Find Best Lawyers

Search Best Lawyers Now

Welcome to Best Lawyers, a purely peer review publication highlighting the top legal talent around the world. To begin your search for legal assistance, either use the search box above or choose a country from the list below.

*This search returned more than the maximum results. Please refine your search using the links above.
Juan Aguayo
Lawyer
Juan Aguayo was awarded  "Lawyer of the Year" in

Juan Aguayo

Cuatrecasas, S.L.P.
  • Location:
    Madrid, Spain
  • Practice Areas:
    Corporate and M&A Law Capital Markets Law Debt & Equity
Rodrigo Berasategui
Lawyer
Rodrigo Berasategui was awarded  "Lawyer of the Year" in

Rodrigo Berasategui

Watson Farley & Williams LLP
  • Location:
    Madrid, Spain
  • Practice Areas:
    Debt & Equity Project Finance and Development Practice Banking and Finance Law
Eduardo García
Lawyer
Eduardo García was awarded  "Lawyer of the Year" in

Eduardo García

Clifford Chance LLC
  • Location:
    Madrid, Spain
  • Practice Areas:
    Project Finance and Development Practice Banking and Finance Law Capital Markets Law Debt & Equity
Ignacio Gómez-Sancha
Lawyer
Ignacio Gómez-Sancha was awarded  "Lawyer of the Year" in

Ignacio Gómez-Sancha

Latham & Watkins LLP
  • Location:
    Madrid, Spain
  • Practice Areas:
    Insolvency and Reorganization Law Debt & Equity Investment Funds Capital Markets Law Entertainment Law Corporate and M&A Law
María Lérida
Lawyer
María Lérida was awarded  "Lawyer of the Year" in

María Lérida

Cuatrecasas, S.L.P.
  • Location:
    Barcelona, Spain
  • Practice Areas:
    Structured Finance Law Debt & Equity
Ana López
Lawyer
Ana López was awarded  "Lawyer of the Year" in

Ana López

Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP
  • Location:
    Madrid, Spain
  • Practice Areas:
    Banking and Finance Law Insolvency and Reorganization Law Debt & Equity Capital Markets Law
Carlos Rey
Lawyer
  • Location:
    Madrid, Spain
  • Practice Areas:
    Debt & Equity Asset Finance Law
Francisco Soler Caballero
Lawyer
Francisco Soler Caballero was awarded 2020 "Lawyer of the Year" in Elasticsearch.PracticeArea

Francisco Soler Caballero

Garrigues
  • Location:
    Valencia, Spain
  • Practice Areas:
    Asset Finance Law Venture Capital Law Banking and Finance Law Investment Investment Funds Equipment Finance Law Structured Finance Law Financial Institutions Private Equity Law Corporate and M&A Law Debt & Equity
Fernando Torrente
Lawyer
Fernando Torrente was awarded 2020 "Lawyer of the Year" in Elasticsearch.PracticeArea

Fernando Torrente

Allen & Overy LLP
  • Location:
    Madrid, Spain
  • Practice Areas:
    Private Equity Law Venture Capital Law Corporate and M&A Law Corporate Governance & Compliance Practice Capital Markets Law Debt & Equity
Víctor Xercavins
Lawyer
Víctor Xercavins was awarded  "Lawyer of the Year" in

Víctor Xercavins

Cuatrecasas, S.L.P.
  • Location:
    Barcelona, Spain
  • Practice Areas:
    Venture Capital Law Private Equity Law Corporate and M&A Law Debt & Equity

  • Location:
  • Practice Areas:

Practice Area Definition

Definition

In unfavorable economic circumstances of both structural and cyclical, it is very common that the balance sheets and operating accounts of companies resent, usually resulting in (i) the accumulation of losses in closures -monthly, quarterly, and annually; and (ii) in cash tensions, that translates into unpaid obligations with third parties. 

These two circumstances force the Organs of Administration of the Companies subject to Spanish Law to a special task of control and surveillance for react and, thus, take appropriate measures to remove their potential personal liability, under the mechanisms established in the Real Decree Legislative 1/2010, of July 2 (in forward "Capital Companies Law") and in the Bankruptcy Law 22/2003, of July 9, (in forward " Bankruptcy Law"). 

The legal mechanisms to avoid such liability which they pass through determine this two different situations: (i) if the Company is under a Cause of Dissolution and must re-balance its debt to equity to accomplish with legal requirements; or (ii) if the Company is under an Insolvency Situation and must file the Insolvency Proceedings before the Court (because the insolvency is in a deeper statement and means the impossibility of payments on regular basis for a long time): 

(i) Existence of Causes of Dissolution: Mechanism: Re-balancing equity in cases of severe equity loss: 

The Board of Directors has the obligation to supervise and direct the accumulation of losses that reduce its assets to less than half of its share capital. Otherwise, the Board has the liability derivation risk corresponding to all those unpaid debts generated after the occurrence of such cause (Article 363.1.e Capital Companies Law). 

The Capital Companies Law establishes inescapably to restore the Company’s equity, through the corresponding increase or reduction of capital mechanisms, to remove the Board of Directors liability. If the Board of Directors does not reestablish the Company’s equity, avoiding being in Dissolution Cause, it would be economically responsible (through derivation of responsibility) for the unpaid debts generated after the occurrence of the Dissolution Cause.

Another important point is that equity re-balancing operations will not avoid the responsibility of the Board of Directors in Company’s Insolvency Situation, understood as the impossibility of paying on regular basis in a prolonged period of time.

