel inside and outside the company must respond to several alarmed constituencies, including insiders (management, the board, employees, shareholders, investors); outsiders (customers, vendors, lenders, insurers), and regulatory authorities (to name only a few: SEC, FTC, FDA, EPA, and DOJ and their international counterparts). Counsel must conduct every aspect of the litigation with the needs and desires of these sometimes conflicting constituencies constantly in mind. 

The company may face multiple investigations: congressional, criminal, regulatory, as well as special quasi-governmental commissions and internal investigations conducted by the company itself or by other parties. Counsel must deal with these investigations understanding that decisions made early on can have an enormous impact on the outcomes of investigations, subsequent litigation, and on the ultimate resolution.  

Litigation may erupt in multiple jurisdictions (federal, state, international) and in multiple forms (criminal, civil, administrative, arbitral). The company may face multiple litigation adversaries, including the United States Department of Justice, State Attorneys General, regulatory counsel, and private counsel for adverse parties. Parties aligned with the company will have their own counsel, constituencies and agendas. The formal and informal coordination of all these proceedings and parties will impact the duration, cost and course of the litigation. The reputation of the company’s lead counsel – in part pre-existing and in part earned over the course of the litigation – will be critical in dealing with all these tribunals, parties, and attorneys. 

Bet-the-company cases require an ability not only to navigate in these different environments, but also to see how the moving parts fit together. That in turn is the key to a more important ability: to work out, with the client, a plan – a plan that will be constantly adjusted – to get from the chaotic beginning to a satisfactory resolution.  

It is best in bet-the-company cases to have a lead lawyer responsible for coordinating the varied teams of lawyers needed to handle, under a coherent plan, all these facets of the problem – teams with varying types of expertise, drawn from multiple firms, and often working in different locations. With leadership, cohesive teams can solve extraordinary problems. 


Bet-the-company litigation threatens to overwhelm and swallow your company, whether a start-up or a long established member of the Fortune 100. Life-threatening stakes can arise from government investigations (Arthur Andersen), large scale industrial disasters (the Gulf Oil Spill, Fukushima), and potential products liability (tobacco, pharmaceuticals). The threat may not be financial. Litigation also can threaten the company’s continued existence through attacks on the company’s core products, core business, or reputation. 

Bet-the-company cases create unique challenges. Counsel inside and outside the company must respond to several alarmed constituencies, including insiders (management, the board, employees, shareholders, investors); outsiders (customers, vendors, lenders, insurers), and regulatory authorities (to name only a few: SEC, FTC, FDA, EPA, and DOJ and their international counterparts). Counsel must conduct every aspect of the litigation with the needs and desires of these sometimes conflicting constituencies constantly in mind. 

The company may face multiple investigations: congressional, criminal, regulatory, as well as special quasi-governmental commissions and internal investigations conducted by the company itself or by other parties. Counsel must deal with these investigations understanding that decisions made early on can have an enormous impact on the outcomes of investigations, subsequent litigation, and on the ultimate resolution.  

Litigation may erupt in multiple jurisdictions (federal, state, international) and in multiple forms (criminal, civil, administrative, arbitral). The company may face multiple litigation adversaries, including the United States Department of Justice, State Attorneys General, regulatory counsel, and private counsel for adverse parties. Parties aligned with the company will have their own counsel, constituencies and agendas. The formal and informal coordination of all these proceedings and parties will impact the duration, cost and course of the litigation. The reputation of the company’s lead counsel – in part pre-existing and in part earned over the course of the litigation – will be critical in dealing with all these tribunals, parties, and attorneys. 

Bet-the-company cases require an ability not only to navigate in these different environments, but also to see how the moving parts fit together. That in turn is the key to a more important ability: to work out, with the client, a plan – a plan that will be constantly adjusted – to get from the chaotic beginning to a satisfactory resolution.  

It is best in bet-the-company cases to have a lead lawyer responsible for coordinating the varied teams of lawyers needed to handle, under a coherent plan, all these facets of the problem – teams with varying types of expertise, drawn from multiple firms, and often working in different locations. With leadership, cohesive teams can solve extraordinary problems.