In such a case, the Board will only be exonerated of presumption of guilt, contained in Article 165.1 joint to Article 164.1 Bankruptcy Law, if it uses the mechanism of Article 5bis Bankruptcy Law - Preparatory Insolvency Proceedings - in order to: A) reach a payment agreement with its suppliers and creditors that remove the Insolvency Situation or B), to file an Insolvency Proceeding if the payment it’s not good enough to remove the Company’s Insolvency Situation.

Article 165.1 and 164.1 Bankruptcy Law allow the Court to declare an Insolvency Proceeding as guilty and derive economic responsibility to the Board of Directors in the event that the Insolvency Proceedings was submitted extemporaneously. It means, two months after the Board knows, that the Company is under an Insolvency Situation.

(ii) Existence of an Insolvency Situation: Mechanism: As commented, a Company is under an Insolvency Situation when it cannot afford the daily payments for a long period of time. 

Under such a situation, the Board has two months to submit the Preparatory Insolvency Proceedings (of Article 5bis Bankruptcy Law) or, where appropriate, the corresponding Insolvency Proceedings.

If the Insolvency Proceedings was submitted out of time, the Court could declare the Insolvency Proceeding as guilty and derive economic liabilities to the Board (Article 165.1 and 164.1 Bankruptcy Law).

In conclusion, the responsibility of the Board of Directors established in the Capital Companies Law by the concurrence of a Dissolution Cause for losses is different and independent from an Insolvency Situation. In this sense, a Company under Dissolution Causes:

- If it re-balances equity and is normally continuously paying creditors (because of either creditors’ agreements or banks credit), it would avoid the Board liability established in Article 363.1.e Capital Companies Law and in Article 165.1 and 164.1 Bankruptcy Law.

- If the Board decides just to reestablish equity but is not aware of the impossibility to afford the daily payments and is not submitting the Insolvency Proceedings to the Court in the two months period, the economic responsibility of the Board, established in in Article 165.1 and 164.1 Bankruptcy Law, will persist. 

In unfavorable economic circumstances of both structural and cyclical, it is very common that the balance sheets and operating accounts of companies resent, usually resulting in (i) the accumulation of losses in closures -monthly, quarterly, and annually; and (ii) in cash tensions, that translates into unpaid obligations with third parties. 

These two circumstances force the Organs of Administration of the Companies subject to Spanish Law to a special task of control and surveillance for react and, thus, take appropriate measures to remove their potential personal liability, under the mechanisms established in the Real Decree Legislative 1/2010, of July 2 (in forward "Capital Companies Law") and in the Bankruptcy Law 22/2003, of July 9, (in forward " Bankruptcy Law"). 

The legal mechanisms to avoid such liability which they pass through determine this two different situations: (i) if the Company is under a Cause of Dissolution and must re-balance its debt to equity to accomplish with legal requirements; or (ii) if the Company is under an Insolvency Situation and must file the Insolvency Proceedings before the Court (because the insolvency is in a deeper statement and means the impossibility of payments on regular basis for a long time): 

(i) Existence of Causes of Dissolution: Mechanism: Re-balancing equity in cases of severe equity loss: 

The Board of Directors has the obligation to supervise and direct the accumulation of losses that reduce its assets to less than half of its share capital. Otherwise, the Board has the liability derivation risk corresponding to all those unpaid debts generated after the occurrence of such cause (Article 363.1.e Capital Companies Law). 

The Capital Companies Law establishes inescapably to restore the Company’s equity, through the corresponding increase or reduction of capital mechanisms, to remove the Board of Directors liability. If the Board of Directors does not reestablish the Company’s equity, avoiding being in Dissolution Cause, it would be economically responsible (through derivation of responsibility) for the unpaid debts generated after the occurrence of the Dissolution Cause.

Another important point is that equity re-balancing operations will not avoid the responsibility of the Board of Directors in Company’s Insolvency Situation, understood as the impossibility of paying on regular basis in a prolonged period of time.

In such a case, the Board will only be exonerated of presumption of guilt, contained in Article 165.1 joint to Article 164.1 Bankruptcy Law, if it uses the mechanism of Article 5bis Bankruptcy Law - Preparatory Insolvency Proceedings - in order to: A) reach a payment agreement with its suppliers and creditors that remove the Insolvency Situation or B), to file an Insolvency Proceeding if the payment it’s not good enough to remove the Company’s Insolvency Situation.

Article 165.1 and 164.1 Bankruptcy Law allow the Court to declare an Insolvency Proceeding as guilty and derive economic responsibility to the Board of Directors in the event that the Insolvency Proceedings was submitted extemporaneously. It means, two months after the Board knows, that the Company is under an Insolvency Situation.

(ii) Existence of an Insolvency Situation: Mechanism: As commented, a Company is under an Insolvency Situation when it cannot afford the daily payments for a long period of time. 

Under such a situation, the Board has two months to submit the Preparatory Insolvency Proceedings (of Article 5bis Bankruptcy Law) or, where appropriate, the corresponding Insolvency Proceedings.

If the Insolvency Proceedings was submitted out of time, the Court could declare the Insolvency Proceeding as guilty and derive economic liabilities to the Board (Article 165.1 and 164.1 Bankruptcy Law).

In conclusion, the responsibility of the Board of Directors established in the Capital Companies Law by the concurrence of a Dissolution Cause for losses is different and independent from an Insolvency Situation. In this sense, a Company under Dissolution Causes:

- If it re-balances equity and is normally continuously paying creditors (because of either creditors’ agreements or banks credit), it would avoid the Board liability established in Article 363.1.e Capital Companies Law and in Article 165.1 and 164.1 Bankruptcy Law.

- If the Board decides just to reestablish equity but is not aware of the impossibility to afford the daily payments and is not submitting the Insolvency Proceedings to the Court in the two months period, the economic responsibility of the Board, established in in Article 165.1 and 164.1 Bankruptcy Law, will persist.